journal article·2024-10-07Open access

Influence of Neuromuscular Activity and Technical Determinants on Scull Rowing Performance

Lorenzo Pitto, Geoffrey N. Ertel, Frédéric R. Simon, Gérome C. Gauchard, Guillaume Mornieux

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 19

Abstract

Rowing is a complex sport where technique can significantly impact performance. A better understanding of the rowers’ technique and neuromuscular activations during scull rowing, along with their impact on rowing performance, could greatly help trainers and athletes. Twelve male rowers were asked to row at their competitive stroke rate, and we collected data describing neuromuscular activations, trunk and arm kinematics, as well as technical determinants such as oar angles and angle asymmetries. We fitted linear mixed-effect models to investigate the effects of these variables on power production and boat speed. A larger effective angle had the greatest positive effect on power output, and slip angles had the largest negative effects. Increased elbow flexion at catch had the greatest negative effect on speed. Angle asymmetries affected neither power nor speed. Increased upper limb neuromuscular activity during the first and third quarters of the drive phase helped reduce slip angles, thus increasing performance. Power and speed were influenced similarly by the predictor variables. Still, they showed subtle differences, indicating that the strategies to maximize power production might not be the best ones to also achieve the maximum speed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Motor Control and Adaptation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Development Adaptation Handicap (DevAH) Research Unit, Université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France

CARE Grand Est, Université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France

Faculty of Sport Sciences, Université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. The Rowing Cycle: Sources of Variance and Invariance in Ergometer and on-the-Water Performance10.1080/00222899809601320 ↗
2. Holt, A.C., Aughey, R.J., Ball, K., Hopkins, W.G., and Siegel, R. (2020). Technical Determinants of On-Water Rowing Performance. Front. Sports Act. Living, 2.10.3389/fspor.2020.589013 ↗
3. Valery, K. (2016). The Biomechanics of Rowing, Crowood Press. [2nd ed.].
4. Duchene, Y., Simon, F.R., Ertel, G.N., Maciejewski, H., Gauchard, G.C., and Mornieux, G. (2024). The Stroke Rate Influences Performance, Technique and Core Stability during Rowing Ergometer. Sports Biomech.10.1080/14763141.2024.2301992 ↗
5. The Effects of Concurrent Biomechanical Biofeedback on Novel Skill Acquisition10.1080/14763141.2019.1650101 ↗
6. Prediction of Rowing Ergometer Performance by Technical and Core Stability Parameters10.1080/02640414.2023.2219076 ↗
7. Over 50 Years of Researching Force Profiles in Rowing: What Do We Know?10.1007/s40279-018-0992-3 ↗
8. Mechanical Power Output in Rowing Should Not Be Determined from Oar Forces and Oar Motion Alone10.1080/02640414.2018.1439346 ↗
9. How Gender and Boat-Side Affect Shape Characteristics of Force–Angle Profiles in Single Sculling: Insights from Functional Data Analysis10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.010 ↗
10. Force Coordination Strategies in On-water Single Sculling: Are Asymmetries Related to Better Rowing Performance?10.1111/sms.13031 ↗
11. Kleshnev, V. (2000, January 25–30). Power in Rowing. Proceedings of the 18 International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports 2000, Hong Kong, China.
12. Skill Variables Discriminate between the Elite and Sub-Elite in Coxless Pair-Oared Rowing
13. Real-Time Feedback on Mechanical Power Output: Facilitating Crew Rowers’ Compliance with Prescribed Training Intensity10.1123/ijspp.2018-0128 ↗
14. Trunk and Shoulder Kinematics of Rowing Displayed by Olympic Athletes10.1080/14763141.2020.1781238 ↗
15. Rowers with a Recent History of Low Back Pain Engage Different Regions of the Lumbar Erector Spinae during Rowing10.1016/j.jsams.2019.07.007 ↗
16. Gender Differences in Trunk and Pelvic Kinematics during Prolonged Ergometer Rowing in Adolescents10.1123/jab.29.2.180 ↗
17. The Impact of Ergometer Design on Hip and Trunk Muscle Activity Patterns in Elite Rowers: An Electromyographic Assessment
18. Electromyography and Kinematics of the Trunk during Rowing in Elite Female Rowers10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818c1300 ↗
19. Changes in Kinematics and Trunk Electromyography during a 2000m Race Simulation in Elite Female Rowers10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01249.x ↗
20. Slide-Based Ergometer Rowing: Effects on Force Production and Neuromuscular Activity10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01441.x ↗
21. Characterizing the Effects of an Ergonomic Handle on Upper Limbs Kinematics and Neuromuscular Activity, Comfort, and Performance during Ergometer Rowing10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104093 ↗
22. A Comparison of Electromyography and Stroke Kinematics during Ergometer and On-Water Rowing10.1080/02640414.2014.886128 ↗
23. Hohmuth, R., Schwensow, D., Malberg, H., and Schmidt, M. (2023). A Wireless Rowing Measurement System for Improving the Rowing Performance of Athletes. Sensors, 23.10.20944/preprints202301.0164.v1 ↗
24. The Validity of Using Inertial Measurement Units to Monitor the Torso and Pelvis Sagittal Plane Motion of Elite Rowers10.1080/02640414.2022.2042146 ↗
25. Kinematic Asymmetries of the Lower Limbs during Ergometer Rowing10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182625231 ↗
26. Measuring Spinal Motion in Rowers: The Use of an Electromagnetic Device10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00043-7 ↗
27. A Comparison of Rowing Technique at Different Stroke Rates: A Description of Sequencing, Force Production and Kinematics10.1055/s-2004-820936 ↗
28. Holt, A.C., Ball, K., Siegel, R., Hopkins, W.G., and Aughey, R.J. (2021). Relationships between Measures of Boat Acceleration and Performance in Rowing, with and without Controlling for Stroke Rate and Power Output. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0249122 ↗
29. Comparison of Force-Related Performance Indicators between Heavyweight and Lightweight Rowers10.1080/14763141.2010.511678 ↗
30. Development of Recommendations for SEMG Sensors and Sensor Placement Procedures10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4 ↗
31. Effect of Hand Loads on Upper Extremity Muscle Activity during Pushing and Pulling Motions10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103504 ↗
32. Elimination of Electrocardiogram Contamination from Electromyogram Signals: An Evaluation of Currently Used Removal Techniques10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.07.003 ↗
33. Bianco, N.A., Patten, C., and Fregly, B.J. (2018). Can Measured Synergy Excitations Accurately Construct Unmeasured Muscle Excitations?. J. Biomech. Eng., 140.10.1115/1.4038199 ↗
34. The Effect of Perspiration on the SEMG Amplitude and Power Spectrum10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.04.009 ↗
35. Co-Contraction Recruitment and Spinal Load during Isometric Trunk Flexion and Extension10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.07.006 ↗
36. Stabilizing Function of Trunk Flexor-Extensor Muscles around a Neutral Spine Posture10.1097/00007632-199710010-00003 ↗
37. Contraction of the Abdominal Muscles Associated with Movement of the Lower Limb10.1093/ptj/77.2.132 ↗
38. The Effects of Concurrent Biomechanical Biofeedback on Rowing Performance at Different Stroke Rates10.1080/02640414.2021.1954349 ↗