journal article·2024-10-22Open access

Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Calcium-Silicate-Based Mineral Foam for Blast Mitigation

Aldjabar Aminou, Mohamed Ben Rhouma, Bachir Belkassem, Hamza Ousji, Lincy Pyl, David Lecompte

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 21

Abstract

Cellular materials such as aluminum and polyurethane foams are recognized for their effectiveness in energy absorption. They commonly serve as crushable cores in sacrificial cladding for blast mitigation purposes. This study delves into the effectiveness of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC), a lightweight, porous material known for its energy-absorbing properties as a crushable core in sacrificial cladding. The experimental set-up features a rigid frame made of steel measuring 1000 × 1000 × 15 mm3 with a central square opening (300 × 300 mm2) holding a 2 mm thick aluminum plate representing the structure. The dynamic response of the aluminum plate is captured using two high-speed cameras arranged in a stereoscopic configuration. Three-dimensional digital image correlation is used to compute the transient deformation fields. Blast loading is achieved by detonating 20 g of C4 explosive set at 250 mm from the plate’s center. The study assesses the mineral foam’s absorption capacity by comparing out-of-plane displacement and mean permanent deformation of the aluminum plate with and without the protective solution. Six foam configurations (A to F) are tested experimentally and numerically, varying in the foam’s free space for expansion relative to its total volume. Results show positive protective effects, with configuration F reducing maximum deflection by at least 30% and configuration C by up to 70%. Foam configuration influences energy dissipation, with an optimal lateral surface-to-volume ratio (ζ) enhancing protective effects, although excessive ζ leads to non-uniform foam crushing. To address the influence of front skin deformability, a non-deformable front skin has been adopted. The latter demonstrates an increased effectiveness of the sacrificial cladding, particularly for ζ values above the optimal value obtained when using a deformable front skin. Notably, using a non-deformable front skin increases maximum deflection reduction and foam energy absorption by up to approximately 30%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Structures and Effects of Explosion Department, Royal Military Academy, 30 Avenue de la Renaissance, 1000 Brussels, Belgium

Mechanics of Materials and Constructions Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Military Research Center, Sciences and Technologies for Defense, Tunis 2045, Tunisia

