Uranium Mineral Transport in the Peña Blanca Desert: Dissolution or Fragmentation? Simulation in Sediment Column Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
The Sierra Peña Blanca (SPB) region in Chihuahua, Mexico contains a significant uranium deposit representing about 40% of the country’s reserves. Common uranium minerals in this area include uranophane, schoepite, and weeksite/boltwoodite, with several superficial occurrences. Mining activities in the 1980s left unprocessed uranium ore exposed to weathering, with potential transport towards Laguna del Cuervo. This study presents an experimental simulation of uranium transport in SPB sediments using three approaches: (i) a batch experiment to evaluate the ideal adsorption of (UO2)2+ by fine sediment; (ii) a column system fed with 569 mgU L−1 UO2(NO3)2 to simulate adsorption by different sediment particle sizes; (iii) a column system with an upper horizon of uranophane from the area, fed with deionized water, to simulate uranium weathering and transport in particulate material, determined by liquid scintillation counting, revealed that the clay fraction had the highest adsorption capacity for U. X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) analysis at the U L3 edge confirmed the U(IV) oxidation state and the fittings of the extended XAFS spectra confirmed the presence of the uranophane group of minerals. X-ray tomography further corroborated the distribution of particulate minerals along the column. The results suggest that the primary transport mechanism in SPB involves the fragmentation of uranium minerals, accompanied by eventual dissolution and subsequent adsorption of U onto sediments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Materials Research Center, Miguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Chihuahua 31136, Mexico
Faculty of Animal Science and Ecology, Autonomous University of Chihuahua, Perif. R. Almada km 1, Chihuahua 31453, Mexico
Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of Chihuahua, Circuito Universitario Campus II, Chihuahua 31125, Mexico
Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of Chiapas, Blvd. Belisario Domínguez km 1081, Tuxtla Gutiérrez 29050, Mexico
Instituto de Geología Estación Regional del Noreste, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Luis Donaldo Colosio s/n, Los Arcos, Hermosillo 83250, Mexico
Funding
CONAHCYT research project
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Uranium in Natural Waters and the Environment: Distribution, Speciation and Impact10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105534 ↗
2. Bourdon, B., Turner, S., Henderson, G.M., and Lundstrom, C.C. (2003). Introduction to U-Series Geochemistry. Miner. Geochem., 52.10.1515/9781501509308 ↗
3. International Atomic Energy Agency (2004). The Long Term Stabilization of Uranium Mill Tailings, IAEA.
4. Dissolution of Uranyl Microprecipitates in Subsurface Sediments at Hanford Site, USA10.1016/j.gca.2004.04.017 ↗
5. Fluorescence Spectroscopy of U(VI)-Silicates and U(VI)-Contaminated Hanford Sediment10.1016/j.gca.2004.08.028 ↗
6. A Multi-Technique Study of Altered Granitic Rock from the Krunkelbach Valley Uranium Deposit, Southern Germany10.1039/D0RA03375H ↗
7. Uranium Speciation in Weathered Granitic Waste Rock Piles: An XAFS Investigation10.1039/C9RA00961B ↗
8. Rapid Dissolution of Soluble Uranyl Phases in Arid, Mine-Impacted Catchments near Church Rock, NM10.1021/es071738k ↗
9. Contaminant Dispersion at the Rehabilitated Mary Kathleen Uranium Mine, Australia10.1007/s00254-005-0014-2 ↗
10. Radiological Analyses of 226Ra and 238U in Surface Water and Sediments from the Jackpile Member of the Morrison Formation, Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico
11. Mineralization of Contaminant Uranium and Leach Rates in Sediments from Hanford, Washington10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.10.005 ↗
12. Metaschoepite Dissolution in Sediment Column Systems—Implications for Uranium Speciation and Transport10.1021/acs.est.9b02292 ↗
13. Johnson, R.H., Tigar, A.D., and Richardson, C.D. (2022). Column-Test Data Analyses and Geochemical Modeling to Determine Uranium Reactive Transport Parameters at a Former Uranium Mill Site (Grand Junction, Colorado). Minerals, 12.10.3390/min12040438 ↗
14. Vadose-Zone Alteration of Metaschoepite and Ceramic UO2 in Savannah River Site Field Lysimeters10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160862 ↗
15. An Experimental Approach to Assess the Post-Depositional Mobility of 134Cs10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106753 ↗
16. K-Ar Ages of Volcanic Rocks from the Central Sierra Peha Blanca, Chihuahua, Mexic
17. Volcanogenic Uranium Mineralizations in the Sierra Pena Blanca District, Chihuahua, Mexico; Three Genetic Models10.2113/gsecongeo.86.2.233 ↗
18. Goodell, P.C. (1985). Chihuahua City Uranium Province, Chihuahua, Mexico. Uranium Deposits in Volcanic Rocks, Proceedings of the Technical Committee Meeting on Uranium Deposits in Volcanic Rocks, El Paso, TX, USA, 2–5 April 1984, IAEA.
