Life Cycle Assessment of Proofing Test Production on Printing Surfaces with Use of Carbon Footprint Methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
This study represents a pioneering initiative in the printing industry, especially in Poland, which assessed the environmental impacts and eco-efficiency of proof printing through the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The process of proof printing on a target substrate was compared with the traditional hard proofing process, which requires trial printing in production conditions. The analysis adhered to the ISO 14040 and 14044 standards, assessing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, raw material use (e.g., plastics, water), and environmental toxicity. The innovative proofing on the target substrate process exhibits a lower environmental impact, as confirmed by the GHG emissions and plastic and water demand of the process. The GHG emissions were reduced from 2610 kg of CO2e to 68.4 kg of CO2e per functional unit (FU). The water demand for the proofing on the target substrate process was 40 times lower, and the plastic demand was also 40 times lower, decreasing to 20 kg per FU. The toxicity impact of the method based on the proofing system on the target substrate on living organisms is more than six times lower than that of the conventional method. The proof printing on the target substrate process offers an environmentally friendly alternative to the traditional hard proofing process, with lower GHG emissions and a lower environmental impact.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chespa Repro Studio Department, Chespa sp. z o.o., ul. Opolska 10A, 47-316 Chorula, Poland
Climate–Nachhaltigkeitsberatung, Moorbachweg 14, 31535 Neustadt, Germany
Graphic Communications Management, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Narbutta 85, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Colour Management in Digital Textile Printing10.1111/j.1478-4408.2011.00304.x ↗
2. Kipphan, H. (2001). Handbook of Print Media: Technologies and Production Methods, Springer. Handbook of Print Media.10.1007/978-3-540-29900-4 ↗
3. Blachowski, K., Czech, G., Dąbrowa, T., Godlewski, H., Hamerliński, J., Jakucewicz, S., Jóźwiak, B., Kowalczyk, J., Markowski, L., and Stachowicz, S. (2021). Poligrafia: Sztuka, Techniki, Technologie, COBRPP.
4. (2009). Graphic Technology and Photography—Viewing Conditions (Standard No. ISO 3664).
5. (2025, January 13). Available online: https://gmgcolor.com/products/proofmedia.
6. (2025, January 13). Available online: https://gmgcolor.b2bwave.com/products/list?category=214.
7. Plastic (PET) vs Bioplastic (PLA) or Refillable Aluminium Bottles–What Is the Most Sustainable Choice for Drinking Water? A Life-Cycle (LCA) Analysis10.1016/j.envres.2021.110974 ↗
8. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Applied to the Manufacturing of Common and Ecological Concrete: A Review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.125 ↗
9. Val, S., and Lamban, M.P. (2025). Enhancing Sustainability with LCA.; A Comparative Analysis of Design and Manufacturing Processes. Processes, 13.10.3390/pr13010195 ↗
10. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for Flow Batteries: A Review of Methodological Decisions
11. From Goods to Services: The Life Cycle Assessment Perspective10.1007/s12927-019-0002-9 ↗
12. Hauschild, M.Z., Rosenbaum, R.K., and Olsen, S.I. (2018). Introduction to LCA Methodology. Life Cycle Assessment, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_6 ↗
13. (2021). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044).
14. (2021). Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment–Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040).
