journal article·2025-02-09Open access

Optimizing Bitumen Performance in Warm Mix Asphalt Using Cecabase RT BIO10: A Taguchi-Based Experimental Approach

Mustafa Çakı, Fatih İrfan Baş

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 4

Abstract

Flexible pavements stand out as the most commonly used worldwide, compared to rigid and composite pavements, owing to their versatility and widespread application. The use of hot mix asphalt (HMA) in flexible pavements causes significant environmental concerns due to high CO2 emissions and energy consumption, whereas warm mix asphalt (WMA) technologies have gained popularity in recent decades, offering a more sustainable alternative by enabling asphalt production at lower temperatures. WMA technologies can be categorized into three main groups: foaming, organic additives, and chemical additives, with each offering distinct benefits for performance and environmental impact. One of the chemical additives used in WMA production is Cecabase RT BIO10. In this study, virgin bitumen with 50/70 penetration was modified by adding Cecabase RT BIO10 at four levels: 0%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5% by weight. The experimental design employed a Taguchi L16 orthogonal array to systematically evaluate the effects of various factors on modified bitumen performance. Binders were prepared at four temperatures (110 °C, 120 °C, 130 °C, and 140 °C), four mixing durations (15, 20, 25, and 30 min), and four mixing speeds (1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 rpm), enabling an efficient analysis of each parameter’s impact. The prepared binders were subjected to a series of tests, including penetration, softening point, flash point, rotational thin film oven test (RTFOT), elastic recovery, Marshall stability, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), and FTIR analysis. These tests were conducted to investigate the effects of various parameters and levels on the binder properties. Additionally, stiffness and seismic modules were evaluated to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the binder’s performance. The experiment results revealed that the penetration, elastic recovery percentage, and Marshall stability increased with increasing additive content while the softening point and RTFOT mass loss decreased. At a high service temperature of 40 °C, the stiffness modulus of the modified bitumen decreased slightly. At a low service temperature of −10 °C, it decreased further. Additionally, the incorporation of Cecabase RT BIO10 led to an increase in the seismic modulus. Through optimization using the Taguchi method, the optimal levels were determined to be a 0.4% Cecabase RT BIO10 ratio, 140 °C mixing temperature, 30 min mixing time, and 1000 RPM mixing speed. The optimal responses for each test were identified and integrated into a unified optimal response, resulting in a comprehensive design guide with 95% confidence level estimates for all possible level combinations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan 24002, Türkiye

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. UN (2021). Global Population Growth and Sustainable Development, UN.
2. UN (2025). Population, UN.
3. A comprehensive review of warm-mix asphalt mixtures: Mix design, construction temperatures determination, performance and life-cycle assessment10.1080/14680629.2023.2268194 ↗
4. Caputo, P., Abe, A.A., Loise, V., Porto, M., Calandra, P., Angelico, R., and Oliviero Rossi, C. (2020). The role of additives in warm mix asphalt technology: An insight into their mechanisms of improving an emerging technology. Nanomaterials, 10.10.3390/nano10061202 ↗
5. Energy consumption and environmental impact of rubberized asphalt pavement10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.086 ↗
6. Jandacka, D., Decky, M., Hodasova, K., Pisca, P., and Briliak, D. (2022). Influence of the urban intersection reconstruction on the reduction of road traffic noise pollution. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178878 ↗
7. PIARC (2025). Term of the Road Dictionary, World Road Association.
8. Evaluation of the performance of warm mix asphalt in Washington state10.1080/10298436.2014.993199 ↗
9. Franesqui, M.A., Yepes, J., and Valencia-Díaz, S. (2024). Sustainable Pavement Construction in Sensitive Environments: Low-Energy Asphalt with Local Waste Materials and Geomaterials. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14020530 ↗
10. Milad, A., Babalghaith, A.M., Al-Sabaeei, A.M., Dulaimi, A., Ali, A., Reddy, S.S., Bilema, M., and Yusoff, N.I.M. (2022). A comparative review of hot and warm mix asphalt technologies from environmental and economic perspectives: Towards a sustainable asphalt pavement. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph192214863 ↗
11. Moisture characteristics of mixtures with warm mix asphalt technologies—A review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.069 ↗
12. Emission analysis of recycled tire rubber modified asphalt in hot and warm mix conditions10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.080 ↗
13. Analysis and evaluation of possibilities for the use of warm mix asphalt in Lithuania10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.80-86 ↗
