Show source-provided references
3. Circular food system approaches can support current European protein intake levels while reducing land use and greenhouse gas emissions
10.1038/s43016-024-00975-2 ↗4. Ajomiwe, N., Boland, M., Phongthai, S., Bagiyal, M., Singh, J., and Kaur, L. (2024). Protein Nutrition: Understanding Structure, Digestibility, and Bioavailability for Optimal Health. Foods, 13.
10.3390/foods13111771 ↗5. Determinants of amino acid bioavailability from ingested protein in relation to gut health
6. European Commission (2023). EU Agricultural Outlook for Markets, Income and Environment, 2023–2035, Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2024-01/agricultural-outlook-2023-report_en_0.pdf.
7. OECD/FAO (2024). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024–2033, OECD Publishing. Available online: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc9016en.
8. Eurostat (2023). Agricultural Production—Livestock and Meat, Eurostat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agricultural_production_-_livestock_and_meat.
9. ProVeg International, University of Copenhagen, and Ghent University (2023). Evolving Appetites: An In-Depth Look at European Attitudes Towards Plant-Based Eating. Smart Protein Project, ProVeg International. Available online: https://food.ku.dk/english/news/2023/most-europeans-are-reducing-their-meat-consumption-eu-funded-survey-finds.
10. Market Data Forecast (2023). Europe Meat Market Size, Share & Growth Report, 2023–2033, Market Data Forecast. Available online: https://www.marketdataforecast.com/market-reports/europe-meat-market.
11. Zhao, S., Qiu, H., and Yang, Z. (2023). Adjustment of meat consumption structure under the dual pressures of food security and low-carbon transformation: Evidence from China. Agriculture, 13.
10.3390/agriculture13122242 ↗12. The future of beef production in South America
13. Council of the European Union (1996). Council Directive 96/22/EC of 29 April 1996 Concerning the Prohibition on the Use in Stock-Farming of Certain Substances Having a Hormonal or Thyrostatic Action and of Beta-Agonists, and Repealing Directives 81/602/EEC, 88/146/EEC and 88/299/EEC. Off. J. Eur. Communities, L 125, 3–9.
14. US Congress (2025, May 02). The U.S.-EU Beef Hormone Dispute, Available online: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R40449.
16. An overview of beef production from pasture and feedlot globally, as demand for beef and the need for sustainable practices increase
10.1016/j.animal.2021.100295 ↗17. Ma, L., Wang, L., Zhang, Z., and Xiao, D. (2023). Research progress of biological feed in beef cattle. Animals, 13.
10.3390/ani13162662 ↗19. Effect of fast-, medium- and slow-growing strains on meat quality of chickens reared under the organic farming method
10.1017/S175173111000176X ↗20. Comparison of Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, and Blood Parameters of Slow- and Fast-Grown Female Broiler Chickens Raised in Organic or Conventional Production System
10.5713/ajas.15.0812 ↗21. FAO (2025). Major Cuts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Livestock Within Reach, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/Major-cuts-of-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-livestock-within-reach/.
23. Vidovic, N., and Vidovic, S. (2020). Antimicrobial resistance and food animals: Influence of livestock environment on the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics, 9.
10.3390/antibiotics9020052 ↗24. Sheffield, D., Fiorotto, M.L., and Davis, T.A. (2024). Nutritional contributions of animal-sourced foods: Implications for dietary adequacy and health. Front. Nutr., 11.
10.3389/fnut.2024.1424912 ↗27. Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities
10.1073/pnas.1220608110 ↗29. Keena, M., Meehan, M., and Scherer, T. (2022). Environmental Implications of Excess Fertilizer and Manure on Water Quality, NDSU Extension. Available online: https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/extension/publications/environmental-implications-excess-fertilizer-and-manure-water-quality.
30. Orzuna-Orzuna, J.F., Godina-Rodríguez, J.E., Garay-Martínez, J.R., Granados-Rivera, L.D., Maldonado-Jáquez, J.A., and Lara-Bueno, A. (2024). A Meta-Analysis of 3-Nitrooxypropanol Dietary Supplementation on Growth Performance, Ruminal Fermentation, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Beef Cattle. Fermentation, 10.
10.3390/fermentation10060273 ↗32. Hu, G., Do, D.N., Gray, J., and Miar, Y. (2020). Selection for Favorable Health Traits: A Potential Approach to Cope with Diseases in Farm Animals. Animals, 10.
10.3390/ani10091717 ↗33. Quality, safety and authenticity of insect protein-based food and feed: Insights from the INPROFF Project
10.37349/eff.2024.00041 ↗34. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2015). Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed. EFSA J., 13, 4257.
10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257 ↗35. Jaworska, D., and Sadowka, A. (2024). Strategies to improve the functional value of meat and meat products. Foods, 13.
10.3390/foods13152433 ↗36. Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores
10.1002/zoo.10031 ↗37. Oonincx, D.G.A.B., and de Boer, I.J.M. (2012). Environmental impact of the production of mealworms as a protein source for humans–A life cycle assessment. PLoS ONE, 7.
10.1371/journal.pone.0051145 ↗38. IFOAM (2025, June 01). Organics Europe. Biodiversity, Soil, and Water., Available online: https://www.organicseurope.bio/what-we-do/biodiversity-soil-water/.
