journal article·2025-03-17Open access

Numerical Evaluation of the Equivalent Damping Ratio Due to Dissipative Roof Structure in the Retrofit of Historical Churches

Nicola Longarini, Pietro Crespi, Marco Zucca, Manuela Scamardo

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

This paper is focused on the numerical evaluation of the equivalent damping ratio (EDR) given by a dissipative wood-based roof diaphragm in the seismic retrofitting of single-nave historical churches. In the design phase, the EDR could be a key parameter to select the optimal roof structure configuration, thereby obtaining the maximum energy dissipation. In this way, the roof structure works as a damper to facilitate a box behavior of the structure during the seismic response. The EDR measures the energy dissipated by the nonlinear behavior of the roof’s steel connections and masonry walls during seismic events. In a preliminary retrofitting design phase, an initial implementation of the geometries of the walls and the chosen geometry for the roof is carried out by adopting an equivalent frame model (FEM) with inelastic rotational hinges for the nonlinear properties of the masonry walls and inelastic shear hinges for the nonlinear behavior of the roof’s steel connections. Since, for historical churches, the transversal response under seismic events is the worst situation for the single-nave configuration, the earthquake is applied as transversal accelerograms. In this way, the damped rocking of the perimeter walls due to the dissipative roof diaphragm can be described in terms of a hysteretic variable. By varying the value of the hysteretic variable, possible configurations of the roof diaphragm are tested in the design phase, considering the different shear deformation values of the inelastic hinges of the roof. Under these hypotheses, the EDR is evaluated by performing nonlinear Time History analyses based on the cyclic behavior of the inelastic hinges of the roof, the strain energy contribution due to the walls, and the lateral displacements of the structure. The EDR values obtained with the Time History method are compared with those obtained by applying the Capacity Spectrum Method by performing nonlinear static analyses, either for the coefficient method of FEMA 356 or the equivalent linearization technique of ATC-40. The EDR evaluations are performed by considering the following different hysteretic behaviors of the roof’s steel connections: the skeleton curves with stiffness degradation and the trilinear model with strength and stiffness degradation. Finally, the variation in the EDR values as a function of the hysteretic variable is presented as well so to evaluate if the maximum EDR value corresponds to the optimal value of the hysteretic variable able to reduce the lateral displacements and to contain the shear forces acting on the roof and the façade under a safety limit.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Building materials and conservation · Hygrothermal properties of building materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering Department, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy

