journal article·2024-10-06Open access

Monthly Maximum Magnitude Prediction in the North–South Seismic Belt of China Based on Deep Learning

Ning Mao, Ke Sun, Jingye Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 19

Abstract

The North–South Seismic Belt is one of the major regions in China where strong earthquakes frequently occur. Predicting the monthly maximum magnitude is of significant importance for proactive seismic hazard defense. This paper uses seismic catalog data from the North–South Seismic Belt since 1970 to calculate and extract multiple seismic parameters. The monthly maximum magnitude is processed using Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) with sample segmentation to avoid information leakage. The decomposed multiple modal data and seismic parameters together form a new dataset. Based on these datasets, this paper employs four deep learning models and four time windows to predict the monthly maximum magnitude, using prediction accuracy (PA), False Alarm Rate (FAR), and Missed Alarm Rate (MR) as evaluation metrics. It is found that a time window of 12 generally yields better prediction results, with the PA for Ms 5.0–6.0 earthquakes reaching 77.27% and for earthquakes above Ms 6.0 reaching 12.5%. Compared to data not decomposed using VMD, traditional error metrics show only a slight improvement, but the model can better predict short-term trends in magnitude changes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Earthquake Detection and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Urlainis, A., and Shohet, I.M. (2023). A Comprehensive Approach to Earthquake-Resilient Infrastructure: Integrating Maintenance with Seismic Fragility Curves. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13092265 ↗
2. Precursory pattern based feature extraction techniques for earthquake prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902224 ↗
3. Neural network applications in earthquake prediction (1994–2019): Meta-analytic and statistical insights on their limitations10.1785/0220200021 ↗
4. The Prediction of Two Large Earthquakes in Greece10.1029/2008EO390002 ↗
5. Nowcasting earthquakes: Imaging the earthquake cycle in California with machine learning10.1029/2021EA001757 ↗
6. Neural network models for earthquake magnitude prediction using multiple seismicity indicators10.1142/S0129065707000890 ↗
7. Research progress in field of earthquake prediction by machine learning based on seismic data
8. Machine learning for earthquake prediction: A review (2017–2021)10.1007/s12145-023-00991-z ↗
9. Predicting the magnitude of an impending earthquake using deep learning techniques10.1007/s12145-022-00916-2 ↗
10. Li, R., Lu, X., Li, S., Yang, H., Qiu, J., and Zhang, L. (2020, January 19–24). DLEP: A Deep Learning Model for Earthquake Prediction. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Glasgow, UK.10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9207621 ↗
11. Earthquake magnitude prediction in Hindukush region using machine learning techniques10.1007/s11069-016-2579-3 ↗
12. Earthquake Prediction Based on Spatio-Temporal Data Mining: An LSTM Network Approach10.1109/TETC.2017.2699169 ↗
13. NEEWS: A novel earthquake early warning model using neural dynamic classification and neural dynamic optimization10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.013 ↗
14. Attention-Based Bi-Directional Long-Short Term Memory Network for Earthquake Prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3071400 ↗
15. A Spatiotemporal Model for Global Earthquake Prediction Based on Convolutional LSTM
16. A CNN-BiLSTM model with attention mechanism for earthquake prediction10.1007/s11227-023-05369-y ↗
17. Last, M., Rabinowitz, N., Leonard, G., and Ebrahimi, M. (2016). Predicting the Maximum Earthquake Magnitude from Seismic Data in Israel and Its Neighboring Countries. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0146101 ↗
18. Exploring the reliability of different artificial intelligence techniques in predicting earthquakes for Malaysia10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106826 ↗
19. EPT: A data-driven transformer model for earthquake prediction10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106176 ↗
20. Earthquake magnitude prediction in Turkey: A comparative study of deep learning methods, ARIMA and singular spectrum analysis10.1007/s12665-023-11072-1 ↗
21. Prediction of the earthquake magnitude by time series methods along the East Anatolian Fault, Turkey10.1007/s12145-021-00636-z ↗
22. Debnath, P., Chittora, P., Chakrabarti, T., Chakrabarti, P., Leonowicz, Z., Jasinski, M., Gono, R., and Jasińska, E. (2021). Analysis of Earthquake Forecasting in India Using Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020971 ↗
23. Seismic indicators based earthquake predictor system using Genetic Programming and AdaBoost classification10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.020 ↗
