journal article·2025-11-04Open access

Animal Protein Sources in Europe: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives—A Review

Monika Marcinkowska-Lesiak, Michał Motrenko, Marcin Niewiadomski, Iga Głuszkiewicz, Iwona Wojtasik-Kalinowska, Ewa Poławska

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

The pursuit of sustainable animal protein sources is critical in light of the environmental, social, and economic challenges associated with conventional livestock production. Although meat, including organic production, remains a valuable source of high-quality protein, diversification is essential to sustainably meet future demand. This review summarizes current knowledge on alternative animal protein sources, with a particular focus on insects and cultured meat in Europe. Insects demonstrate high feed conversion efficiency, require minimal land and water resources, and provide essential amino acids, lipids, and micronutrients, while contributing to circular economy models. Cultured meat presents potential advantages for environmental sustainability and animal welfare; however, its large-scale application depends on technological advances, cost reduction, and supportive regulation. Consumer acceptance remains a challenge influenced by cultural heritage, food neophobia, and product presentation. Policy frameworks, including the European Green Deal and the Farm to Fork Strategy, seek to foster innovation and sustainable food systems. Future perspectives emphasize that conventional and organic meat, insect-based protein, and cultured meat should be regarded as complementary solutions for a balanced and resilient protein supply in Europe.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Insect Utilization and Effects · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Technique and Food Development, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c Street, 32, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

