Event-Based Emergency Detection for Safe Drone
Source abstract
Abstract
Quadrotor drones have rapidly gained interest recently. Numerous studies are underway for the commercial use of autonomous drones, and distribution businesses especially are taking serious reviews on drone-delivery services. However, there are still many concerns about urban drone operations. The risk of failures and accidents makes it difficult to provide drone-based services in the real world with ease. There have been many studies that introduced supplementary methods to handle drone failures and emergencies. However, we discovered the limitation of the existing methods. Most approaches were improving PID-based control algorithms, which is the dominant drone-control method. This type of low-level approach lacks situation awareness and the ability to handle unexpected situations. This study introduces an event-based control methodology that takes a high-level diagnosing approach that can implement situation awareness via a time-window. While low-level controllers are left to operate drones most of the time in normal situations, our controller operates at a higher level and detects unexpected behaviors and abnormal situations of the drone. We tested our method with real-time 3D computer simulation environments and in several cases, our method was able to detect emergencies that typical PID controllers were not able to handle. We were able to verify that our approach can provide enhanced double safety and better ensure safe drone operations. We hope our discovery can possibly contribute to the advance of real-world drone services in the near future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-si 10540, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Department of Software and Computer Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-si 10540, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Funding
Korea Research Institute
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Managing the Drone Revolution: A Systematic Literature Review into the Current Use of Airborne Drones and Future Strategic Directions for Their Effective Control10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101929 ↗
2. Scott, J., and Scott, C. (2017, January 4–7). Drone Delivery Models for Healthcare. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2017.399 ↗
3. Factors Affecting Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’ Safety: A Post-Occurrence Exploratory Data Analysis of Drones’ Accidents and Incidents in Australia10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105273 ↗
4. Hazard Analysis and Safety Requirements for Small Drone Operations: To What Extent Do Popular Drones Embed Safety?10.1111/risa.12867 ↗
5. LiveBox: A Self-Adaptive Forensic-Ready Service for Drones10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942033 ↗
6. PID Control System Analysis, Design, and Technology10.1109/TCST.2005.847331 ↗
7. Classical and Fuzzy-Genetic Autopilot Design for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles10.1016/j.asoc.2009.11.027 ↗
8. A Comprehensive Survey of Control Strategies for Autonomous Quadrotors10.1109/CJECE.2019.2920938 ↗
9. Smyczynski, P., Starzec, L., and Granosik, G. (2017, January 28–31). Autonomous Drone Control System for Object Tracking: Flexible System Design with Implementation Example. Proceedings of the 2017 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), Międzyzdroje, Poland.10.1109/MMAR.2017.8046919 ↗
10. The Future of PID Control10.1016/S0967-0661(01)00062-4 ↗
11. Abdelkrim, N., Aouf, N., Tsourdos, A., and White, B. (2008, January 25–27). Robust Nonlinear Filtering for INS/GPS UAV Localization. Proceedings of the 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Ajaccio, France.10.1109/MED.2008.4602149 ↗
12. The Navigation and Control Technology inside the AR.Drone micro UAV10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.02327 ↗
13. Integrating Global Position Estimation and Position Tracking for Mobile Robots: The Dynamic Markov Localization Approach
14. Albaker, B.M., and Rahim, N.A. (2009, January 14–15). A Survey of Collision Avoidance Approaches for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference for Technical Postgraduates (TECHPOS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/TECHPOS.2009.5412074 ↗
15. Berbra, C., Lesecq, S., and Martinez, J.J. (2008, January 25–27). A Multi-Observer Switching Strategy for Fault-Tolerant Control of a Quadrotor Helicopter. Proceedings of the 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Ajaccio, France.10.1109/MED.2008.4602064 ↗
16. Ducard, G.J.J. (2010). Fault-Tolerant Flight Control and Guidance Systems: Practical Methods for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84882-561-1 ↗
17. Detection of Sensor Faults in Small Helicopter UAVs Using Observer/Kalman Filter Identification10.1155/2011/174618 ↗
18. Hierarchical-Structure-Based Fault Estimation and Fault-Tolerant Control for Multiagent Systems. IEEE Trans10.1109/TCNS.2018.2860460 ↗
19. Active Fault-Tolerant Control for a Quadrotor with Sensor Faults10.1007/s10846-017-0474-0 ↗
20. Rafaralahy, H., Richard, E., Boutayeb, M., and Zasadzinski, M. (2008, January 9–11). Simultaneous Observer Based Sensor Diagnosis and Speed Estimation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Proceedings of the 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico.10.1109/CDC.2008.4739369 ↗
21. Sadeghzadeh, I., and Zhang, Y. (2011, January 29–31). A Review on Fault-Tolerant Control for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Proceedings of the Infotech@Aerospace 2011, St. Louis, MI, USA.10.2514/6.2011-1472 ↗
22. Hierarchical Model-Based Diagnosis for High Autonomy Systems10.1007/BF01276498 ↗
23. An Introduction to Autonomous Control Systems10.1109/37.88585 ↗
24. Drone Flight Planning for Safe Urban Operations: UTM Requirements and Tools10.1007/s00779-019-01353-7 ↗
25. Reliable Path Planning for Drone Delivery Using a Stochastic Time-Dependent Public Transportation Network10.1109/TITS.2020.2983491 ↗
26. Ochoa, C.A., and Atkins, E.M. (2018, January 8–12). Fail-Safe Navigation for Autonomous Urban Multicopter Flight. Proceedings of the AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech@Aerospace, Kissimmee, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2017-0222 ↗
27. Siewert, S., Sampigethaya, K., Buchholz, J., and Rizor, S. (2019, January 8–12). Fail-Safe, Fail-Secure Experiments for Small UAS and UAM Traffic in Urban Airspace. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/AIAA 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/DASC43569.2019.9081710 ↗
28. Automatic Path Planning for an Unmanned Drone with Constrained Flight Dynamics10.3103/S0147688215050093 ↗
29. Shah, S., Dey, D., Lovett, C., and Kapoor, A. (2018). AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehicles. Field and Service Robotics, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-67361-5_40 ↗
30. Epic Games (2022, May 16). Unreal Engine. Available online: https://www.unrealengine.com.
31. Jafari, M., and Xu, H. (2018). Intelligent Control for Unmanned Aerial Systems with System Uncertainties and Disturbances Using Artificial Neural Network. Drones, 2.10.3390/drones2030030 ↗
32. A Roll Stabilization System for a Monohull Ship: Modeling, Identification, and Adaptive Control10.1109/87.481763 ↗