Modifying the Refuse Chute Design to Prevent Infection Spread: Engineering Analysis and Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
Considering the presence of airborne viruses, there is a need for renovation in refuse chutes, regarded as the first step in recycling household waste in buildings. This study aimed to revise the design of existing refuse chutes in light of the challenging experiences in waste management and public health during the coronavirus pandemic. This research primarily focused on the risks posed by various types of coronaviruses, such as the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and acute respiratory syndrome (SARS and SARS-CoV), on stainless steel surfaces, with evidence of their survival under certain conditions. Refuse chutes are manufactured from stainless steel to resist the corrosive effects of waste. In examining the existing studies, it was observed that Casanova et al. and Chowdhury et al. found that the survival time of coronaviruses on stainless steel surfaces decreases as the temperature increases. Based on these studies, mechanical revisions have been made to the sanitation system of the refuse chute, thus increasing the washing water temperature. Additionally, through mechanical improvements, an automatic solution spray entry is provided before the intake doors are opened. Furthermore, to understand airflow and clarify flow parameters related to airborne infection transmission on residential floors in buildings equipped with refuse chutes, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was conducted using a sample three-story refuse chute system. Based on the simulation results, a fan motor was integrated into the system to prevent pathogens from affecting users on other floors through airflow. Thus, airborne pathogens were periodically expelled into the atmosphere via a fan shortly before the intake doors were opened, supported by a PLC unit. Additionally, the intake doors were electronically interlocked, ensuring that all other intake doors remained locked while any single door was in use, thereby ensuring user safety. In a sample refuse chute, numerical calculations were performed to evaluate parameters such as the static suitability of the chute body thickness, static compliance of the chute support dimensions, chute diameter, chute thickness, fan airflow rate, ventilation duct diameter, minimum rock wool thickness for human contact safety, and the required number of spare containers. Additionally, a MATLAB code was developed to facilitate these numerical calculations, with values optimized using the Fmincon function. This allowed for the easy calculation of outputs for the new refuse chute systems and enabled the conversion of existing systems, evaluating compatibility with the new design for cost-effective upgrades. This refuse chute design aims to serve as a resource for readers in case of infection risks and contribute to the literature. The new refuse chute design supports the global circular economy (CE) model by enabling waste disinfection under pandemic conditions and ensuring cleaner source separation and collection for recycling. Due to its adaptability to different pandemic conditions including pathogens beyond coronavirus and potential new virus strains, the designed system is intended to contribute to the global health framework. In addition to the health measures described, this study calls for future research on how evolving global health conditions might impact refuse chute design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infection Control and Ventilation · Water Systems and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Health and Technology University, 34445 Beyoglu, Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Marmara University, 34854 Maltepe, Turkey
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. WHO (2024, April 09). Constitution World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution.
2. COVID-19 and municipal solid waste (MSW) management: A review10.1007/s11356-021-13914-6 ↗
3. Impact of COVID-19 on household waste flows, diversion and reuse: The case of multi-residential buildings in Toronto, Canada, Resources10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105111 ↗
4. ADEPT (2024, April 09). COVID-19 Waste Survey Results, Week Commencing 18th May. Available online: https://www.adeptnet.org.uk/documents/covid-19-waste-survey-results-wc-18th-may.
5. Feretzakis, G., Harokopou, A., Fafoula, O., Balaska, A., Koulountzou, A., Katoikou, E., Anastasiou, A., Zagkavieros, G., Dalainas, I., and Gkritzelas, G. (2024). The Impact of Psychological Health on Childhood Obesity: A Cross-Developmental Stage Analysis. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202402.1142.v1 ↗
6. Tao, Z., Youcai, Z., and Nyankson, E.A. (2023). Chapter 17—Containerization collection and transfer of municipal solid waste for megacity. Resource Recovery Technology for Municipal and Rural Solid Waste, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-98978-7.00003-8 ↗
7. Evaluation of aerosol transmission risk during home quarantine under different operating scenarios: A pilot study10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109640 ↗
8. (2017). Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy (Standard No. ASHRAE, ANSI, Standard 55-2017).