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Blast disruption using 3D grids/perforated plates for vehicle protection10.1016/j.dt.2022.10.005 ↗
2. Mitigation effects on the reflected overpressure of blast shock with water surrounding an explosive in a confined space10.1016/j.dt.2020.06.026 ↗
3. Blast mitigation by water mist: The effect of the detonation configuration10.1007/s00193-020-00960-1 ↗
4. Kontis, K. (2018). Analysis of planar and spherical shock-wave mitigation by wet aqueous foams. Shock Wave Interactions, Springer. RaiNew 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-73180-3 ↗
5. Optimal Design of Bundled Layered Elastic Stress Wave Attenuators10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000143 ↗
6. Blast response of aluminum foam sandwich panel with double V-shaped face plate10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103666 ↗
7. Experimental investigation on the shock-wave load attenuation by geometrical means10.1007/s00193-009-0237-3 ↗
8. Review of methods to attenuate shock/blast waves10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.08.003 ↗
9. Effects of Foam Claddings for Structure Protection against Blast Loads10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:1(41) ↗
10. Air-blast response of cellular material with a face plate: An analytical-numerical approach10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.03.027 ↗
11. Analysis of foam claddings for blast alleviation10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.10.005 ↗
12. Blast response of continuous-density graded cellular material based on the 3D Voronoi model10.1016/j.dt.2018.06.003 ↗
13. Blast Alleviation of Cellular Sacrificial Cladding: A Nonlinear Plastic Shock Model10.1142/S1758825116500575 ↗
14. Blast mitigation performance of cladding using square dome-shape kirigami folded structure as core10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.035 ↗
15. Blast performance of a sacrificial cladding with composite tubes for protection of civil engineering structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.004 ↗
16. Blast mitigation of RC column using polymeric foam10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.273 ↗
17. Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Sacrificial Cladding Using Polymeric Foams as Crushable Core with a Simply Supported Steel Beam
18. Fracture of aluminium foam core sacrificial cladding subjected to air-blast loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.07.006 ↗
19. Blast protection of steel reinforced concrete structures using composite foam-core sacrificial cladding10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109330 ↗
20. Experimental and numerical investigation on 3D printed PLA sacrificial honeycomb cladding10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.013 ↗
21. Improving Blast Performance of Reinforced Concrete Panels Using Sacrificial Cladding with Hybrid-Multi Cell Tubes10.3390/modelling2010008 ↗
22. Mitigation of Accelerations Caused by Blast Loading Utilizing Polymeric-Coated Metallic Thin-Walled Cylinders10.1007/s40870-015-0023-5 ↗
23. Close-range blast loading on empty recyclable metal beverage cans for use in sacrificial cladding structure10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.034 ↗
24. Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: Comparisons and parametric designs10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.018 ↗
25. Blast analysis of efficient honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP/Steel FML skins10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104609 ↗
26. Ballistic performance and energy dissipation characteristics of cylindrical honeycomb sandwich structure10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104065 ↗
27. Low-velocity impact resistance of composite sandwich panels with various types of auxetic and non-auxetic core structures10.1016/j.tws.2021.107738 ↗
28. Anti-blast and -impact performances of auxetic structures: A review of structures, materials, methods, and fabrications10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115377 ↗
29. Dual-mechanism auxetic-core protective sandwich structure under blast loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116088 ↗
30. Simplified Analysis of Foam Cladding Protected Reinforced Concrete Slabs against Blast Loadings10.1260/2041-4196.2.3.351 ↗
31. Experimental study on the dynamic responses of foam sandwich panels with different facesheets and core gradients subjected to blast impulse10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103327 ↗
32. Experiments on curved sandwich panels under blast loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.002 ↗
33. Effects of specimen aspect ratio on the compressive properties of Mg alloy foam10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.011 ↗
34. Gabriel, S., von Klemperer, C.J., Yuen, S.C.K., and Langdon, G.S. (2021). Towards an understanding of the effect of adding a foam core on the blast performance of glass fibre reinforced epoxy laminate panels. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14237118 ↗
35. Mitigation of Blast Induced Acceleration using open cell natural rubber and Synthetic Foam10.14429/dsj.69.12586 ↗
36. Aminou, A., Rhouma, M.B., Belkassem, B., and Ousji, H. (2023). Blast Absorption Capacity of Brittle Mineral Foam: An Experimental Evaluation. Hormigón Y Acero Sep.10.33586/hya.2023.3131 ↗
37. Numerical modeling of brittle mineral foam in a sacrificial cladding under blast loading10.1051/meca/2023021 ↗
38. Effect of high strain rate and confinement on the compressive properties of autoclaved aerated concrete10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103943 ↗
39. Mechanical properties of carbon foams under quasi-static and dynamic loading10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105039 ↗
40. Comparative performance of composite sandwich panels and non-composite panels under blast loading10.1617/s11527-015-0523-8 ↗
41. Brekken, K.A., Reyes, A., Børvik, T., Berstad, T., and Langseth, M. (2020). Sandwich panels with polymeric foam cores exposed to blast loading: An experimental and numerical investigation. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10249061 ↗
42. Protection effectiveness of sacrificial cladding for near-field blast mitigation10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104361 ↗
43. Estimation of the Strain Rate Hardening of Aluminium Using an Inverse Method and Blast Loading10.1007/s40870-017-0101-y ↗
44. Eccles, W. (1993). Design Guidelines for Torque Controlled Tightening of Bolted Joints. SAE Int.10.4271/930578 ↗
45. Experimental study on the response of thin aluminium and steel plates subjected to airblast loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.017 ↗
46. Numerical modeling of large deformations in soil structure interaction problems using FE, EFG, SPH, and MM-ALE formulations10.1007/s00419-014-0830-5 ↗
47. LSTC (2021, February 24). Ls-Dyna® Keyword User’s Manual Volume I. July 2017. Available online: www.lstc.com.