Exploring Factors Associated with Changes in Pain and Function Following mHealth-Based Exercise Therapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
Source abstract
Abstract
Exercise therapy is the first-line intervention recommended for those with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). Smartphone technologies (mHealth) represent a feasible means for exercise prescription and individualization. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to identify factors associated with changes in pain and function following mHealth-based exercise therapy in patients with CMP. CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTdiscus were searched from inception to February 2023. Observational and controlled clinical trials with correlation or regression analysis of factors associated with the effect of mHealth exercise interventions on pain and function were included. The risk of bias, completeness of interventions, spin of information, and certainty in the evidence were evaluated. Eight studies with 51,755 participants were included. Reduced pain intensity after intervention was associated with higher physical function: r (95% CI) = −0.55 (−0.67 to −0.41); I2 = 86%, Tau2 = 0.02; p < 0.01. Meta-regression identified the Body Mass Index (BMI), exercise dose, and completion rate as potential moderators between changes in pain and physical function following mHealth exercise therapy. No association was found between pain and anxiety: r (95% CI) = 0.15 (−0.08 to 0.37); I2 = 87%, Tau2 = 0.02; p = 0.19. Very low certainty in the evidence was observed due to serious concerns regarding the risk of bias, inconsistency, and indirectness. The limited available evidence detracts from the clinical interpretation of the findings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Seville, Spain
CTS 1110: Understanding Movement and Self in Health from Science (UMSS) Research Group, 41009 Andalusia, Spain
Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain
Departamento de Salud, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Seville, Spain
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 201910.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0 ↗
2. The world-wide burden of musculoskeletal diseases: A systematic analysis of the World Health Organization Burden of Diseases Database10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215142 ↗
3. Williams, A., Kamper, S.J., Wiggers, J.H., O’brien, K.M., Lee, H., Wolfenden, L., Yoong, S.L., Robson, E., McAuley, J.H., and Hartvigsen, J. (2018). Musculoskeletal conditions may increase the risk of chronic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMC Med., 16.10.1186/s12916-018-1151-2 ↗
4. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: Systematic review10.1136/bjsports-2018-099878 ↗
5. Core Recommendations for Osteoarthritis Care: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines10.1002/acr.25101 ↗
6. Exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A biopsychosocial approach10.1002/msc.1191 ↗
7. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain
8. Some types of exercise are more effective than others in people with chronic low back pain: A network meta-analysis10.1016/j.jphys.2021.09.004 ↗
9. Some conservative interventions are more effective than others for people with chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis10.1016/j.jphys.2022.09.007 ↗
10. Recommendations for the delivery of therapeutic exercise for people with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis. An international consensus study from the OARSI Rehabilitation Discussion Group10.1016/j.joca.2022.10.009 ↗
11. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee
12. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders
13. Absence of Improvement with Exercise in Some Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Qualitative Study of Responders and Nonresponders10.1002/acr.25085 ↗
14. Karlsson, L., Takala, E.P., Gerdle, B., and Larsson, B. (2014). Evaluation of pain and function after two home exercise programs in a clinical trial on women with chronic neck pain—With special emphasises on completers and responders. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 15.10.1186/1471-2474-15-6 ↗
15. Who responds to first-line interventions delivered in primary care? a responder—Non-responder analysis on people with knee or hip osteoarthritis treated in Swedish primary cares10.1016/j.joca.2020.02.730 ↗
16. Identifying potential moderators for response to treatment in low back pain: A systematic review10.1016/j.physio.2015.01.006 ↗
17. Exercise treatment effect modifiers in persistent low back pain: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 3514 participants from 27 randomised controlled trials10.1136/bjsports-2019-101205 ↗
18. Moderators of the Effect of Therapeutic Exercise for People With Knee and/or Hip Osteoarthritis: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00122-4 ↗
19. Exercise Therapy for Chronic Pain10.1016/j.pmr.2014.12.007 ↗
20. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: Evidence, challenges, and promising directions10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6 ↗
21. Digital interventions for promoting exercise adherence in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.physio.2020.08.001 ↗
22. Measurement, determinants, barriers, and interventions for exercise adherence: A scoping review10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.014 ↗
23. The state of the art in telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions10.1186/s40945-022-00155-0 ↗
24. Telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal pain—An overview of systematic reviews10.1177/20552076231164242 ↗
25. Effectiveness of exercises by telerehabilitation on pain, physical function and quality of life in people with physical disabilities: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with GRADE recommendations
26. Understanding Telerehabilitation Technology to Evaluate Stakeholders’ Adoption of Telerehabilitation Services: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Further Research10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.014 ↗
27. Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Evidence-Based Tablet App for Rehabilitation in Traumatic Bone and Soft Tissue Injuries of the Hand, Wrist, and Fingers10.1016/j.apmr.2023.01.016 ↗
28. Kushnir, A., Kachmar, O., and Bonnechère, B. (2024). STASISM: A Versatile Serious Gaming Multi-Sensor Platform for Personalized Telerehabilitation and Telemonitoring. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24020351 ↗
29. Stark, C., Cunningham, J., Turner, P., Johnson, M.A., and Bäcker, H.C. (2022). App-Based Rehabilitation in Back Pain, a Systematic Review. J. Pers. Med., 12.10.3390/jpm12101558 ↗
30. Effect of an Artificial Intelligence—Based Self-Management App on Musculoskeletal Health in Patients With Neck and / or Low Back Pain Referred to Specialist Care A Randomized Clinical Trial10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20400 ↗
31. Pfeifer, A.C., Uddin, R., Schröder-Pfeifer, P., Holl, F., Swoboda, W., and Schiltenwolf, M. (2020). Mobile application-based interventions for chronic pain patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness. J. Clin. Med., 9.10.3390/jcm9113557 ↗