9. Jacques, E.d.A., Júnior, A.N., de Paris, S., Francescatto, M.B., and Nunes, R.F.B. (2024). Smart City Actions Integrated into Urban Planning: Management of Urban Environments by Thematic Areas. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14083351 ↗
10. Hospital laundry and refuse chutes as source of staphylococcic cross-infection10.1001/jama.1958.02990270029007 ↗
11. A circular economy approach to plastic waste10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.05.014 ↗
12. Tanrıver, K. (2018). Separation of Polymeric Materials with Recycling System. [Master’s Thesis, İstanbul Gedik University].
13. The carbon footprint of future engineered wood construction in Montreal10.1088/2634-4505/ad2153 ↗
14. A review of refuse collection systems in high-rise housings in Hong Kong10.1108/02632770610677655 ↗
15. Chehab, K. (2022). Enhancing Solid Wastes Separation Behaviour at the Residential Towers, Using the Garbage Chute Systems, SLU, Department of Molecular Sciences. Second Cycle, A2E.
16. Down the Vertical Refuse Chutes in Singapore High-rise Living10.1177/15385132221085948 ↗
17. Soh, S., Chua, C.H., Neo, Z.W., Kong, M., Ong, B.L., and Aik, J. (2023). Rodent activity in municipal waste collection premises in Singapore: An analysis of risk factors using mixed-effects modelling. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-29405-2 ↗
18. Aigbavboa, C., Mojekwu, J.N., Thwala, W.D., Atepor, L., Adinyira, E., Nani, G., and Bamfo, E.-A. (2023). Assessment of Refuse Shute Practices in Medium-Rise Buildings Within the Greater Accra Region, Ghana. Sustainable Education and Development—Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation, Springer. ARCA 2022.10.1007/978-3-031-25998-2 ↗
19. Chandrappa, R., and Das, D.B. (2024). Storage and Collection. Solid Waste Management. Environmental Science and Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-50442-6 ↗
20. A novel design on polymeric material recycling technology10.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.56211 ↗
21. (2024, October 08). Multicomponents. Available online: https://www.multicomponents.com.au.
22. (2024, October 08). PSI Waste. Available online: https://www.psiwaste.com.
23. Investigation of the Application of the Legislation on the Management of Biomedical and Medical Wastes
24. Negi, S., Pratap Singh, S., and Das, S. (2023). Exploring hostel kitchen waste as feedstock for bioethanol and biogas production in a biorefinery setup. Mater. Today Proc.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.379 ↗
25. Corrosion characteristics of zinc coated SS304 stainless steel10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.508 ↗
26. (2024, April 09). Chutedr. Available online: https://www.chutedr.com.
27. Critical review on emerging health effects associated with the indoor air quality and its sustainable management10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162163 ↗
28. Airborne route and bad use of ventilation systems as non-negligible factors in SARS-CoV-2 transmission10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109781 ↗
29. Du, X., Li, J., Tang, Z., and Hu, S. (2024). Research on Factors Influencing Indoor PM2.5 Concentration in Curling Venues Based on CFD Simulation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14083446 ↗
30. Spawn: Coupling Modelica Buildings Library and Energy Plus to enable new energy system and control applications10.1080/19401493.2023.2266414 ↗
31. Dilution of airborne contaminants from through-wall exhausts located on the side of multi-family residential buildings10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109379 ↗
32. A systematic investigation on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of eight low-cost particle sensors and devices10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105715 ↗
33. Preventing mold growth and maintaining acceptable indoor air quality for educational buildings operating with high mechanical ventilation rates in hot and humid climates10.1007/s11869-022-01277-x ↗
34. Investigation of the Effects of Ventilation Performance on Energy Consumption in Subway Stations and Tunnels
35. Effects of Air Temperature and Relative Humidity on Coronavirus Survival on Surfaces10.1128/AEM.02291-09 ↗
36. COVID 19 virus elimination from food using microwave oven
37. Reconsidering the assessment method of Environmental implications of Circular Economy in the Built Environment10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012007 ↗
38. Efficacy evaluation of an air-assisted electrostatic disinfection device for the effective disinfection and sanitization against the spread of pathogenic infections10.1016/j.elstat.2023.103807 ↗
39. CFD modeling of airborne pathogen transmission of COVID-19 in confined spaces under different ventilation strategies10.1016/j.scs.2021.103397 ↗
40. Charlson, J., and Dimka, N. (2023). Lessons from Grenfell Tower: The New Building Safety Regime, Routledge. [1st ed.].10.1201/9781003357452 ↗
41. Ruff, G.A., Urban, D.L., Dietrich, D.L., Johnston, M., Meyer, M., Olson, S.L., Ferkul, P., Fortenberry, C., Padilla, R., and Pedley, T. (2023). Chapter 17—Fire Safety, Safety Design for Space Systems, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-323-95654-3.00005-5 ↗
42. (2024, April 09). American Chute. Available online: http://americanchutesystems.com.
