journal article·2025-07-10Open access

Ultimate Capacity of a GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Bridge Barrier–Deck Anchorage Subjected to Transverse Loading

Gledis Dervishhasani, Khaled Sennah, Hamdy M. Afefy, Ahmed Diab

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14

Abstract

This paper outlines a structural qualification process to assess the use of newly developed high-modulus (HM) glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars with headed ends in the joint between concrete bridge barriers and decks. The main goals of the study are to evaluate the structural performance of GFRP-reinforced TL-5 barrier–deck systems under transverse loading and to determine the pullout capacity of GFRP anchorage systems for both new construction and retrofit applications. The research is divided into two phases. In the first phase, six full-scale Test-Level 5 (TL-5) barrier wall–deck specimens, divided into three systems, were constructed and tested up to failure. The first system used headed-end GFRP bars to connect the barrier wall to a non-deformable thick deck slab. The second system was similar to the first but had a deck slab overhang for improved anchorage. The third system utilized postinstalled GFRP bars in a non-deformable thick deck slab, bonded with a commercial epoxy adhesive as a solution for deteriorated barrier replacement. The second phase involves an experimental program to evaluate the pullout strength of the GFRP bar anchorage in normal-strength concrete. The experimental results from the tested specimens were then compared to the factored applied moments in existing literature based on traffic loads in the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. Experimental results confirmed that GFRP-reinforced TL-5 barrier–deck systems exceeded factored design moments, with capacity-to-demand ratios above 1.38 (above 1.17 with the inclusion of an environmental reduction factor of 0.85). A 195 mm embedment length proved sufficient for both pre- and postinstalled bars. Headed-end GFRP bars improved pullout strength compared to straight-end bars, especially when bonded. Failure modes occurred at high loads, demonstrating structural integrity. Postinstalled bars bonded with epoxy performed comparably to preinstalled bars. A design equation for the barrier resistance due to a diagonal concrete crack at the barrier–deck corner was developed and validated using experimental findings. This equation offers a conservative and safe design approach for evaluating barrier–deck anchorage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Department, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada

Construction Engineering and Management Department, Faculty of Engineering, Pharos University, Alexandria 21648, Egypt

Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. Corrosion Performance of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel: North American Experience10.1016/0950-0618(95)00028-3 ↗
2. Performance of Epoxy-Coated Rebars in Bridge Decks
3. Lai, D., and Raven, R. (2010, January 3–6). Performance of Epoxy Coated Reinforcement in Bridge Barriers Subjected to Direct Salt Splashing. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada. Paper # 76.
4. Bond characteristics of straight- and headed-end ribbed-surface GFRP bars embedded in high-strength concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.025 ↗
5. Bond performance of sand-coated and ribbed-surface glass fiber reinforced polymer bars in high-performance concrete10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.060 ↗
6. Khederzadeh, H., and Sennah, K. (June, January 29). Pullout Strength of Pre-installed GFRP Bars in Concrete. Proceedings of the CSCE Annual Conference, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montreal, QC, Canada.
7. Bend strength of FRP stirrups: Comparison and evaluation of testing methods10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000050 ↗
8. Bond Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars under Direct Pullout Conditions10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(173) ↗
9. Experimental Study of Bond Behavior between Concrete and FRP Bars using a Pull-out Test10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.07.003 ↗
10. Effect of Fibers on the Bonds between FRP Reinforcing Bars and High-Strength Concrete10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.005 ↗
11. Analytical Bond Model for GFRP Bars to Steel Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000399 ↗
12. Bond Stress-Slip Behavior: Case of GFRP Bars in Geopolymer Concrete10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001046 ↗
13. Pullout Behavior of GFRP bars with Anchor in Geopolymer Concrete10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.021 ↗
14. Ametrano, D. (2011). Bond Characteristics of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Bars Embedded in High Strength and Ultra-High Strength Concrete. [Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University].
15. Mak, C. (2011). Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Tension Lap Splices in Ultra High Performance Concrete. [Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University].
16. Local Bond-Slip Response of GFRP Rebar in Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.055 ↗
17. Structural Behavior of Full-Depth Deck Panels Having Developed Closure Strips Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Filled with UHPFRC
18. Fatigue and Ultimate Strength Evaluation of GFRP-Reinforced, Laterally Restrained, Full-Depth Precast Deck Panels with Developed UHPFRC Filled Transverse Closure Strips
19. Bond Between Carbon Fibre-reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Bars and Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC): Experimental study10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.006 ↗
20. Evaluation of Physical and Durability Characteristics of New Headed Glass-Fiber-Reinforced-Polymer (GFRP) Bars10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000738 ↗
21. Investigation of Bond Properties of Alternate Anchorage Schemes for Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars
22. Vint, L. (2012). Investigation of Bond Properties of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars in Concrete under Direct Tension. [Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto].
23. Mohamed, H., Zaki, M., and Benmokrane, B. (2012, January 6–9). Newly Developed FRP-Headed Rebars for Infrastructure Applications. Proceedings of the 3rd International Structural Specialty Conference, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
24. Bond characteristics of glass fiber reinforced polymer bars in high-strength concrete10.1680/jstbu.19.00230 ↗
25. Experimental Investigation of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Normal-Strength Concrete Beams
26. Development of Cost-Effective PL-3 Concrete Bridge Barrier Reinforced with Sand-Coated GFRP Bars: Vehicle Crash Test10.1139/cjce-2013-0393 ↗
27. Structural Qualification of a Developed GFRP-Reinforced PL-3 Concrete Bridge Barrier Using Vehicle Crash Testing
28. Structural Qualification of a Developed GFRP-Reinforced PL-3 Concrete Bridge Barrier Using Ultimate Load Testing10.1186/s40069-018-0284-1 ↗
29. Ultimate capacity of barrier-deck anchorage in MTQ TL-5 barrier reinforced with headed-end, high-modulus, sand-coated GFRP bars10.1139/cjce-2017-0002 ↗
30. Development of Cost-Effective PL-3 Concrete Bridge Barrier Reinforced with Sand-Coated GFRP Bars: Static Load Tests10.1139/cjce-2013-0394 ↗
31. Performance of a Developed TL-5 Concrete Bridge Barrier Reinforced with GFRP Hooked Bars: Vehicle Crash Testing10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001184 ↗
32. Experimental Study on the Transverse Load Carrying Capacity of TL-5 Bridge Barrier Reinforced with Special Profile GFRP Bars10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000929 ↗
33. Hasaballa, M., and El-Salakawy, E. (2012, January 2–4). Seismic performance of beam-column joints reinforced with GFRP headed bars. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP Is Structures (APFIS 2012), Sapporo, Japan.
34. El-Badry, M., Moravvej, M., and Joulani, P. (2017, January 13–15). Performance of a Hybrid FRP-Reinforced Bridge Truss Girder System – Experimental Assessment. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment, and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures, SMAR 2017, Zurich, Switzerland.
35. Long-term tensile performance of GFRP bars in loaded concrete and aggressive solutions10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105587 ↗
36. Zhu, P., Li, Z., Zhu, Y., Wu, Y., and Qu, W. (2023). Prediction of the Long-Term Tensile Strength of GFRP Bars in Concrete. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13041035 ↗
