Assessment of Carbon Neutrality Performance of Buildings Using EPD-Certified Korean Construction Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Achieving carbon neutrality in the building sector is essential for addressing the global climate crisis. However, the production stage—which contributes to over 29% of a building’s life cycle carbon emissions (CE)—poses significant challenges for consistent carbon performance assessment due to the diversity of building materials and the uniqueness of individual building projects. These factors often lead to inconsistent evaluation results across assessors and the fragmented management of carbon data at the project level. This study proposes the Zero Carbon Building Index (ZCBI), a quantitative assessment method that incorporates embodied carbon from raw material extraction, transportation, and manufacturing. ZCBI enables the evaluation of carbon neutrality performance at the material level and supports the identification of reduction potentials in the production stage. A classification system was developed to evaluate CE during production, creating reference buildings for residential and non-residential purposes. Additionally, a Korean Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) database was established by incorporating CE data from 797 EPD-certified materials. Carbon reduction (CR) and ZCBI values were analyzed by categorizing CE variations across manufacturers into the lowest, average, and highest values. The results showed that CR for apartment complexes ranged from 42.1 to 311 kgCO2e/m2, with ZCBI values between 8.84% and 65.30%, and those for business facilities ranged from 40.9 to 264 kgCO2e/m2, with ZCBI values from 8.59% and 55.43. The proposed ZCBI framework provides a basis for optimizing material selection to reduce emissions and may evolve into a comprehensive carbon neutrality assessment covering the entire construction process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Building Design and Assessment · Facilities and Workplace Management · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sustainable Smartcity Research Center (BK21 Four Sustainable Smart City Convergence Educational Research Group), Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangrok-gu, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
School of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangrok-gu, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
Funding
Hanyang University
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P.R., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W., Pan, C., and Pidcock, R. (2018). Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5 C in the Context of Sustainable Development, Global Warming of 1.5 C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 C Above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, in press.
2. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C10.1038/nature18307 ↗
3. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2014). Annual Energy Outlook—Fossil Fuels Remain Dominant Through 2040.
4. United Nations (2025, March 30). Net Zero Coalition. United Nations Climate Change, Available online: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition.
5. (2025, March 30). WMO Confirms 2024 as Warmest Year on Record at About 1.55 °C Above Pre-Industrial Level. World Meteorological Organization. Available online: https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-confirms-2024-warmest-year-record-about-155degc-above-pre-industrial-level.
6. A year above 1.5 °C signals that Earth is most probably within the 20-year period that will reach the Paris Agreement limit10.1038/s41558-025-02246-9 ↗
7. Ministry of Environment (ME) (2024, March 30). Discussion on the National Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals. 2050 Carbon Neutrality Promotion Committee, Available online: https://www.2050cnc.go.kr/base/board/read?boardManagementNo=4&boardNo=101&page.
8. Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) (2024, November 30). Korean New Deal. Ministry of Economy and Finance, Available online: https://english.moef.go.kr/pc/selectTbPressCenterDtl.do?boardCd=N0001&seq=4948.
9. Ministry of Environment (ME) (2025, March 30). Framework Act on Carbon Neutrality and Green Growth for Coping with Climate Crisis, Available online: https://law.go.kr/LSW/eng/engLsSc.do?menuId=2§ion=lawNm&query=carbon+neutral&x.
10. Wang, S. (2023). A Study on Carbon Neutral Building Certification System Based on Building Life Cycle Assessment. [Doctoral Thesis, Hanyang University].
11. A comprehensive review of building lifecycle carbon emissions and assessment methods
12. Lee, J., and Woo, J. (2020). Green New Deal policy of South Korea: Policy innovation for a sustainability transition. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su122310191 ↗
13. World Green Building Council (2021). Advancing Net Zero: Embodied Carbon, World Green Building Council. Available online: https://worldgbc.org/advancing-net-zero/embodied-carbon/.
14. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2025, March 30). Systematic Review of Embodied Carbon Assessment and Reduction Methodologies, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.1324.pdf.
15. Embodied GHG Emissions of Buildings—The Hidden Challenge for Effective Climate Change Mitigation10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107 ↗
16. Chen, C., Zhao, Z., Xiao, J., and Tiong, R. (2021). A Conceptual Framework for Estimating Building Embodied Carbon Based on Digital Twin Technology and Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132413875 ↗
17. Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) (2025, April 30). EPD Certification Status. KEITI EcoSquare, Available online: https://ecosq.or.kr/websquare.do#w2xPath=/ui/cer/ic/oh/ICOH110M01.xml&valVl.
18. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT) (2024, December 31). Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) Manual. KITC G-SEED Website. Available online: http://www.gseed.or.kr/greenCommentary.do.
19. Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) (2025, April 30). Introduction to the LCI Database. KEITI EcoSquare, Available online: https://ecosq.or.kr/websquare.do#w2xPath=/ui/cer/ic/oh/ICOH110M01.xml.
20. The Role of Environmental Product Declarations in the Decarbonization of the Construction Industry
21. Wang, S.J., Tae, S.H., and Kim, R.H. (2019). Development of a Green Building Materials Integrated Platform Based on Materials and Resources in G-SEED in South Korea. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11236532 ↗
22. Characterization of environmental labels beyond the criteria of ISO 14020-series
23. (2022). Environmental Statements and Programes for Products—Principles and General Requirements (Standard No. ISO 14020).
24. (2016). Environmental Labels and Declarations—Self-Declared Environmental Claims (Type II Environmental Labelling) (Standard No. ISO 14021).
25. (1999). Environmental Labels and Declarations-Type I Environmental Labelling-Principles and Procedures (Standard No. ISO 14024:1999).
26. (2006). Environmental Labels and Declarations—Type III Environmental Declarations—Principles and Procedures (Standard No. ISO 14025).
27. Evaluating the efficiency of green innovation and marketing strategies for long-term sustainability in the context of environmental labeling10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141870 ↗
28. Kuznetsova, M., and Kuznetsov, A. (2021). Ecolabeling as a policy instrument for more sustainable development. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13179581 ↗
29. Nikolay, M., Vanessa, B., and Matthias, F. (2018). Characterization of the cradle to cradle certified™ products program in the context of eco-labels and environmental declarations. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10030738 ↗
30. Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) (2025, April 30). Maximum Allowable Carbon Emissions Standard. KEITI EcoSquare, Available online: https://ecosq.or.kr/websquare.do#w2xPath=/ui/cer/ic/oh/ICOH110M03.xml&valVl.
31. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040).
32. (2020). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044:2006/Amd 2:2020).
33. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT) (2018). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Preparation Guideline, KITC. Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) Manual.
34. The Study on Environmental Impacts of Building Using Life Cycle Assessment of G-SEED10.62765/kjlca.2018.19.1.15 ↗
35. Evaluating the embodied environmental impacts of major building tasks and materials of apartment buildings in Korea10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.081 ↗
36. Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: A case study on building assessment10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.025 ↗
37. Comparison of generic and product-specific Life Cycle Assessment databases: Application to construction materials used in building LCA studies10.1007/s11367-015-0938-z ↗
38. LCA databases focused on construction materials: A review10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.243 ↗
39. Mohebbi, G., Bahadori-Jahromi, A., Ferri, M., and Mylona, A. (2021). The Role of Embodied Carbon Databases in the Accuracy of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Calculations for the Embodied Carbon of Buildings. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13147988 ↗
40. Jang, H.J., Wang, S.J., Tae, S.H., and Zheng, P.F. (2024). Establishment of an Environmental Impact Factor Database for Building Materials to Support Building Life Cycle Assessments in China. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14010228 ↗
41. Zheng, J.-F., Lu, Z.-P., Ding, Y., Guo, Z.-Z., and Zhou, S.-X. (2025). Management of Carbon Emissions Throughout the Building Life Cycle Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15040592 ↗
42. Ministry of Environment (ME) (2025, April 30). National LCI DB Development Guideline, Available online: https://ecosq.or.kr/websquare.do#w2xPath=/ui/com/nn/oe/NNOE100M02.xml&tmpltNo=BBS0085&bbsSn=5050&twdcvlnTaskSeCd=&tabId=tabs&menuSn=80010104&lgcyTabId=tabs&lgcyPageIdx=0&lgcyTwdcvlnBbsLclsfCd=&lgcyRecsroomMclsfCd=&lgcySrchCondt=SRCH_ALL&lgcySrchCondtCn=LCI.
43. Kim, H.S. (2022). Proposal of a Methodology for Evaluating the Life Cycle Assessment Using the Standard Quantity of Building Materials Based on Probabilistic Analysis Techniques. [Master’s Thesis, Hanyang University].10.3390/ma15124103 ↗