Anaerobic Digestion in the Presence of Antimicrobials—Characteristics of Its Parameters and the Structure of Methanogens
Source abstract
Abstract
Antibiotics are widely used in human and veterinary medicine, and they are accumulated in various types of waste, including sewage sludge (SS) and cattle slurry (CS), processed by anaerobic digestion (AD). Anaerobic treatment is a method enabling the stabilization of these substrates before transferring to the environment. The presence of contaminants, such as antimicrobials, in organic substrates processed by AD is not regulated by law. The accumulation of antimicrobials in SS and CS is a crucial issue because it may reduce the effectiveness of their stabilization. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of growing concentrations of a mixture of antibiotics on the AD of SS and CS. Methane (CH4) yield, which is the main indicator of the efficiency of AD, was determined. Antibiotic exposure significantly decreased CH4 production only in SS (by 5–8% relative to control; p < 0.05). The copy numbers of the mcrA gene, a functional marker of methanogenesis, were not reliable indicators of CH4 yields in either substrate. During long-term AD, the average concentrations of the mcrA gene were determined at 108 in 1 g of SS digestate and from 108 to 109 in 1 g of CS digestate samples. At the end of long-term AD, methanogens belonging to the family Methanosarcinaceae were more prevalent than methanogens of the family Methanosaetaceae both in SS and CS samples (107 and 108–109 gene copies in 1 g of digestate, respectively).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts · Gut microbiota and health · Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Water Protection Engineering and Environmental Microbiology, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Prawocheńskiego 1, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland
Funding
NATIONAL SCIENCE CENTRE (Poland)
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Collivignarelli, M.C., Abba, A., Frattarola, A., Miino, M.C., Padovani, S., Katsoyiannis, I., and Torretta, V. (2019). Legislation for the Reuse of Biosolids on Agricultural Land in Europe: Overview. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11216015 ↗
2. Stiborova, H., Kracmarova, M., Vesela, T., Biesiekierska, M., Cerny, J., Balik, J., and Demnerova, K. (2021). Impact of Long-Term Manure and Sewage Sludge Application to Soil as Organic Fertilizer on the Incidence of Pathogenic Microorganisms and Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11071423 ↗
3. Dynamic effect of leachate recirculation on batch mode solid state anaerobic digestion: Influence of recirculated volume, leachate to substrate ratio and recirculation periodicity10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.113 ↗
4. Effect of Antibiotics on the Microbial Efficiency of Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater: A Review10.3389/fmicb.2020.611613 ↗
5. Koniuszewska, I., Czatzkowska, M., Harnisz, M., and Korzeniewska, E. (2021). The impact of antimicrobial substances on the methanogenic community during methane fermentation of sewage sludge and cattle slurry. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010369 ↗
6. Effect of antimicrobial compounds tylosin and chlortetracycline during batch anaerobic swine manure digestion10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.005 ↗
7. Metagenomic analysis reveals the effects of long-term antibiotic pressure on sludge anaerobic digestion and antimicrobial resistance risk10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.120 ↗
8. Molecular analyses of methyl-coenzyme M reductase α-subunit (mcrA) genes in rice field soil and enrichment cultures reveal the methanogenic phenotype of a novel archaeal lineage10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00179.x ↗
9. Effects of oxytetracycline, tylosin, and amoxicillin antibiotics on specific methanogenic activity of anaerobic biomass10.4103/2277-9183.102356 ↗
10. Pharmaceuticals in the environment-Global occurrences and perspectives10.1002/etc.3339 ↗
11. Use of real-time PCR for group-specific quantification of aceticlastic methanogens in anaerobic processes: Population dynamics and community structures10.1002/bit.20724 ↗
12. Application of real-time PCR to determination of combined effect of antibiotics on Bacteria, Methanogenic Archaea, Archaea in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.043 ↗
13. Osińska, A., Korzeniewska, E., Harnisz, M., and Niestȩpski, S. (2019). Quantitative occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes among bacterial populations from wastewater treatment plants using activated sludge. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9030387 ↗
14. Antibiotic contamination in animal manure, soil, and sewage sludge in Shenyang, northeast China10.1007/s12665-015-4528-y ↗
15. Kies, F.K., Boutchebak, S., and Bendaida, N. (2020). Soil Contamination by Pharmaceutical Pollutants: Adsorption of an Antibiotic (Amoxicillin) on an Agricultural Land. Proceedings, 30.10.3390/proceedings2019030060 ↗
