Towards an Automated Design Evaluation Method for Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Freedom of design and the cost-effective production of structural parts have led to much research interest in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). Nevertheless, WAAM is subject to design constraints and fundamentally differs from other additive manufacturing processes. Consequently, design guidelines and supporting design evaluation tools adapted to WAAM are needed. One geometric approach to design evaluation is the use of a three-dimensional medial axis transformation (3D-MAT) to derive local geometry indicators. Previous works define the thickness and radius indicators. In this work, the angle between opposing faces and a mass gradient indicator are added. To apply the literature design rules regarding wall thickness, clearance, bead angle, and edge radius to specific geometry regions, features are classified by the indicators. Following a literature suggestion, wall and corner regions are differentiated by the angle indicator. An angle of 65° is identified as an effective separation limit. Additionally, the analogy of Heuvers’ spheres to the MAT helps estimate a limit of kH−1kH+1 for the mass gradient (kH: Heuvers’ factor). Finally, tests on example parts demonstrate the method’s effectiveness in verifying compliance to the specified rules. With a numerical complexity of O(n2), this method is more efficient than finite element analyses, providing early feedback in the design process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Clausthal University of Technology, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Funding
Clausthal University of Technology
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Wire-Feed Additive Manufacturing of Metal Components: Technologies, Developments and Future Interests10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 ↗
2. Roy, S., Shassere, B., Yoder, J., Nycz, A., Noakes, M., Narayanan, B.K., Meyer, L., Paul, J., and Sridharan, N. (2020). Mitigating Scatter in Mechanical Properties in AISI 410 Fabricated via Arc-Based Additive Manufacturing Process. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13214855 ↗
3. Design for Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture: Design Rules and Build Orientation Selection10.1080/09544828.2017.1365826 ↗
4. Treutler, K., and Wesling, V. (2021). The Current State of Research of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM): A Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11188619 ↗
5. A Review of Challenges for Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM)10.1007/s12666-022-02823-y ↗
6. Chaturvedi, M., Scutelnicu, E., Rusu, C.C., Mistodie, L.R., Mihailescu, D., and Subbiah, A.V. (2021). Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing: Review on Recent Findings and Challenges in Industrial Applications and Materials Characterization. Metals, 11.10.3390/met11060939 ↗
7. Rodrigues, T.A., Duarte, V., Miranda, R., Santos, T.G., and Oliveira, J. (2019). Current Status and Perspectives on Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12071121 ↗
8. Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073 ↗
9. A review of WAAM for steel construction—Manufacturing, material and geometric properties, design, and future directions10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.084 ↗
10. Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, Opportunities, Considerations, and Constraints10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 ↗
11. Bernard, A. (2011). Design for Wire and Arc Additive Layer Manufacture. Global Product Development, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2 ↗
12. Harnessing the scientific synergy of welding and additive manufacturing10.1080/13621718.2019.1615189 ↗
13. Lachmayer, R., Rettschlag, K., and Kaierle, S. (2020). Konstruktive Randbedingungen bei Anwendung des WAAM-Verfahrens. Konstruktion für die Additive Fertigung 2019, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-61149-4 ↗
14. Introduction to the design rules for Metal Big Area Additive Manufacturing
15. Computer Implementation of Heuvers’ Circle Method for Thermal Optimisation in Castings10.1179/136404605225022910 ↗
16. Design Study for Wire and Arc Additive Manufacture10.1504/IJPD.2014.060028 ↗
17. A Review of Constitutive Models Used in Macroscale Finite Element Analysis of Additive Manufacturing and Post-Processing of Additively Manufactured Components10.1080/17452759.2024.2356079 ↗
18. Extraction and Visualization of Dimensions from a Geometric Model10.3722/cadaps.2010.579-589 ↗
19. Tominski, J., Lammers, S., Wulf, C., and Zimmer, D. (2018, January 13–15). Method for a Software-Based Design Check of Additively Manufactured Components. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium–An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, USA.
20. Analysis of Design Guidelines for Automated Order Acceptance in Additive Manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.027 ↗
21. Lockett, H., Emms, R., Williams, S., Ding, J., and Martina, F. (2018, January 9–11). The Application of Knowledge Based Engineering to Design for Wire+Arc Additive Manufacture (WAAM). Proceedings of the 6th Aircraft Structural Design Conference, Bristol, UK.
