journal article·2024-12-28Open access

Evaluating the Functionality of a Field-Based Test Battery for the Identification of Risk for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: An Exploratory Factor Analysis

Charis Tsarbou, Nikolaos I. Liveris, Sofia A. Xergia, George Papageorgiou, Vasileios Sideris, Giannis Giakas, Elias Tsepis

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 1

Abstract

(1) Background: A parsimonious test battery is deemed necessary to efficiently assess the functional performance of athletes avoiding redundant measurements. This study investigates the interrelationships between elements of an experimental field-based test battery during pre-season assessment (PA), with the purpose of enhancing comprehension of the underlying structure of the assessed variables and suggesting guidelines for the tests incorporated in a PA. (2) Methods: Sixty-two professional football athletes performed a PA, including isometric muscle strength, triple hop and core stability tests, the LESS, and evaluation of landing performance through kinetic and electromyographic data. (3) Results: For the dominant lower limb, the factor analysis resulted in six factors, explaining 79.04% of the variance including core stability, ground reaction forces, dynamic balance, hamstrings strength, quadriceps–hamstring EMG ratio, and quadriceps performance. For the non-dominant lower limb, factor analysis resulted in five factors, explaining 76.60% of the variance including core stability, dynamic balance, ground reaction force, quadriceps–hamstring EMG ratio, and quadriceps–abductors strength. The LESS was loaded with various factors. (4) Conclusions: Given the need for efficient field-based assessments that can be repeated throughout the season without sacrificing data quality, we suggest incorporating the LESS, the prone bridge test, and force-plate-based landing performance evaluation as key elements of the PA.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Sports injuries and prevention · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physiotherapy Department, School of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece

SYSTEMA Research Centre, European University Cyprus, 2404 Nicosia, Cyprus

Rehabilitation Department, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Medical Centre of Excellence, Doha P.O. Box 29222, Qatar

Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, 42100 Trikala, Greece

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Neuromuscular function of the knee joint following knee injuries: Does it ever get back to normal? A systematic review with meta-analyses10.1007/s40279-020-01386-6 ↗
2. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398 ↗
3. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/0363546515621554 ↗
4. Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment10.1007/s00167-008-0498-x ↗
5. Joint injury, osteoarthritis, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in former national football league athletes: An NFL-LONG Study10.4085/1062-6050-0437.22 ↗
6. What’s the rate of knee osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury? An updated systematic review10.1136/bjsports-2018-099751 ↗
7. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury10.3928/0147-7447-20000601-15 ↗
8. Systematic video analysis of ACL injuries in professional male football (soccer): Injury mechanisms, situational patterns and biomechanics study on 134 consecutive cases10.1136/bjsports-2019-101247 ↗
9. A majority of anterior cruciate ligament injuries can be prevented by injury prevention programs: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cluster-randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis10.1177/0363546519870175 ↗
10. Meta-analysis of meta-analyses of anterior cruciate ligament injury reduction training programs10.1002/jor.24043 ↗
11. Complex systems approach for sports injuries: Moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition—Narrative review and new concept10.1136/bjsports-2015-095850 ↗
12. Sports injury forecasting and complexity: A synergetic approach10.1007/s40279-020-01326-4 ↗
13. Tsarbou, C., Liveris, N.I., Xergia, S.A., Papageorgiou, G., Kvist, J., and Tsepis, E. (2024). ACL injury etiology in its context: A systems thinking, group model building approach. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13164928 ↗
14. Xu, D., Zhou, H., Quan, W., Gusztav, F., Wang, M., Baker, J.S., and Gu, Y. (2023). Accurately and effectively predict the ACL force: Utilizing biomechanical landing pattern before and after-fatigue. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 241.10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107761 ↗
15. Limitations of separating athletes into high or low-risk groups based on a cut-off. A clinical commentary10.26603/001c.122644 ↗
16. To do or not to do?—The value of the preseason assessment in sport injury prevention
17. Tsarbou, C., Liveris, N.I., Xergia, S.A., Tsekoura, M., Fousekis, K., and Tsepis, E. (2023). Pre-season ACL risk classification of professional and semi-professional football players, via a proof-of-concept test battery. Appl. Sci., 13.10.20944/preprints202305.1921.v1 ↗
18. Rehabilitation and return to sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Where are we in 2022?10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.025 ↗
19. Correlation of isokinetic and novel hand-held dynamometry measures of knee flexion and extension strength testing10.1016/j.jsams.2012.01.003 ↗
20. Is the landing error scoring system reliable and valid? A systematic review10.1177/1941738119886593 ↗
21. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE)10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511 ↗
22. van Melick, N., Meddeler, B.M., Hoogeboom, T.J., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W.G., and van Cingel, R.E.H. (2017). How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0189876 ↗
23. Timing differences in the generation of ground reaction forces between the initial and secondary landing phases of the drop vertical jump10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.07.004 ↗
24. Standards for reporting EMG data
25. Hermens, H.J., Freriks, B., Merletti, R., Stegeman, D., Blok, J., Rau, G., Disselhorst, -K.C., and Hägg, G. (2022, May 05). European Recommendations for Surface Electromyography Results of the SENIAM Project. Available online: http://www.seniam.org/pdf/contents8.PDF.
26. Asymmetry and thigh muscle coactivity in fatigued anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed elite skiers10.1249/MSS.0000000000001076 ↗
27. Timing of strain response of the ACL and MCL relative to impulse delivery during simulated landings leading up to ACL failure10.1123/jab.2019-0308 ↗
28. Identification of athletes at future risk of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures by neuromuscular screening10.1177/0363546509335000 ↗
29. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: A systematic review
30. Hand-held dynamometer positioning impacts discomfort during quadriceps strength testing: A validity and reliability study
31. Clinical assessment of hip strength using a hand-held dynamometer is reliable10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00958.x ↗
32. Triple-hop distance as a valid predictor of lower limb strength and power10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.144 ↗
33. The single leg triple hop for distance test10.1519/SSC.0000000000000304 ↗
34. The landing error scoring system as a screening tool for an anterior cruciate ligament injury–prevention program in elite-youth soccer athletes10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.10 ↗
35. The landing error scoring system (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics: The JUMP-ACL study10.1177/0363546509343200 ↗
36. Liveris, N.I., Tsarbou, C., Xergia, S.A., Papadopoulos, A., and Tsepis, E. (2024). Comparison of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of raters with different levels of experience when using landing error scoring system (LESS) in field-based screening of professional football players. Sports, 12.10.3390/sports12090242 ↗
37. Evaluating the effects of match-induced fatigue on landing ability; the case of the basketball game
38. Greater core endurance identifies improved mechanics during jump landing in female youth soccer athletes
39. Is core stability a risk factor for lower extremity injuries in an athletic population? A systematic review10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.08.076 ↗
40. Limited support for trunk and hip deficits as risk factors for athletic knee injuries: A systematic review with meta-analysis and best-evidence synthesis10.2519/jospt.2020.9705 ↗
41. Evaluating abdominal core muscle fatigue: Assessment of the validity and reliability of the prone bridging test10.1111/sms.12919 ↗
42. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: Clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90087-4 ↗
43. Assessment of the validity of the biering-sørensen test for measuring back muscle fatigue based on EMG median frequency characteristics of back and hip muscles10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.10.012 ↗
44. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 ↗
45. Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice10.1177/0095798418771807 ↗
46. On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005 ↗
47. Arumugam, A., and Häger, C.K. (2022). Thigh muscle co-contraction patterns in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, athletes and controls during a novel double-hop test. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-12436-6 ↗
48. Triple Hop for distance as a predictor of lower extremity performance in firefighter equipment10.70252/UFYE5615 ↗
49. Factors influencing the landing error scoring system: Systematic review with meta-analysis10.1016/j.jsams.2020.08.013 ↗