43. Tanriver, K., Ay, M., and Yalçınkaya, S. (2023, January 5). Employee Health and Occupational Safety in The Installation of Refuse Chute. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Occupational Safety and Healt Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
44. An Automated Waste Collection System by using of Trash Chute for Hi-Rise Residential Buildings
45. (2024, October 18). BS1703: 2005. Refuse Chute and Hopper-Specification, UK. Available online: https://www.document-center.com/standards/show/BS-1703.
46. (2024, October 18). NFPA 82-2019. NFPA 82 Standard on Incinerators and Waste and Linen Handling Systems and Equipment, 2019 Edition. Available online: https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/nfpa/nfpa822019?srsltid=AfmBOorNkDcEBKCNvQMT1NNy59y6sTncgCurTcMN18zTF-1fehrMHb7q.
47. (2024, October 18). BS 5906:2005, Waste Management in Buildings. Code of Practice. Available online: https://assets.ctfassets.net/xodraixfdnfd/2uwRVK76EpJ2pJT8ZipzQr/da9d23293dfd97f6b9fade92745871a4/Waste_management_in_buildings_Code_of_practice_BS_5906_2005.pdf.
48. Multi-scale modeling in thermal conductivity of Polyurethane incorporated with Phase Change Materials using Physics-Informed Neural Networks10.1016/j.renene.2023.119565 ↗
49. Experimental and finite element analysis of thermal stress on thermal spray coated AISI 304 stainless steel specimen using low-cost solid lubricant10.1007/s12008-023-01322-8 ↗
50. Optimization of thermal insulation thickness pertaining to embodied and operational GHG emissions in cold climates—Future and present cases10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110187 ↗
51. Singapore Civil Defense Force (2024, October 18). Refuse Chute Fires in Public Housing Estates (2014–2016), Available online: https://www.scdf.gov.sg/docs/default-source/scdf-library/far-issue-6.pdf?sfvrsn=284a8a4e_3.
52. Surface Treatment of AISI 304 Stainless Steel by GOV (Flow Peening) Process10.1007/s13369-023-08032-z ↗
53. Experimental Investigation with Optimization of Spot-Welding Parameters on Stainless Steel AISI 30410.1007/s11837-023-06136-3 ↗
54. Investigation of flue gas temperature effects in natural gas-fueled systems: Experimental thermal performance and structural optimization10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2024.109428 ↗
55. Caetano, I., Rios, S., and Milheiro-Oliveira, P. (2024). Response Surface Design Models to Predict the Strength of Iron Tailings Stabilized with an Alkali-Activated Cement. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188116 ↗
56. Feng, J., Zhou, M., Chen, C., Wang, Q., and Cao, L. (2024). Thermal Interaction and Cooling of Electronic Device with Chiplet 2.5D Integration. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188114 ↗
57. Efficient path planning for drilling processes: The hybrid approach of a genetic algorithm and ant colony optimization10.21278/TOF.483062023 ↗
58. Shao, Q., Miao, J., and Liao Liu, T. (2024). Dynamic Scheduling Optimization of Automatic Guide Vehicle for Terminal Delivery under Uncertain Conditions. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202408.1160.v1 ↗
59. Simulation of speed reducer design with the modified ant colony optimization algorithm
60. Smart Planning of Waste Management System in Saudi Arabia; Challenges and Opportunities10.1088/1755-1315/1026/1/012035 ↗
61. Automated Garbage Bin Monitoring: An Embedded System Approach