journal article·2022-11-10Open access

Anaerobic Fermentation of Silage from the Above-Ground Biomass of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) and Maize (Zea mayse L.) as a New and Promising Input Raw Material for Biogas Production

Antonín Kintl, Tomáš Vítěz, Igor Huňady, Martin Brtnický, David Novák, Jan Lochman, Monika Vítězová, Tereza Hammerschmiedt, Jiří Holátko, Jakub Elbl

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 22

Abstract

Research of new input raw materials for biogas plants is a very actual topic. There are only a very few studies dealing with the possibility of using silage prepared from the above-ground parts of the Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) and maize (Zea mayse L.) for methane production. This study deals with the determination of methane production and methane content in biogas during the fermentation of maize silage with dissimilar additions of the biomass of the Jerusalem artichoke (JA). Except for the effect of the JA’s addition on the yield of methane, we also studied its potential influence on the inhibition of the process of anaerobic digestion and the bacterial and methanogenic archaeal composition of anaerobic digestate. There were five model silages prepared; two of them contained only maize or JAs, and the remaining three were mixtures of maize and JA silages (30%wt; 50%wt and 70%wt). The fermentation tests showed that the JA addition (from 30 to 70%wt) resulted in the production of biogas decreasing, on average, by 15%. Based on the performed metagenomic analysis, we cannot confirm an essential influence of JA biomass addition on the composition of the community of microorganisms during fermentation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Agricultural Research, Ltd., Zahradní 1, 664 41 Troubsko, Czech Republic

