journal article·2025-05-09Open access

Conversion of Kitchen Waste into Sustainable Fertilizers: Comparative Effectiveness of Biological, Microbial, and Thermal Treatments in a Ryegrass Growth Trial

Ksawery Kuligowski, Izabela Konkol, Lesław Świerczek, Adrian Woźniak, Adam Cenian

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

This study investigated the conversion of kitchen waste into environmentally friendly fertilizers and soil improvers using five various treatments: (1) inoculation with effective microorganisms followed by anaerobic fermentation, (2) 12 days of decay before adding a double dose of effective microbes, (3) sterilization at 70 °C for 1 h after 12 days of decay, and (4) sterilization followed by effective microbes addition. In (5), waste was decayed, sterilized, and digested without effective microbes. For comparison, a commercial NPK fertilizer and pelleted cow manure were also applied. These treatments were tested in a ryegrass growth experiment in a glasshouse under warm conditions in northern Poland, with four successive harvests. Measurements included dry matter yield, N uptake, N utilization per hectare, and soil properties. Results showed that granulated cow manure and (5) were the most effective fertilizers during the first two months, while other kitchen waste treatments performed better in months 3 and 4, functioning as slow-release fertilizers. The relative agronomic effectiveness after four months was 88%, 67.8%, 60.2%, 48.6%, and 48.6% for (5), (4), (2), (3), and (1), respectively, compared to cow manure, and 36.3%, 27.9%, 24.8%, 20%, and 20% compared to NPK fertilizer. The study indicated that using a double dose of effective microbes produced yields comparable to sterilized waste, suggesting that microbial treatments could replace energy-intensive sterilization, reducing costs. Soil properties were largely unaffected, but residual soil N levels increased from 0.5 to 1.1 g/kg.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques · Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management · Turfgrass Adaptation and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Air and Water Purification Department, The Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery Polish Academy of Sciences, Fiszera 14 St., 80-231 Gdansk, Poland