15. Upcycling of Printed Plastic Films: LCA Analysis and Effects on the Circular Economy10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122138 ↗
16. Assessment of the Environmental Break-Even Point for Deposit Return Systems through an LCA Analysis of Single-Use and Reusable Cups10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.002 ↗
17. Choi, B., Yoo, S., and Park, S. (2018). Carbon Footprint of Packaging Films Made from LDPE, PLA, and PLA/PBAT Blends in South Korea. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10072369 ↗
18. Life Cycle Assessment of PE and PP Multi Film Compared with PLA and PLA Reinforced with Nanoclays Film10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134891 ↗
19. A Gate-to-Gate Life Cycle Analysis of Wide-Format Flatbed Inkjet Printing
20. Streamlined LCA of Soy-Based Ink Printing10.1007/BF02978677 ↗
21. Life Cycle Assessment of a Jet Printing and Dispensing Machine10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.070 ↗
22. Uncovering Environmental Performance Patterns of Plastic Packaging Waste in High Recovery Rate Countries: An Example of EU-2710.1016/j.envres.2023.117581 ↗
23. Shrivastava, C., Crenna, E., Schudel, S., Shoji, K., Onwude, D., Hischier, R., and Defraeye, T. (2022). To Wrap Or to Not Wrap Cucumbers?. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 6.10.3389/fsufs.2022.750199 ↗
24. Abdalla, H., Fattah, K.P., Abdallah, M., and Tamimi, A.K. (2021). Environmental Footprint and Economics of a Full-Scale 3D-Printed House. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132111978 ↗
25. Life Cycle Assessment of a Concrete 3D Printing Process10.1007/s11367-022-02111-3 ↗
26. Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint of 3D Printing in Pharmaceutical Manufacture10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122926 ↗
27. Environmental Improvement in the Printing Industry: The Case Study of Self-Adhesive Labels10.1007/s11356-019-04460-3 ↗
28. Applied Properties and Life Cycle Assessment of Flexible Packaging Lamination Processes: A Comparative Study10.1007/s11367-021-01883-4 ↗
29. Cao, C. (2017). Sustainability and Life Assessment of High Strength Natural Fibre Composites in Construction. Adv. High. Strength. Nat. Fibre Compos. Constr., 529–544.10.1016/B978-0-08-100411-1.00021-2 ↗
30. (2024, January 25). ecoinvent v3.8—ecoinvent. Available online: https://ecoinvent.org/the-ecoinvent-database/data-releases/ecoinvent-3-8/.
31. “Green Ink in All Colors”—Printing Ink from Renewable Resources10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.08.007 ↗
32. Eldred, N.R. (2005). What the Printer Should Know About Ink, GATFPress.
33. Kwiatkowska, I., and Stankiewicz, B. (2019). Gospodarka Odpadami w Przemyśle Poligraficznym (Eng: Waste Management in the Printing Industry), COBPRPP.
34. Plastics Europe (2024, May 21). Plastics–the Facts 2021. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Plastics-the-Facts-2021-web-final.pdf.
35. Queiroz Cerqueira, C., Silva Lora, E.E., La Picirelli de Souza, L., Montagnana Vicente Leme, M., Mambeli Barros, R., and Venturini, O.J. (2025). Life Cycle Assessment of Methanol Production from Municipal Solid Waste: Environmental Comparison with Landfilling and Incineration. Resources, 14.10.3390/resources14010012 ↗
36. Meyer, L.A., and Pachauri, R.K. (2014). The Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat.
37. (2024, February 04). GEMIS IINAS. GEMIS-Global Emission Model of Integrated Systems, Version 5.1. Available online: https://iinas.org/en/downloads/gemis-downloads/.
38. Buschmann, U. (2024, February 04). Climate3-LCA. Available online: https://www.climate3.org/en-gb.
39. (2022, August 23). Available online: https://swiatoze.pl/smutna-prawda-o-recyklingu-plastiku/.
40. (2022, August 23). Available online: https://dstv.deutscherstahlbau.de/fileadmin/user_upload/bauforumstahl.de/wissen/grundlagen/brandschutz/Heizwertalpha.pdf.
41. (2022, April 30). Available online: https://iprdb.com/patent-2576-US5733948A.html.
42. (2022, August 23). Available online: https://timberlove.blog/e-commerce/co2-bilanz-stationaer-vs-paketversand-und-warum-das-strategisch-noch-richtig-relevant-werden-duerfte/.
43. (2016). Graphic Technology Process Control for the Production of Half-Tone Colour Separations, Proof and Production Prints Part 2: Offset Lithographic Processes (Standard No. ISO 12647-2).
44. Klein, M., Neumair, C., Primoceri, M., Tracker, M., and Apprich, S. (2025). Fit for the Future: An Assessment of the Sustainability Parameters of Liguid Dairy Product Packaging in the DACH Region and the Implications of Upcoming Regulatory Changes. Food, 14.10.3390/foods14020195 ↗
45. European Commission (2019). Directive of The European Parliament and of The Council on the Reduction of the Impact of Certain Plastic Products on the Environment.
46. Keys, A., Saffron, C.M., Manjure, S., and Narayan, R. (2024). Biobased Compostable Plastics End-of-Life: Environmental Assessment Including Carbon Footprint and Microplastic Impact. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16213073 ↗