Impact of Bioactivity on Push-Out Bond Strength of AH Plus Bioceramic versus BC Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers
Source abstract
Abstract
This study compared the push-out bond strength and adaptation of the recently developed AH Plus bioceramic (AHP-Bio) root canal sealer with Bioceramic Endosequence (BC) and AH Plus (AHP) sealers when exposed to simulated body fluid for inducing bioactivity. Cross-section discs of 1 mm thick slices from obturated root canals were prepared and either kept dry or immersed in serum for 30 days. All discs were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and then subjected to a push-out test. The failure modes were also determined. The data were statistically analyzed using an ANOVA test at p < 0.05. In both environments, the BC sealer recorded the greatest bond strength, while the AHP-Bio sealer recorded the lowest mean values. However, bond strength was significantly improved after immersion in serum (p < 0.001). The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test revealed a significant difference in failure mode among the tested groups at p < 0.001. The predominant failure mode was cohesive failure in both bioceramic sealers, with the greatest value for AHP-Bio (70%), and adhesive failure for AHP/gutta-percha (60%, 80%) in both environments. SEM revealed good dentin adaptation of the three sealers, with marked decreases in gaps at the bioceramic/dentin interface after immersion in serum. In conclusion, although BC exhibited greater push-out bond strength than AHP-Bio, the latter achieved good displacement resistance that increased when the sealer was exposed to simulated body fluid (serum).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental materials and restorations · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22252, Saudi Arabia
Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza 12345, Egypt
Restorative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22252, Saudi Arabia
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Physicochemical properties and surfaces morphologies evaluation of MTA FillApex and AH plus10.1155/2014/589732 ↗
2. Materials used for root canal obturation: Technical, biological and clinical testing10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00197.x ↗
3. Grossman, L.I. (1988). Endodontic Practice, Lea & Febiger. [11th ed.].
4. Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)10.1007/s00784-017-2216-x ↗
5. Correlation between bond strength to dentin and sealers penetration by push-out test and CLSM analysis10.1590/0103-6440201902766 ↗
6. Solubility of bioceramic- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/aej.12487 ↗
7. Dentin bond strength of two mineral trioxide aggregate-based and one epoxy resin-based sealers10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.018 ↗
8. Structural, fluoride release, and 3d interfacial adhesion analysis of bioactive endodontic sealers10.4012/dmj.2019-064 ↗
9. Characterisation of the Bioactivity and the Solubility of a New Root Canal Sealer10.1016/j.identj.2023.04.003 ↗
10. The Increased Use of Bioceramics in Endodontics
11. AbuZeid, S.T., Alamoudi, R.A., and Mokeem Saleh, A.A. (2022). Impact of Water Solubility on Chemical Composition and Surface Structure of Two Generations of Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020873 ↗
12. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study10.1002/lsm.22446 ↗
13. The use of premixed bioceramic materials in endodontics10.1016/j.gien.2016.09.001 ↗
14. Solubility, pH Changes and Releasing Elements of Different Bioceramic and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Root Canal Sealers Comparative Study
15. (2024, July 01). Dentsply Sirona AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer. Available online: https://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-nz/discover/discover-by-brand/ah-plus-bioceramic-sealer.html.
