Microscopic Simulation of Heterogeneous Traffic Flow on Multi-Lane Ring Roads and Highways
Source abstract
Abstract
In the connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) environment, vehicles with different levels of automation are being deployed on public roads. Most research focuses on traffic flow simulation for a single vehicle type, while there are few studies on the interactions of mixed traffic involving CAVs, autonomous vehicles (AVs), and human-driven vehicles (HDVs). To fill this gap, this study investigates the traffic performance of heterogeneous traffic on multi-lane ring roads and highways with on-ramps. Leveraging the Python and SUMO simulation platform, the JAD strategy is introduced to optimize the dynamic interactions within heterogeneous traffic flow. Various scenarios with different proportions of CAVs, AVs, and HDVs were simulated to assess their impact on traffic efficiency, dynamics, safety, and environmental factors. The findings indicate that traffic efficiency, stability, and environmental impact improve as the share of HDVs declines and the proportion of CAVs and AVs rises. In scenarios with more HDVs, the improvements are minimal. Traffic safety gradually improves as the proportion of CAVs and AVs increases, with significant improvements observed when CAVs account for 40% of vehicles on ring roads and 50% on highways. This study advances the understanding of complex interactions in mixed traffic scenarios and their implications for traffic management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Traffic and Road Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electronics and Control Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Sustainable transportation planning considering traffic congestion and uncertain conditions10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119792 ↗
2. Analysis of the impact of maximum platoon size of CAVs on mixed traffic flow: An analytical and simulation method10.1016/j.trc.2022.103989 ↗
3. Li, H., Roncoli, C., Zhao, W., and Ju, Y. (2024). Assessing the impact of CAV driving strategies on mixed traffic on the ring road and freeway. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16083179 ↗
4. Factors affecting traffic flow efficiency implications of connected and autonomous vehicles: A review and policy recommendations10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.02.004 ↗
5. An attempt to determine the impact of the implementation of autonomous vehicles on a larger scale on the planning of city transport systems10.14254/jsdtl.2024.9-1.8 ↗
6. Stability analysis and connected vehicles management for mixed traffic flow with platoons of connected automated vehicles10.1016/j.trc.2023.104370 ↗
7. On the assessment of the dynamic platoon and information flow topology on mixed traffic flow under connected environment10.1016/j.trc.2023.104265 ↗
8. A new control strategy of CAVs platoon for mitigating traffic oscillation in a two-lane highway10.1016/j.physa.2023.129289 ↗
9. Theory of jam-absorption driving10.1016/j.trb.2013.02.003 ↗
10. A jam-absorption driving strategy for mitigating traffic oscillations10.1109/TITS.2016.2587699 ↗
11. Environmental impact estimation of mixed traffic flow involving CAVs and human-driven vehicles considering the non-equilibrium state10.1016/j.trc.2024.104542 ↗
12. Heterogeneous traffic mixing regular and connected vehicles: Modeling and stabilization10.1109/TITS.2018.2857465 ↗
13. The Calculation and distribution of CAV carbon emissions on urban transportation systems: A comparative analysis of renewable and non-renewable energy sources10.1016/j.renene.2024.120884 ↗
14. Theory-data dual driven car following model in traffic flow mixed of AVs and HDVs10.1016/j.trc.2024.104747 ↗
15. Li, H., Roncoli, C., and Ju, Y. (2024). A helly model-based MPC control system for jam-absorption driving strategy against traffic waves in mixed traffic. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14041424 ↗
16. Traffic flow optimisation in presence of vehicle automation and communication systems-Part II: Optimal control for multi-lane motorways10.1016/j.trc.2015.05.011 ↗
17. Continuum modeling of freeway traffic flows: State-of-the-art, challenges and future directions in the era of connected and automated vehicles10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100107 ↗
18. Study on mixed traffic of autonomous vehicles and human-driven vehicles with different cyber interaction approaches
19. Macroscopic modeling of connected, autonomous and human-driven vehicles: A pragmatic perspective
20. Data-driven adaptive automated driving model in mixed traffic10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3321804 ↗
21. Managing mixed traffic at signalized intersections: An adaptive signal control and CAV coordination system based on deep reinforcement learning10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121959 ↗
22. Influence of realistic perception and surroundings on qualitative results in automated and connected vehicle simulation10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3380369 ↗
