journal article·2025-01-23Open access

The Effects of Cushioning Properties on Parameters of Gait in Habituated Females While Walking and Running

Paul William Macdermid, Stephanie Julie Walker, Darryl Cochrane

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of a non-cushioned minimalistic shoe and cushioned shoe during walking at 6 and running at 10 and 14 km∙h−1 in habituated female runners. Twelve habituated female runners completed two trials (cushioned shoe vs. minimalist shoe) with three within-trial speeds (6, 10, and 14 km∙h−1) in a counter-balanced design. Flexible pressure insole sensors were used to determine kinetic variables (peak vertical impact force, average loading rate, active vertical peak force, time to active peak vertical force, and impulse) and spatiotemporal variables (stride duration, cadence, ground contact time, swing time, and time to midstance). Cushioned running shoes exhibited greater energy absorption (690%), recovered energy (920%), and heat dissipation (350%). The cushioned shoes significantly reduced peak vertical impact (~12%) and average loading rate (~11%) at running speeds 10–14 km∙h−1. However, these effects were not observed during walking, nor did the cushioned shoes influence peak active force, impulse, stride duration, ground contact or swing time. Cushioned running shoes provide significant benefits in energy absorption, energy recovery, and heat dissipation, which decrease impact-related forces and loading rates in female runners without changing the spatiotemporal variables of gait.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Foot and Ankle Surgery · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, College of Health, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Nordic Walking Can Be Incorporated in the Exercise Prescription to Increase Aerobic Capacity, Strength, and Quality of Life for Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1089/rej.2017.1921 ↗
2. Scheerder, J., Breedveld, K., and Borgers, J. (2015). Running Across Europe: The Rise and Size of One of the Largest Sport Markets, Springer.10.1057/9781137446374 ↗
3. Differential shock transmission response of the human body to impact severity and lower limb posture10.1016/S0021-9290(96)80004-2 ↗
4. Dynamic loading on the human musculoskeletal system—Effect of fatigue10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00030-8 ↗
5. Classifying the variability in impact and active peak vertical ground reaction forces during running using DFA and ARFIMA models10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.003 ↗
6. Shock attenuation and stride frequency during running10.1016/0167-9457(95)00004-C ↗
7. Greater vertical impact loading in female runners with medically diagnosed injuries: A prospective investigation10.1136/bjsports-2015-094579 ↗
8. Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners10.1249/01.mss.0000183477.75808.92 ↗
9. Variations in ground reaction force parameters at different running speeds10.1016/0167-9457(83)90005-2 ↗
10. Muscular strategy shift in human running: Dependence of running speed on hip and ankle muscle performance10.1242/jeb.064527 ↗
11. The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running10.1016/0021-9290(87)90324-1 ↗
12. The effect of speed on leg stiffness and joint kinetics in human running10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00133-5 ↗
13. Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running10.1111/j.1748-1716.1989.tb08655.x ↗
14. Kinetic consequences of constraining running behavior
15. Impact forces during heel-toe running10.1123/jab.11.4.407 ↗
16. Deformation characteristics of the heel region of the shod foot during a simulated heel strike: The effect of varying midsole hardness10.1080/02640419308730011 ↗
17. Compression fatigue of elastomeric foams used in midsoles of running shoes10.1080/19424280.2024.2317881 ↗
18. The ‘heel impact’ force peak during running is neither ‘heel’ nor ‘impact’ and does not quantify shoe cushioning effects10.1080/19424280.2010.542186 ↗
19. Running with a minimalist shoe increases plantar pressure in the forefoot region of healthy female runners10.1016/j.jsams.2014.06.007 ↗
20. Kulmala, J.-P., Kosonen, J., Nurminen, J., and Avela, J. (2018). Running in highly cushioned shoes increases leg stiffness and amplifies impact loading. Sci. Rep., 8.10.1038/s41598-018-35980-6 ↗
21. Differences in running biomechanics between a maximal, traditional, and minimal running shoe10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.008 ↗
22. Differences in stride length and lower limb moments of recreational runners during over-ground running while barefoot, in minimalist and in maximalist running shoes10.1080/19424280.2021.1878285 ↗
23. A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2 ↗
