Versatility Evaluation of Landslide Risk with Window Sizes and Sampling Techniques Based on Deep Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Across the globe, landslides cause significant loss of life, injuries, and widespread damage to homes and infrastructure. Therefore, assessing and analyzing landslide hazards is crucial to human, environmental, cultural, economic, and social sustainability. This study utilizes ArcGIS 10.8 and Python 3.9 to create landslide databases for Niigata Prefecture (NIG), Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures (IWT-MYG), and Hokkaido (HKD), drawing on data obtained from the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Japan. A distinguishing feature of this study is the application of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which significantly outperforms traditional machine learning models in image-based pattern recognition by extracting contextual information from surrounding areas, a distinct advantage in image and pattern recognition tasks. Unlike conventional methods that often require manual feature selection and engineering, CNNs automate feature extraction, enabling a more nuanced understanding of complex patterns. By experimenting with CNN input window sizes ranging from 3 × 3 to 27 × 27 pixels and employing diverse sampling techniques, we demonstrate that larger windows enhance the model’s predictive accuracy by capturing a wider range of environmental interactions critical for effective landslide modeling. CNN models with 19 × 19 pixel windows typically yield the best overall performance, with CNN-19 achieving an AUC of 0.950, 0.982 and 0.969 for NIG, HKD, and IWT-MYG, respectively. Furthermore, we improve prediction reliability using oversampling and a random window-moving method. For instance, in the NIG region, the AUC of the oversampling CNN-19 is 0.983, while the downsampling AUC is 0.950). These techniques, less commonly applied in traditional machine learning approaches to landslide detection, help address the issue of data imbalance often seen in landslide datasets, where instances of landslides are far outnumbered by non-landslide occurrences. While challenges remain in enhancing the model’s generalization, this research makes significant progress in developing more robust and adaptable tools for landslide prediction, which are vital for ensuring environmental and societal resilience.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Cryospheric studies and observations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Hokkaido, Japan
Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Hokkaido, Japan
Funding
JST SPRING · KAKENHI · Sato Kogyo Co., Ltd.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang, Q. (2005). Evaluation Based on ArcGIS for Slopes Geohazards. [Master’s Thesis, Chengdu University of Technology].
2. Chen, X. (2007). Application of Artificial Intelligence to Assessment of Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility. [Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration]. (In Chinese).
3. Landslide-susceptibility mapping in Gangwon-do, South Korea, using logistic regression and decision tree models10.1007/s12665-019-8119-1 ↗
4. Lee, S., Hong, S.-M., and Jung, H.-S. (2017). A support vector machine for landslide susceptibility mapping in Gangwon Province, Korea. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9010048 ↗
5. Systematic sample subdividing strategy for training landslide susceptibility models10.1016/j.catena.2019.104358 ↗
6. Adnan, M.S.G., Rahman, M.S., Ahmed, N., Ahmed, B., Rabbi, M.F., and Rahman, R.M. (2020). Improving spatial agreement in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12203347 ↗
7. A feature enhancement framework for landslide detection
8. Combining spatial response features and machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping
9. A unified network of information considering superimposed landslide factors sequence and pixel spatial neighbourhood for landslide susceptibility mapping
10. Jiang, W., Xi, J., Li, Z., Zang, M., Chen, B., Zhang, C., Liu, Z., Gao, S., and Zhu, W. (2022). Deep Learning for Landslide Detection and Segmentation in High-Resolution Optical Images along the Sichuan-Tibet Transportation Corridor. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14215490 ↗
11. Jiang, Z., Wang, M., and Liu, K. (2023). Comparisons of Convolutional Neural Network and Other Machine Learning Methods in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study in Pingwu. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15030798 ↗
12. Hussain, M.A., Chen, Z., Zheng, Y., Zhou, Y., and Daud, H. (2023). Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15194703 ↗
13. Ghorbanzadeh, O., Blaschke, T., Gholamnia, K., Meena, S.R., Tiede, D., and Aryal, J. (2019). Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11020196 ↗
14. Liu, R., Yang, X., Xu, C., Wei, L., and Zeng, X. (2022). Comparative Study of Convolutional Neural Network and Conventional Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14020321 ↗
15. National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Japan (2024, October 14). Landslide Topography GIS Data. Available online: https://www.bosai.go.jp/e/index.html.
16. Analysis of Geological Environment and Causes of Landslides in Guangdong
17. Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea10.1007/s002540100310 ↗
18. Landslide occurrence as a response to land use change: A review of evidence from New Zealand10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00170-4 ↗
19. Relationships among remotely sensed soil moisture, precipitation and landslide events10.1007/s11069-006-9095-9 ↗
20. The relationship of human activities and rainfall-induced landslide and debris flow hazards in Central China10.1007/s11069-021-04577-0 ↗
21. Landslide erosion coupled to tectonics and river incision10.1038/ngeo1479 ↗
22. Landslides triggered by earthquakes and their relations with faults and mountain slope geometry: An example from Ecuador10.1016/0169-555X(94)00060-5 ↗
23. Hydrological effect of vegetation against rainfall-induced landslides10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.014 ↗
24. Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin10.1007/s10346-005-0021-0 ↗
25. Representation of topographical features by opennesses
26. Ding, A., Zhang, Q., Zhou, X., and Dai, B. (2016, January 11–13). Automatic recognition of landslide based on CNN and texture change detection. Proceedings of the 2016 31st Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), Wuhan, China.10.1109/YAC.2016.7804935 ↗
27. An object-based convolutional neural network (OCNN) for urban land use classification10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.034 ↗
28. Dixit, M., Kwitt, R., Niethammer, M., and Vasconcelos, N. (2017, January 21–26). Aga: Attribute-guided augmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.355 ↗
29. Liu, B., Wang, X., Dixit, M., Kwitt, R., and Vasconcelos, N. (2018, January 18–23). Feature Space Transfer for Data Augmentation. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00947 ↗
30. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263 ↗
31. Landslide mapping using two main deep-learning convolution neural network streams combined by the Dempster–Shafer model10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3043836 ↗
32. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 ↗
33. Uncertainties of prediction accuracy in shallow landslide modeling: Sample size and raster resolution10.1016/j.catena.2019.03.017 ↗