Rendben Ltd., Wiczlińska 117 M, 81-578 Gdynia, Poland

Funding

European Regional Development Fund · Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego (Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland) within the “Projekty Międzynarodowe Współfinansowane” (International Projects Co-financed) Programme · #049 INTERREG Baltic Sea Region ‘Circular Nutrients for the Baltic Sea Region’ CiNURGi Project · COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Sadhukhan, J., Dugmore, T.I.J., Matharu, A., Martinez-Hernandez, E., Aburto, J., Rahman, P.K.S.M., and Lynch, J. (2020). Perspectives on “Game Changer” Global Challenges for Sustainable 21st Century: Plant-Based Diet, Unavoidable Food Waste Biorefining, and Circular Economy. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12051976 ↗
2. New Environmentally Friendly Bio-Based Micronutrient Fertilizer by Biosorption: From Laboratory Studies to the Field10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136061 ↗
3. Bioprocessing to Upcycle Agro-Industrial and Food Wastes into High-Nutritional Value Animal Feed for Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107325 ↗
4. Estimation of Nutritional Composition of Kitchen Wastes and Comparison of the Effect of Different Drying Methods on Bioactive Compounds in the Wastes10.1016/j.foohum.2023.11.002 ↗
5. Food Waste: Analysis of the Complex and Variable Composition of a Promising Feedstock for Valorisation10.1016/j.fbp.2024.08.012 ↗
6. Anaerobic Digestion and Recycling of Kitchen Waste: A Review10.1007/s10311-022-01408-x ↗
7. New Opportunities for Agricultural Digestate Valorization: Current Situation and Perspectives10.1039/C5EE01633A ↗
8. Nutrient Recovery from Digestate of Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Manure: A Review10.1007/s40726-018-0082-z ↗
9. Recovery of Ammonium from Digestate as Fertilizer10.2166/wpt.2017.049 ↗
10. Agronomic Characteristics of Five Different Urban Waste Digestates10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.001 ↗
11. Post-Treatment of Food Waste Digestate towards Land Application: A Review10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127033 ↗
12. Quantitative Analysis of the Three Main Genera in Effective Microorganisms Using QPCR10.1007/s11814-013-0274-6 ↗
13. Evaluation of Effective Microorganisms on Home Scale Organic Waste Composting10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.019 ↗
14. Higa, T., and Parr, J.F. (1994). Beneficial and Effective Microorganisms for a Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, International Nature Farming Research Center.
15. Effective Microorganisms, Turmeric (Curcuma Longa), and Their Combination on Performance and Economic Benefits in Broilers10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09568 ↗
16. Effects of Integrated Use of Residual Sulfur-Enhanced Biochar with Effective Microorganisms on Soil Properties, Plant Growth and Short-Term Productivity of Capsicum annuum under Salt Stress10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108930 ↗
17. By Reconstructing a Multifunctional Intensive Microbiome, Effective Microorganisms (EM) Improve the Ecological Environment of Rice-Crayfish Cocropping10.1016/j.agee.2023.108698 ↗
18. Do Effective Microorganisms and Supermagro Fertilizers Improve Gladiolus Quality?10.1016/j.sajb.2023.08.006 ↗
19. Effect of Micronutrients, Rhizobium, Salicylic Acid, and Effective Microorganisms in Plant Growth and Yield Characteristics of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] in Rupandehi, Nepal10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26821 ↗
20. Production of Health Drink Using Effective Microorganisms and Medicinal Plant Extracts
21. Model Study on Bioremediation Process for the Treatment of Polluted River through Effective Microorganisms10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.045 ↗
22. Remediation of Biochar-Supported Effective Microorganisms and Microplastics on Multiple Forms of Heavy Metals in Eutrophic Lake10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133098 ↗
23. Sustainable and Effective Microorganisms Method for Wastewater Treatment10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100419 ↗
24. Research on the Influence of Anaerobic Stabilization of Various Dairy Sewage Sludge on Biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PAHs with the Use of Effective Microorganisms10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.019 ↗
25. Durability Performance of Modified Concrete Incorporating Fly Ash and Effective Microorganism10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120947 ↗
26. Biogenic Approach for Concrete Durability and Sustainability Using Effective Microorganisms: A Review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119664 ↗
27. Effective Microorganism Solution-Imbued Sustainable Self-Curing Concrete: Evaluation of Sorptivity, Drying Shrinkage and Expansion
28. Cai, J.Z., Yu, Y.L., Yang, Z.B., Xu, X.X., Lv, G.C., Xu, C.L., Wang, G.Y., Qi, X., Li, T., and Man, Y.B. (2024). Synergistic Improvement of Humus Formation in Compost Residue by Fenton-like and Effective Microorganism Composite Agents. Bioresour. Technol., 400.10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130703 ↗
29. Impact of Effective Microorganisms on the Vermicomposting of Sewage Sludge10.5004/dwt.2023.29322 ↗