Department of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland

Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

Department of Genomics and Biodiversity, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, Postępu St. 36A, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Understanding Protein Functions in the Biological Context10.2174/0929866530666230507212638 ↗
2. Food proteins from animals and plants: Differences in the nutritional and functional properties10.1016/j.tifs.2021.12.020 ↗
3. Circular food system approaches can support current European protein intake levels while reducing land use and greenhouse gas emissions10.1038/s43016-024-00975-2 ↗
4. Ajomiwe, N., Boland, M., Phongthai, S., Bagiyal, M., Singh, J., and Kaur, L. (2024). Protein Nutrition: Understanding Structure, Digestibility, and Bioavailability for Optimal Health. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13111771 ↗
5. Determinants of amino acid bioavailability from ingested protein in relation to gut health
6. European Commission (2023). EU Agricultural Outlook for Markets, Income and Environment, 2023–2035, Publications Office of the European Union. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2024-01/agricultural-outlook-2023-report_en_0.pdf.
7. OECD/FAO (2024). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024–2033, OECD Publishing. Available online: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc9016en.
8. Eurostat (2023). Agricultural Production—Livestock and Meat, Eurostat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agricultural_production_-_livestock_and_meat.
9. ProVeg International, University of Copenhagen, and Ghent University (2023). Evolving Appetites: An In-Depth Look at European Attitudes Towards Plant-Based Eating. Smart Protein Project, ProVeg International. Available online: https://food.ku.dk/english/news/2023/most-europeans-are-reducing-their-meat-consumption-eu-funded-survey-finds.
10. Market Data Forecast (2023). Europe Meat Market Size, Share & Growth Report, 2023–2033, Market Data Forecast. Available online: https://www.marketdataforecast.com/market-reports/europe-meat-market.
11. Zhao, S., Qiu, H., and Yang, Z. (2023). Adjustment of meat consumption structure under the dual pressures of food security and low-carbon transformation: Evidence from China. Agriculture, 13.10.3390/agriculture13122242 ↗
12. The future of beef production in South America
13. Council of the European Union (1996). Council Directive 96/22/EC of 29 April 1996 Concerning the Prohibition on the Use in Stock-Farming of Certain Substances Having a Hormonal or Thyrostatic Action and of Beta-Agonists, and Repealing Directives 81/602/EEC, 88/146/EEC and 88/299/EEC. Off. J. Eur. Communities, L 125, 3–9.
14. US Congress (2025, May 02). The U.S.-EU Beef Hormone Dispute, Available online: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R40449.
15. Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 200510.3382/ps.2014-04291 ↗
16. An overview of beef production from pasture and feedlot globally, as demand for beef and the need for sustainable practices increase10.1016/j.animal.2021.100295 ↗
17. Ma, L., Wang, L., Zhang, Z., and Xiao, D. (2023). Research progress of biological feed in beef cattle. Animals, 13.10.3390/ani13162662 ↗
18. Garmyn, A. (2020). Consumer preferences and acceptance of meat products. Foods, 9.10.3390/foods9060708 ↗
19. Effect of fast-, medium- and slow-growing strains on meat quality of chickens reared under the organic farming method10.1017/S175173111000176X ↗
20. Comparison of Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, and Blood Parameters of Slow- and Fast-Grown Female Broiler Chickens Raised in Organic or Conventional Production System10.5713/ajas.15.0812 ↗
21. FAO (2025). Major Cuts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Livestock Within Reach, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/Major-cuts-of-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-livestock-within-reach/.
22. Cattle ranchers and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Production, location, and policies10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102280 ↗
23. Vidovic, N., and Vidovic, S. (2020). Antimicrobial resistance and food animals: Influence of livestock environment on the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics, 9.10.3390/antibiotics9020052 ↗
24. Sheffield, D., Fiorotto, M.L., and Davis, T.A. (2024). Nutritional contributions of animal-sourced foods: Implications for dietary adequacy and health. Front. Nutr., 11.10.3389/fnut.2024.1424912 ↗
25. High physiological demands in intensively raised pigs: Impact on health and welfare10.1017/S175173111000008X ↗
26. Breeding for better welfare: Genetic goals for broiler chickens and their parents10.7120/09627286.21.2.147 ↗
27. Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities10.1073/pnas.1220608110 ↗
28. The infectious disease trap of animal agriculture10.1126/sciadv.add6681 ↗
29. Keena, M., Meehan, M., and Scherer, T. (2022). Environmental Implications of Excess Fertilizer and Manure on Water Quality, NDSU Extension. Available online: https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/extension/publications/environmental-implications-excess-fertilizer-and-manure-water-quality.
30. Orzuna-Orzuna, J.F., Godina-Rodríguez, J.E., Garay-Martínez, J.R., Granados-Rivera, L.D., Maldonado-Jáquez, J.A., and Lara-Bueno, A. (2024). A Meta-Analysis of 3-Nitrooxypropanol Dietary Supplementation on Growth Performance, Ruminal Fermentation, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Beef Cattle. Fermentation, 10.10.3390/fermentation10060273 ↗
31. Economic-environmental assessment of silvo-pastoral systems in Colombia: An ecosystem service perspective10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19082 ↗
32. Hu, G., Do, D.N., Gray, J., and Miar, Y. (2020). Selection for Favorable Health Traits: A Potential Approach to Cope with Diseases in Farm Animals. Animals, 10.10.3390/ani10091717 ↗
33. Quality, safety and authenticity of insect protein-based food and feed: Insights from the INPROFF Project10.37349/eff.2024.00041 ↗
34. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2015). Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed. EFSA J., 13, 4257.10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257 ↗
35. Jaworska, D., and Sadowka, A. (2024). Strategies to improve the functional value of meat and meat products. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13152433 ↗
36. Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores10.1002/zoo.10031 ↗
37. Oonincx, D.G.A.B., and de Boer, I.J.M. (2012). Environmental impact of the production of mealworms as a protein source for humans–A life cycle assessment. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0051145 ↗
38. IFOAM (2025, June 01). Organics Europe. Biodiversity, Soil, and Water., Available online: https://www.organicseurope.bio/what-we-do/biodiversity-soil-water/.
39. Willer, H., Schlatter, B., and Trávníček, J. (2023). The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2023, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL.
40. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture10.1038/nature11069 ↗
41. Climate change impacts on global agricultural land availability10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014014 ↗
42. European Commission (2025, June 01). Control and Enforcement in Organic Farming. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/farming/organic-farming/controls_pl.
43. Health and welfare in organic livestock production systems—A systematic mapping of current knowledge
44. Composition differences between organic conventional meat: Asystematic literature review and meta-analysis10.1017/S0007114515005073 ↗
