journal article·2024-08-27Open access

Methodology and Monitoring of the Strengthening and Upgrading of a Four-Story Building with an Open Ground Floor in a Seismic Region

Iakov Iskhakov, Sharon Yehuda, Yuri Ribakov

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

Many buildings around the world fail to meet current earthquake resistance requirements and have significant potential to be a risk to human life and property. Therefore, a seismic upgrade of such buildings is quite necessary. Over the past decades, hundreds of buildings have been strengthened and upgraded to improve their seismic resistance, and thousands more are planned for years to come. In Israel, this was followed by National Outline Plan No. 38, which provides a basis for retrofitting and adding new areas to existing buildings. It should be noted that adding new floors to existing buildings increases seismic forces. Moreover, structure material properties change over a building’s lifetime, which should be also considered for strengthening. The proposed research investigates and validates the existing practice for strengthening and upgrading buildings in seismic regions and suggests ways of improving their efficiency. Experiments and numerical analysis were performed on a real existing residential building that requires strengthening and upgrading. A corresponding methodology was proposed for monitoring the strengthening and upgrading processes, including selecting measurement devices and their real use. Using sensors with the highest sensitivity enabled measurements of micro-vibrations and investigations of the recorded signal to obtain the building’s natural vibration frequencies. Experimental measurements allowed us to distinguish different frequencies of the building at all strengthening and upgrading stages. The measured dynamic parameters of the building allowed a more accurate calculation of seismic forces for all of these stages and consequently made the design more effective. Therefore, we recommended monitoring buildings in each stage of seismic strengthening and upgrading.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. (2013). Design Provision for Earthquake Resistance of Structure, Amendment 5 (Standard No. IS 413).
2. (2003). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1).
3. (2003). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-3).
4. (2013). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (Standard No. ASCE 7-05).
5. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a Real Four-Story Building with an Open Ground Floor in Seismic Region for Proper Strengthening10.1155/2024/7812859 ↗
6. Rehabilitation of reinforced concrete frames with reinforced concrete infills
7. Contribution of reinforced concrete infills to seismic behavior of structural systems
8. Kaplan, H., and Yilmaz, S. (2012). Seismic Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Earthquake-Resistant Structures—Design, Assessment and Rehabilitation, BoD–Books on Demand. Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/221926358_Seismic_Strengthening_of_Reinforced_Concrete_Building.10.5772/28854 ↗
9. Gião, R., Lúcio, V., and Chastre, C. (2023). Innovative Seismic Strengthening Techniques to Be Used in RC Beams’ Critical Zones. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13010095 ↗
10. Appraisal of masonry infill walls effect in the seismic response of RC framed buildings: A case study10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.043 ↗
11. Assessment of the earthquake behavior of Hotel Ermionio in Kozani, Greece constructed in 1933 before and after its recent retrofit
12. Structural performance evaluation of a historical landmark built in the Taisho period
13. Offir, Y., Shohat, A., and Cohen, A. (2017, January 9–13). Seismic retrofit of B’nai Zion hospital using an innovative damped rocking-mass system. Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake, Santiago, Chile.
14. Seismic strengthening of churches as a part of earthquake renewal in the Posočje region, Slovenia
15. Assessment on Natural Frequencies of Structures using Field Measurement and FE Analysis
16. Experimental and numerical investigation of a full-scale multistory RC building under dynamic loading10.1002/tal.267 ↗
17. Selection of Base Isolation System Properties Using a Three-Story Structural Part Impulse Tests
18. Full-Scale Structural and Nonstructural Building System Performance during Earthquakes: Part I—Specimen Description, Test Protocol, and Structural Response10.1193/012414eqs016m ↗
19. Fajfar, P., and Godec, M.A. (1982). Compression of Numerical Analysis and Full-Scale Tests for Free Vibration of Three Reinforced Concrete Buildings, IKPIR Publication.
20. (2016). ETABS Verification Examples, CSI Computers and Structures, Computers & Structures, Inc.
21. (2014). STRAP Verification Manual, Structural Analysis Program, ATIR Engineering Software Ltd.. Version 2014.
22. (2023, May 14). Specifications for Raspberry Shake RS4D—Your RS4D Personal Seismograph & Accelerograph—An IoT Home-Automation Device Born on: February. Available online: https://manual.raspberryshake.org/_downloads/SpecificationsforRaspberryShake4DMEMSV4.pdf.
23. (2023, May 14). Specifications for: Raspberry Shake 3D—Your 3D Personal Seismograph, An IoT Home-Automation Device Born on: February. Available online: https://manual.raspberryshake.org/_downloads/SpecificationsforRaspberryShake3D.pdf.
24. (2023, May 28). SWARM—Seismic Wave Analysis and Real Time Monitor: User Manual and Reference Guide, Version 3.1.0; February 2020, Available online: https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/software/swarm/doc/swarm_v3.pdf.
25. (2023, May 28). WinQuake Documentation, Version 3.4.2; 3 December 2018. Available online: http://webtronics.com/wqdocs/.
26. Do Low-Cost Seismographs Perform Well Enough for Your Network? An Overview of Laboratory Tests and Field Observations of the OSOP Raspberry Shake 4D10.1785/0220180251 ↗
27. Staat, E. (2023, May 28). Comparing Inexpensive Raspberry Shakes to Broadband Seismometers in Estimating Deep Earth Structure through The Use of Receiver Functions. Available online: https://raspberryshake.org/wp-content/uploads/StaatPoster465-3.0s_compressed.pdf.