19. Stratigraphy of the PB-1 Well, Nopal I Uranium Deposit, Sierra Peña Blanca, Chihuahua, Mexico10.2747/0020-6814.50.11.959 ↗
20. Alteration of Uraninite from the Nopai I Deposit, Pefia Blanca District, Chihuahua, Mexico, Compared to Degradation of Spent Nuclear Fuel in the Proposed U.S. High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada10.1016/0883-2927(94)90030-2 ↗
21. García, E. (2004). Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Köppen, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
22. INEGI (2017). Anuario Estadístico y Geográfico de Chihuahua, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Available online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=702825092139.
23. Schmidt, R.H. (1986). Chihuahuan Climate. Proceedings, Second Symposium on Resources of the Chihuahuan Desert, Chihuahuan, Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute. Available online: https://www.utep.edu/leb/pdf/chihuahuanclimate.pdf.
24. INEGI (2003). Síntesis de Información Geográfica Del Estado de Chihuahua, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
25. Reineck, H.-E., and Singh, I.B. (2012). Depositional Sedimentary Environments with Reference to Terrigenous Clastics, Springer Study ed., Springer.
26. A Record of Uranium-Series Transport at Nopal I, Sierra Peña Blanca, Mexico: Implications for Natural Uranium Deposits and Radioactive Waste Repositories10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.03.034 ↗
27. Heterogeneous Seepage at the Nopal I Natural Analogue Site, Chihuahua, Mexico10.1007/s10040-011-0783-5 ↗
28. Uranium-Series Constraints on Radionuclide Transport and Groundwater Flow at the Nopal I Uranium Deposit, Sierra Peña Blanca, Mexico10.1021/es902689e ↗
29. Modeling Non-Steady State Radioisotope Transport in the Vadose Zone—A Case Study Using Uranium Isotopes at Peña Blanca, Mexico10.1016/j.gca.2009.07.011 ↗
30. Unsaturated Zone Waters From the Nopal I Natural Analog, Chihuahua, Mexico—Implications for Radionuclide Mobility at Yucca Mountain10.1557/PROC-556-809 ↗
31. Hernández-Hernández, D. (2019). Transporte y Equilibrio Radioactivo Del Uranio Desde El Yacimiento de Peña Blanca Hasta Laguna Del Cuervo, Chihuahua. [Master’s Thesis, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados].
32. Rodríguez-Guerra, Y. (2023). Transporte de Isótopos Radiactivos de La Serie Del Uranio Desde Peña Blanca Hasta Laguna Del Cuervo a Través Del Arroyo El Tigre, Chihuahua. [Master’s Thesis, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados].
33. Salas, G., and Castillo Nieto, F. (1991). Geology of Uranium Deposits in Mexico. Economic Geology, Mexico, Geological Society of America.10.1130/DNAG-GNA-P3 ↗
34. Transport and Concentration of Uranium Isotopes in the Laguna Del Cuervo, Chihuahua, Mexico
35. Nash, T. (2024, September 05). Volcanogenic Uranium Deposits: Geology, Geochemical Processes, and Criteria for Resource Assessment, Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1001/pdf/OF10-1001.pdf.10.3133/ofr20101001 ↗
36. Hernández-Herrera, C., Canche-Tello, J., Reyes-Cortés, I., Rodríguez-Guerra, Y., Pérez-Reyes, V., Faudoa-Goméz, F., Cabral-Lares, M., Hernández-Cruz, D., Loredo-Portales, R., and Montero-Cabrera, M.E. (2023, January 8–13). Interpretación de Los Espectros de Absorción de Rayos-X Por Radiación Sincrotrón de Las Especies Minerales Uraníferas Transportadas Por El Arroyo “El Tigre”, En Peña Blanca, Chihuahua, México. Proceedings of the LXVI Congreso Nacional de Física, Morelia, Mexico.
37. Uranium Chemistry in Soils and Sediments10.1016/S0166-2481(10)34014-1 ↗
38. Koningsberger, D.C., and Prins, R. (2024, October 03). X-ray Absorption: Principles, Applications, Techniques of EXAFS, SEXAFS and XANES, Available online: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6748791.
39. (2017). Soil Quality-Sampling-Part 102: Selection and Application of Sampling Techniques (Standard No. ISO 18400-102).
40. Measuring and Analyzing Particle Size in a Geomorphic Context10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00385-7 ↗
41. Recent Advances in Magnetic Structure Determination Neutron Powder Diffraction10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I ↗
42. Review of adsorption isotherms models
43. Tuli, J.K. (2024, October 01). Nuclear Wallet Cards, Available online: https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/walletcards/doc/wallet-cards-large-2011-10.pdf.
