Influence of Seismic Loads Considering Soil Properties and Wave Passage Effect on the Seismic Response of a Multi-Span PSC Girder Bridge
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates the analytical results of the seismic response of multi-span prestressed concrete (PSC) I-girder bridges under seismic loads. To perform numerical analyses, a three-span PSC I-girder bridge with a width of 12 m, a total length of 100 m, and a maximum span length of 40 m was modeled, and a virtual location was selected to consider the soil properties of the area where the bridge was constructed. The seismic load acting on the PSC I-girder bridge was applied in consideration of the soil properties around the pier and the wave passage effect of the bedrock in the artificial seismic load generated, according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) standard. The analysis results confirmed that the seismic load, with consideration of the soil properties and wave passage effect, generated the maximum response acceleration and bending moment at the deck of the bridge—152% and 232% greater than without considering them, respectively. Therefore, in order to ensure the earthquake resistance of the bridge, the soil properties of the area where the bridge will be built and the wave passage effect of the bedrock must be considered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Earthquake Hazards Reduction Center, National Disaster Management Research Institute, 406-33, Jongga-ro, Jung-gu, Ulsan 44538, Korea
Department of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National University, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, Korea
Land and Housing Institute, 99, Expo-ro 539, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, Korea
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Proposals of Reliable Shapes of Supplementary V-Ties for Section Jacketing Method of Columns
2. Material properties of basalt fiber reinforced concrete made with recycled earthquake waste10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.118 ↗
3. Damage estimation of concrete canal due to earthquake effects by acoustic emission method10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.016 ↗
4. Nonlinear Seismic Analysis Method of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Including Their Pile Foundations10.5000/EESK.2003.7.2.009 ↗
5. Evaluation of soil–foundation–structure interaction effects on seismic response demands of multi-story MRF buildings on raft foundations
6. Structure–soil–structure interaction between underground structure and ground structure10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.015 ↗
7. Lysmer, J., Udaka, T., Tsai, C., and Seed, H.B. (1975). FLUSH-A Computer Program for Approximate 3-D Analysis of Soil-Structure Interaction Problems, California University.
8. Wolf, J.P. (1987). Soil-structure-interaction analysis in time domain. Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, IAEA.
9. Soil–Structure Interaction in Yielding Systems10.1002/eqe.300 ↗
10. Some Cornerstones of Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00082-7 ↗
11. Studies of the Influence of Non-Linear Stress–Strain Characteristics in Soil–Structure Interaction10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.377 ↗
12. A shake table investigation of dynamic behavior of pile supported bridges in liquefiable soil deposits10.1007/s11803-021-2002-2 ↗
13. Dynamic Analysis of Floating Bridge subject to Earthquake Load Considering Multi-Support Excitation10.5000/EESK.2004.8.2.027 ↗
14. Sensitivity of Optimum Designs for Spatially Varying Ground Motions10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:11(1324) ↗
15. Ancheta, T.D., Stewart, J.P., and Abramhamson, N.A. (2011, January 23–26). Engineering characterization of earthquake ground motion coherency and amplitude variability. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
16. Prediction of Tunnel Response by Spatially Variable Ground Motion
17. Effect of Nonlinear Soil Behavior on the Inelastic Seismic Response of a Structure10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2004)4:2(104) ↗
18. Wave Passage Effect on the Seismic Response of a Building Considering Bedrock Shear Wave Velocity10.5000/EESK.2014.18.2.089 ↗
19. Nonlinear Soil–Abutment–Bridge Structure Interaction for Seismic Performance-Based Design10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(707) ↗
20. Seismic Response of a Bridge–Soil–Foundation System under the Combined Effect of Vertical and Horizontal Ground Motions10.1002/eqe.2226 ↗
21. Seismic Wave Passage Effect on Dynamic Response of Submerged Floating Tunnels10.1016/j.proeng.2010.08.025 ↗
22. Wave-Passage Effect on the Seismic Response of Suspension Bridges Considering Local Soil Conditions10.1007/s13296-017-6010-z ↗
23. Nonlinear soil deformability effects on the seismic damage mechanisms of brick and stone masonry arch bridge10.1177/1056789520974423 ↗
24. Characteristics and Triggers of Earthquake-Induced Landslides of Pyroclastic Fall Deposits: An Example from Hachinohe during the 1968 M7. 9 Tokachi-Oki Earthquake, Japan10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105301 ↗
25. Takao, T., Kozawa, K., Murakami, K., Abe, I., Ogasawara, T., Shibaki, H., and Nakamura, Y. (2018). Impact on Dissolved Oxygen of Intermittent Deep Water Intrusion from the Outer Bay after the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami in Ofunato Bay, Japan. Proceedings of the ASIAN AND PACIFIC COASTS 2017: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on APAC 2017, World Scientific.10.1142/9789813233812_0080 ↗
26. Repercussions of the Great East Japan Earthquake Tsunami on Ellipsoidal Alexandrium Cysts (Dinophyceae) in Ofunato Bay, Japan10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.01.001 ↗
27. Improvement of energy damage index bounds for circular reinforced concrete bridge piers under dynamic analysis10.1002/suco.202000762 ↗
28. Generation of Artificial Time History Covering Design Response Spectrum by Two Modification Functions
29. Lilhanand, K., and Tseng, W.S. (1988, January 2–9). Development and Application of Realistic Earthquake Time Histories Compatible with Multiple-Damping Design Spectra. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
30. Newmark, N.M., and Hall, W.J. (1982). Earthquake Spectra and Design. Engineering Monographs on Earthquake Criteria, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
31. Hudson, D.E. (1979). Reading and Interpreting Strong Motion Accelerograms, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
32. Site-Dependent Spectra for Earthquake-Resistant Design10.1785/BSSA0660010221 ↗
33. Hashash, Y.M.A., Musgrove, M.I., Harmon, J.A., Okan, I., Xing, G., Numanoglu, O., Groholski, D.R., Phillips, C.A., and Park, D. (2021, December 25). DEEPSOIL 7.0, User Manual. Available online: http://deepsoil.cee.illinois.edu.
34. Ancheta, D.T. (2010). Engineering Characterization of Spatially Variable Earthquake Ground Motions. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of California].
35. Evaluation of Dynamic Properties and Ground-Response Analysis of Soil Reinforced with Cement and Biopolymer10.9798/KOSHAM.2020.20.5.291 ↗