journal article·2021-02-04Open access

The Reproduction and Evaluation of Star Fields with the Milky Way in a Planetarium

Midori Tanaka, Ken’ichi Otani, Saori Setoguchi, Takahiko Horiuchi

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 4

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the physical factors required to accurately reproduce the Milky Way in star fields in a planetarium using three evaluation indices: faithfulness, preference, and depth feeling. Psychometric experiments were conducted by manipulating three different physical factors (transmittance, representation size and star density) of the stars projected on a dome screen as experimental stimuli. The three evaluation indices were rated by observers for 12 different reproductions of the Milky Way. By analyzing the experimental results, we developed a common model to estimate the scores for each evaluation index by changing the coefficients of the three physical factors. Our proposed model has good accuracy, and each evaluation index can be represented by transmittance, representation size and star density. The weighting values indicate that density reproduction was the pivotal factor for the majority of observers. In contrast, the observers were not affected by the size of the stars in the projected Milky Way.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Visual perception and processing mechanisms · Spatial Cognition and Navigation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Global and Transdisciplinary Studies, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan

Engineering Division, Konica Minolta Planetarium Co., Ltd., 3-1-3 Higashi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo 170-8630, Japan

Graduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. (2021, February 04). International Astronomical Union. Available online: http://www.iau.org.
2. (2021, February 04). International Dark-Sky Association. Available online: http://www.darksky.org/light-pollution/.
3. (2021, February 04). International Planetarium Society. Available online: http://www.ips-planetarium.org.
4. Good, G.A. (2012). Observing Variable Stars, Springer Science and Business Media.
5. Jensen, H.W., Durand, F., Dorsey, J., Stark, M.M., Shirley, P., and Premože, S. (2001, January 12–17). A physically-based night sky model. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference ACM, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1145/383259.383306 ↗
6. Jensen, H.W., Premože, S., Shirley, P., Thompson, W.B., Ferwerda, J.A., and Stark, M.M. (2000). Night Rendering, Department of Computer Science, University of Utah. Technical Report UUCS-00-016.
7. Evaluation for Faithful Reproduction of Star Fields in a Planetarium
8. Relationship between Faithfulness and Preference of Stars in a Planetarium10.2352/J.Percept.Imaging.2019.2.1.010402 ↗
9. Contrast perception across changes in luminance and spatial frequency10.1364/JOSAA.13.001953 ↗
10. Visual aftereffects of sequential perception: Dynamic adaptation to changes in texture density and contrast10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00120-1 ↗
11. The 1997 reference of diffuse night sky brightness10.1051/aas:1998105 ↗
12. Telescopic limiting magnitudes10.1086/132629 ↗
13. Jones, D. (1967). Norman Pogson and the Definition of Stellar Magnitude, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflets.
14. The Hipparcos Catalogue
15. Williamson, S.J., and Cummins, H.Z. (1983). Light and Color in Nature and Art, John Wiley and Sons.
16. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x ↗
17. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y ↗
18. Mansfield, R.J.W. (1974). Measurement, Invariance, and Psychophysics, Springer.10.1007/978-94-010-2245-3_10 ↗
19. Shao, Z., Wu, J., Ouyang, Q., He, C., and Cao, Z. (2019). Multi-Layered Perceptual Model for Haptic Perception of Compliance. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8121497 ↗
20. Hennig, C. (2015). Clustering Strategy and Method Selection. arXiv.10.1201/b19706-40 ↗