Dynamic Prediction of Shale Gas Drilling Costs Based on Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Shale gas, a significant recoverable natural gas resource trapped in shale formations, represents a significant energy reservoir. Although China has significant recoverable shale gas reserves, the challenge of controlling drilling costs remains a critical barrier to efficient development. This study presents a novel stacked ensemble learning model that integrates support vector machine (SVM) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks to improve the accuracy of shale gas drilling cost prediction. The methodology consists of three main phases. First, we constructed a comprehensive, multidimensional spatiotemporal dataset of shale gas drilling costs. Second, we used Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) modelling to rank the importance of various factors influencing drilling costs. Finally, we developed a stacked ensemble learning model combining SVM and LSTM architectures to achieve superior cost prediction accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the model, with the coefficient of determination (R2) improving from 0.25189/0.33834 (traditional SVM/LSTM models) to 0.55934. Model validation using selected well investment data from the Changning Block shows promising performance, achieving a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 6.41%, with optimal prediction accuracy in the medium investment range (60–70 million yuan). This innovative approach provides a reliable tool for predicting shale gas drilling costs and offers new methodological perspectives for cost reduction strategies. The results contribute significantly to the sustainable development of shale gas resources and provide valuable insights for industry practitioners and researchers in the fields of energy economics and resource management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Oil and Gas Production Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Natural Gas Economic Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610051, China
College of Mathematics and Physics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
School of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Geomathematics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Funding
Philosophy and Social Science Research Fund of Chengdu University of Technology · 2024 Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. A systematic review of data science and machine learning applications to the oil and gas industry10.1007/s13202-021-01302-2 ↗
2. Computer-aided process engineering in oil and gas production10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.08.014 ↗
3. Design and optimization of shale gas energy systems: Overview, research challenges, and future directions10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.01.032 ↗
4. Drilling performance monitoring and optimization: A data-driven approach10.1007/s13202-019-0657-2 ↗
5. Machine Learning Application in Enhancing Drilling Performance10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.068 ↗
6. Goodkey, B., Carvalho, R., Davila, A.N., Hernandez, G., Corona, M., Atriby, K., and Herrera, C. (2021, January 27–29). Recipe for digital change: A case study approach to drilling automation. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/202181-MS ↗
7. Research progress and potential of new enhanced oil recovery methods in oilfield development10.1016/S1876-3804(24)60518-5 ↗
8. Research status and application of artificial intelligence large models in the oil and gas industry10.1016/S1876-3804(24)60524-0 ↗
9. Use of machine learning and data analytics to increase drilling efficiency for nearby wells10.1016/j.jngse.2017.02.019 ↗
10. A hybrid cost estimation framework based on feature-oriented data mining approach10.1016/j.aei.2015.06.001 ↗
11. Machine learning methods applied to drilling rate of penetration prediction and optimization—A review10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106332 ↗
12. Research on adaptive feature optimization and drilling rate prediction based on real-time data10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213247 ↗
13. A comprehensive data mining approach to estimate the rate of penetration: Application of neural network, rule based models and feature ranking10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.039 ↗
14. Yin, H., Tang, K., Gao, Y., Klawonn, F., Lee, M., Weise, T., Li, B., and Yao, X. (2013). Drilling Cost Prediction Based on Self-adaptive Differential Evolution and Support Vector Regression. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning—IDEAL 2013, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3 ↗
15. Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry
16. Zhang, C., and Ma, Y. (2012). Ensemble Learning. Ensemble Machine Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7 ↗
17. Prediction Model of Drilling Costs for Ultra-Deep Wells Based on GA-BP Neural Network10.32604/ee.2023.027703 ↗
18. A stacked generalization ensemble model for optimization and prediction of the gas well rate of penetration: A case study in Xinjiang10.1007/s13202-021-01402-z ↗
19. Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for predicting drilling rate of penetration (ROP) in geothermal wells: A case study of FORGE site10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103028 ↗
20. Drilling efficiency enhancement in oil and gas domain using machine learning10.1504/IJOGCT.2023.129577 ↗
21. Developing a New Model for Drilling Rate of Penetration Prediction Using Convolutional Neural Network10.1007/s13369-022-06765-x ↗
22. Tewari, S., Dwivedi, U.D., and Biswas, S. (2021). Intelligent Drilling of Oil and Gas Wells Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Bee Colony. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13041664 ↗
23. Drilling operation optimization using machine learning framework10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211969 ↗
24. Optimization of Drilling Parameters of Target Wells Based on Machine Learning and Data Analysis10.1007/s13369-022-07103-x ↗
25. Automated real-time prediction of geological formation tops during drilling operations: An applied machine learning solution for the Norwegian Continental Shelf10.1007/s13202-024-01789-5 ↗
26. A machine learning approach to predict drilling rate using petrophysical and mud logging data10.1007/s12145-019-00381-4 ↗
27. Intelligent Drilling and Completion: A Review10.1016/j.eng.2022.07.014 ↗
28. Lin, J. Optimized Drilling Status Recognition for Oil Drilling Using Artificial Intelligence: Empirical Research and Methodology. Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2023, Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering.
29. Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods In Drilling System Design And Operations: A Review Of The State Of The Art10.1515/jaiscr-2015-0024 ↗
30. Gan, C., Cao, W., and Liu, K. (2018, January 25–27). To Improve Drilling Efficiency by Multi-objective Optimization of Operational Drilling Parameters in the Complex Geological Drilling Process. Proceedings of the 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Wuhan, China.10.23919/ChiCC.2018.8482948 ↗
31. Drilling Engineering Assessment and Cost Analysis of Oil and Gas Wells Drilled in Onshore of Turkey
32. Matrix selection and comparison for selecting drilling methods and technologies for a wide range of applications10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107289 ↗
33. Purba, D., Adityatama, D.W., Agustino, V., Fininda, F., Alamsyah, D., and Muhammad, F. (2020, January 10–12). Geothermal Drilling Cost Optimization in Indonesia: A Discussion of Various Factors. Proceedings of the 45th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University (SGP-TR-216), Stanford, CA, USA.
34. Improving drilling performance through optimizing controllable drilling parameters10.1007/s13202-021-01116-2 ↗
35. Shale gas production costs: Historical developments and outlook10.1016/j.esr.2018.01.001 ↗
36. Shale gas in China: Characteristics, challenges and prospects (II)10.1016/S1876-3804(16)30022-2 ↗
37. Research status of shale gas: A review10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.007 ↗
38. A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.040 ↗
39. Fractured Shale-Gas Systems
40. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
41. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
42. Alonso-Español, A., Bravo, E., Ribeiro-Vidal, H., Virto, L., Herrera, D., Alonso, B., and Sanz, M. (2023). The Antimicrobial Activity of Curcumin and Xanthohumol on Bacterial Biofilms Developed over Dental Implant Surfaces. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24032335 ↗
43. Support-Vector Networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
44. Vapnik, V.N. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley-Interscience.
45. A tutorial on support vector regression10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
46. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
47. Gers, F.A., Schmidhuber, J., and Cummins, F. (1999, January 7–10). Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. Proceedings of the 1999 Ninth International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks ICANN 99 (Conf. Publ. No. 470), Edinburgh, UK.10.1049/cp:19991218 ↗
48. LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582924 ↗
49. A Machine Learning Methodology for Predicting Geothermal Heat Flow in the Bohai Bay Basin, China10.1007/s11053-021-10002-x ↗
50. Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization
51. Ron, K. (1995, January 20–25). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence—Volume 2 (IJCAI’95), Montreal, QC, Canada.
52. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE)?—Arguments against Avoiding RMSE in the Literature10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
53. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer Science & Business Media.