24. EPM–DCNN: Earthquake Prediction Models Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks10.1785/0120220058 ↗
25. Variational Mode Decomposition10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675 ↗
26. Enhancing earthquake signal based on variational mode decomposition and S-G filter10.1007/s10950-020-09948-x ↗
27. Sarlis, N.V., Skordas, E.S., Mintzelas, A., and Papadopoulou, K.A. (2018). Micro-scale, mid-scale, and macro-scale in global seismicity identified by empirical mode decomposition and their multifractal characteristics. Sci. Rep., 8.10.1038/s41598-018-27567-y ↗
28. Granda, F., Benítez, D.S., and Yépez, F. (2019, January 13–27). On the analysis of strong earthquake seismic signals using variational-mode decomposition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies, Valparaiso, Chile.10.1109/CHILECON47746.2019.8987561 ↗
29. Chi, C., Li, C., Han, Y., Yu, Z.N., and Zhang, D. (2023). Pre-earthquake anomaly extraction from borehole strain data based on machine learning. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-47387-z ↗
30. Strong earthquake migration characteristics in the North-South seismic belt and their relationship with the South Asian seismic belt
31. Earthquake prediction in the North-South seismic belt based on image information methods
32. Discussion on the basic characteristics and formation mechanism of the North-South seismic belt in China
33. Deng, Q.D., Zhang, P.Z., Ran, Y.K., Yang, X.P., Min, W., and Chu, Q.Z. (2002). Basic characteristics of active tectonics in China. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci., 12.
34. Application of the maximum aftershock magnitude estimation method in the North-South seismic belt
35. A testable five-year forecast of moderate and large earthquakes in southern California based on smoothed seismicity10.1785/gssrl.78.1.94 ↗
36. Quantification of Earthquakes10.1038/271411a0 ↗
37. A BP artificial neural network model for earthquake magnitude prediction in Himalayas, India10.4236/cs.2016.711294 ↗
38. Recurrent convolutional neural networks help to predict location of earthquakes10.1109/LGRS.2021.3107998 ↗
39. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
40. Graves, A., and Jaitly, N. (2013, January 26–31). Bidirectional LSTM networks for improved phoneme classification and recognition. Proceedings of the ICASSP, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
41. Tay, Y., Luu, A.T., and Hui, S.C. (2018, January 19–23). Multi-pointer co-attention networks for recommendation. Proceedings of the KDD, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3219819.3220086 ↗
42. A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091 ↗
43. Earthquake prediction: Review and prospects
44. Acoustic emission sources localization of laser cladding metallic panels using improved fruit fly optimization algorithm-based independent variational mode decomposition10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108514 ↗
45. A VMD-EWT-LSTM-based multi-step prediction approach for shield tunneling machine cutterhead torque10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107213 ↗
46. Proaño, E., Benítez, D.S., Lara-Cueva, R., and Ruiz, M. (2018, January 14–16). On the use of variational mode decomposition for seismic event detection. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC), Ixtapa, Mexico.10.1109/ROPEC.2018.8661428 ↗
47. (2024, October 02). MSE and RMSE: A Clear Guide to Understanding These Evaluation Metrics in Machine Learning. (In Chinese).
48. (2023, March 29). Choosing between MAE, MSE and RMSE. (In Chinese).
49. Zhang, J., Sun, K., Zhu, J., Mao, N., and Ouzounov, D. (2023). Application of Model-Based Time Series Prediction of Infrared Long-Wave Radiation Data for Exploring the Precursory Patterns Associated with the 2021 Madoi Earthquake. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15194748 ↗
50. Satellite observation of CH4 and CO anomalies associated with the Wenchuan Ms 8.0 and Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquakes in China10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.06.028 ↗
51. Prediction of ionospheric TEC over China based on long and short-term memory neural network
52. Magnetic field variations associated with the SES before the 6.6 Grevena-Kozani earthquake10.2183/pjab.77.93 ↗
53. The OLR anomaly and mechanism before Tibet earthquake (M6.9)
54. A multi-network based hybrid LSTM model for ionospheric anomaly detection: A case study of the Mw 7.8 Nepal earthquake10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.057 ↗
55. Successive Variational Mode Decomposition10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107610 ↗
56. Feature Mode Decomposition: New Decomposition Theory for Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis10.1109/TIE.2022.3156156 ↗
57. Orthonormal Bases of Compactly Supported Wavelets10.1002/cpa.3160410705 ↗