journal article·2022-06-27Open access

Estimation of the Underlying F0 Range of a Speaker from the Spectral Features of a Brief Speech Input

Wei Zhang, Yanlu Xie, Binghuai Lin, Liyuan Wang, Jinsong Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 13

Abstract

From a very brief speech, human listeners can estimate the pitch range of the speaker and normalize pitch perception. Spectral features which inherently involve both articulatory and phonatory characteristics were speculated to play roles in this process, but few were reported to directly correlate with speaker’s F0 range. To mimic this human auditory capability and validate the speculation, in a preliminary study we proposed an LSTM-based method to estimate speaker’s F0 range from a 300 ms-long speech input, which turned out to outperform the conventional method. By two more experiments, this study further improved the method and verified its validity in estimating the speaker-specific underlying F0 range. After incorporating a novel measurement of F0 range and a multi-task training approach, Experiment 1 showed that the refined model gave more accurate estimates than the initial model. Based on a Japanese-Chinese bilingual parallel speech corpus, Experiment 2 found that the F0 ranges estimated with the model from the Chinese speech and the model from the Japanese speech produced by the same set of speakers had no significant difference, whereas the conventional method showed significant difference. The results indicate that the proposed spectrum-based method captures the speaker-specific underlying F0 range which is independent of the linguistic content.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Speech and Audio Processing · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Speech Recognition and Synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A7, Canada

Department of Information Science, Beijing Language and Culture University, 15 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China

Smart Platform Product Department, Tencent Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100193, China

Funding

Science Foundation and Special Program for Key Basic Research fund of Beijing Language and Culture University · advanced Innovation Center for Language Resource and Intelligence · Wutong Innovation Platform of Beijing Language and Culture University

