Evaluation of ISO 31010 Techniques for Supply Chain Risk Management in Automotive Suppliers
Source abstract
Abstract
Supply chain risk management (SCRM) has become an increasingly relevant field of study, driven by operational challenges, global crises, and the increasing complexity of supply chains. Although the number of publications on the topic has increased significantly over the last two decades, empirical research aimed at practical applications is still limited. In this context, the present research aims to select and rank tools for use in SCRM in direct and indirect suppliers of the automotive industry. As a secondary objective, the research aimed to identify which risk management stages (identification, analysis, and assessment) are most relevant for SCRM. Methodologically, the research was conducted in two main stages, the first involving the Delphi method in twenty suppliers (Tier 2) to select and evaluate risk management tools and the second involving the AHP method in an auto parts manufacturer (Tier 1) to rank the tools raised in the previous step. The main results show that the risk identification phase is considered the most relevant in the SCRM process, being prioritized by 56% of the experts. Regarding the tools, the ISO 31010 techniques most suitable for SCRM in suppliers, in order of priority, are FMEA, SWIFT, and cause and consequence analysis, standing out for their ability to identify and prevent failures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Quality and Supply Management · Risk and Safety Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Programa de Pós Graduação em Administração, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Volta Redonda Campus, Volta Redonda 27213-145, Brazil
Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile
Escola de Engenharia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói Campus, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil
Funding
FAPERJ—Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro
References (94)
Show source-provided references
1. Comparing supply chain risks for multiple product categories with cognitive mapping and analytic hierarchy process10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.036 ↗
2. The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.008 ↗
3. A decision support system for selection and risk management of sustainability governance approaches in multi-tier supply chain10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108960 ↗
4. Mitigating Supply Chain Risk Through Improved Confidence10.1108/09600030410545436 ↗
5. Integrating performance and risk aspects of supply chain design processes10.1080/09537287.2018.1520314 ↗
6. From supply chain risk to system-wide disruptions: Research opportunities in forecasting, risk management and product design10.1108/IJOPM-09-2022-0573 ↗
7. Supplier-initiating risk management behaviour and supply-side resilience: The effects of interpersonal relationships and dependence asymmetry in buyer-supplier relationships10.1108/IJOPM-06-2019-0497 ↗
8. Risk management processes in supplier networks10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.007 ↗
9. Disaster resilient proactive and reactive procurement models for humanitarian supply chain10.1080/09537287.2020.1834124 ↗
10. An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.010 ↗
11. Radjou, N. (2022, March 04). Adapting to Supply Network Change. Forrester Research Tech Strategy Report, Cambridge, MA. Available online: http://www.fipa.org/docs/input/f-in-00060/f-in-00060.pdf.
12. Manufacturer cooperation in supplier development under risk10.1016/j.ejor.2010.03.041 ↗
13. Supply risk management: Model development and empirical analysis10.1108/09600031211202472 ↗
14. Supplier assistance within supplier development initiatives10.1111/j.1745-493X.2004.tb00171.x ↗
15. Supplier development with benchmarking as part of a comprehensive supplier risk management framework10.1108/01443570910938989 ↗
16. The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.054 ↗
17. Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research10.1080/13675560310001627016 ↗
18. Risk in supply networks10.1016/S1478-4092(03)00004-9 ↗
19. Supply chain risk management and performance: A guiding framework for future development10.1108/01443570710725563 ↗
20. (2009). Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 31000:2009).
21. Dias, G.C., de Oliveira, U.R., Lima, G.B.A., and Fernandes, V.A. (2021). Risk Management in the Import/Export Process of an Automobile Company: A Contribution for Supply Chain Sustainability. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13116049 ↗
22. Analysis of the MORT method applicability for risk management in supply chains10.1007/s12063-021-00248-2 ↗
23. Evaluation of a conceptual model of supply chain risk management to import/export process of an automotive industry: An action research approach10.1007/s12063-023-00422-8 ↗
24. Risk management applied to the reverse logistics of solid waste10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126517 ↗
25. Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x ↗
26. Failure mapping for occupational safety management in the film and television industry10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.024 ↗
27. Analysis of occupational risk management tools for the film and television industry10.1016/j.ergon.2019.05.002 ↗
28. Analysis of failures in the accessibility of university buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101654 ↗
29. (2009). Risk Management—Risk Assessment Techniques (Standard No. ISO 31010:2009).
30. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.013 ↗
31. Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study10.1108/13598541111139062 ↗
32. Configuring lean manufacturing and supply chain risk management: A cluster analysis10.1080/09537287.2023.2215721 ↗
33. Dynamic supply chain risk management plans for mitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic
34. A maturity model for supply chain risk management10.1108/SCM-11-2022-0435 ↗
35. Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: Sustainability analysis under disruption risks10.1080/00207543.2018.1461950 ↗
36. Risk management strategy for supply chain sustainability and resilience capability10.1057/s41283-023-00138-w ↗
37. Sustainability risk management in the supply chain of telecommunication companies: A case study10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.174 ↗
38. The effect of supplier sustainability risk management strategies on supply chain performance
39. ISO 31000:2009—Setting a new standard for risk management: Perspective10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01442.x ↗
40. Framework of Effective Risk Management in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMESs): A Literature Review
41. Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk10.1136/jme.2004.010470 ↗
42. Supply chain risk management at seaport container terminals
43. Analysis of supply chain risk management researches
44. Supply chain risk management: Present and future scope10.1108/09574091211289200 ↗
45. Global supply chain risk management strategies10.1108/09600030810866986 ↗
46. Risk Uncertainty and Supply Chain Decisions: A Real Options Perspective10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00276.x ↗
47. Supply chain risk management and risk ranking in the automotive industry
48. Managing risk to avoid supply chain breakdown
49. Supply chain risk classification: Discussion and proposal10.1080/00207543.2014.910620 ↗
50. Assessing and managing risks using the Supply Chain Risk Management Process (SCRMP)10.1108/13598541111171165 ↗
51. Supply chain risk management in French companies10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.017 ↗
52. Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107972 ↗
53. Incorporating the risk of knowledge loss in supply chain risk management10.1108/IJLM-06-2020-0225 ↗
54. Antecedents and consequences of supply chain risk management capabilities: An investigation in the post-coronavirus crisis10.1080/00207543.2020.1856958 ↗
55. Supply chain risk management in the COVID-19 pandemic: Strategies and empirical lessons for improving global logistics service providers’ performance10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0109 ↗
56. Research on Knowledge-Oriented Supply Chain Risk Management System Model10.5430/jms.v2n2p72 ↗
57. A comprehensive decision-making model for risk management of supply chain10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.156 ↗
58. Supply chain risk management: Review, classification and future research directions10.69864/ijbsam.6-3.75 ↗
59. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions10.1080/13675560500405584 ↗
60. Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry10.1108/09600030810861215 ↗
61. Proposal of a method for selecting suppliers considering risk management: An application at the automotive industry10.1108/IJQRM-11-2014-0172 ↗
62. Modeling supplier risks using Bayesian networks10.1108/02635571211204317 ↗
63. Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM): An empirical investigation on French industrial firms10.1080/00207543.2013.878057 ↗
64. Internal visibility of external supplier risks and the dynamics of risk management silos10.1109/TEM.2016.2596144 ↗
65. A proactive approach to supply chain risk management: Shifting orders among suppliers to mitigate the supply side risks10.1016/j.pursup.2016.04.002 ↗
66. The role of supplier collaboration and risk management capabilities in managing product complexity10.1007/s12063-019-00144-w ↗
67. Barriers to multi-tier supply chain risk management10.1108/IJLM-09-2019-0256 ↗
68. Role of information processing and digital supply chain in supply chain resilience through supply chain risk management
69. Achieving competitive advantage through technology-driven proactive supply chain risk management: An empirical study10.1007/s10479-023-05604-y ↗
70. The effect of supply chain collaboration on firms’ risk management under technology turbulence10.1080/09537287.2023.2225474 ↗
71. Risk management and firm performance: The moderating role of supplier integration10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0427 ↗
72. The influence of supply chain risk management in healthcare supply chains performance10.1080/09537287.2023.2182726 ↗
73. Supply chain risk management to achieve healthcare supply chain operational excellence: A fsQCA and PLS-SEM approach10.1108/IJLSS-05-2023-0091 ↗
74. Compound mechanism design of supplier selection based on multi-attribute auction and risk management of supply chain10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.042 ↗
75. Designing the Buyer–Supplier Contract for Risk Management: Assessing Complexity and Mission Criticality10.1111/jscm.12137 ↗
76. A systematic review of empirical and normative decision analysis of sustainability-related supplier risk management10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118808 ↗
77. Dynamic procurement risk management with supplier portfolio selection and order allocation under green market segmentation10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119835 ↗
78. Risk management on joint product development with power asymmetry between supplier and manufacturer10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.08.008 ↗
79. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x ↗
80. Internet-Based Delphi Research: Case Based Discussion10.1007/s00267-012-0005-5 ↗
81. The competencies and characteristics required of an effective project manager: A web-based Delphi study10.1007/s11423-006-8251-y ↗
82. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process
83. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0 ↗
84. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process
85. The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383 ↗
86. The Optimisation Problem Formulation: Criticism and Overstepping10.1057/jors.1981.93 ↗
87. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 ↗
88. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. review and implications for future quality assurance10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013 ↗
89. The Delphi method as early warning. Linking global societal trends to future radicalization and terrorism in The Netherlands
90. Elmsalmi, M., Hachicha, W., and Aljuaid, A.M. (2021). Prioritization of the Best Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management Practices Using a Structural Analysis Based-Approach. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13094608 ↗
91. Risk propagation mechanisms and risk management strategies for a sustainable perishable products supply chain10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.014 ↗
92. A Dynamic Maintenance Planning Framework Based on Fuzzy TOPSIS and FMEA: Application in an International Food Company10.1002/qre.1791 ↗
93. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS based fuzzy AHP10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044 ↗
94. Modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using approximate reasoning10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00179-5 ↗