Part A: Innovative Data Augmentation Approach to Enhance Machine Learning Efficiency—Case Study for Hydrodynamic Purposes
Source abstract
Abstract
These days, AI and machine learning (ML) have become pervasive in numerous fields. However, the maritime industry has faced challenges due to the dynamic and unstructured nature of environmental inputs. Hydrodynamic models, vital for predicting ship responses and estimating sea states, rely on diverse data sources of varying fidelities. The effectiveness of ML models in real-world applications hinges on the diversity, range, and quality of the data. Linear simulation techniques, chosen for their simplicity and cost-effectiveness, produce unrealistic and overly optimistic results. Conversely, high-fidelity experiments are prohibitively expensive. To address this, the study introduces an innovative feature engineering that incorporates uncertainty into features of linear models derived from higher fidelity modeling. This enhances productive data entropy, positively enhancing feature classification and improving the accuracy and feasibility of ML models in hydrodynamic responses of floating vessels. Tested with data from a known geometrical shape exposed to regular and irregular waves, the technique employs Ansys Aqwa for linear models. The results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed technique, expanding the applicability of ML models in realistic scenarios. The application of the proposed approach extends beyond and can be further applied to any stochastic process, which expands the ML application for realistic use cases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Time Series Analysis and Forecasting · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Data Stream Mining Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Maritime Engineering and Hydrodynamics, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Voice Recognition Systems in the Cloud Networks: Has It Reached Its Full Potential
2. A survey on natural language processing in context with machine learning
3. Intelligent Image Recognition System for Marine Fouling Using Softmax Transfer Learning and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks10.1155/2017/5730419 ↗
4. Aggarwal, C.C. (2018). Neural Networks and Deep Learning, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center.10.1007/978-3-319-94463-0 ↗
5. Brian Murray, L.P. (2019, January 22–24). Proactive Collision Avoidance for Autonomous Ships: Leveraging Machine Learning to Emulate Situation Awareness. Proceedings of the 13th IFAC Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems, Robotics, and Vehicles, Oldenburg, Germany.
6. Bart Mak, D.B. (2019, January 9–14). Ship as a wave buoy—Using simulated data to train neural networks for real time estimation of relative wave direction. Proceedings of the ASME 2019 38th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore & Arctic Engineering OMAE, Glasgow, UK.10.1115/OMAE2019-96225 ↗
7. Majidiyan, H., Enshaei, H., Howe, D., and Wang, Y. (2024). An Integrated Framework for Real-Time Sea-State Estimation of Stationary Marine Units Using Wave Buoy Analogy. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.21203/rs.3.rs-4463215/v1 ↗
8. Publisher Correction: Safety challenges related to autonomous ships in mixed navigational environments10.1007/s13437-022-00282-2 ↗
9. Tangirala, A.K. (2018). Principles of System Identification Theory and Practice, Taylor & Francis.10.1201/9781315222509 ↗
10. Constrained multi-fidelity surrogate framework using Bayesian optimization with non-intrusive reduced-order basis10.1186/s40323-020-00176-z ↗
11. Sea state estimation using monitoring data by convolutional neural network (CNN)10.1007/s00773-020-00785-8 ↗
12. An EMD-LSTM-SVR model for the short-term roll and sway predictions of semi-submersible10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111460 ↗
13. Ling Liu, Y.Y. (2022). Machine learning prediction of 6-DOF motions of KVLCC2 ship based on RC model. J. Ocean Eng. Sci., in press.10.1016/j.joes.2022.08.004 ↗
14. Response component analysis for sea state estimation using artificial neural networks and vessel response spectral data10.1016/j.apor.2022.103320 ↗
15. Hamed Majidiyan, H.E. (2023). Augmented Adaptive Filter For Real-Time Sea State Estimation Using Vessel Motions Through Deep Learning. Omae42, ASME.10.1115/OMAE2023-104286 ↗
16. Kim, H., Kang, H., and Kim, M.-H. (2019). Real-Time Inverse Estimation of Ocean Wave Spectra from Vessel-Motion Sensors Using Adaptive Kalman Filter. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9142797 ↗
17. A review: Data pre-processing and data augmentation techniques10.1016/j.gltp.2022.04.020 ↗
18. Data augmentation: A comprehensive survey of modern approaches10.1016/j.array.2022.100258 ↗
19. Directional wave spectrum estimation with ship motion responses using adversarial networks10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103159 ↗
20. Wakita, K., Miyauchi, Y., Akimoto, Y., and Maki, A. (2024). Data augmentation methods of dynamic model identification for harbor maneuvers using feedforward neural network. J. Mar. Sci. Technol.10.1007/s00773-024-01036-w ↗
21. Lee, U.-J., Jeong, W.-M., and Cho, H.-Y. (2022). Estimation and Analysis of JONSWAP Spectrum Parameter Using Observed Data around Korean Coast. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10050578 ↗
22. Kennedy, O. (2022). An Alternative Mooring Tension Prediction Method Using a Neural Network, NCMEH, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania.
23. ANSYS (2012). AQWA User Manual, ANSYS, Inc.
24. Hamed Majidiyan, H.E. (2024). Real-Time Sea State Estimation Using Deep Transfer Learning; an Integrated Framework. Res. Sq.10.21203/rs.3.rs-3826677/v1 ↗
25. Tucker (1991). Waves in Ocean Engineering, Ellis Horwood Ltd.
26. Non-parametric wave spectral estimation using vessel motions10.1016/j.apor.2008.03.003 ↗
27. Estimation of wind sea and swell using shipboard measurements—A refined parametric modelling approach10.1016/j.apor.2015.11.004 ↗
28. A brute-force spectral approach for wave estimation using measured vessel motions10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.03.011 ↗
29. Generalized morse wavelets10.1109/TSP.2002.804066 ↗
30. García-Villamil, G., Ruiz, L., Jiménez, A.R., Seco, F., and Rodríguez-Sánchez, M.C. (December, January 29). Influence of IMU’s Measurement Noise on the Accuracy of Stride-Length Estimation for Gait Analysis. Proceedings of the IPIN 2021 WiP Proceedings, Lloret de Mar, Spain.
31. Faltinsen, O. (1993). Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures, Cambridge University Press.10.4043/7142-MS ↗
32. Journée, J.M. (2001, February 12). Theoretical Manual of SEAWAY. Delft University of Technology Shiphydromechanics Laboratory, (Release 4.19, 12-02-2001). Available online: https://paperzz.com/doc/7753354/theoretical-manual-of-seaway.
33. Thompson, N.C., Greenewald, K., Lee, K., and Manso, G.F. (2020). The computational limits of deep learning. arXiv.