30. Morphology and Characterization Study on Effective Microorganism (EM) Water Based Epoxy Coatings10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.334 ↗
31. Characteristics of Rice Straw and Sewage Sludge as Composting Materials in Valencia (Spain)10.1016/j.biortech.2004.01.013 ↗
32. Testing Composted Bamboo Residues with and without Added Effective Microorganisms as a Renewable Alternative to Peat in Horticultural Production10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.043 ↗
33. Composting of Rice Straw with Effective Microorganisms (EM) and Its Influence on Compost Quality
34. Metagenomic Analysis Reveals Enhanced Biodiversity and Composting Efficiency of Lignocellulosic Waste by Thermoacidophilic Effective Microorganism (TEM)10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111252 ↗
35. The Effects of Goat Manure, Sewage Sludge and Effective Microorganisms on the Composting of Pine Bark10.1080/1065657X.2006.10702284 ↗
36. Long-Term Effective Microorganisms Application Promote Growth and Increase Yields and Nutrition of Wheat in China10.1016/j.eja.2012.12.003 ↗
37. Effects of Probiotic Fermented Kitchen Waste on the Growth and Propagation of Rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus10.1166/jbmb.2021.2024 ↗
38. Indoor Potted Plant Based Biofilter: Performance Evaluation and Kinetics Study
39. Finding Liebig’s Law of the Minimum10.1002/eap.2458 ↗
40. Potential Mineralization of Nitrogen from Organic Wastes to Ryegrass and Wheat Crops10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.014 ↗
41. Efficiency of Green Waste Compost and Biochar Soil Amendments for Reducing Lead and Copper Mobility and Uptake to Ryegrass10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.025 ↗
42. Testing Low-Quality Urban Composts for Agriculture: Germination and Seedling Performance of Plants10.1016/0167-8809(94)00576-Z ↗
43. Rayment, G.E., and Higginson, F.R. (1992). Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods, Inkata Press.
44. European Union (2011). The European Comission Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 Implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down Health Rules as Regards Animal by-Products and Derived Products Not Intended for Human Consumption. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 54, 1–254.
45. Biogas Production from Bakery Wastes-Dynamics, Retention Time and Biogas Potential
46. (2006). Fermentation of Organic Materials, Characterization of the Substrate, Sampling, Collection of Material Data, Fermentation Tests (Standard No. VDI 4630).
47. (2017). German Standard Methods for the Examination of Water, Waste Water and Sludge; Sludge and Sediments (Group S); Determination of the Amenability to Anaerobic Digestion (S 8) (Standard No. DIN 38414 (S8)).
48. (2025, May 04). Act of 20 July 2017. Water Law. Article 105-Maximum Dose of Natural Fertilizers Used for Agricultural Purposes, Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20170001566/U/D20171566Lj.pdf.
49. The Poor Performance of Rock Phosphate Fertilizers in Western Australia: Part 1. The Crop and Pasture Response
50. Ash from the Thermal Gasification of Pig Manure—Effects on Ryegrass Yield, Element Uptake, and Soil Properties10.1071/SR12075 ↗
51. A Laboratory and Glasshouse Evaluation of Chicken Litter Ash, Wood Ash, and Iron Smelting Slag as Liming Agents and P Fertilisers10.1071/SR06136 ↗
52. Kuligowski, K., Konkol, I., Świerczek, L., Chojnacka, K., Cenian, A., and Szufa, S. (2023). Evaluation of Kitchen Waste Recycling as Organic N-Fertiliser for Sustainable Agriculture under Cool and Warm Seasons. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15107997 ↗
53. Value of Dehydrated Food Waste Fertiliser Products in Increasing Soil Health and Crop Productivity10.1016/j.envres.2021.111927 ↗
54. Food Waste-Based Bio-Fertilizers Production by Bio-Based Fermenters and Their Potential Impact on the Environment10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141539 ↗
55. Microbial Bioconversion of Food Waste to Bio-Fertilizers10.1039/D3FB00041A ↗
56. Performance Assessment of Innovative Waste Management System Developed for the Production of Bio-Fertilizer10.1016/j.scenv.2024.100148 ↗
57. Valorisation of Agri-Food Waste to Fertilisers Is a Challenge in Implementing the Circular Economy Concept in Practice10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119906 ↗
58. Peng, X.-Y., Wang, S.-P., Chu, X.-L., Sun, Z.-Y., Xia, Z.-Y., Xie, C.-Y., Gou, M., and Tang, Y.-Q. (2023). Valorizing Kitchen Waste to Produce Value-Added Fertilizer by Thermophilic Semi-Continuous Composting Followed by Static Stacking: Performance and Bacterial Community Succession Analysis. Bioresour. Technol., 373.10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128732 ↗
59. Chu, X.-L., Peng, X.-Y., Sun, Z.-Y., Xie, C.-Y., and Tang, Y.-Q. (2024). Converting Kitchen Waste into Value-Added Fertilizer Using Thermophilic Semi-Continuous Composting-Biofiltration Two-Stage Process with Minimized NH3 Emission. Bioresour. Technol., 406.10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130955 ↗
60. Effects and Mechanisms of Kitchen Waste Organic Fertilizers Application on Soil Nitrogen Transformation, Plant Pathogenic Virulence Genes, and Metabolites10.1016/j.cej.2024.154125 ↗