journal article·2025-01-27Open access

Quantification Method of Driving Risks for Networked Autonomous Vehicles Based on Molecular Potential Fields

Yicheng Chen, Dayi Qu, Tao Wang, Shanning Cui, Dedong Shao

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

Connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) face constraints from multiple traffic elements, such as the vehicle, road, and environmental factors. Accurately quantifying the vehicle’s operational status and driving risk level in complex traffic scenarios is crucial for enhancing the efficiency and safety of connected autonomous driving. To continuously and dynamically quantify the driving risks faced by CAVs in the road environment—arising from the front, rear, and lateral directions—this study focused s on the self-driving particle characteristics that enable CAVs to perceive their surrounding environment and make driving decisions. The vehicle-to-vehicle interaction behavior was analogized to the inter-molecular interaction relationship, and a molecular Morse potential model was applied, coupled with the vehicle dynamics theory. This approach considers the safety margin and the specificity of driving styles. A multi-layer decoder–encoder long short-term memory (LSTM) network was employed to predict vehicle trajectories and establish a risk quantification model for vehicle-to-vehicle interaction behavior. Using SUMO software (win64-1.11.0), three typical driving behavior scenarios—car-following, lane-changing, and yielding—were modeled. A comparative analysis was conducted between the risk field quantification method and existing risk quantification indicators such as post-encroachment time (PET), deceleration rate to avoid crash (DRAC), modified time to collision (MTTC), and safety potential fields (SPFs). The evaluation results demonstrate that the risk field quantification method has the advantage of continuously quantifying risk, addressing the limitations of traditional risk indicators, which may yield discontinuous results when conflict points disappear. Furthermore, when the half-life parameter is reasonably set, the method exhibits more stable evaluation performance. This research provides a theoretical basis for the dynamic equilibrium control of driving risks in connected autonomous vehicle fleets within mixed-traffic environments, offering insights and references for collision avoidance design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018, World Health Organization.
2. Research on space-time layout optimization of right-turning vehicles and pedestrians at level intersection
3. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00019-1 ↗
4. Validating the bivariate extreme value modeling approach for road safety estimation with different traffic conflict indicators10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.007 ↗
5. Headway on urban streets: Observational data and an intervention to decrease tailgating10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00015-2 ↗
6. Study on pedestrian-vehicle conflict severity grade based on cloud theory
7. A Simplified Car-following Model Based on the Artificial Potential Field10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.229 ↗
8. Comprehensive predictive control method for automated vehicles in dynamic traffic circumstances10.1049/iet-its.2018.5142 ↗
9. Dynamic Driving Risk Potential Field Model Under the Connected and Automated Vehicles Environment and Its Application in Car-Following Modeling10.1109/TITS.2020.3008284 ↗
10. The driving safety field based on driver–vehicle–road interactions10.1109/TITS.2015.2401837 ↗
11. Capacity analysis of mixed traffic flow considering the influence of connected auxiliary driving equipment
12. Car-following Decision-making and Model for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Based on Safety Potential Field
13. Car-following Model of Networked Autonomous Vehicle Based on Safety Characteristics of Molecular Force Field
14. Takeover Risk Assessment Model Based on Risk Field Theory Under Different Cognitive Secondary Tasks
15. A probabilistic risk assessment framework considering lane-changing behavior interaction10.1007/s11432-019-2983-0 ↗
16. Zheng, L., Liu, W., and Zhai, C. (2024). A Dynamic Lane-Changing Trajectory Planning Algorithm for Intelligent Connected Vehicles Based on Modified Driving Risk Field Model. Actuators, 13.10.3390/act13100380 ↗
17. Lane Change Trajectory Planning of Intelligent Vehicle Considering Safety and Comfort
18. Diatomic molecules according to the wave mechanics
19. Nilsson, R. (2001). Safety Margins in the Driver, Uppsala University.
20. Ettinger, S., Cheng, S., and Caine, B. (2021, January 11–17). Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving: The Waymo Open Motion Dataset. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00957 ↗
21. Wang, K., Qu, D., Shao, D., Wei, L., and Zhang, Z. (2024). Research on Risk Quantification Methods for Connected Autonomous Vehicles Based on CNN-LSTM. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311204 ↗
22. Ma, B., Zhou, J., and Zhang, C. (2024). Risk Prediction Model for Tailings Ponds Based on EEMD-DA-LSTM Model. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14199141 ↗
23. Udurume, M., Shakhov, V., and Koo, I. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Deep Convolutional Neural Network—Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory and Machine Learning Methods in Intrusion Detection Systems. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14166967 ↗
24. Diaaeldin, A., and Zaher, M. (2024, January 13–14). Enhancing Road Safety: Leveraging CNN-LSTM and Bi-LSTM Models for Advanced Driver Behavior Detection. Proceedings of the 2024 Intelligent Methods, Systems, and Applications (IMSA), Giza, Egypt.10.1109/IMSA61967.2024.10652785 ↗
25. Bian, S., Li, H., Wang, C., Song, C., and Tang, Y. (2023, January 8–11). MSBF-LSTM: Most-significant Bit-first LSTM Accelerators with Energy Efficiency Optimisations. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 31st Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines (FCCM), Marina Del Rey, CA, USA.10.1109/FCCM57271.2023.00046 ↗
26. Islam, M., and Lee, T. (2022, January 1–4). Wavelet Based Emotion Detection from Multi-channel EEG Using a Hybrid CNN-LSTM Model. Proceedings of the TENCON 2022–2022 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/TENCON55691.2022.9978122 ↗
27. Xiong, W., Han, L., and Qu, X. (2023, January 11–13). Bus Load Forecasting Based on Maximum Information Coefficient and CNN-LSTM Model. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing and Computer Applications (ICIPCA), Changchun, China.10.1109/ICIPCA59209.2023.10257944 ↗
28. CitySim: A Drone-Based Vehicle Trajectory Dataset for Safety-Oriented Research and Digital Twins10.1177/03611981231185768 ↗
29. A Class of Nonlinear Kalman Filters Under a Generalized Measurement Model with False Data Injection Attacks10.1109/LSP.2022.3172623 ↗
30. Bayesian Approximation Filtering with False Data Attack on Network10.1109/TAES.2021.3117664 ↗
31. Real-Time Joint Filtering of Gravity and Gravity Gradient Data Based on Improved Kalman Filter10.1109/TGRS.2024.3452038 ↗
32. Gaussian Filtering with Cyber-Attacked Data10.1109/LSP.2024.3356825 ↗