Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index
Source abstract
Abstract
There is increasing pressure from developers toward architects and engineers to deliver scientifically sound proposals for often complex and cost-intensive construction products. An increase in digitalization within the construction industry and the availability of intelligently built assets and overall sustainability make it possible to customize a construction product. This servitization of construction products is assumed to perform much preferably in satisfying stakeholders’ physical, psychological, and social needs. The degree to which these products are performing can be evaluated through an evidence index. This article aims to introduce a conceptual model of an evidence index and test it in the programming stage of a case study. The investigation follows the evidence-based design approach and renders evidence through key performance indicators in the programming stage of the building process. For testing the concept, a case study investigation was performed by simulating a novice research assistant, and the amount of evidence was collected and appraised for evidence index. The case study showed that key performance indicators of a servitized project could be evaluated on a four-point scale. The quality of the evidence index generation depended on the level of expertise the evaluator has in research and the skilful use of scientific databases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Service and Product Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Construction Engineering and Lighting Science, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, 553 18 Jönköping, Sweden
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Fischer, M. (2017). Integrating Project Delivery, Wiley.10.1002/9781119049272 ↗
2. Smart versus conventional lighting in apartments-Electric lighting energy consumption simulation for three different households10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111009 ↗
3. Davoodi, A., Johansson, P., Henricson, M., and Aries, M. (2017). A conceptual framework for integration of evidence-based design with lighting simulation tools. Buildings, 7.10.3390/buildings7040082 ↗
4. System-level key performance indicators for building performance evaluation10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109703 ↗
5. Li-BIM, an agent-based approach to simulate occupant-building interaction from the Building-Information Modelling10.1016/j.engappai.2019.03.008 ↗
6. A stochastic model of integrating occupant behaviour into energy simulation with respect to actual energy consumption in high-rise apartment buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.037 ↗
7. Johansson, P., Fischl, G., and Granath, K. (2019). Towards Evidence-Based BIM. The Advances in ICT in Design, Construction and Management in Architecture, Engineering, Construction and Operations (AECO): Proceedings of the 36th CIB W78 2019 Conference, University of Northumbria.
8. A Value and Model Driven Method for Patient Oriented KPI Design in Health Care10.1007/978-3-642-18472-7_10 ↗
9. How to tell if a BIM project is successful: A goal-driven approach10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.022 ↗
10. Arkitektur, C.F.V. (2021, May 02). Administrativa Arbetsplatser inom Vården och dess Förvaltningar. Available online: https://www.ptsforum.se/media/1082/2015-02-05-admarbplatser.pdf.
11. Servitization of the manufacturing firm10.1108/IJOPM-02-2012-0086 ↗
12. Servitization and sustainability actions. Evidence from European manufacturing companies10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.004 ↗
13. A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design10.1177/193758670800100306 ↗
14. Hamilton, D.K., and Watkins, D.H. (2009). Evidence-Based Design for Multiple Building Types, John Wiley & Sons.
15. Defining Evidence-Based Design
16. Building performance assessment—from POE to BPE, a personal perspective10.3763/asre.2005.4826 ↗
17. Preiser, W., and Vischer, J. (2006). Assessing Building Performance, Routledge.10.4324/9780080455228 ↗
18. The use of lighting simulation in the evidence-based design process: A case study approach using visual comfort analysis in offices10.1007/s12273-019-0578-5 ↗
19. Davoodi, A., Johansson, P., and Aries, M. (2021). The Implementation of Visual Comfort Evaluation in the Evidence-Based Design Process Using Lighting Simulation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11114982 ↗
20. Association, C.P. (2016). The Future for Construction Product Manufacturing, Digitalisation, Industry 4.0 and the Circular Economy, Construction Products Association.
21. Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.024 ↗
22. Preiser, W.F., White, E., and Rabinowitz, H. (2015). Post-Occupancy Evaluation (Routledge Revivals), Routledge.10.4324/9781315713519 ↗
23. Malone, E., Nanda, U., Harmsen, C., Reno, K., Edelstein, E., Hamilton, D.K., Salvatore, A., Mann-Dooks, J.R., and Oland, C. (2008). An Introduction to Evidence-Based Design: Exploring Healthcare and Design (EDAC Study Guides, Volume 1), The Center for Health Design.
24. Zimring, C., and Rosenheck, T. (2001). Post-Occupancy Evaluations and Organizational Learning1. Learning from Our Buildings: A State-of-the-Practice Summary of Post-Occupancy Evaluation, National Academic Press.
25. Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G., Banbury, S., and Parasuraman, R. (2015). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Psychology Press.10.4324/9781315665177 ↗
26. Materializing the Promises of Cognitive IoT: How Cognitive Buildings Are Shaping the Way10.1109/JIOT.2017.2755376 ↗
27. Evidence-Based Design and Research-Informed Design: What’s the Difference? Conceptual Definitions and Comparative Analysis10.1177/1937586717697683 ↗
28. Cama, R. (2009). Evidence-Based Healthcare Design, John Wiley & Sons.
29. A Framework for Evaluating Evidence in Evidence-Based Design10.1177/193758671100400305 ↗
30. Stetler, C. (2002). Evidence-Based Practice and the Use of Research: A Synopsis of Basic Concepts & Strategies to Improve Care, NOVA Foundation.