45. Growth, carcass and meat quality traits of pigs raised under organic or conventional rearing systems using commercially available feed mixtures
46. Nutritional properties of organic and conventional beef meat at retail10.1002/jsfa.9652 ↗
47. Alonso, M.E., González-Montaña, J.R., and Lomillos, J.M. (2020). Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare. Animals, 10.10.3390/ani10030385 ↗
48. Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001 ↗
49. Climate change impacts on global food security10.1126/science.1239402 ↗
50. Carbon footprint of conventional and organic beef production systems: An Italian case study10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.075 ↗
51. US grass-fed beef is as carbon intensive as industrial beef and ≈10-fold more intensive than common protein-dense alternatives10.1073/pnas.2404329122 ↗
52. A review of fatty acid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef10.1186/1475-2891-9-10 ↗
53. Evans, N., Cloward, J., Ward, R.E., van Wietmarschen, H.A., van Eekeren, N., Kronberg, S.L., Provenza, F.D., and van Vliet, S. (2024). Pasture-finishing of cattle in Western U.S. rangelands improves markers of animal metabolic health and nutritional compounds in beef. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-71073-3 ↗
54. (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products, and Repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 150, 1–92.
55. Comparison of the Sensory Characteristics of Suckling Lamb Meat: Organic vs. Conventional Production10.17221/949-CJFS ↗
56. Abdullah, F.A.A., and Hulánková, R. (2025, September 25). Comparison of Organic and Conventional Chicken Meat from the Consumer’s Perspective: Production Properties and Sensory Attributes. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348264990_Comparison_of_organic_and_conventional_chicken_meat_from_the_consumer’s_perspective_production_properties_and_sensory_attributes.
57. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: A hierarchical meta-analysis10.1111/1365-2664.12219 ↗
58. Organic farming and small-scale farmers: Main opportunities and challenges10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.016 ↗
59. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities
60. Organic agriculture and ecosystem services10.1016/j.envsci.2009.11.002 ↗
61. Najdek, B.E., Chaaban, N., Therkildsen, M., and Andersen, B.V. (2024). The Impact of Storytelling about an Innovative and Sustainable Organic Beef Production System on Product Acceptance, Preference, and Satisfaction. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13182940 ↗
62. Górska-Warsewicz, H., Żakowska-Biemans, S., Stangierska, D., Świątkowska, M., Bobola, A., and Krajewski, K. (2021). Factors Limiting the Development of the Organic Food Sector—Perspective of Processors, Distributors, and Retailers. Agriculture, 11.10.3390/agriculture11090882 ↗
63. Future Trends and Consumer Lifestyles with Regard to Meat Consumption10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.016 ↗
64. Reconsidering the Political Economy of Farm Animal Welfare: An Anatomy of Market Failure10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.006 ↗
65. Willer, H., and Lernoud, J. (2020). The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2020, IFOAM—Organics International.
66. FAO (2020). The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets 2020. Agricultural Markets and Sustainable Development: Global Value Chains, Smallholder Farmers and Digital Innovations, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/publications/soco/2020.
67. Insect-based protein sources and their potential for human consumption: Nutritional composition and processing
68. Nutritional value of insects and ways to manipulate their composition10.3920/JIFF2020.0050 ↗
69. Perspektywa wykorzystania białka z owadów jako alternatywnego składnika pasz
70. Allergic risks of consuming edible insects: A systematic review10.1002/mnfr.201700030 ↗
71. The use of edible insect proteins in food: Challenges and issues related to their functional properties10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102272 ↗
72. Insect protein: A sustainable and healthy alternative to animal protein?10.1093/jn/nxy315 ↗
73. Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: A review10.3920/JIFF2019.0017 ↗
74. Bioavailability of nutrients from edible insects10.1016/j.cofs.2021.08.003 ↗
75. Comparison of functional properties of edible insects and protein preparations thereof10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.058 ↗
76. Edible insects as a protein source: A review of public perception, processing technology, and research trends10.5851/kosfa.2019.e53 ↗
77. Functional properties of insect proteins10.59783/aire.2024.38 ↗
78. Edible insect as an alternative protein source: A review on the chemistry and functionalities of proteins under different processing methods10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14831 ↗
79. Garrido-Ortiz, E.R., and Morales-Camacho, J.I. (2025). Production of Protein Hydrolysates with Antioxidant and Antihypertensive Activity from Edible Larvae of Aegiale hesperiaris and Comadia redtenbacheri. Foods, 14.10.3390/foods14122124 ↗
80. Extraction and Characterization of Protein Fractions from Five Insect Species10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.115 ↗
81. Edible Insect Protein for Food Applications: Extraction, Composition, and Functional Properties10.1111/jfpe.13362 ↗
82. Techno-Functional Properties of Edible Insect Proteins and Effects of Processing10.1016/j.cocis.2021.101508 ↗
83. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects10.1002/mnfr.201200735 ↗
84. Are edible insects more or less ‘healthy’ than commonly consumed meats? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over- and undernutrition10.1038/ejcn.2015.149 ↗
85. State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 ↗
86. Mealworms for Food: A Water Footprint Perspective10.3390/w7116190 ↗
87. The sustainability of industrial insect mass rearing for food and feed production: Zero waste goals through by-product utilization10.1016/j.cois.2021.09.003 ↗
88. Eurogroup for Animals (2021). Insect Farming: A False Solution for the EU’s Food System, Eurogroup for Animals. Available online: https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/files/eurogroupforanimals/2021-10/2021_10_29_pp_Insect%20farming_%20a%20false%20solution%20for%20the%20EU%27s%20food%20system_0.pdf.
89. Edible insects: Benefits and potential risk for consumers and the food industry
90. (2015). European Union Regulation
91. (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament of the Council of 25 November 2015 on Novel Foods. Off. J. Eur. Union, L327, 1-22.
92. Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., and Roos, N. (2018). What governs selection and acceptance of edible insect species?. Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-74011-9 ↗
93. Edible insects as future food: Chances and challenges10.1016/j.jfutfo.2021.10.001 ↗
94. Munteanu, C., Mireşan, V., Răducu, C., Ihuţ, A., Uiuiu, P., Pop, D., Neacşu, A., Cenariu, M., and Groza, I. (2021). Can cultured meat be an alternative to farm animal production for a sustainable and healthier lifestyle?. Front. Nutr., 8.10.3389/fnut.2021.749298 ↗
95. Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market—A review10.5713/ajas.20.0419 ↗
96. Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y ↗
97. In vitro edible muscle protein production system (MPPS): Stage 1, fish10.1016/S0094-5765(02)00033-4 ↗
98. Growing semi-living sculptures: The Tissue Culture & Art Project10.1162/002409402760181123 ↗
99. Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010 ↗
100. Good Food Institute (2023). The Science of Cultivated Meat, GFI. Available online: https://gfi.org/science/the-science-of-cultivated-meat.