Finite Element Analysis on Stress Development in Alveolar Bone During Insertion of a Novel Dental Implant Design
Source abstract
Abstract
A novel macrodesign for a dental implant characterized by a non-monotonic variation in core diameter and thread shape has been described to produce lower stress levels during insertion as compared to conventional tapered implants. Two finite element models resembling the lower left molar region with preformed osteotomies were created based on a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Insertion of both the novel and the conventional, tapered implant type were simulated using Standard for the Exchange of Product model data (STEP) files of both implant types. Von Mises equivalent stress, strain development, and amount of redistributed bone were recorded. The conventional implant demonstrated a continuous increase in strain values and reaction moment throughout the insertion process, with a brief decrease observed during the final stages. Stress levels in the cortical bone gradually increased, followed by a reduction when the implant was finally positioned subcrestally. The novel implant achieved the maximum magnitude of reaction moment and cortical bone strain values when the implant’s maximum core diameter passed the cortical bone layer at around 60% of the insertion process. Following a notable decrease, both the reaction moment and stress started to rise again as the implant penetrated further. The novel implant removed more bones in the trabecular region while the conventional implant predominantly interacted with cortical bone. Overall, the novel design seems to be less traumatic to alveolar bone during the insertion process and hence may lead to reduced levels of initial peri-implant bone loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Materials Simulation, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 90762 Fürth, Germany
Department of Prosthodontics, Philipps University Marburg, 35039 Marburg, Germany
Funding
AlfaGate, Bonn, Germany
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Integrative Performance Analysis of a Novel Bone Level Tapered Implant10.1177/0022034515624443 ↗
2. Relationship Between Primary/Mechanical and Secondary/Biological Implant Stability10.11607/jomi.19suppl.g1 ↗
3. Effects of Drilling Protocol and Bone Density on the Stability of Implants According to Different Macrogeometries of the Implant Used: Results of an In Vitro Study10.11607/jomi.8176 ↗
4. Primary stability, insertion torque, and bone density of conical implants with internal hexagon: Is there a relationship?10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827c9e01 ↗
5. Effect of Osteotomy Preparation on Osseointegration of Immediately Loaded, Tapered Dental Implants10.1177/0022034515624446 ↗
6. Tapered Implants in Dentistry: Revitalizing Concepts with Technology: A Review10.1177/0022034516628868 ↗
7. Mechanical stress during implant surgery and its effects on marginal bone: A literature review
8. Paeßens, K., van Bebber, L., Zipprich, H., and Weigl, P. (2025). Effect of Irrigation, Bur Size and Rotational Speed on Thermographic Heat at Implant Site Osteotomy Interface. An In Vitro Study. Clin. Oral Implants Res.10.1111/clr.14462 ↗
9. Effects of Different Implant Osteotomy Preparation Sizes on Implant Stability and Bone Response in the Minipig Mandible10.11607/jomi.4165 ↗
10. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x ↗
11. Influence of implant geometry and osteotomy design on early bone healing: A pre-clinical in vivo study10.1111/clr.13816 ↗
12. Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants10.1111/prd.12176 ↗
13. Initial stability and bone strain evaluation of the immediately loaded dental implant: An in vitro model study10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01983.x ↗
14. Yin, X., Li, J., Hoffmann, W., Gasser, A., Brunski, J.B., and Helms, J.A. (2019). Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design. J. Clin. Med., 8.10.3390/jcm8040427 ↗
15. Clinical and radiographic assessment of circular versus triangular cross-section neck Implants in the posterior maxilla: A 1-year randomized controlled trial10.1111/clr.13624 ↗
16. Clinical and radiographic assessment of circular versus triangular cross-section neck implants in the posterior maxilla: Five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial10.1111/clr.14082 ↗
17. Schulz, A., Klär, V., Grobecker-Karl, T., and Karl, M. (2023). Biomechanical Rationale for a Novel Implant Design Reducing Stress on Buccal Bone. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010666 ↗
18. Relative Contribution of Trabecular and Cortical Bone to Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Model Study10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00322 ↗
19. Modeling dental implant insertion10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.021 ↗
20. Klär, V., Zimmerer, R., Schulz, A., and Lethaus, B. (2023). Biomechanical performance of a novel implant design in simulated extraction sites and sinuslift procedures. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13137541 ↗
21. Erbel, C., Laschke, M.W., Grobecker-Karl, T., and Karl, M. (2025). Preclinical performance of a novel dental implant design reducing mechanical stress in cortical bone. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16030102 ↗
22. Finite element analysis in implant dentistry: State of the art and future directions10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.002 ↗
23. González-Mederos, P., Rodríguez-Guerra, J., González, J.E., Picardo, A., and Torres, Y. (2025). A Finite Element Analysis of a New Dental Implant Design: The Influence of the Diameter, Length, and Material of an Implant on Its Biomechanical Behavior. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18122692 ↗
24. Salehivaziri, H., Yousefimanesh, H., Hagh, L.G., and Jahangirnezhad, M. (2025). Evaluation of the Effects of Diameter, Length, Splinted or Non- Splinted Forms, and Crown-to-Implant Ratio on the Stress Distribution around Extra-Short Implants in the Posterior Mandible: Finite Element Analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant., 1–20.10.11607/jomi.11298 ↗
25. (2024, September 16). CBCT scan of mandible, Salvatori, G. Available online: https://www.embodi3d.com/files/file/60927-quiste-dental-12.
26. Cortical bone thickness in dentate and edentulous human cadavers10.1902/jop.2007.060342 ↗
27. Dynamic modelling and simulation of dental implant insertion process—A finite element study10.1016/j.finel.2011.03.005 ↗
28. Bone stress and damage distributions during dental implant insertion: A novel dynamic FEM analysis10.1080/10255842.2021.2012765 ↗
29. A Review on Recent Advances in the Constitutive Modeling of Bone Tissue10.1007/s11914-020-00631-1 ↗
30. ABAQUS (2025, July 25). Analysis User’s Manual (v6.6), Chapter 19.2.2 (Damage Initiation for Ductile Metals). Available online: https://classes.engineering.wustl.edu/2009/spring/mase5513/abaqus/docs/v6.6/books/usb/default.htm?startat=pt05ch19s02abm38.html.
31. Antonelli, A., Barone, S., Attanasio, F., Salviati, M., Cerra, M.G., Calabria, E., Bennardo, F., and Giudice, A. (2023). Effect of Implant Macro-Design and Magnetodynamic Surgical Preparation on Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Investigation. Dent. J., 11.10.3390/dj11100227 ↗
32. Mojaver, S., Patel, N., Sarmiento, H., and Fiorellini, J.P. (2025). Under pressure: Unraveling the impact of occlusal overload on peri-implant health—A systematic review. J. Prosthodont.10.1111/jopr.14088 ↗
33. Introduction to ISO 10303—The STEP Standard for Product Data Exchange10.1115/1.1354995 ↗