31. Research or evidence-based design: Which process should we be using?
32. Weighing the evidence
33. How to rate the quality of a research paper: Introducing a helpful algorithm for architects and designers10.1177/193758671300600210 ↗
34. Hierarchy of evidence: A framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00662.x ↗
35. Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the Likert scale10.1002/pfi.21727 ↗
36. Regionfastigheter, J.L. (2021, June 08). Program för Tekniskt Standard (Program for Technical Standard). Available online: https://www.ptsforum.se/.
37. A methodology for simulation of daylight room illuminance distribution and light dimming for a room with a controlled shading device10.1016/S0038-092X(02)00016-6 ↗
38. An experimental evaluation of daylight systems and lighting control
39. Eleanor, S.L., Glenn, D.H., Robert, D.C., Luis, L.F., Sila, K., Mary Ann, P., Francis, M.R., and Stephen, E.S. (2007). Daylighting the New York Times Headquarters Building: Final Report: Commissioning Daylighting Systems and Estimation of Demand Response, Commissioning Daylighting Systems and Estimation of Demand Response.
40. Lighting, Z. (2013). The Lighting Handbook, Zumtobel Lighting.
41. Benya, J.R. (2001). Lighting for Schools.
42. Sit–stand desks in call centres: Associations of use and ergonomics awareness with sedentary behavior10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.001 ↗
43. Chandra, A., Chandna, P., Deswal, S., and Kumar, R. (2009, January 23–24). Ergonomics in the office environment: A review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy and Environment, Chandigarh, Haryana, India.
44. Svensson, E. (2006). Bygg Ikapp Handikapp: Att Bygga för Ökad Tillgänglighet och Användbarhet för Personer med Funktionshinder: Kommentarer till Boverkets Byggregler, BBR, Svensk Byggtjänst.
45. Thermal comfort and use of thermostats in Finnish homes and offices10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.09.002 ↗
46. Usability guidelines for room temperature controls
47. Indoor air quality requirements for healthy office buildings: Recommendations based on an epidemiologic study10.1016/0160-4120(91)90025-L ↗
48. Reactions of Ozone on Ventilation Filters10.1177/1420326X03012003002 ↗
49. Ohno, Y. (2000). CIE fundamentals for color measurements. Proceedings of the NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference, Society for Imaging ScienceTechnology.10.2352/ISSN.2169-4451.2000.16.1.art00033_2 ↗
50. Non-visual effects of light: How to use light to promote circadian entrainment and elicit alertness10.1177/1477153517721598 ↗
51. Morrow, B., and Kanakri, S. (2018). The Effect of LED and Fluorescent Lighting on Children in the Classroom, EDRA.
52. Wang, M.L., and Luo, M.R. (2016, January 15–17). Effects of LED lighting on office work performance. Proceedings of the 2016 13th China International Forum on Solid State Lighting (SSLChina), Beijing, China.10.1109/SSLCHINA.2016.7804366 ↗
53. Effects of realistic office daylighting and electric lighting conditions on visual comfort, alertness and mood10.1177/1477153514531518 ↗
54. Svensk Standard, S. (2007). 25268: 2007. Byggakustik–Ljud. Av Utrymmen I Byggn. –VårdlokalerUndervis. Dag-Och FritidshemKontor Och Hotel, Swedish Institute for Standards.
55. Boyce, P., Hunter, C., and Howlett, O. (2003). The Benefits of Daylight through Windows, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
56. Löfberg, H.A., Bäck, B., and Glaas, F. (1987). Räkna Med Dagsljus, Statens Institut för Byggnadsforskning.
57. Elstandard, S.S. (2017). Elinstallationsreglerna SS 436 40 00, utgåva 3, med kommentarer, SEK Svensk Elstandard.
58. The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005 ↗
59. Farley, K.M., and Veitch, J.A. (2001). A Room with a View: A Review of the Effects of Windows on Work and Well-Being, Citeseer.10.1037/e668402012-001 ↗
60. Can surrounding greenery reduce noise annoyance at home?10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.025 ↗
61. för Vårdhygien, S.F. (2003). Byggenskap och vårdhygien. Vårdhygieniska Aspekter vid ny-och Ombyggnation samt Renovering av vårdlokaler, Arbetsgruppen BOV (Byggenskap och Vårdhygien).
62. Gedda, M. (2017). Evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice and evidence index 1.0 (EVID-i). Kinésithér. Rev.10.1016/j.kine.2017.05.010 ↗
63. Polit, D.F., and Beck, C.T. (2008). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
64. Huovila, P., Hyvärinen, J., Granath, K., Johansson, P., Bruun, C., and Annerstedt, J. (2012). Value Driven Procurement in Building and Real Estate-Final Report, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.