16. Cytocompatibility and bioactive potential of AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer: An in vitro study10.1111/iej.13805 ↗
17. Dislodgment Resistance of Bioceramic and Epoxy Sealers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.04.004 ↗
18. Assessment of Interfacial Adaptation of New Endodontic Sealers to Root Canal Dentin with and Without a Main Guttaperch Cone: An SEM Analysis
19. Effects of storage solutions on mineral contents of dentin10.1016/j.jds.2011.09.001 ↗
20. The push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers10.1186/s13005-018-0170-8 ↗
21. Edrees, H.Y., Abu Zeid, S.T.H., Atta, H.M., and AlQriqri, M.A. (2019). Induction of Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Bioceramic Root Repair Material. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12142311 ↗
22. Carbonate and fluoride incorporation in synthetic apatites: Comparative effect on physico-chemical properties and in vitro bioactivity in fetal bovine serum10.1016/j.msec.2009.12.011 ↗
23. The effect of obturation technique on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate sealers10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.002 ↗
24. Bond strength of different endodontic sealers to dentin: Push-out test10.1590/S1678-77572011000600017 ↗
25. Monoblocks in root canals: A finite elemental stress analysis study10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01885.x ↗
26. Al-Haddad, A., and Aziz, Z.A.C.A. (2016). Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. Int. J. Biomater., 2016.10.1155/2016/9753210 ↗
27. Push-out bond strengths of the dentine-sealer interface with and without a main cone: A comparative study using different sealers and cone systems
28. Push-out bond strength of root fillings made with C-Point and BC sealer versus gutta-percha and AH Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne10.1111/iej.12455 ↗
29. Push-out bond strengths of the dentine-sealer interface with and without a main cone10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01308.x ↗
30. Push-Out Bond Strength, Characterization, and Ion Release of Premixed and Powder-Liquid Bioceramic Sealers with or without Gutta-Percha
31. Push-out bond strengths: The Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01132.x ↗
32. Al-Haddad, A.Y., Kutty, M.G., and Che Ab Aziz, Z.A. (2018). Push-Out Bond Strength of Experimental Apatite Calcium Phosphate Based Coated Gutta-Percha. Int. J. Biomater., 2018.10.1155/2018/1731857 ↗
33. A scanning electron microscope analysis of sealing potential and marginal adaptation of different root canal sealers to dentin: An In Vitro study10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2733 ↗
34. Effect of final irrigant on depth of tubular penetration of resin-based root canal sealer and bioactive sealers using confocal laser scanning microscope10.4103/endo.endo_49_20 ↗
35. Dislocation resistance of iRoot SP, a calcium silicate-based sealer, from radicular dentine10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.037 ↗
36. Marques Ferreira, M., Martinho, J.P., Duarte, I., Mendonça, D., Craveiro, A.C., Botelho, M.F., Carrilho, E., Miguel Marto, C., Coelho, A., and Paula, A. (2022). Evaluation of the Sealing Ability and Bond Strength of Two Endodontic Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study. Dent. J., 10.10.3390/dj10110201 ↗
37. Physicochemical and Biological Properties of AH Plus Bioceramic10.1016/j.joen.2022.10.009 ↗
38. Shieh, K., Yang, J., Zhu, E.H., Peters, O.A., and Hosseinpour, S. (2023). Dentinal Tubule Penetrability and Bond Strength of Two Novel Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16093309 ↗
39. Influence of bioceramic intracanal medication on the bond strength of bioceramic root canal sealer10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0056 ↗
40. Abu-zeid, S.T. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Interfacial Adaptation and Depth Penetration of Recent HiFlow versus Regular Bioceramic Sealers in Conjunction with BC Gutta-Percha Points Using Two Different Obturation Techniques—A Preliminary Report of an Ex Vivo Study. J. Funct. Biomater., 15.10.3390/jfb15050134 ↗
41. A critical review of the material properties guiding the clinician’s choice of root canal sealers10.1007/s00784-023-05140-w ↗
42. Kim, Y., Kim, B.S., Kim, Y.M., Lee, D., and Kim, S.Y. (2019). The penetration ability of calcium silicate root canal sealers into dentinal tubules compared to conventional resin-based sealer: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12030531 ↗
43. De Angelis, F., D’arcangelo, C., Buonvivere, M., Argentino, R., and Vadini, M. (2021). In vitro microleakage evaluation of bioceramic and zinc-eugenol sealers with two obturation techniques. Coatings, 11.10.3390/coatings11060727 ↗
44. The single cone obturation technique with a modified warm filler10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103181 ↗
45. Assessment of a new root canal sealer’s apical sealing ability10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.024 ↗
46. Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers10.4012/dmj.2015-049 ↗
47. Hydration behaviors of calcium silicate-based biomaterials10.1016/j.jfma.2016.07.009 ↗
48. Biomineralization Ability and Interaction of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and White Portland Cement with Dentin in a Phosphate-containing Fluid10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.011 ↗