22. An End-to-End Framework for the Additive Manufacture of Optimized Tubular Structures10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3132797 ↗
23. Was hat der Stahlgießer dem Konstrukteur über Lunker- und Rißbildung zu sagen?
24. Geupel, H. (1996). Konstruktionslehre, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-61098-1 ↗
25. Fritz, A.H. (2018). Fertigungstechnik, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-56535-3 ↗
26. Lambourne, J., Djuric, Z., Brujic, D., and Ristic, M. (2005, January 13–17). Calculation and visualisation of the thickness of 3D CAD models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2005, Cambridge, MA, USA.
27. Manufacturability Analysis for Additive Manufacturing Using a Novel Feature Recognition Technique10.1080/16864360.2018.1462574 ↗
28. Tedia, S., and Williams, C.B. (2016, January 8–10). Manufacturability Analysis Tool for Additive Manufacturing Using Voxel-Based Geometric Modeling. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 2016—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, USA.
29. A Geometric Reasoning Approach for Additive Manufacturing Print Quality Assessment and Automated Model Correction10.1016/j.cad.2018.12.001 ↗
30. Automatic Recognition of Machining Features Using Artificial Neural Networks10.1007/s00170-008-1536-z ↗
31. A data-driven approach for predicting printability in metal additive manufacturing processes10.1007/s10845-020-01541-w ↗
32. An Ontology for Supporting Digital Manufacturability Analysis10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.211 ↗
33. Knowledge-Driven Manufacturability Analysis for Additive Manufacturing10.1109/OJIES.2021.3061610 ↗
34. Campbell, J. (2011). Chapter 10—The 10 Rules for Good Castings. Complete Casting Handbook, Butterworth-Heinemann.10.1016/B978-1-85617-809-9.10010-6 ↗
35. Bralla, J.G. (1999). Design for Manufacturability Handbook, McGraw-Hill. [2nd ed.]. McGraw-Hill Handbooks.
36. Geometric Limitation and Tensile Properties of Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing 5A06 Aluminum Alloy Parts10.1007/s11665-016-2480-y ↗
37. 3D Welding and Milling: Part I–a Direct Approach for Freeform Fabrication of Metallic Prototypes10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.11.021 ↗
38. Fabrication of Geometrical Features Using Wire and Arc Additive Manufacture10.1177/0954405412437126 ↗
39. Optimization of WAAM Deposition Patterns for T-crossing Features10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.043 ↗
40. End lateral extension path strategy for intersection in wire and arc additive manufactured 2319 aluminum alloy10.1108/RPJ-05-2019-0123 ↗
41. A Path Planning and Sharp Corner Correction Strategy for Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing of Solid Components with Polygonal Cross-Sections10.1007/s00170-020-04960-4 ↗
42. (2020). Guide for Additive Manufacturing—Design–Directed Energy Deposition (Standard No. ASTM F3413-19e1).
43. Wathen-Dunn, W. (1967). A Transformation for Extracting New Descriptors of Shape. Models for Perception of Speech and Visual Form, MIT Press.
44. Gmsh: A 3-D Finite Element Mesh Generator with Built-in Pre- and Post-Processing Facilities: THE GMSH PAPER10.1002/nme.2579 ↗
45. The rust language10.1145/2692956.2663188 ↗
46. Stromberg, H., and Pusicha, J. (2024, February 05). WAAM_fit GitLab Repository. Available online: https://gitlab.tu-clausthal.de/jpu18/WAAM_fit.
47. Preston-Werner, T., and Gedam, P. (2024, May 25). TOML v1.0.0. Available online: https://toml.io/en/v1.0.0.
48. 3D Medial Axis Point Approximation Using Nearest Neighbors and the Normal Field10.1007/s00371-011-0594-7 ↗
49. Multidimensional Binary Search Trees Used for Associative Searching10.1145/361002.361007 ↗
50. Bayardo Spadafora, J., Gomez-Fernandez, F., and Taubin, G. (2019, January 16–19). Fast Non-Convex Hull Computation. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), Québec City, QC, Canada.10.1109/3DV.2019.00087 ↗
51. An Algorithm for Finding Best Matches in Logarithmic Expected Time10.1145/355744.355745 ↗
52. Peters, R. (2018). Geographical point cloud modelling with the 3D medial axis transform. [Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology].