journal article·2025-01-13Open access

Two-Party Quantum Private Comparison Protocol Based on Rotational Encryption

Min Hou, Yue Wu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a two-party quantum private comparison (QPC) protocol that employs single photons as quantum resources and utilizes rotational encryption to safeguard the privacy of the inputs. This protocol enables two parties to compare their private data without disclosing any information beyond the outcome of the comparison. The participants’ private data are encoded as single photons, which are encrypted using a rotational encryption method. These encrypted single photons are then transmitted to a semi-honest third party (TP), who conducts single-particle measurements to determine if the users’ private data are equal and subsequently announces the results to the participants. By harnessing the principles of quantum mechanics, we ensure robust protection against potential eavesdropping and participant attacks. In contrast to numerous existing QPC protocols that rely on multi-qubit or d-dimensional quantum states, our method exhibits superior efficiency and practicality. Specifically, our protocol achieves a qubit efficiency of 50% by using two single photons to compare one bit of classical information, and single photons are easier to prepare than multi-qubit and d-dimensional quantum states.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Mechanics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Computer Science, Sichuan University Jinjiang College, Meishan 620860, China

Network and Data Security Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China

Funding

Open Fund of Network and Data Security Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province · Gongga Plan for the “Double World-class Project”

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Bennett, C.H., and Brassard, G. (1984, January 9–12). Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India.
2. Efficient and secure quantum secret sharing for eight users10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033036 ↗
3. Theory of communication efficient quantum secret sharing10.1109/TIT.2021.3139839 ↗
4. Experimental quantum secret sharing based on phase encoding of coherent states10.1007/s11433-023-2105-7 ↗
5. The evolution of quantum secure direct communication: On the road to the qinternet10.1109/COMST.2024.3367535 ↗
6. One-step quantum secure direct communication10.1016/j.scib.2021.11.002 ↗
7. Realization of quantum secure direct communication over 100 km fiber with time-bin and phase quantum states10.1038/s41377-022-00769-w ↗
8. Quantum secure direct communication based on quantum homomorphic encryption10.1142/S0217732321502631 ↗
9. Multiparty quantum key agreement10.1103/PhysRevA.104.042421 ↗
10. Multiparty Quantum Key Agreement with Strong Fairness Property10.32604/csse.2020.35.457 ↗
11. Quantum key agreement protocol based on quantum search algorithm10.1007/s10773-020-04703-x ↗
12. An improved quantum private set intersection protocol based on hadamard gates10.1007/s10773-022-05048-3 ↗
13. A novel quantum private set intersection scheme with a semi-honest third party10.1007/s11128-023-04195-8 ↗
14. A novel quantum protocol for private set intersection10.1007/s10773-021-04824-x ↗
15. Quantum multi-party private set intersection using single photons10.1016/j.physa.2024.129974 ↗
16. Yao, A.C. (1982, January 3–5). Protocols for secure computations. Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’ 82), Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/SFCS.1982.38 ↗
17. A fair and efficient solution to the socialist millionaires’ problem10.1016/S0166-218X(00)00342-5 ↗
18. Insecurity of quantum secure computations10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1154 ↗
19. An efficient two-party quantum private comparison protocol with decoy photons and two-photon entanglement10.1088/1751-8113/42/5/055305 ↗
20. An efficient protocol for the private comparison of equal information based on the triplet entangled state and single-particle measurement10.1016/j.optcom.2009.11.085 ↗
21. New quantum private comparison protocol using χ-type state10.1007/s10773-011-1073-7 ↗
22. Two-party quantum private comparison with five-qubit entangled states10.1007/s10773-017-3291-0 ↗
23. Quantum private comparison with six-particle maximally entangled states10.1142/S0217732322501498 ↗
24. Two-party quantum private comparison protocol with maximally entangled seven-qubit state10.1142/S0217732319502298 ↗
25. Two-party quantum private comparison based on eight-qubit entangled state10.1142/S0217732322500262 ↗
26. Efficient quantum private comparison based on entanglement swapping of bell states10.1007/s10773-021-04915-9 ↗
27. Hou, M., Sun, S.Y., and Zhang, W. (2024). Quantum private comparison for the socialist millionaire problem. Front. Phys., 12.10.3389/fphy.2024.1408446 ↗
28. Hou, M., and Wu, Y. (2024). New Quantum Private Comparison Using Bell States. Entropy, 26.10.3390/e26080682 ↗
29. Quantum private comparison using single bell state10.1007/s10773-021-04937-3 ↗
30. Quantum gate-based quantum private comparison10.1007/s10773-019-04369-0 ↗
31. Hou, M., and Wu, Y. (2024). Efficient Quantum Private Comparison with Unitary Operations. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12223541 ↗
32. Huang, X., Zhang, S.B., and Cheng, W. (2021, January 13–15). Quantum Private Comparison Based on GHZ-type States. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE AFRICON, Arusha, Tanzania.10.1109/AFRICON51333.2021.9570929 ↗
33. Quantum private comparison protocols with a number of multi-particle entangled states10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906687 ↗
34. Hou, M., Wu, Y., and Zhang, S. (2024). New Quantum Private Comparison Using Four-Particle Cluster State. Entropy, 26.10.3390/e26060512 ↗
35. Quantum private comparison of equality based on five-particle cluster state10.1088/0253-6102/66/6/621 ↗
36. Hou, M., Wu, Y., and Zhang, S. (2024). Efficient Quantum Private Comparison Based on GHZ States. Entropy, 26.10.3390/e26050413 ↗
37. Multi-party quantum private comparison based on the entanglement swapping of d-level cat states and d-level Bell states10.1007/s11128-017-1628-5 ↗
38. Quantum private comparison protocol with d-dimensional Bell states10.1007/s11128-012-0395-6 ↗
39. Quantum private comparison protocol based on entanglement swapping of-level Bell states10.1007/s11128-013-0536-6 ↗
40. Quantum private comparison of size using d-level Bell states with a semi-honest third party10.1007/s11128-021-03059-3 ↗
41. Efficient multiparty quantum private comparison protocol based on single photons and rotation encryption10.1007/s11128-023-04027-9 ↗
42. Practical quantum protocols for blind millionaires’ problem based on rotation encryption and swap test10.1016/j.physa.2024.129614 ↗
43. Hou, M., and Wu, Y. (2024). Single-photon-based quantum secure protocol for the socialist millionaires’ problem. Front. Phys., 12.10.3389/fphy.2024.1364140 ↗
44. Quantum private comparison of arbitrary single qubit states based on swap test10.1088/1674-1056/ac4103 ↗
45. Improving the security of secure direct communication based on the secret transmitting order of particles10.1103/PhysRevA.74.054302 ↗
46. Trojan-horse attacks on quantum key distribution with classical Bob10.1007/s11128-014-0872-1 ↗
47. Huang, X., Zhang, S., and Xia, J. (2022, January 22–26). Efficient Quantum Private Comparison Using Locally Indistinguishable Orthogonal Product States. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Security, Qinghai, China.10.1007/978-3-031-06764-8_21 ↗
48. New quantum private comparison protocol using EPR pairs10.1007/s11128-011-0251-0 ↗
49. Efficient quantum private comparison protocol based on the entanglement swapping between four-qubit cluster state and extended Bell state10.1007/s11128-019-2266-x ↗
50. Hou, M., and Wu, Y. (2024). Quantum Private Comparison Based on Four-Particle Cluster State. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210759 ↗