journal article·2024-08-06Open access

Biomechanical Characterization of the CrossFit® Isabel Workout: A Cross-Sectional Study

Manoel Rios, Ricardo Cardoso, Pedro Fonseca, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, Victor Machado Reis, Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves, Ricardo J. Fernandes

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 16

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted to biomechanically characterize Isabel’s workout (30 snatch repetitions with 61 kg fixed weight), focusing on eventual changes in knee, hip and shoulder angles. A three-dimensional markerless motion capture system was used to collect data from 11 highly trained male crossfitters along the Isabel workout performed at maximal effort. The routine was analyzed globally and in initial, middle and final phases (10, 20 and 30 repetitions, respectively). Lift total time increased (1.51 ± 0.18 vs. 1.97 ± 0.20 s) and maximal lift velocity (2.64 ± 0.12 vs. 2.32 ± 0.13 m/s) and maximal lift power (15.58 ± 2.34 vs. 13.80 ± 2.49 W/kg) decreased from the initial to final phases, while the time from lift until the bar crossed the hip and shoulder (34.20 ± 4.00 vs. 27.50 ± 5.10 and 39.70 ± 16.80 vs. 30.90 ± 13.90%) decreased along the Isabel workout. In addition, a decrease in hip flexion was observed during the last two phases when the bar crosses the knee (62.62 ± 24.80 vs. 53.60 ± 19.99°). Data evidence a decrease in the power profile and a change in hip flexion throughout the Isabel workout, without compromising the other joints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Shoulder Injury and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center of Research, Education Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Department of Sport Sciences, Exercise and Health, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal

Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal

Research Center in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, 4050-091 Porto, Portugal

Funding

Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. (FCT) and the European Union (EU) · Victor Machado Reis · Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5 ↗
2. Meier, N., Schlie, J., and Schmidt, A. (2023). CrossFit(®): ‘Unknowable’ or Predictable?—A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit(®) Performance. Sports, 11.10.3390/sports11060112 ↗
3. Acute CrossFit® workout session impacts blood redox marker modulation10.3390/physiologia1010004 ↗
4. Rios, M., Becker, K.M., Cardoso, F., Pyne, D.B., Reis, V.M., Moreira-Gonçalves, D., and Fernandes, R.J. (2024). Assessment of Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Contributions in an Extreme Intensity CrossFit(®) Benchmark Workout. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24020513 ↗
5. Are extreme conditioning programmes effective and safe? A narrative review of high-intensity functional training methods research paradigms and findings10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000435 ↗
6. Maté-Muñoz, J.L., Lougedo, J.H., Barba, M., García-Fernández, P., Garnacho-Castaño, M.V., and Domínguez, R. (2017). Muscular fatigue in response to different modalities of CrossFit sessions. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0181855 ↗
7. Physiological responses after two different CrossFit workouts10.5114/biolsport.2021.102928 ↗
8. Effect of the Fran CrossFit Workout on Oxygen Uptake Kinetics, Energetics, and Postexercise Muscle Function in Trained CrossFitters10.1123/ijspp.2023-0201 ↗
9. Bioenergetic Analysis and Fatigue Assessment during the Fran Workout in Experienced Crossfitters10.1123/ijspp.2022-0411 ↗
10. Peña, J., Moreno-Doutres, D., Peña, I., Chulvi-Medrano, I., Ortegón, A., Aguilera-Castells, J., and Buscà, B. (2021). Predicting the Unknown and the Unknowable. Are Anthropometric Measures and Fitness Profile Associated with the Outcome of a Simulated CrossFit(®) Competition?. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18073692 ↗
11. A 4-Year Analysis of the Incidence of Injuries Among CrossFit-Trained Participants10.1177/2325967118803100 ↗
12. Are Injuries More Common. with CrossFit Training than Other Forms of Exercise?10.1123/jsr.2016-0040 ↗
13. Hak, P.T., Hodzovic, E., and Hickey, B. (2022). The nature and prevalence of injury during CrossFit training. J. Strength Cond. Res.
14. Power Output and Electromyographic Activity during and after a Moderate Load Muscular Endurance Session10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a5bc44 ↗
15. Fatigue and Performance Rates as Decision-Making Criteria in Pacing Control during CrossFit(®)10.1177/00315125241247858 ↗
16. Biomechanical comparison of successful snatch and unsuccessful frontward barbell drop in world-class male weightlifters10.1080/14763141.2020.1787498 ↗
17. Analysis of bar paths during the snatch in elite male weightlifters10.1519/1073-6840(1998)020<0030:AOBPDT>2.3.CO;2 ↗
18. Weightlifting: An applied method of technical analysis10.1519/SSC.0000000000000614 ↗
19. Comparative kinematic analysis of the snatch lifts in elite male adolescent weightlifters
20. A review of power output studies of Olympic and powerlifting: Methodology, performance prediction, and evaluation tests
21. Unsuccessful vs. Successful Performance in Snatch Lifts: A Kinematic Approach10.1519/JSC.0b013e318196b843 ↗
22. Marfell-Jones, M., Olds, T., Stewart, A., and Carter, L. (2024, July 01). International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment (2006). Available online: https://researchportal.vub.be/en/publications/international-standards-for-anthropometric-assessment-2006.
23. Cardoso, R., Rios, M., Cardoso, F., Fonseca, P., Ferreira, F.A., Abraldes, J.A., Gomes, B.B., Vilas-Boas, J.P., and Fernandes, R.J. (2024). Physiological and Biomechanical Characteristics of Olympic and World-Class Rowers—Case Study. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14104273 ↗
24. Maintenance of Velocity and Power with Cluster Sets during High-Volume Back Squats10.1123/ijspp.2015-0602 ↗
25. Effect of 3 Different Set Configurations on Kinematic Variables and Internal Loads During a Power Snatch Session10.1519/JSC.0000000000004498 ↗
26. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the snatch of elite Greek weightlifters10.1080/02640410050082332 ↗
27. Weightlifting: A brief overview
28. Lower extremity biomechanics during weightlifting exercise vary across joint and load10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181da780b ↗
29. Changes in lifting dynamics after localized arm fatigue10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00048-7 ↗