24. Softer and more resilient running shoe cushioning properties enhance running economy10.1080/19424280.2014.918184 ↗
25. Effects of the material of running shoes on biomechanical characteristics during running10.1080/15376494.2018.1513613 ↗
26. Baltich, J., Maurer, C., and Nigg, B.M. (2015). Increased Vertical Impact Forces and Altered Running Mechanics with Softer Midsole Shoes. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0125196 ↗
27. Effects of Shoe Cushioning Upon Ground Reaction Forces in Running10.1055/s-2008-1026043 ↗
28. Surface effects on ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics in running10.1097/00005768-200011000-00016 ↗
29. A kinematics analysis of the lower limb during running with different sports shoes
30. Kinematic and kinetic parameters associated with running in different shoes10.1136/bjsm.28.4.256 ↗
31. Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00192-X ↗
32. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners10.1038/nature08723 ↗
33. The effect of stride length on the dynamics of barefoot and shod running10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.043 ↗
34. Influence of Maximal Running Shoes on Biomechanics Before and After a 5K Run10.1177/2325967118775720 ↗
35. No immediate effects of highly cushioned shoes on basic running biomechanics10.26582/k.50.1.10 ↗
36. Immediate and short-term adaptations to maximalist and minimalist running shoes10.1080/19424280.2018.1460624 ↗
37. The influence of minimalist and maximalist footwear on the kinetics and kinematics of running10.1080/19424280.2016.1142003 ↗
38. Acute effects of minimalist shoes on biomechanical gait parameters in comparison to walking barefoot and in cushioned shoes: A randomised crossover study10.1080/19424280.2022.2057593 ↗
39. Comparison of in-shoe plantar loading forces between minimalist and maximalist cushion running shoes10.1080/19424280.2018.1561760 ↗
40. Running patterns for male and female competitive and recreational runners based on accelerometer data10.1080/02640414.2018.1488518 ↗
41. Stress Injuries to Bone in College Athletes:A Retrospective Review of Experience at a Single Institution*10.1177/03635465030310063601 ↗
42. The Prevalence of Lower Extremity Injuries in Running and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review10.5334/paah.109 ↗
43. The Effects of Speed and Surface Compliance on Shock Attenuation Characteristics for Male and Female Runners10.1123/jab.25.3.219 ↗
44. Shoe Cushioning Influences the Running Injury Risk According to Body Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving 848 Recreational Runners10.1177/0363546519892578 ↗
45. Anthropometric Characteristics of Ultramarathoners10.1055/s-2008-1038434 ↗
46. Being barefoot. Prevalence at home, in school and during sport: A cross-sectional survey of 714 New Zealand secondary school boys10.1186/s13047-018-0285-y ↗
47. Charmant, J. (2024, December 17). Kinovea, version 0.9.5. Available online: https://www.kinovea.org/.
48. Conceptualizing minimalist footwear: An objective definition10.1080/02640414.2017.1346816 ↗
49. Renner, K.E., Peebles, A.T., Socha, J.J., and Queen, R.M. (2022). The impact of sampling frequency on ground reaction force variables. J. Biomech., 135.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111034 ↗
50. Passive regulation of impact forces in heel-toe running10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00025-4 ↗
51. Characterizing gait asymmetry via frequency sub-band components of the ground reaction force10.1016/j.bspc.2014.11.008 ↗
52. Does maximalist footwear lower impact loading during level ground and downhill running?10.1080/17461391.2018.1472298 ↗
53. (2021). Personal Protective Equipment—Test Methods for Footwear. Standard No. ISO 20344:2021.
54. Force-, EMG-, and elasticity-velocity relationships at submaximal, maximal and supramaximal running speeds in sprinters10.1007/BF00421652 ↗
55. The Biomechanics of Lower Extremity Action in Distance Running10.1177/107110078700700402 ↗
56. Effect of Running Speed and Aerobic Dance Jump Height on Vertical Ground Reaction Forces10.1123/jab.10.1.14 ↗
57. A framework for the etiology of running-related injuries10.1111/sms.12883 ↗
58. The energetics of running and running shoes10.1016/0021-9290(93)90078-S ↗
59. Energy return in footwear–revisited10.1080/19424280.2024.2369995 ↗
60. Möhler, F., Fadillioglu, C., and Stein, T. (2021). Fatigue-Related Changes in Spatiotemporal Parameters, Joint Kinematics and Leg Stiffness in Expert Runners During a Middle-Distance Run. Front. Sports Act. Living, 3.10.3389/fspor.2021.634258 ↗
61. The Preferred Movement Path Paradigm: Influence of Running Shoes on Joint Movement10.1249/MSS.0000000000001260 ↗
62. Biomechanical factors affecting running economy10.1097/00005768-200108000-00014 ↗