journal article·2025-01-08Open access

Authenticity at Risk: Key Factors in the Generation and Detection of Audio Deepfakes

Alba Martínez-Serrano, Claudia Montero-Ramírez, Carmen Peláez-Moreno

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

Detecting audio deepfakes is crucial to ensure authenticity and security, especially in contexts where audio veracity can have critical implications, such as in the legal, security or human rights domains. Various elements, such as complex acoustic backgrounds, enhance the realism of deepfakes; however, their effect on the processes of creation and detection of deepfakes remains under-explored. This study systematically analyses how factors such as the acoustic environment, user type and signal-to-noise ratio influence the quality and detectability of deepfakes. For this study, we use the WELIVE dataset, which contains audio recordings of 14 female victims of gender-based violence in real and uncontrolled environments. The results indicate that the complexity of the acoustic scene affects both the generation and detection of deepfakes: classifiers, particularly the linear SVM, are more effective in complex acoustic environments, suggesting that simpler acoustic environments may facilitate the generation of more realistic deepfakes and, in turn, make it more difficult for classifiers to detect them. These findings underscore the need to develop adaptive models capable of handling diverse acoustic environments, thus improving detection reliability in dynamic and real-world contexts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Music and Audio Processing · Music Technology and Sound Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Signal Theory and Communications Department, University Carlos III of Madrid, 28911 Madrid, Spain