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Department of Experimental Biology, Section of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Consequences of maize cultivation intended for biogas production10.17221/209/2016-AGRICECON ↗
2. Biogas Production from Maize: Current State, Challenges and Prospects. 2. Agronomic and Environmental Aspects10.1007/s12155-012-9227-x ↗
3. Menšík, L., Kincl, D., Nerušil, P., Srbek, J., Hlisnikovský, L., and Smutný, V. (2020). Water erosion reduction using different soil tillage approaches for maize (Zea mays L.) in the Czech Republic. Land, 9.10.3390/land9100358 ↗
4. Legume-maize rotation effect on maize productivity and soil fertility parameters under selected agronomic practices in a sandy loam soil10.1038/s41598-019-43679-5 ↗
5. Mezera, J., Lukas, V., Horniaček, I., Smutný, V., and Elbl, J. (2021). Comparison of proximal and remote sensing for the diagnosis of crop status in site-specific crop management. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22010019 ↗
6. Spatial interpretation of plant parameters in winter wheat10.1007/s11119-013-9340-7 ↗
7. Optimisation of substrate blends in anaerobic co-digestion using adaptive linear programming10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.089 ↗
8. Contribution to Circular Economy options of mixed agricultural wastes management: Coupling anaerobic digestion with gasification for enhanced energy and material recovery10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.055 ↗
9. The use of legumes as a biogas substrate—Potentials for saving energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions through symbiotic nitrogen fixation10.1186/s13705-015-0034-z ↗
10. Mixed Culture of Corn and White Lupine as an Alternative to Silage Made from Corn Monoculture Intended for Biogas Production10.1007/s12155-019-10003-y ↗
11. Legume Intercropping With the Bioenergy Crop Sida hermaphrodita on Marginal Soil10.3389/fpls.2018.00905 ↗
12. Environmental consequences of the conversion from traditional to energy cropping systems in a mediterranean area10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.008 ↗
13. Biogas crops grown in energy crop rotations: Linking chemical composition and methane production characteristics10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.058 ↗
14. Biogas production from coumarin-rich plants--inhibition by coumarin and recovery by adaptation of the bacterial community10.1093/femsec/fiv103 ↗
15. Kadankova, P., Kintl, A., Koukalova, V., Kucerova, J., and Brtnicky, M. (July, January 30). Coumarin content in silages made of mixed cropping biomass comprising maize and white sweet clover. Proceedings of the 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2019, Sofia, Bulgaria.10.5593/sgem2019/4.1/S17.015 ↗
16. Kintl, A., Elbl, J., Vítěz, T., Brtnický, M., Skládanka, J., Hammerschmiedt, T., and Vítězová, M. (2020). Possibilities of Using White Sweetclover Grown in Mixture with Maize for Biomethane Production. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10091407 ↗
17. Adaptation of Methanogenic Inocula to Anaerobic Digestion of Maize Silage10.3389/fmicb.2017.01881 ↗
18. Assessing the Synergistic Effects of Co-digestion of Maize Silage and Red Chicory Waste10.15255/CABEQ.2018.1300 ↗
19. Co-ensiling of straw with sugar beet leaves increases the methane yield from straw10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.117 ↗
20. The Digestion of Waste from Vegetables and Maize Processing10.1007/s12649-019-00583-3 ↗
21. Optimization of microalgal growth and cultivation parameters for increasing bioenergy potential: Case study using the oleaginous microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa Chick (IPPAS C2)10.1016/j.algal.2019.101519 ↗
22. The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals10.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.015 ↗
23. Economically viable components from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) in a biorefinery concept10.3390/ijms16048997 ↗
24. Effect of industrial crop Jerusalem artichoke on the micro-ecological rhizosphere environment in saline soil10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104080 ↗
25. Kays, S.J., and Nottingham, S.F. (2007). Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke: Helianthus tuberosus L., CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.1201/9781420044966 ↗
26. The perspective of cultivation and utilization of the species Silphium perfoliatum L. and Helianthus tuberosus L. in Moldova. Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca
27. Heuzé, V., Tran, G., Chapoutot, P., Bastianelli, D., and Lebas, F. (2022, November 08). Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Feedipedia, aprogramme by INRA. Available online: https://www.feedipedia.org/node/544.
28. The effect of harvest strategy on the energy potential of Jerusalem artichoke10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114473 ↗
29. Chichory and Jerusalem artichoke productivity in different areas of Italy, in relation to water availability and time of harvest10.4081/ija.2006.291 ↗
30. Topinambur—New possibilities for use in a supplementation diet
31. Helianthus tuberosus as an alternative forage crop for cool maritime regions: A preliminary study of the yield and nutritional quality of shoot tissues from perennial stands10.1002/jsfa.2740600209 ↗
32. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for biogas production10.1016/0144-4565(85)90036-8 ↗
33. Anaerobic co-digestion of topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.) and properties of the remaining biogas manure
34. (2012). Sludge, Treated Biowaste, Soil and Waste—Calculation of Dry Matter Fraction After Determination of Dry Residue or Water Content (Standard No. ČSN EN 15934).
35. (2012). Sludge, Treated Biowaste, Soil and Waste—Determination of Loss on Ignition (Standard No. ČSN EN 15935).
36. (2013). Cereals and Pulses—Determination of the Nitrogen Content and Calculation of the Crude Protein Content—Kjeldahl Method—Kjeldahl Method (Standard No. ISO 20483:2013).
37. (2008). Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Acid Detergent Fibre (ADF) and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) Contents (Standard No. ČSN EN ISO 13906).
38. Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests10.2166/wst.2016.336 ↗
39. A 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analysis protocol for the Illumina MiniSeq platform10.1002/mbo3.611 ↗
40. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample10.1073/pnas.1000080107 ↗
41. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity10.1038/nature24621 ↗
42. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data10.1038/nmeth.3869 ↗
43. Bioconductor Workflow for Microbiome Data Analysis: From raw reads to community analyses10.12688/f1000research.8986.1 ↗
44. Naive Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy10.1128/AEM.00062-07 ↗
45. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools10.1093/nar/gks1219 ↗
46. Ţiţei, V. (2020). The biochemical composition and the feed value of green mass and silage from Cynara cardunculus and Helianthus tuberosus in the Republic of Moldova. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, University of Agronomic Sciences & Veterinary Medicine Bucharest.
47. Nutritional value, bioactivity, and application potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a neotype feed resource10.1016/j.aninu.2020.09.001 ↗
48. NRC (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle.
49. Effects of incremental substitution of maize silage with Jerusalem artichoke silage on performance of fat-tailed lambs10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.11.013 ↗
50. Study on mixed silage of corn straw and Jerusalem artichoke stalk as feed sources
51. Use of Jerusalem artichoke tops silage to replace corn silage in sheep diet10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.04.019 ↗
52. Loughrin, J., Antle, S., Bryant, M., Berry, Z., and Lovanh, N. (2020). Evaluation of Microaeration and Sound to Increase Biogas Production from Poultry Litter. Environments, 7.10.3390/environments7080062 ↗
53. A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: Influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.026 ↗
54. Evaluating Methane Production from Anaerobic Mono- and Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste, Corn Stover, and Chicken Manure10.1021/ef400117f ↗
55. Ozbayram, E.G., Ince, O., Ince, B., Harms, H., and Kleinsteuber, S. (2018). Comparison of Rumen and Manure Microbiomes and Implications for the Inoculation of Anaerobic Digesters. Microorganisms, 6.10.3390/microorganisms6010015 ↗
56. Effect of silage maize plant density and plant parts on biogas production and composition10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105770 ↗
57. Methanogenic fermentation of fresh and ensiled plant materials10.1016/0144-4565(86)90064-8 ↗
58. Screening boreal energy crops and crop residues for methane biofuel production10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.013 ↗
59. Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.007 ↗
60. Biochemical characteristics of the Asteraceae species silage and possible use as a feedstock for livestock and biogas production in Republic of Moldova
61. Biogas Production from Maize Grains and Maize Silage
62. Dyksma, S., Jansen, L., and Gallert, C. (2020). Syntrophic acetate oxidation replaces acetoclastic methanogenesis during thermophilic digestion of biowaste. Microbiome, 8.10.1186/s40168-020-00862-5 ↗
63. Functions of bacteria and archaea participating in the bioconversion of organic waste for methane production10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143007 ↗
64. Lentimicrobium saccharophilum gen. nov., sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium representing a new family in the phylum Bacteroidetes, and proposal of Lentimicrobiaceae fam. nov10.1099/ijsem.0.001103 ↗
65. Muñoz-Tamayo, R., Popova, M., Tillier, M., Morgavi, D.P., Morel, J.P., Fonty, G., and Morel-Desrosiers, N. (2019). Hydrogenotrophic methanogens of the mammalian gut: Functionally similar, thermodynamically different—A modelling approach. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0226243 ↗