Risk Assessment of Hydrogen Cyanide for Available Safe Egress Time in Fire Simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
The majority of fatalities in building fires are attributed to asphyxiation caused by toxic gases. Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) is one of the toxic gases that can be released during a fire, posing a lethal risk to humans even at low concentrations. However, analysis of the risk posed by HCN in fire risk assessments using fire simulations is relatively rare. This study conducted fire simulations to examine the potential risks of HCN to occupants during a fire. The simulations considered various fire conditions in residential buildings by varying fuel types, fire growth rates, and HCN yields. The relative risk score (RRS) was derived based on the time to reach the threshold values of parameters considered critical for life safety. The results of the fire simulations indicated that the RRS for HCN was approximately 20–40 points higher than that of O2, CO, and CO2, reaching a maximum of 92 points. However, the risk posed by HCN was found to be limited in comparison to the risks associated with temperature and visibility. Nevertheless, considering that the primary cause of fatalities in fires is asphyxiation due to toxic gases, HCN must be regarded as a critical factor in fire risk assessments. Additionally, since HCN yield values can increase up to nine times depending on temperature and ventilation conditions, the risk posed by HCN could be significantly higher.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Wind and Air Flow Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Fire and Disaster Prevention, Graduate School, Daejeon University, 62 Daehak-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34520, Republic of Korea
Department of Disaster Prevention, Graduate School, Daejeon University, 62 Daehak-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34520, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA)
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Performance-based Fire Engineering Design and Its Application in Australia10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.5-23 ↗
2. RSET/ASET, A flawed concept for fire safety assessment
3. Effects of User Dependence on the Prediction Results of Visibility in Fire Simulations10.7731/KIFSE.b5e493d9 ↗
4. McGrattan, K., Hostikka, S., McDermott, R., Flo, J., Wein, C., and Over, K. (2022). Fire Dynamics Simulator: Technical Reference Guide, NIST SP 1018-1, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
5. Karter, M.J. (2014). Fire Loss in the United States during 2013, National Fire Protection Association. Fire Analysis Research Division.
6. The fire toxicity of polyurethane foams10.1186/s40038-016-0012-3 ↗
7. Toxic Gases from Fires10.1126/science.208143 ↗
8. Overview of Combustion Toxicology10.1016/S0300-483X(96)03492-0 ↗
9. The Incapacitative Effects of Exposure to the thermal decomposition products of polyurethane foams10.1002/fam.810080104 ↗
10. Toxic product yields and hazard assessment for fully enclosed design fires10.1002/1097-0126(200010)49:10<1232::AID-PI543>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
11. Toxicity Evaluation of Fire Effluent Gases from Experimental Fires in building
12. Evaluation of Toxic Gases from Building Polymeric Materials in a Small-scale Box Model10.1002/fam.810120202 ↗
13. National Standards of the Republic of Korea (2013). Performance Based Design Methods and Standards on Fire-Fighting System Design Installation Act, National Fire Agency. Annex 1, p. 3-a.
14. Buchanan, A.H. (1994). Fire Engineering Design Guide, Centre for Advanced Engineering, University of Canterbury.
15. Hurley, M.J., and Rosebaum, E.R. (2016). Performance-Based Design. The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, National Fire Protection Association.10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_37 ↗
16. NRCC-43976, Development of performance-based codes performance criteria and fire safety engineering methods
17. (2004). The Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles to Fire Safety Design of Buildings Part 6: Human factors: Life Safety strategies—Occupant Evacuation, Behavior and Condition. Standard No. BSI, PD 7974-6.
18. The Fractional Effective Dose Model for Assessment of Toxic Hazards in Fires10.1177/073490418800600504 ↗
19. McGrattan, K., Hostikka, S., Floyd, J., McDermott, R., and Vanella, M. (2022). Fire Dynamics Simulator: User’s Guide, NIST SP 1019.
20. Fire Deaths in the Glasgow Area: III the Role of Hydrogen Cyanide10.1177/002580248202200106 ↗
21. He, Y. (2009, January 18–19). Evaluating visibility using FDS modeling result. Proceedings of the Fire Safety Engineering International Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
22. Analysis on the Implementation Status of Domestic PBD (Performance Based Design)—Focusing on the Fire Scenario and Simulation
23. Combustion Toxicity10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_62 ↗
24. Flexible Polyurethane Foam: A Literature Review of Thermal Decomposition Products and Toxicity10.3109/10915818909018074 ↗
25. Fire performance of charring closed-cell polymeric insulation materials: Polyisocyanurate and phenolic foam10.1002/fam.2501 ↗
26. Generation of Hydrogen Cyanide from Flexible Polyurethane Foam Decomposed under Different Combustion Condition10.1002/fam.810090305 ↗
27. Thermal Decomposition of Polymeric Materials10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_7 ↗
28. HCN Yields and Fate of Fuel Nitrogen for Materials under Different Combustion Conditions in the ISO 19700 Tube Furnace and Large-scale Fires10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.9-1117 ↗
29. The effect of temperature and ventilation condition on the toxic product yields from burning polymers10.1002/fam.955 ↗
30. Purser, D.A., Maynard, R.L., and Wakefield, J.C. (2015). Toxicology, Survival and Health Hazards of Combustion Products, The Royal Society of Chemistry. Issues in Toxicology No. 23.10.1039/9781849737487 ↗
31. Bounagui, A., Benichou, N., McCartney, C., and Kashef, A. (2003, January 4). Optimizing the Grid Size Used in CFD Simulations to Evaluate Fire Safety in Houses. Proceedings of the 3rd NRC Symposium on Computational Fluid Dynamics, High Performance Computing and Virtual Reality, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
32. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (2016). Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications, NUREG-1824 and EPRI 3002002182, Final Report.
33. Study on the Available Safe Egress Time (ASET) Considering the Input Parameters and Model Uncertainties in Fire Simulation10.7731/KIFSE.2019.33.3.112 ↗