44. Determination of Trace Elements in 11 Chinese Geological Reference Materials by ICP-MS10.1111/j.1751-908X.1992.tb00488.x ↗
45. McDowell, W.J. (1994). Isotopic Uranium by PERALS, ORDELA, Inc.. Reference SOP #AM-792.0.
46. Determination of 234U and 238U Activities in Soil by Liquid Scintillation and High-Resolution Alpha Spectrometry10.15415/jnp.2021.82014 ↗
47. Villalobos, R. (2012). Influencia Del Hierro En La Remoción de Uranio Por Membranas de Triacetato de Celulosa Con Carbón Activado. [Ph.D. Thesis, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados]. Available online: http://cimav.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1004/690.
48. A Review of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods and Applications in Contaminant Hydrogeology Research10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.01.001 ↗
49. Analysis of Uranyl-Bearing Phases by EXAFS Spectroscopy: Interferences, Multiple Scattering, Accuracy of Structural Parameters, and Spectral Differences10.2138/am-2004-0711 ↗
50. Confocal Micrometer-Scale X-ray Fluorescence and X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure Studies of Uranium Speciation in a Tertiary Sediment from a Waste Disposal Natural Analogue Site10.1021/es048644k ↗
51. Uranium Redox Transition Pathways in Acetate-Amended Sediments10.1073/pnas.1219198110 ↗
52. Uranium (IV) Adsorption by Natural Organic Matter in Anoxic Sediments10.1073/pnas.1611918114 ↗
53. I20; the Versatile X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Beamline at Diamond Light Source10.1088/1742-6596/190/1/012038 ↗
54. Faudoa, F. (2023). Modelo de La Evolución de Las Especies Minerales Superficiales de Uranio de La Sierra Peña Blanca, Chihuahua, México. [Master’s Thesis, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados].
55. B18: A Core XAS Spectroscopy Beamline for Diamond10.1088/1742-6596/190/1/012039 ↗
56. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: Data Analysis for X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Using IFEFFIT10.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
57. Uranium Minerals from the San Marcos District, Chihuahua, Mexico10.1007/s00710-009-0104-z ↗
58. (2024, September 26). XAS Database (XASDB). Canadian Light Source. Available online: http://xasdb.lightsource.ca.
59. Cárdenas-Flores, D. (1985). Volcanic Stratigraphy and U-Mo Mineralization of the Sierra de Peña District, Chihuahua, Mexico. Uranium Deposits in Volcanic Rocks, Proceedings of a Technical Committee Meeting on Uranium Deposits in Volcanic Rocks, El Paso, TX, USA, 2–5 April 1984, IAEA.
60. Adamson, A. (2012). A Textbook of Physical Chemistry, Elsevier.
61. Sorption Characteristic of Uranium(VI) Ion onto K-Feldspar10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.07.041 ↗
62. Approaches to Surface Complexation Modeling of Uranium(VI) Adsorption on Aquifer Sediments10.1016/j.gca.2004.03.003 ↗
63. Analysis of Uranium Sorption in a Laboratory Column Experiment Using a Reactive Transport and Surface Complexation Model10.1007/s11242-023-01956-y ↗
64. Organic Complexation of U(VI) in Reducing Soils at a Natural Analogue Site: Implications for Uranium Transport10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126859 ↗
65. Use of HERFD–XANES at the U L3- and M4-Edges To Determine the Uranium Valence State on [Ni(H2O)4]3[U(OH,H2O)(UO2)8O12(OH)3]10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00014 ↗
66. Chemical Shift of U L3 Edges in Different Uranium Compounds Obtained by X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy with Synchrotron Radiation10.1007/s12034-014-0679-9 ↗
67. Structure de l’uranophane alpha, Ca(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2.5H2O10.1107/S0108270187011491 ↗
68. Sorption of Uranium on Some Natural Modified Clay Mineral Deposits
69. Uranium Anomalies in Recent Sediments of Lakes from the Northern Part of the Murmansk Region, Arctic10.1134/S0016702920100134 ↗
70. Radionuclides from Past Uranium Mining in Rivers of Portugal10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.05.007 ↗
71. Pérez-Reyes, V. (2020). Estudio de La Distribución de Uranio Proveniente Del Yacimiento de Peña Blanca En La Laguna Del Cuervo. [Master’s Thesis, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados].
72. Effect of Grain Size on Uranium (VI) Surface Complexation Kinetics and Adsorption Additivity10.1021/es200920k ↗
73. Church Rock Revisited: The Tailings Spill Three Years Later
74. (2024, September 26). Soil Survey Staf Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42, Version 6.0, Available online: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/SSIR42.pdf.
75. Porosity and Pore Size Distribution
76. Reich, T., Drebert, J., and Boulyga, S. (2004). EXAFS Study of Uranium (VI) Sorption on Kaolinite, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Speciation Techniques and Facilities for Radioactive Materials at Synchrotron Light Sources.
77. Thompson, H.A., Parks, G.A., and Brown, G.E. (1994). Spectroscopic Studies of U(VI) Sorption at the Kaolinite-Water Interface LANL Grant 9-X42-6947E-1, Los Alamos National Lab.10.2172/113877 ↗