39. Willer, H., Schlatter, B., and Trávníček, J. (2023). The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2023, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL.
42. European Commission (2025, June 01). Control and Enforcement in Organic Farming. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/farming/organic-farming/controls_pl.
43. Health and welfare in organic livestock production systems—A systematic mapping of current knowledge
44. Composition differences between organic conventional meat: Asystematic literature review and meta-analysis
10.1017/S0007114515005073 ↗45. Growth, carcass and meat quality traits of pigs raised under organic or conventional rearing systems using commercially available feed mixtures
47. Alonso, M.E., González-Montaña, J.R., and Lomillos, J.M. (2020). Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare. Animals, 10.
10.3390/ani10030385 ↗51. US grass-fed beef is as carbon intensive as industrial beef and ≈10-fold more intensive than common protein-dense alternatives
10.1073/pnas.2404329122 ↗53. Evans, N., Cloward, J., Ward, R.E., van Wietmarschen, H.A., van Eekeren, N., Kronberg, S.L., Provenza, F.D., and van Vliet, S. (2024). Pasture-finishing of cattle in Western U.S. rangelands improves markers of animal metabolic health and nutritional compounds in beef. Sci. Rep., 14.
10.1038/s41598-024-71073-3 ↗54. (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products, and Repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 150, 1–92.
55. Comparison of the Sensory Characteristics of Suckling Lamb Meat: Organic vs. Conventional Production
10.17221/949-CJFS ↗56. Abdullah, F.A.A., and Hulánková, R. (2025, September 25). Comparison of Organic and Conventional Chicken Meat from the Consumer’s Perspective: Production Properties and Sensory Attributes. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348264990_Comparison_of_organic_and_conventional_chicken_meat_from_the_consumer’s_perspective_production_properties_and_sensory_attributes.
57. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: A hierarchical meta-analysis
10.1111/1365-2664.12219 ↗59. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities
61. Najdek, B.E., Chaaban, N., Therkildsen, M., and Andersen, B.V. (2024). The Impact of Storytelling about an Innovative and Sustainable Organic Beef Production System on Product Acceptance, Preference, and Satisfaction. Foods, 13.
10.3390/foods13182940 ↗62. Górska-Warsewicz, H., Żakowska-Biemans, S., Stangierska, D., Świątkowska, M., Bobola, A., and Krajewski, K. (2021). Factors Limiting the Development of the Organic Food Sector—Perspective of Processors, Distributors, and Retailers. Agriculture, 11.
10.3390/agriculture11090882 ↗65. Willer, H., and Lernoud, J. (2020). The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2020, IFOAM—Organics International.
66. FAO (2020). The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets 2020. Agricultural Markets and Sustainable Development: Global Value Chains, Smallholder Farmers and Digital Innovations, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/publications/soco/2020.
67. Insect-based protein sources and their potential for human consumption: Nutritional composition and processing
69. Perspektywa wykorzystania białka z owadów jako alternatywnego składnika pasz
72. Insect protein: A sustainable and healthy alternative to animal protein?
10.1093/jn/nxy315 ↗76. Edible insects as a protein source: A review of public perception, processing technology, and research trends
10.5851/kosfa.2019.e53 ↗78. Edible insect as an alternative protein source: A review on the chemistry and functionalities of proteins under different processing methods
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14831 ↗79. Garrido-Ortiz, E.R., and Morales-Camacho, J.I. (2025). Production of Protein Hydrolysates with Antioxidant and Antihypertensive Activity from Edible Larvae of Aegiale hesperiaris and Comadia redtenbacheri. Foods, 14.
10.3390/foods14122124 ↗81. Edible Insect Protein for Food Applications: Extraction, Composition, and Functional Properties
10.1111/jfpe.13362 ↗84. Are edible insects more or less ‘healthy’ than commonly consumed meats? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over- and undernutrition
10.1038/ejcn.2015.149 ↗87. The sustainability of industrial insect mass rearing for food and feed production: Zero waste goals through by-product utilization
10.1016/j.cois.2021.09.003 ↗88. Eurogroup for Animals (2021). Insect Farming: A False Solution for the EU’s Food System, Eurogroup for Animals. Available online: https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/files/eurogroupforanimals/2021-10/2021_10_29_pp_Insect%20farming_%20a%20false%20solution%20for%20the%20EU%27s%20food%20system_0.pdf.
89. Edible insects: Benefits and potential risk for consumers and the food industry
90. (2015). European Union Regulation
91. (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament of the Council of 25 November 2015 on Novel Foods. Off. J. Eur. Union, L327, 1-22.
92. Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., and Roos, N. (2018). What governs selection and acceptance of edible insect species?. Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-74011-9 ↗94. Munteanu, C., Mireşan, V., Răducu, C., Ihuţ, A., Uiuiu, P., Pop, D., Neacşu, A., Cenariu, M., and Groza, I. (2021). Can cultured meat be an alternative to farm animal production for a sustainable and healthier lifestyle?. Front. Nutr., 8.
10.3389/fnut.2021.749298 ↗95. Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market—A review
10.5713/ajas.20.0419 ↗100. Good Food Institute (2023). The Science of Cultivated Meat, GFI. Available online: https://gfi.org/science/the-science-of-cultivated-meat.