14. EAPA (2010). The use of warm mix asphalt. EAPA Position Paper, European Asphalt Pavement Association.
15. Performance of WMA additives under freeze–thaw action10.1080/14680629.2018.1444668 ↗
16. Chowdhury, A., and Button, J.W. (2008). A Review of Warm Mix Asphalt, Texas Transportation Institute.
17. Economic and environmental impact study of warm mix asphalt compared to hot mix asphalt10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.077 ↗
18. Evaluation of the potential of Sasobit® to reduce required heat energy and CO2 emission in the asphalt industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.002 ↗
19. Hybrid input–output life cycle assessment of warm mix asphalt mixtures10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.035 ↗
20. Rheological properties of warm mix asphalt binders and warm mix asphalt binders containing polyphosphoric acid10.1016/j.ijprt.2018.03.005 ↗
21. Warm mix asphalt: An overview10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.053 ↗
22. A review of the warm mix asphalt (WMA) technologies: Effects on thermo-mechanical and rheological properties10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120817 ↗
23. Prowell, B.D., Hurley, G.C., and Crews, E. (2007, January 21–25). Field performance of warm mix asphalt at the NCAT test tack. Proceedings of the 86th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
24. Warm mix asphalt technology: An up to date review10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122128 ↗
25. Gonzalez Leon, J.A., Grampre, L., and Barreto, G. (2009). Warm-Mix Asphalts with Low-Dosage Chemical Additives, National Academies Press.
26. Sheth, N.M. (2010). Evaluation of Selected Warm Mix Asphalt Additives, The University of Iowa.
27. Influence of warm-mix additives and reduced aging on the rheology of asphalt binders with different natural wax contents10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000315 ↗
28. Influence of short-term aging on rheological characteristics of non-foaming WMA binders10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000223 ↗
29. The role of a surfactant based additive on the production of recycled warm mix asphalts–Less is more10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.141 ↗
30. Performances evaluation of Cecabase® RT in warm mix asphalt technology10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.311 ↗
31. Probabilistic parametric approach for rutting evaluation: Application to hot and warm asphalt10.1080/10298436.2012.725473 ↗
32. Mechanistic-Empirical Properties and Long-Term Potential of Warm Mix with Cecabase10.1520/ACEM20230024 ↗
33. Comparison of rut performance of asphalt concrete and binder containing warm mix additives10.1007/s42947-019-0021-4 ↗
34. Bairgi, B.K., and Tarefder, R.A. (2021, January 8–10). Field performance characteristics of warm mix asphalt (WMA) with various additives. Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation and Development, Virtual.10.1061/9780784483541.026 ↗
35. Doyle, J.D., Rushing, J.F., Mejías-Santiago, M., McCaffrey, T.J., Warnock, L.C., and Taylor, M.K. (2013). Laboratory Performance Testing of Warm-Mix Asphalt Technologies for Airfield Pavements, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
36. Experience with The Use of Warm Mix Asphalt Additives in Bitumen Binders10.2478/sjce-2018-0005 ↗
37. Capayova, S., Zuzulova, A., Hodakova, D., and Schlosser, T. (July, January 29). Influence of Chemical Additives on Asphalt Binder Properties. Proceedings of the 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference, Albena, Bulgaria.
38. Stienss, M., and Szydlowski, C. (2020). Influence of selected warm mix asphalt additives on cracking susceptibility of asphalt mixtures. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13010202 ↗
39. (2020). Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials (Standard No. D5/D5M-20).
40. (2020). Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus) (Standard No. D36-06).
41. (2018). Standard Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup Tester (Standard No. D92-24).
