journal article·2025-01-18Open access

Laser Applications in Metal Orthodontic Bracket Debonding: A Systematic Review

Patryk Woś, Sylwia Kiryk, Tomasz Dyl, Jan Kiryk, Tomasz Horodniczy, Magdalena Szablińska, Magdalena Aleksandra Dubowik, Wojciech Dobrzyński, Marcin Mikulewicz, Jacek Matys, Maciej Dobrzyński

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various laser wavelengths for debonding orthodontic metal brackets compared to traditional plier-based methods. The primary outcomes assessed were enamel damage, pulp temperature changes, adhesive remnant index (ARI), and shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and Methods: In September 2024, an electronic search was performed across the PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus databases, adhering to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICO framework. The initial search yielded 453 records. After eliminating 256 duplicates, 197 unique records were left for screening, which ultimately led to the qualification of 8 articles that met the inclusion criteria for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. The risk of bias in the articles was assessed by two independent reviewers. Results: The included studies demonstrated that laser-assisted debonding generally resulted in less adhesive residue on the enamel surface compared to conventional methods, as evidenced by the reductions in ARI scores reported in two studies. Temperature increases during laser use varied depending on the laser type and power settings. The Nd:YAG (neodymium-yttrium, aluminum, garnet) laser was found to cause significant temperature rises, posing a potential risk to pulp tissue, while the Er:YAG (erbium—yttrium, aluminum, garnet) and Er,Cr:YSGG (erbium, chromium—yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet) lasers produced only negligible increases in pulp temperature. SBS comparisons revealed no significant differences between the laser-assisted and traditional debonding methods. Additionally, diode lasers demonstrated the potential to minimize enamel damage, particularly when operated at lower power settings. Four publications were assessed as high quality (low risk of bias), and another four as moderate quality (average risk of bias). Conclusions: In conclusion, laser-assisted orthodontic metal bracket debonding, when conducted with appropriately calibrated parameters, is a safe method for preserving tooth tissue. However, its advantages appear to be minimal compared to conventional plier-based methods, highlighting the need for further research to justify its broader clinical application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ortodoncja P.S., ul. Pomorska 32/U6, 50-218 Wroclaw, Poland

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Preclinical Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

Medical Center of Innovation, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

Oral Surgery Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

Ortho.pl Centrum Zdrowego Uśmiechu, Buforowa 34, 52-131 Wroclaw, Poland

Department of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

Department of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Division of Facial Abnormalities, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland

Funding

subsidy from Wroclaw Medical University

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review on Orthodontic Brackets and Their Application in Clinical Orthodontics
2. Nickel Allergy in Orthodontics
3. Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Different Types of Orthodontic Brackets and Archwires by Optical Microscopy and X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy10.3390/prosthesis3040031 ↗
4. Laser Debonding of Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81765-2 ↗
5. Er: YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis10.1089/pho.2017.4412 ↗
6. Effect of the Bracket Debonding Force and Residual Adhesives on Enamel Cracks
7. Assessment Of Enamel Loss After Debonding Of Ceramic, Composite Plastic And Metal Brackets-An In Vitro Study10.18231/j.jco.2019.021 ↗
8. Paolone, G., Mandurino, M., Baldani, S., Paolone, M.G., Goracci, C., Scolavino, S., Gherlone, E., Cantatore, G., and Gastaldi, G. (2023). Quantitative Volumetric Enamel Loss after Orthodontic Debracketing/Debonding and Clean-Up Procedures: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13095369 ↗
9. Ghaleb, L., Al-Worafi, N.A., Thawaba, A., Abdulqader, A.A., Alkamel, A., Abdo, Y., Yang, Z., Noman, N., Al-Aroomi, M.A., and Yulou, T. (2024). Evaluation of Enamel Surface Integrity After Orthodontic Bracket Debonding: Comparison of Three Different System. BMC Oral Health, 24.10.1186/s12903-024-04138-4 ↗
10. Do Different Orthodontic Pliers Used in Bracket Debonding Have Different Effects on Pain and Sensitivity? A Prospective Split-Mouth Study10.1007/s00784-022-04604-9 ↗
11. What Is the Safest Method of Orthodontic Debonding—A Systematic Review of the Literature
12. Pulpal Response in Electrothermal Debonding10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70008-0 ↗
13. Tüfekçi, E., and Brantley, W. (2023). Debonding Protocols. Debonding and Fixed Retention in Orthodontics: An Evidence-Based Clinical Guide, Wiley.10.1002/9781119623984.ch2 ↗
14. Khalil, A.S., Tamish, N.M., and Elkalza, A.R. (2022). Assessment of Chemical, Ultrasonic, Diode Laser, and Er:YAG Laser Application on Debonding of Ceramic Brackets. BMC Oral Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02111-7 ↗
15. Impact of Laser and Ultrasound on Pain Intensity and Enamel Surface During Orthodontic Debonding (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
16. Debonding of Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature—Part 110.18231/j.ijodr.2020.023 ↗
17. Survey on Awareness and Preference of Ceramic Bracket Debonding Techniques Among Orthodontists10.4317/jced.56976 ↗
18. Risk of Pulp Damage Due to Temperature Increase During Thermodebonding of Ceramic Brackets10.1093/ejo/19.6.623 ↗
19. Effect of Different Chemical Solvents on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3582 ↗
20. The Effects of Eucalyptus Oil, Glutathione, and Lemon Essential Oil on the Debonding Force, Adhesive Remnant Index, and Enamel Surface During Debonding of Ceramic Brackets10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0226 ↗
21. Laser Debonding of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review10.1067/mod.2003.2 ↗
22. Zakrzewski, W., Dobrzynski, M., Kuropka, P., Matys, J., Malecka, M., Kiryk, J., Rybak, Z., Dominiak, M., Grzech-Lesniak, K., and Wiglusz, K. (2020). Removal of Composite Restoration from the Root Surface in the Cervical Region Using Er: YAG Laser and Drill—In Vitro Study. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13133027 ↗
23. Kiryk, J., Matys, J., Grzech-Leśniak, K., Dominiak, M., Małecka, M., Kuropka, P., Wiglusz, R.J., and Dobrzyński, M. (2021). SEM Evaluation of Tooth Surface after a Composite Filling Removal Using Er:YAG Laser, Drills with and without Curettes, and Optional EDTA or NaOCl Conditioning. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14164469 ↗
24. Destruction of polymers under the action of laser radiation10.1088/1757-899X/1083/1/012040 ↗
25. The Evaluation of Laser Application in Surgery: A Review Article10.15171/jlms.2019.S18 ↗
26. Kiryk, J., Matys, J., Nikodem, A., Burzyńska, K., Grzech-Leśniak, K., Dominiak, M., and Dobrzyński, M. (2021). The Effect of Er:YAG Laser on a Shear Bond Strength Value of Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel—A Preliminary Study. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14092093 ↗
27. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index Between Precoated and Conventionally Bonded Orthodontic Brackets10.1186/2196-1042-14-39 ↗
28. In vitro Analysis of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Stainless Steel Brackets with Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2379 ↗
29. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Brackets Bonded with Two Types of Orthodontic Adhesives10.37358/MP.17.1.4805 ↗
30. Loss of Surface Enamel After Bracket Debonding: An In-Vivo and ex-Vivo Evaluation10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.028 ↗
31. (2024, January 01). Oral Microbiological Changes, Long-Term Enamel Alterations Due to Decalcification, and Caries Prophylactic Aspects. In Orthodontic Materials; 2014. Available online: https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ebooks/book/10.1055/b-002-43889.
32. Heat Generated During Dental Treatments Affecting Intrapulpal Temperature: A Review10.1007/s00784-023-04951-1 ↗
33. Pulp Vitality During Ultrasonic Tooth Preparation. Part 2
34. Heat Production and Bacteriostatic Effect of Neodymium Laser and Semiconductor Laser on Cavity Disinfection: In-Vitro Study
35. Evaluation of Failure Characteristics and Bond Strength After Ceramic and Polycarbonate Bracket Debonding: Effect of Bracket Base Silanization10.1093/ejo/cjm100 ↗
36. Schneiderian Membrane Perforation Rate and Increase in Bone Temperature During Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation by Means of Er: YAG Laser-An Animal Study in Pigs10.1097/ID.0000000000000520 ↗
37. Evaluation of PICO as a Knowledge Representation for Clinical Questions
38. PRISMA 2020 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews10.1136/bmj.n160 ↗
39. Method Agreement Analysis: A Review of Correct Methodology10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.003 ↗
40. Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of CAD/CAM vs. Conventional Provisional Crowns10.1590/1678-775720150451 ↗
41. Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index in Debonding of Stainless Steel Brackets Assisted with Nd:YAG Laser Irradiation
42. The Use of the Er:YAG Laser for Bracket Debonding and Its Effect on Enamel Damage10.1089/pho.2016.4115 ↗
43. Thermal effect of Er: YAG and Er, Cr: YSGG Used for Debonding Ceramic and Metal Orthodontic Brackets: An Experimental Analysis10.17219/acem/118844 ↗
44. The effect of using Er,Cr:YSGG Laser in Debonding Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study10.1007/s41547-017-0012-1 ↗
45. Effect of ER, CR: YSGG Laser Debonding on Enamel Surface Changes in Stainless Steel and Ceramic Brackets—An in Vitro Study10.4103/jos.jos_52_22 ↗
46. Effects of 445-nm Diode Laser-Assisted Debonding of Metallic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength and Enamel Surface Morphology10.1089/photob.2019.4704 ↗
47. Effectiveness of Two Intensity Levels of Diode Laser in Debonding Metallic Brackets Regarding Enamel Surface Integrity and Pulpal Temperature: An Ex-Vivo Study
48. Retrieval of Glass Fiber Post Using Er:YAG Laser and Conventional Endodontic Ultrasonic Method: An In Vitro Study10.1111/jopr.13114 ↗
49. Effect of Composite Temperature on In Vitro Intrapulpal Temperature Rise10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.024 ↗
50. Temperature Rise in Curing Modes of Two Different Dental Light-Curing Units: The Importance of Heating Rate10.1007/s10765-023-03166-6 ↗
51. Temperature Rise in Photopolymerized Adhesively-bonded Resin Composite: A Thermography Study10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.006 ↗
52. Assessment of Enamel Surface Using Scanning Electron Microscope After Debonding Conventional and Self-Ligating Metal and Ceramic Brackets: An In Vitro Study10.4103/jioh.jioh_270_23 ↗
53. Full Operating Parameter Recording As an Essential Component of the Reproducibility of Laser-Tissue Interaction and Treatments10.17219/acem/189795 ↗
54. Effect of the Different Debonding Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets on the Degree of Enamel Microcrack Healing10.1590/2177-6709.26.3.e2119177.oar ↗
55. Comparison of Different Methods of Controlling Pain During Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets10.47391/JPMA.6875 ↗
56. Efficacy of Lasers in Debonding Ceramic Brackets: Exploring the Rationale and Methods
57. Mesaroș, A., Mesaroș, M., and Buduru, S. (2022). Orthodontic Bracket Removal Using LASER-Technology—A Short Systematic Literature Review of the Past 30 Years. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15020548 ↗