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Crystal, D. (2011). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, John Wiley & Sons.
2. Trask, R. (1996). A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology, Routledge.
3. Perception of pitch location within a speaker’s F0 range10.1121/1.1841751 ↗
4. Perception of pitch location within a speaker’s range: Fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex10.1121/1.4714351 ↗
5. Mo, Y., Cole, J., and Lee, E.-K. (2008, January 6–9). Naïve listeners’ prominence and boundary perception. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, Brazil.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2008-163 ↗
6. Identifying isolated, multispeaker Mandarin tones from brief acoustic input: A perceptual and acoustic study10.1121/1.3050322 ↗
7. Integrating Voice Quality Cues in the Pitch Perception of Speech and Non-speech Utterances10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02147 ↗
8. The effect of speaker gender on Cantonese tone perception10.1121/10.0001411 ↗
9. Acoustic parameters in speaker height and weight identification: Sex-specific behaviour10.1177/002383099503800304 ↗
10. Underpinning/nailon/: Automatic Estimation of Pitch Range and Speaker Relative Pitch10.1007/978-3-540-74122-0_18 ↗
11. Looze, C.D., and Hirst, D. (2008, January 6–9). Detecting changes in key and range for the automatic modelling and coding of intonation. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, Brazil.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2008-32 ↗
12. Ambrazaitis, G. (2010, January 9–11). Revisiting intonational pitch accents in Swedish: Evidence from lexical accent neutralization. Proceedings of the TIE4, the Fourth European Conference on Tone and Intonation, Stockholm, Sweden.
13. Mahmoodzadeh, A., Abutalebi, H.R., Soltanian-Zadeh, H., and Sheikhzadeh, H. (2010, January 4–6). Determination of pitch range based on onset and offset analysis in modulation frequency domain. Proceedings of the 2010 5th International Symposium on Telecommunications, Tehran, Iran.10.1109/ISTEL.2010.5734096 ↗
14. Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Xie, Y., and Zhang, J. (2018, January 26–29). LSTM-Based Pitch Range Estimation from Spectral Information of Brief Speech Input. Proceedings of the 2018 11th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP), Taipei City, Taiwan.10.1109/ISCSLP.2018.8706608 ↗
15. Baken, R.J., and Orlikoff, R.F. (2000). Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice, Cengage Learning.
16. Laver, J., and John, L. (1994). Principles of Phonetics, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166621 ↗
17. Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: A comparison of English and German10.1121/1.3681950 ↗
18. Voice loudness and gender effects on jitter and shimmer in healthy adults10.1044/1092-4388(2008/06-0208) ↗
19. Effects of aging on selected acoustic voice parameters: Preliminary normative data and educational implications10.1080/03601270151075561 ↗
20. Changes in Acoustic Characteristics of the Voice Across the Life Span: Measures From Individuals 4–93 Years of Age10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0036) ↗
21. The aging female voice: Acoustic and respiratory data10.1080/02699200400026918 ↗
22. Some acoustic and perceptual factors in acute-laryngitic hoarseness10.1044/jshd.3004.350 ↗
23. Descriptions of the speech of patients with cancer of the vocal folds. Part I: Measures of fundamental frequency10.1121/1.1912490 ↗
24. Spectrographic analysis of fundamental frequency and hoarseness before and after vocal rehabilitation10.1044/jshd.3903.286 ↗
25. Selected acoustic characteristics of pathologic and normal speakers10.1044/jshr.2302.361 ↗
26. Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin10.1121/1.4730893 ↗
27. Patterson, D., and Ladd, D.R. (1999, January 1–7). Pitch range modelling: Linguistic dimensions of variation. Proceedings of the ICPhS, San Francisco, CA, USA.
28. Patterson, D.J. (2000). Linguistic Approach to Pitch Range Modelling. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh].
29. Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., and Docherty, G. (2008, January 6–9). A methodological study into the linguistic dimensions of pitch range differences between German and English. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Speech Prosody, Campinas, Brazil.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2008-118 ↗
30. Control methods used in a study of the vowels10.1121/1.1906875 ↗
31. Information conveyed by vowels10.1121/1.1908694 ↗
32. Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30836-8 ↗
33. Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones10.1121/1.420092 ↗
34. Perceptual Normalization for Inter- and Intratalker Variation in Cantonese Level Tones10.1044/1092-4388(2003/034) ↗
35. Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments10.1159/000261901 ↗
36. A preliminary study on the perceptual center of tones in Standard Chinese
37. Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin Chinese vowels and tones10.1006/jpho.1997.0042 ↗
38. Fant, G. (1970). Acoustic Theory of Speech Production, Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110873429 ↗
39. Influence of tonal context and timbral variation on perception of pitch10.3758/BF03195786 ↗
40. Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones10.1121/1.404381 ↗
41. An interval size illusion: The influence of timbre on the perceived size of melodic intervals10.3758/BF03193514 ↗
42. Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre10.1121/1.4863269 ↗
43. The effect of speech melody on voice quality10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00061-3 ↗
44. Carlson, R., Elenius, K., and Swerts, M. (2004, January 23–26). Perceptual judgments of pitch range. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2004, International Conference, Nara, Japan.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004-159 ↗
45. The Effect of Sustained Phonation at High and Low Pitch on Vocal Jitter and Shimmer10.1159/000266266 ↗
46. Ullakonoja, R. (2007, January 6–10). Comparison of pitch range in Finnish (L1) and Russian (L2). Proceedings of the ICPhS, Saarbrücken, Germany.
47. Zimmerer, F., Jügler, J., Andreeva, B., Möbius, B., and Trouvain, J. (2014, January 20–23). Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation in native and non-native productions of French and German speakers. Proceedings of the 7th Speech Prosody Conference, Dublin, Ireland.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-197 ↗
48. Gao, S., Xu, B., Zhang, H., Zhao, B., Li, C., and Huang, T. (2000, January 16–20). Update progress of Sinohear: Advanced Mandarin LVCSR system at NLPR. Proceedings of the ICPhS, Beijing, China.10.21437/ICSLP.2000-655 ↗
49. Bu, H., Du, J., Na, X., Wu, B., and Zheng, H. (2017, January 1–3). Aishell-1: An open-source mandarin speech corpus and a speech recognition baseline. Proceedings of the 2017 20th Conference of the Oriental Chapter of the International Coordinating Committee on Speech Databases and Speech I/O Systems and Assessment (O-COCOSDA), Seoul, Korea.10.1109/ICSDA.2017.8384449 ↗
50. Wang, D., and Zhang, X. (2015). Thchs-30: A free chinese speech corpus. arXiv.
51. Boersma, P. (2022, June 24). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Available online: http://www.praat.org/.
52. Multitask learning10.1023/A:1007379606734 ↗
53. Zhang, Q., Cao, C., Li, T., Xie, Y., and Zhang, J. (2018, January 12–16). Pitch range estimation with multi features and MTL-DNN model. Proceedings of the 2018 14th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICSP.2018.8652462 ↗
54. Improving Pronunciation Erroneous Tendency Detection with Multi-Model Soft Targets10.1007/s11265-019-01485-2 ↗
55. Charles, P.W.D. (2022, June 24). Keras. GitHub Repository. Available online: https://keras.io/.
56. Povey, D., Ghoshal, A., Boulianne, G., Burget, L., Glembek, O., Goel, N., Hannemann, M., Motlicek, P., Qian, Y., and Schwarz, P. (2011, January 11–15). The Kaldi speech recognition toolkit. Proceedings of the IEEE 2011 Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Waikoloa, HI, USA.