Department of Civil Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Lesson Learned after the Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 20-29 May 2012 Earthquakes: A Limit Analysis Insight on Three Masonry Churches10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.001 ↗
2. Liberatore, D., Doglioni, C., AlShawa, O., Atzori, S., and Sorrentino, L. (2019). Effects of Coseismic Ground Vertical Motion on Masonry Constructions Damage during the 2016 Amatrice-Norcia (Central Italy) Earthquakes. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 120.10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.015 ↗
3. The Influence of the Geometrical Features on the Seismic Response of Historical Churches Reinforced by Different Cross Lam Roof-Solutions10.1007/s10518-022-01468-y ↗
4. Numerical Approaches for Cross-Laminated Timber Roof Structure Optimization in Seismic Retrofitting of a Historical Masonry Church10.1007/s10518-019-00661-w ↗
5. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Timber Roof Structures: Criteria and Procedures10.1680/jstbu.19.00097 ↗
6. Thin-Folded Shell for the Renewal of Existing Wooden Roofs10.1080/15583058.2015.1075626 ↗
7. Department of Homeland Security (2005). FEMA 440: Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures.
8. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Historical Church: Limit Analysis and Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis10.1155/2013/517454 ↗
9. Structural Assessment and Seismic Analysis of a 14th Century Masonry Tower10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104198 ↗
10. Preliminary Assessment of the Seismic Vulnerability of Three Inclined Bell-Towers in Ferrara, Italy10.1080/15583058.2020.1805045 ↗
11. Non-Linear Analysis of the Carmine Bell Tower under Seismic Actions Accounting for Soil–Foundation–Structure Interaction10.1007/s10518-017-0298-0 ↗
12. Seismic Vulnerability and Failure Modes Simulation of Ancient Masonry Towers by Validated Virtual Finite Element Models10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.07.030 ↗
13. Cannizzaro, F., Pantò, B., Lepidi, M., Caddemi, S., and Caliò, I. (2017). Multi-Directional Seismic Assessment of Historical Masonry Buildings by Means of Macro-Element Modelling: Application to a Building Damaged during the L’Aquila Earthquake (Italy). Buildings, 7.10.3390/buildings7040106 ↗
14. Masciotta, M.G., and Lourenço, P.B. (2022). Seismic Analysis of Slender Monumental Structures: Current Strategies and Challenges. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12147340 ↗
15. Simplified Mechanical Models for the Seismic Collapse Performance Prediction of Unreinforced Masonry Structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114131 ↗
16. Structure-to-structure Seismic Damage Correlation Model10.1002/eqe.4172 ↗
17. Dissipative Roof Diaphragm for the Seismic Retrofit of Listed Masonry Churches10.1080/13632469.2017.1360223 ↗
18. Preti, M., Bolis, V., Marini, A., and Giuriani, E. (2014, January 4–17). Example of the Benefits of a Dissipative Roof Diaphragm in the Seismic Response of Masonry. Proceedings of the SAHC2014–9th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Mexico City, Mexico.
19. Surrogate Models for Seismic Response Analysis of Flexible Rocking Structures10.1002/eqe.4193 ↗
20. SOFIE Project—3D Shaking Table Test on a Seven-Storey Full-Scale Cross-Laminated Timber Building10.1002/eqe.2309 ↗
21. System Effects in T-shaped Timber Shear Walls: Effects of Transverse Walls, Diaphragms, and Axial Loading10.1002/eqe.4125 ↗
22. Johansen, K.W. (1949). Theory of Timber Connections, IABSE: International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering.
23. Shahnewaz, M., Alam, S., and Tannert, T. (2018). In-Plane Strength and Stiffness of Cross-Laminated Timber Shear Walls. Buildings, 8.10.3390/buildings8080100 ↗
24. Strength and Stiffness of Timber Joints with Very High Strength Steel Dowels10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.046 ↗
25. Hossain, A., Lakshman, R., and Tannert, T. (2015, January 23–25). Shear Connections with Self-Tapping Screws for Cross-Laminated Timber Panels. Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2015, Portland, OR, USA.10.1061/9780784479117.195 ↗
26. (2004). Eurocode 5—Design of Timber Structures—General—Common Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1995-1-1).
27. Equivalent Viscous Damping of Cross-Laminated Timber Structural Archetypes10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002947 ↗
28. Towards Increased BIM Usage for Existing Building Interventions10.1108/SS-01-2015-0002 ↗
29. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 356.
30. Applied Technology Council (1996). ATC 40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings.
31. Base Seismic Isolation of a Historical Masonry Church Using Fiber Reinforced Elastomeric Isolators10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.022 ↗
32. Seismic Assessment of Two Masonry Baroque Churches Damaged by the 2012 Emilia Earthquake10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.026 ↗
33. Damage Assessment of Three Medieval Churches after the 2012 Emilia Earthquake10.1007/s10518-016-0073-7 ↗
34. A Method for Generating Fully Non-Stationary and Spectrum-Compatible Ground Motion Vector Processes10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.09.003 ↗
35. REXEL: Computer Aided Record Selection for Code-Based Seismic Structural Analysis10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1 ↗
36. Wooden Roof Box Structure for the Anti-Seismic Strengthening of Historic Buildings10.1080/15583050802063733 ↗
37. Preti, M., Bolis, V., Giuriani, E., Marini, A., and Peretti, M. (2013). Studio Del Ruolo Del Diaframma Di Copertura Nel Comportamento Sismico Degli Archi Diaframma Nella Chiesa Parrocchiale Di Sirmione, Università di Brescia. Technical Report n. 1.
38. Seismic Force Modification Factors for Modified-Clough Hysteretic Model10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.007 ↗
39. Simple Cross-Laminated Timber Shear Connections with Spatially Arranged Screws10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.004 ↗
40. The Effective Period and Damping of a Class of Hysteretic Structures10.1002/eqe.4290070302 ↗
41. Clough, R.W. (1966). Effect of Stiffness Degradation on Earthquake Ductility Requirements, UC Berkeley.
42. Hysteresis models of reinforced concrete for earthquake response analysis
43. Reinforced Concrete Response to Simulated Earthquakes10.1061/JSDEAG.0002765 ↗
44. Steady Forced Vibrations as Influenced by Damping10.1115/1.4057368 ↗
45. Jacobsen, L. (1960, January 11–18). Damping in Composite Structures. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan.
46. Equivalent Viscous Damping for Yielding Structures10.1061/JMCEA3.0000929 ↗
47. Risk-Based Optimization of Concentrically Braced Tall Timber Buildings: Derivative Free Optimization Algorithm10.1002/eqe.4015 ↗
48. Priestley, M.J.N. (2003). Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering, Revisited: The Ninth Mallet Milne Lecture, IUSS Press.
49. Chopra, A.K. (2019). Dynamics of Structures, Pearson Education.
50. Damping Mechanisms and Damping Ratios in Vibrating Unreinforced Stone Masonry10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.016 ↗
51. A Plastic-Damage Model for Concrete10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
52. Plastic-Damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
53. Damage Assessment and Partial Failure Mechanisms Activation of Historical Masonry Churches under Seismic Actions: Three Case Studies in Mantua10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.017 ↗
54. (2025, January 30). Midas GEN 2023. Available online: https://support.midasuser.com/hc/en-us/articles/27773333780761--GEN-2023-v1-1-Release-Note.
55. Development of a Uniaxial Hysteretic Model for Dowel-Type Timber Joints in OpenSees10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123112 ↗
56. Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Modeling of Nailed Connections in Wood10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000160 ↗
57. Modeling Three-Dimensional Timber Light-Frame Buildings10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:8(901) ↗
58. Totani, G., Monaco, P., Totani, F., Lanzo, G., Pagliaroli, A., Amoroso, S., and Marchetti, D. (2016, January 5–9). Site Characterization and Seismic Response Analysis in the Area of Collemaggio, L’Aquila (Italy). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterisation, ISC 2016, Gold Coast, Australia.
59. (2025, January 30). NTC2018, I.M. of I. Norme Tecniche per Le Costruzioni. DM 17/1/2018 (In Italian). Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. Available online: https://biblus.acca.it/download/norme-tecniche-per-le-costruzioni-2018-ntc-2018-pdf/.