23. Wang, C., Ren, W., Xu, C., Zheng, N., Peng, C., and Tong, H. (2024). Exploring the impact of conditionally automated driving vehicles transferring control to human drivers on the stability of heterogeneous traffic flow. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., 1–17.10.1109/TIV.2024.3419789 ↗
24. A cooperative control methodology considering dynamic interaction for multiple connected and automated vehicles in the merging zone10.1109/TITS.2024.3386200 ↗
25. Learning from trajectories: How heterogeneous CACC platoons affect the traffic flow in highway merging area10.1109/TVT.2024.3419143 ↗
26. Reducing CACC platoon disturbances caused by state jitters by combining two stages driving state recognition with multiple platoons’ strategies and risk prediction10.1109/TITS.2020.3033436 ↗
27. A review of communication, driver characteristics, and controls aspects of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC)10.1109/TITS.2015.2483063 ↗
28. CACC simulation platform designed for urban scenes10.1109/TIV.2023.3234890 ↗
29. Modelling multi-lane heterogeneous traffic flow with human-driven, automated, and communicating automated vehicles10.1016/j.physa.2021.126629 ↗
30. Impact of autonomous-vehicle-only lanes in mixed traffic conditions10.1177/0361198119847475 ↗
31. A multistep cooperative lane change strategy for connected and autonomous vehicle platoons departing from dedicated lanes10.1016/j.trc.2024.104720 ↗
32. A multi-agent reinforcement learning-based longitudinal and lateral control of CAVs to improve traffic efficiency in a mandatory lane change scenario10.1016/j.trc.2023.104445 ↗
33. Multiclass multilane model for freeway traffic mixed with connected automated vehicles and regular human-piloted vehicles10.1080/23249935.2019.1573858 ↗
34. Reservation-based cooperative ecodriving model for mixed autonomous and manual vehicles at intersections10.1109/TITS.2023.3269803 ↗
35. Chen, P.C., Liu, X., Lin, C.W., Huang, C., and Zhu, Q. (2023, January 31). Mixed-traffic intersection management utilizing connected and autonomous vehicles as traffic regulators. Proceedings of the 28th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, Tokyo, Japan.10.1145/3566097.3567849 ↗
36. Evaluation of platooning configurations for connected and automated vehicles at an isolated roundabout in a mixed traffic environment10.26599/JICV.2023.9210013 ↗
37. Roundabouts: Traffic simulations of connected and automated vehicles-a state of the art10.1109/TITS.2023.3325000 ↗
38. Fernandes, P., and Nunes, U. (2010, January 19–22). Platooning of autonomous vehicles with intervehicle communications in SUMO traffic simulator. Proceedings of the 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Funchal, Portugal.10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625277 ↗
39. Game theory-based ramp merging for mixed traffic with unity-sumo co-simulation10.1109/TSMC.2021.3131431 ↗
40. How does the traffic behavior change by using SUMO traffic generation tools10.1016/j.comcom.2021.09.023 ↗
41. Traffic simulation with SUMO-simulation of urban mobility10.1007/978-1-4419-6142-6_7 ↗
42. Lim, K.G., Lee, C.H., Chin, R.K.Y., Yeo, K.B., and Teo, K.T.K. (2017, January 21). SUMO enhancement for vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) simulation. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.10.1109/I2CACIS.2017.8239038 ↗
43. Mena-Oreja, J., and Gozalvez, J. (2018, January 4–7). Permit-a SUMO simulator for platooning maneuvers in mixed traffic scenarios. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569496 ↗
44. Erdmann, J. (2015). SUMO’s lane-changing model. Modeling Mobility with Open Data, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-15024-6_7 ↗
45. Jam-absorption driving with a car-following model10.1016/j.physa.2015.03.036 ↗
46. Treiber, M., and Kesting, A. (2013). Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation, Springer. [2013rd ed.].10.1007/978-3-642-32460-4 ↗
47. Realistic car-following models for microscopic simulation of adaptive and cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles10.3141/2623-01 ↗
48. Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001 ↗
49. Surrogate safety measures: Review and assessment in real-world mixed traditional and autonomous vehicle platoons10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3248628 ↗
50. Experimental microsimulation modeling of road safety impacts of bus priority10.3141/2402-02 ↗
51. Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance10.1016/j.trc.2007.12.004 ↗
52. Can connected autonomous vehicles improve mixed traffic safety without compromising efficiency in realistic scenarios?10.1109/TITS.2023.3238889 ↗
53. Andreotti, E., and Boyraz, P. (2020, January 20–23). Safety-centred analysis of transition stages to traffic with fully autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rhodes, Greece.10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294644 ↗
54. Modelling and simulation of (connected) autonomous vehicles longitudinal driving behavior: A state-of-the-art10.1049/itr2.12337 ↗