Gender Studies Institute, University Carlos III of Madrid, 28903 Madrid, Spain

Funding

INCIBE (Ministry of Digital Transformation and Public Function) · Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Martínez-Serrano, A., Montero-Ramírez, C., and Peláez-Moreno, C. (2024, January 11–13). The Influence of Acoustic Context on the Generation and Detection of Audio Deepfakes. Proceedings of the Iberspeech 2024, Aveiro, Portugal.10.21437/IberSPEECH.2024-2 ↗
2. Empowering Things with Intelligence: A Survey of the Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence of Things10.1109/JIOT.2020.3039359 ↗
3. Deepfakes: Current and future trends10.1007/s10462-023-10679-x ↗
4. Hu, H.R., Song, Y., Liu, Y., Dai, L.R., McLoughlin, I., and Liu, L. (2022, January 23–27). Domain robust deep embedding learning for speaker recognition. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2022—2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Singapore.10.1109/ICASSP43922.2022.9747364 ↗
5. The effect of deep learning methods on deepfake audio detection for digital investigation10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.283 ↗
6. Bindi: Affective Internet of Things to Combat Gender-Based Violence10.1109/JIOT.2022.3177256 ↗
7. TIMIT-TTS: A text-to-speech dataset for multimodal synthetic media detection10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3276480 ↗
8. Sun, C., Jia, S., Hou, S., and Lyu, S. (2023, January 17–24). Ai-synthesized voice detection using neural vocoder artifacts. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPRW59228.2023.00097 ↗
9. Toda, T., Chen, L.H., Saito, D., Villavicencio, F., Wester, M., Wu, Z., and Yamagishi, J. (2016, January 8–12). The Voice Conversion Challenge 2016. Proceedings of the Interspeech, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.21437/Interspeech.2016-1066 ↗
10. Ping, W., Peng, K., Gibiansky, A., Arik, S.O., Kannan, A., Narang, S., Raiman, J., and Miller, J. (2017). Deep voice 3: Scaling text-to-speech with convolutional sequence learning. arXiv.
11. Ren, Y., Hu, C., Tan, X., Qin, T., Zhao, S., Zhao, Z., and Liu, T.Y. (2020). Fastspeech 2: Fast and high-quality end-to-end text to speech. arXiv.
12. Kaneko, T., Kameoka, H., Tanaka, K., and Hojo, N. (2019, January 12–17). Cyclegan-vc2: Improved cyclegan-based non-parallel voice conversion. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2019—2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK.10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682897 ↗
13. Li, Y.A., Zare, A., and Mesgarani, N. (2021). Starganv2-vc: A diverse, unsupervised, non-parallel framework for natural-sounding voice conversion. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2021-319 ↗
14. Yamamoto, R., Song, E., and Kim, J.M. (2020). Parallel WaveGAN: A Fast Waveform Generation Model Based on Generative Adversarial Networks with Multi-Resolution Spectrogram. arXiv.10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053795 ↗
15. A dataset of histograms of original and fake voice recordings (H-Voice)10.1016/j.dib.2020.105331 ↗
16. Khalid, H., Tariq, S., Kim, M., and Woo, S.S. (2021). FakeAVCeleb: A novel audio-video multimodal deepfake dataset. arXiv.
17. Yi, J., Bai, Y., Tao, J., Ma, H., Tian, Z., Wang, C., Wang, T., and Fu, R. (2021). Half-truth: A partially fake audio detection dataset. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2021-930 ↗
18. Information Forensics and Security: A quarter-century-long journey10.1109/MSP.2023.3275319 ↗
19. Kalpokas, I., and Kalpokiene, J. (2022). Deepfakes: A Realistic Assessment of Potentials, Risks, and Policy Regulation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-93802-4 ↗
20. Deepfakes and beyond: A survey of face manipulation and fake detection10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014 ↗
21. Martín-Doñas, J.M., and Álvarez, A. (2022, January 23–27). The vicomtech audio deepfake detection system based on wav2vec2 for the 2022 add challenge. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2022—2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Singapore.10.1109/ICASSP43922.2022.9747768 ↗
22. Yi, J., Tao, J., Fu, R., Yan, X., Wang, C., Wang, T., Zhang, C.Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., and Ren, Y. (2023). Add 2023: The second audio deepfake detection challenge. arXiv.
23. Rodríguez-Ortega, Y., Ballesteros, D.M., and Renza, D. (2020). A machine learning model to detect fake voice. International Conference on Applied Informatics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-61702-8_1 ↗
24. Singh, A.K., and Singh, P. (2021, January 8–10). Detection of ai-synthesized speech using cepstral & bispectral statistics. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/MIPR51284.2021.00076 ↗
25. Li, X., Li, N., Weng, C., Liu, X., Su, D., Yu, D., and Meng, H. (2021, January 6–11). Replay and synthetic speech detection with res2net architecture. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2021—2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP39728.2021.9413828 ↗
26. Gomez-Alanis, A., Peinado, A.M., Gonzalez, J.A., and Gomez, A.M. (2019, January 15–19). A light convolutional GRU-RNN deep feature extractor for ASV spoofing detection. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Graz, Austria.10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2212 ↗
27. Subramani, N., and Rao, D. (2020, January 7–12). Learning efficient representations for fake speech detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, NY, USA.
28. Deep4SNet: Deep learning for fake speech classification10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115465 ↗
29. Xie, Z., Li, B., Xu, X., Liang, Z., Yu, K., and Wu, M. (2024). FakeSound: Deepfake General Audio Detection. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2024-1703 ↗
30. Xu, X., Ma, Z., Wu, M., and Yu, K. (2024). Towards Weakly Supervised Text-to-Audio Grounding. arXiv.10.1109/TMM.2024.3443614 ↗
31. Liu, H., Chen, K., Tian, Q., Wang, W., and Plumbley, M.D. (2024, January 14–19). AudioSR: Versatile audio super-resolution at scale. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10447246 ↗
32. Kim, C.D., Kim, B., Lee, H., and Kim, G. (2019, January 2–7). Audiocaps: Generating captions for audios in the wild. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
33. Rituerto González, E. (2023). Multimodal Affective Computing in Wearable Devices with Applications in the Detection of Gender-Based Violence, Programa de Doctorado en Multimedia y Comunicaciones, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
34. Montero-Ramírez, C., Rituerto-González, E., and Peláez-Moreno, C. (2024, January 11–13). Evaluation of Automatic Embeddings for Supervised Soundscape Classification in-the-wild. Proceedings of the Iberspeech 2024, Aveiro, Portugal.10.21437/IberSPEECH.2024-22 ↗
35. Dziech, A., Mees, W., and Czyżewski, A. (2020). A Hybrid Data Fusion Architecture for BINDI: A Wearable Solution to Combat Gender-Based Violence. Multimedia Communications, Services and Security, Springer International Publishing. Communications in Computer and Information Science.
36. Montero-Ramírez, C., Rituerto-González, E., and Peláez-Moreno, C. (Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 2024). Building Artificial Situational Awareness: Soundscape Classification in Daily-life Scenarios of Gender based Violence Victims, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., submitted for publication.
37. Kum, S., and Nam, J. (2019). Joint detection and classification of singing voice melody using convolutional recurrent neural networks. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9071324 ↗
38. Veaux, C., Yamagishi, J., and MacDonald, K. (2024, May 13). Superseded-CSTR VCTK Corpus: English Multi-Speaker Corpus for CSTR Voice Cloning Toolkit. Available online: http://datashare.is.ed.ac.uk/handle/10283/2651.
39. Rabiner, L., and Schafer, R. (2010). Theory and Applications of Digital Speech Processing, Prentice Hall Press. [1st ed.].
40. Support-Vector Networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
41. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
42. Nearest Neighbor Pattern Classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
43. Bayesian Network Classifiers10.1023/A:1007465528199 ↗
44. Koutini, K., Schlüter, J., Eghbal-Zadeh, H., and Widmer, G. (2021). Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2022-227 ↗
45. Park, D.S., Chan, W., Zhang, Y., Chiu, C.C., Zoph, B., Cubuk, E.D., and Le, Q.V. (2019). Specaugment: A simple data augmentation method for automatic speech recognition. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2680 ↗
46. Gemmeke, J.F., Ellis, D.P., Freedman, D., Jansen, A., Lawrence, W., Moore, R.C., Plakal, M., and Ritter, M. (2017, January 5–9). Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/ICASSP.2017.7952261 ↗
47. Gong, Y., Chung, Y.A., and Glass, J. (2021). Ast: Audio spectrogram transformer. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2021-698 ↗
48. Bredin, H., and Laurent, A. (September, January 30). End-to-end speaker segmentation for overlap-aware resegmentation. Proceedings of the Interspeech 2021, Brno, Czech Republic.10.21437/Interspeech.2021-560 ↗
49. Tamayo Flórez, P.A., Manrique, R., and Pereira Nunes, B. (2023, January 20–24). HABLA: A Dataset of Latin American Spanish Accents for Voice Anti-spoofing. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Dublin, Ireland.10.21437/Interspeech.2023-2272 ↗
50. Park, K., and Mulc, T. (2019). CSS10: A Collection of Single Speaker Speech Datasets for 10 Languages. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1500 ↗
51. Calzolari, N., Béchet, F., Blache, P., Choukri, K., Cieri, C., Declerck, T., Goggi, S., Isahara, H., Maegaard, B., and Mariani, J. (2020, January 11–16). Crowdsourcing Latin American Spanish for Low-Resource Text-to-Speech. Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France.
52. Popov, V., Vovk, I., Gogoryan, V., Sadekova, T., Kudinov, M., and Wei, J. (2021). Diffusion-based voice conversion with fast maximum likelihood sampling scheme. arXiv.
53. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
54. Mittag, G., Naderi, B., Chehadi, A., and Möller, S. (2021). NISQA: A deep CNN-self-attention model for multidimensional speech quality prediction with crowdsourced datasets. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2021-299 ↗