42. (2021). Standard Test Method for Specific Gravity and Density of Semi-Solid Asphalt Binder (Pycnometer Method) (Standard No. D70/D70M-21).
43. (2017). Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate (Standard No. C127-24).
44. (2017). Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate (Standard No. C128-22).
45. (2023). Standard Test Method for Materials Finer than 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing (Standard No. C117-17).
46. Material selections in asphalt pavement for wet-freeze climate zones: A review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.276 ↗
47. ARKEMA (2025, February 04). CECABASE RT BIO10: Paving the way to Sustainable Asphalt Innovation. Available online: https://specialtysurfactants.arkema.com/en/innovation/cecabaser-rt-bio-10/.
48. Warm mix asphalt: Chemical additives’ effects on bitumen properties and limestone aggregates mixture compactibility10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.10.005 ↗
49. ARKEMA (2024, June 12). Warm Mix Asphalt Additives. Available online: https://specialtysurfactants.arkema.com/en/functionalities/asphalt-bitumen/asphalt-additives/warm-mix-additives/.
50. (2022). Standard Test Method for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt Binder (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test) (Standard No. D2872-22).
51. (2021). Standard Test Method for Elastic Recovery of Asphalt Materials by Ductilometer (Standard No. D6084/D6084M-21).
52. (2022). Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Asphalt Mixtures (Standard No. D6927-22).
53. (2016). Standard Test Method for Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Through Concrete (Standard No. C597-22).
54. Mercan, Ş. (2019). Deney Tasarımı ve Yapay Zeka Tekniklerinden Yararlanarak Ürün Kalitesinin Geliştirilmesi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi/Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
55. Selection of cutting tool for desired surface finish in milling Machine using Taguchi optimization methodology10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.253 ↗
56. Baş, F.İ., Bayrak, O.Ü., and Bayata, H.F. (2022). A Practical Design Guide for Unbonded Jointed Plain Concrete Roads over Deteriorated HMA Roads: Realistic Traffic Loading. Coatings, 12.10.3390/coatings12121817 ↗
57. Investigating the Usability of Kevlar and Steel Fibers as a Hybrid in Concrete Pavements
58. Tunçel, M., Bayrak, O.Ü., Baş, F.İ., and Bayata, H.F. (2020). Atık Kevların Beton Yol Kaplamalarında Kullanılabilirliğinin Araştırılması. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknol. Derg., 668–678.10.31590/ejosat.678672 ↗
59. Bayata, H.F., Baş, F.İ., and Mengi, G.Ş. (2024). Traffic Impact Analysis of a Regional Shopping Center Using Microsimulation with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng., 1–9.10.1007/s40996-024-01517-3 ↗
60. Roy, R.K. (2010). A Primer on the Taguchi Method, Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
61. Geçkil, T. (2019). Physical, chemical, microstructural and rheological properties of reactive terpolymer-modified bitumen. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12060921 ↗
62. Analysis of styrene-butadiene-styrene polymer modified bitumen using fluorescent microscopy and conventional test methods10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.122 ↗
63. Rheological evaluation of ethylene vinyl acetate polymer modified bitumens10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00103-4 ↗
64. Roberts, F.L., Kandhal, P.S., Brown, E.R., Lee, D.-Y., and Kennedy, T.W. (1996). Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction, National Academies Press.
65. A general system describing the visco-elastic properties of bitumens and its relation to routine test data10.1002/jctb.5010040501 ↗
66. Ullidtz, P., and Larsen, B. (1983). Mathematical model for predicting pavement performance. Transportation Research Record, National Academies Press.