37. Durability of FRP-to-concrete bonded joints subjected to 110 months of accelerated laboratory and field exposure10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117681 ↗
38. Durability of concrete-encapsulated GFRP bars subjected to seawater immersion
39. Review on the bond behavior and durability of FRP bars to concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123042 ↗
40. Bond Behavior of GFRP-Concrete Under Long-term Exposure to Aggressive Environments10.3151/jact.18.730 ↗
41. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2023). MASH Railing Load Requirements for Bridge Deck Overhang. NCHRP Research Report 1078, The National Academies Press.
42. Frosch, R.J., and Morel, A.J. (2016). Guardrails for Use on Historic Bridges: Volume 2—Bridge Deck Overhang Design, Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2016/34; Joint Transportation Research Program, Purdue University.10.5703/1288284316361 ↗
43. Concrete Roadside Barrier Anchorage Details for 5-in., Cast-in-Place Decks on Prestressed Beams10.3141/2313-04 ↗
44. Impact resistance performance of precast reinforced concrete barriers with grouted sleeve and steel angle-to-plate connections10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118533 ↗
45. Nguyen, Q.T., Maki, T., Mutsuyoshi, H., and Ishihara, Y. (2023). Experimental Study on Connection Between Precast Concrete Barrier and Existing Bridge Deck by Loop Steel Bars and Post-installed Anchor. International Symposium of the International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-32511-3_152 ↗
46. Optimal design for the connector of bridge prefabricated concrete barriers10.1177/00368504211036386 ↗
47. Alaywan, W.R. (2018). Performance and Analysis of Concrete Bridge Railing Using Conventional and Composite Reinforcement Materials, Louisiana Transportation Research Center. Report No. FHWA/LA.16/547.
48. Azimi, H., Grégoire, M., Liu, Z., and Bahous, A. (August, January 31). A Precast Barrier Alternative Connected to Moment Slab for Accelerated Construction. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
49. Ecklund, A., and Sritharan, S. (2018). Precast Concrete Bridge Barriers for Accelerated Bridge Construction, Iowa State University. Technical Report.
50. Development of Precast Concrete Barrier Wall System for Bridge Decks
51. Effect of Beam Depth on Anchorage Strength of Hooked and Headed Bars
52. A Study of the Bolt Connection System for a Concrete Barrier of a Modular Bridge
53. Connection of Concrete Railing Post and Bridge Deck with Internal FRP Reinforcement10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:1(66) ↗
54. Full-scale tests on bridge kerbs subjected to horizontal actions10.1002/suco.202000538 ↗
55. Cattaneo, S., and Crespi, P. (2019). Response of Connections between Concrete Corbels and Safety Barriers. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12244103 ↗
56. Steel Post-and-Beam Barrier with GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Curb and Bridge Deck Connection10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000470 ↗
57. Bridge Deck-Guardrail Anchorage Detailing for Sustainable Construction10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000613 ↗
58. Farghal, H., Arvan, H., and Azizinamini, A. (2025). Use of All Lightweight Concrete in Conjunction with UHPC Connection for Prefabricated Barrier System, Florida International University. Technical Report No. ABC-UTC-2016-C4-FIU02.
59. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Prefabricated Concrete Barrier Systems Using Ultra-High-Performance Concrete10.1177/03611981231162591 ↗
60. Rostami, M., Sennah, K., Azimi, H., and Afefy, H. (2025). Behavior and design of GFRP bar adhesive anchors under direct tension for deteriorated concrete bridge barrier replacement. Adv. Struct. Eng.10.1177/13694332251334830 ↗
61. Anchorage Capacity of Concrete Bridge Barriers Reinforced with GFRP Bars with Headed Ends10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000606 ↗
62. (2019). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (Standard No. CAN/CSA-S6:19).
63. Diab, A., Sennah, K., Rostami, M., Dervishhasani, G., and Sayed Ahmed, M. (2024, January 5–7). Development of live load moment and tension force in bridge deck slab overhang due to transverse vehicle impact for CHBDC 2025. Proceedings of the CSCE Annual Conference, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada.
64. Omar, O. (2024). Investigation of Moment and Tension Force in Bridge Deck Slab Overhang in Slab-on-Girder Bridge Due to Traffic Loading, M.Eng. Project Report; Civil Engineering Department, Toronto Metropolitan University.
65. MTO (2018). Structural Manual, Ministry of Transportation Ontario, Transportation Infrastructure Management Division, Standards and Contracts Branch Structures Office.
66. Hilti Canada Corporation (2016). HIT-RE 500 V3 Epoxy Adhesive Anchoring System. North American Product Technical Guide—Volume 2: Anchor Fastening Technical Guide, Hilti Corporation. [17th ed.].
67. (2018). Specification for Fibre Reinforced Polymers (Standard No. CSA-S807:18).
68. B&B FRP Manufacturing Inc. (2016, November 23). MST-BAR® GIII Material Specification. B&B Manufacturing Inc. Available online: https://www.bandbfrp.com/.
69. Reinforced concrete corners and joints subjected to bending moment10.1061/JSDEAG.0004362 ↗
70. (2024). Design of Concrete Structures (Standard No. CAN/CSA-A23.3:24).
71. Effect of the Environment on the Performance of GFRP Reinforcing Bars10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.037 ↗
72. AASHTO (2018). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Guide Specifications for GFRP-Reinforced Concrete, American Association of State Highway and Building Officials (AASHTO).
73. A Reconsideration of the Environmental Reduction Factor CE for GFRP Reinforcing Bars10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001040 ↗
74. (2024). Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars (Standard No. ACI 440.1R-24).
75. (2015). Standard Test Methods for Strength of Anchors in Concrete Elements (Standard No. ASTM E488/E488M-15).