16. The analysis of animal faeces as a tool to monitor antibiotic usage10.1016/j.talanta.2014.09.022 ↗
17. Exploring the links between antibiotic occurrence, antibiotic resistance, and bacterial communities in water supply reservoirs10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.071 ↗
18. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 201510.1073/pnas.1717295115 ↗
19. The impact of antimicrobials on the efficiency of methane fermentation of sewage sludge, changes in microbial biodiversity and the spread of antibiotic resistance10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125773 ↗
20. Koniuszewska, I., Harnisz, M., Korzeniewska, E., Czatzkowska, M., Jastrzębski, J.P., Paukszto, Ł., Bajkacz, S., Felis, E., and Rusanowska, P. (2021). The Effect of Antibiotics on Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion Process of Cattle Manure. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14041125 ↗
21. Occurrence and fate of antibiotics in manure during manure treatments: A short review10.1016/j.scp.2018.06.004 ↗
22. Improvement of biohydrogen production using a reduced pressure fermentation10.1007/s00449-015-1434-3 ↗
23. Group-Specific Primer and Probe Sets to Detect Methanogenic Communities Using Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction10.1002/bit.20347 ↗
24. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00394.x ↗
25. High-solid Anaerobic Co-digestion of Sewage Sludge and Cattle Manure: The Effects of Volatile Solid Ratio and pH10.1038/srep35194 ↗
26. Co-digestion of organic solid waste and sludge from sewage treatment10.2166/wst.2000.0074 ↗
27. Nikiema, M., Narcis, B., Ynoussa, M., Marius, K.S., Emilian, M., Cheik, A.T.O., Dayeri, D., Alfred, S.T., Valentin, N., and Aboubakar, S.O. (2022). Optimization of Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge: Impact of Combination with Bovine Dung and Leachate from Municipal Organic Waste. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14084380 ↗
28. Elimination patterns of worldwide used sulfonamides and tetracyclines during anaerobic fermentation10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.081 ↗
29. Adaptation at different points along antibiotic concentration gradients10.1098/rsbl.2020.0913 ↗
30. Comparative analysis of the methanogen diversity in horse and pony by using mcra gene and archaeal 16S rRNA Gene clone libraries10.1155/2014/483574 ↗
31. Microbial trophic interactions and mcrA gene expression in monitoring of anaerobic digesters10.3389/fmicb.2014.00597 ↗
32. Responses of methanogen mcrA genes and their transcripts to an alternate dry/wet cycle of paddy field soil10.1128/AEM.06934-11 ↗
33. Methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene abundance correlates with activity measurements of methanogenic H2/CO2-enriched anaerobic biomass10.1111/1751-7915.12094 ↗
34. Anaerobic digestion of molasses by means of a vibrating and non-vibrating submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.06.009 ↗
35. Czatzkowska, M., Harnisz, M., Korzeniewska, E., Wolak, I., Rusanowska, P., Paukszto, Ł., Jastrzębski, J.P., and Bajkacz, S. (2022). Long-Term, Simultaneous Impact of Antimicrobials on the Efficiency of Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Changes in the Microbial Community. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15051826 ↗
36. Hydrogenotrophic Methanogenesis and Autotrophic Growth of Methanosarcina thermophila
37. Several ways one goal—Methanogenesis from unconventional substrates10.1007/s00253-020-10724-7 ↗
38. Methanosarcinaceae and Acetate-Oxidizing Pathways Dominate in High-Rate Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Waste-Activated Sludge10.1128/AEM.01730-13 ↗
39. Methanosarcina spp., the key to relieve the start-up of a thermophilic anaerobic digestion suffering from high acetic acid loads10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.020 ↗
40. Microbial population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic digester treating industrial food waste in Kyoto eco-energy project10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.028 ↗
41. Quantitative analysis of methanogenic community dynamics in three anaerobic batch digesters treating different wastewaters10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.032 ↗
42. Enhancement of microbial density and methane production in advanced anaerobic digestion of secondary sewage sludge by continuous removal of ammonia10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.066 ↗
43. Anaerobic digestion of pig manure supernatant at high ammonia concentrations characterized by high abundances of Methanosaeta and non-euryarchaeotal archaea10.1038/s41598-017-14527-1 ↗
44. Enhancement of biogas production by addition of hemicellulolytic bacteria immobilised on activated zeolite10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.048 ↗
45. The role of different methanogen groups evaluated by real-time qPCR as high-efficiency bioindicators of wet anaerobic co-digestion of organic waste10.1186/2191-0855-1-28 ↗