67. Abatech Inc. (2024, August 15). BitProps v2. Available online: https://www.abatech.com/.
68. Stiffness modulus of reclaimed asphalt binder modified with local bio-rejuvenator in Indonesia (dynamic shear rheometer to van der poel nomograph test result)10.1088/1755-1315/1195/1/012023 ↗
69. Martinez, F., Angelone, S., and Casaux, M. (2015, January 10–12). Evaluation of predictive models for the rheological properties of paving asphalt binders. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference “Bituminous Mixtures And Pavements”, Thessaloniki, Greece.10.1201/b18538-12 ↗
70. Effects of Surfactant Warm-Mix Additives on the Rheological Properties of High-Viscosity Asphalt10.1155/2020/6506938 ↗
71. Evaluation of Evotherm for use in warm mix asphalt
72. Camargo, I.G.d.N., Hofko, B., Mirwald, J., and Grothe, H. (2020). Effect of thermal and oxidative aging on asphalt binders rheology and chemical composition. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13194438 ↗
73. Błażejowski, K., Olszacki, J., and Peciakowski, H. (2014). Bitumen Handbook, ORLEN Asfalt.
74. Ma, F., Luo, X., Huang, Z., and Wang, J. (2020). Characterization of recovery in asphalt binders. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13040920 ↗
75. Asfalt kaplamaların nem performansı üzerinde siyah karbonun etkisi10.29130/dubited.920549 ↗
76. Sol-Sánchez, M., Moreno-Navarro, F., and Rubio-Gámez, M.C. (2017). Study of surfactant additives for the manufacture of warm mix asphalt: From laboratory design to asphalt plant manufacture. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7070745 ↗
77. Optimization of preparation procedure of liquid warm mix additive modified asphalt rubber10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.043 ↗
78. Preparation and properties of imidazoline surfactant as additive for warm mix asphalt10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121692 ↗
79. Atık PET ile modifiye edilmiş bitümlü sıcak karışımların nem direnci
80. Physical properties of graphene-oxide modified asphalt and performance analysis of its mixtures using response surface methodology10.1080/10298436.2020.1804061 ↗
81. Evaluation of the performance of brick dust as a filler material for hot asphalt mix design: A case study in Jimma zone
82. Roy, A., Rajkumar, K., and Kapgate, B. (2024). Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt: Fundamentals to Recent Developments, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.1004314 ↗
83. Brown, E.R., Hainin, M.R., Cooley, A., and Hurley, G. (2025, February 06). Relationships of HMA in-Place Air Voids, Lift Thickness, and Permeability. Available online: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w68v1.pdf.
84. Vavrik, W.R. (2000). Asphalt Mixture Design Concepts to Develop Aggregate Interlock, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
85. An application to the European practice of the Bailey method for HMA aggregate grading design10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.948 ↗
86. Dynamic modulus of asphalt mixture by ultrasonic direct test10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.06.007 ↗
87. Strength properties of roller compacted concrete pavement (RCCP) under different curing methods10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126530 ↗
88. Suitability of Nondestructive Testing of Asphalt Concrete for Detecting the Impact of Moisture Damage
89. Pellinen, T.K. (2001). Investigation of the Use of Dynamic Modulus as an Indicator of Hot-Mix Asphalt Peformance, Arizona State University.
90. Use of ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) for assessment of HMA mixtures behavior
91. Monismith, C.L., and Secor, K.E. (1962, January 20–24). Viscoelastic behavior of asphalt concrete pavements. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt PavementsUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
92. Estimation of asphalt concrete modulus using the ultrasonic pulse velocity test10.1061/JPEODX.0000036 ↗
93. Characterization of entrained air voids in cement paste with scattered ultrasound10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.02.001 ↗
94. Laboratory evaluation of antioxidants for asphalt binders10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.058 ↗
95. Material characteristics of long lasting asphalt pavements10.1080/14680629.2011.9695261 ↗
96. Ageing in modified bitumen using FTIR spectroscopy10.1080/10298436.2015.1007230 ↗
97. D’Angelo, S., Ferrotti, G., Cardone, F., and Canestrari, F. (2022). Asphalt binder modification with plastomeric compounds containing recycled plastics and graphene. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15020516 ↗
98. Investigation of the effect of aging on the thermodynamic parameters and the intrinsic healing capability of graphene oxide modified asphalt binders10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116984 ↗
99. The impact of field ageing on molecular structure and chemistry of bitumen10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127904 ↗
100. Wang, F., Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Li, H., and Wu, S. (2020). Aging mechanism and rejuvenating possibility of SBS copolymers in asphalt binders. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12010092 ↗