32. World Health Organization (2011). mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. Observatory, 3, 66–71.
33. The efficacy of e-health in the self-management of chronic low back pain: A meta analysis10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103507 ↗
34. Giansanti, D. (2024). Joint Expedition: Exploring Telehealth and the Digital Healthcare Landscape as a Team Integration. Healthcare, 12.10.3390/healthcare12050585 ↗
35. Mobile app use to support therapeutic exercise for musculoskeletal pain conditions may help improve pain intensity and self-reported physical function: A systematic review10.1016/j.jphys.2022.11.012 ↗
36. mHealth Intervention for Improving Pain, Quality of Life, and Functional Disability in Patients With Chronic Pain: Systematic Review10.2196/40844 ↗
37. The effects of a mobile app-delivered intervention in people with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial
38. An Exercise and Educational and Self-management Program Delivered With a Smartphone App (CareHand) in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hands: Randomized Controlled Trial10.2196/35462 ↗
39. Moderators of the effect of a self-directed digitally delivered exercise program for people with knee osteoarthritis: Exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial10.2196/30768 ↗
40. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Outcomes of a 12-Week Digital Rehabilitation Program for Musculoskeletal Pain: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study10.2196/41306 ↗
41. Beller, E.M., Glasziou, P.P., Altman, D.G., Hopewell, S., Bastian, H., Chalmers, I., Gøtzsche, P.C., Lasserson, T., Tovey, D., and For The PRISMA for Abstracts Group (2013). PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts. PLoS Med., 10.10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419 ↗
42. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
43. Janela, D., Costa, F., Areias, A.C., Molinos, M., Moulder, R.G., Lains, J., Bento, V., Scheer, J.K., Yanamadala, V., and Cohen, S.P. (2022). Digital Care Programs for Chronic Hip Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. Healthcare, 10.10.3390/healthcare10081595 ↗
44. Digital rehabilitation for hand and wrist pain: A single-arm prospective longitudinal cohort study10.1097/PR9.0000000000001026 ↗
45. An Educational and Exercise Mobile Phone-Based Intervention to Elicit Electrophysiological Changes and to Improve Psychological Functioning in Adults With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (BackFit App): Nonrandomized Clinical Trial10.2196/29171 ↗
46. Wang, G., Bailey, J.F., Yang, M., and Krauss, J. (2021). Older Adult Use and Outcomes in a Digital Musculoskeletal (MSK) Program, by Generation. Front. Digit. Health, 3.10.3389/fdgth.2021.693170 ↗
47. Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: Mobile health (mHealth) Evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist10.1136/bmj.i1174 ↗
48. Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015 ↗
49. Multidimensional Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Pain: Introduction to the ACTTION–American Pain Society Pain Taxonomy (AAPT)10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.010 ↗
50. Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009 ↗
51. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials10.1136/bmj.l4898 ↗
52. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions10.1136/bmj.i4919 ↗
53. Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10.1136/bmj.g1687 ↗
54. Abstracts of Low Back Pain Trials Are Poorly Reported, Contain Spin of Information, and Are Inconsistent With the Full Text: An Overview Study10.1016/j.apmr.2019.03.024 ↗
55. Schünemann, H., Brozek, J., Guyatt, G., and Oxman, A. (2013). Handbook for Grading the Quality of Evidence and the Strength of Recommendations Using the GRADE Approach, McMaster University GRADE Center.
56. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117 ↗
57. Conducting meta-analisys in R with metafor package10.18637/jss.v036.i03 ↗
58. Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T., and Ebert, D.D. (2023, June 27). dmetar: Companion R Package For The Guide ‘Doing Meta-Analysis in R’. R Package Version 0.0.9000. Available online: http://dmetar.protectlab.org/.
59. On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 ↗
60. Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Tianjing, L., and Page, M. (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].10.1002/9781119536604 ↗
61. Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis10.1007/s11606-018-4425-7 ↗
62. Wearable motion sensor device to facilitate rehabilitation in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis: Pilot study to assess feasibility10.2196/17032 ↗
63. An mhealth app for self-management of chronic lower back pain (Limbr): Pilot study10.2196/mhealth.8256 ↗
64. Predictors of functional outcome in musculoskeletal healthcare: An umbrella review10.1002/ejp.1483 ↗
65. Wippert, P.M., Niederer, D., Drießlein, D., Beck, H., Banzer, W., Schneider, C., Schiltenwolf, M., and Mayer, F. (2021). Psychosocial Moderators and Mediators of Sensorimotor Exercise in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial. Front. Psychiatry, 12.10.3389/fpsyt.2021.629474 ↗
66. Are we giving stratified care a fair trial?10.1016/j.jphys.2023.02.014 ↗
67. Do comorbidities predict pain and function in knee osteoarthritis following an exercise intervention, and do they moderate the effect of exercise? Analyses of data from three randomized controlled trials10.1002/msc.1425 ↗
68. Moderators of the effects of therapeutic exercise for people with knee and hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review of sub-group analyses from randomised controlled trials10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100113 ↗
69. Knoop, J., de Joode, J.W., Brandt, H., Dekker, J., and Ostelo, R.W.J.G. (2022). Patients’ and clinicians’ experiences with stratified exercise therapy in knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23.10.1186/s12891-022-05496-2 ↗
70. Socio-technical Factors Impacting Patients’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis10.2196/36284 ↗
71. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Unguided Electronic and Mobile Health Technologies for Chronic Pain—Is It Time to Start Prescribing Electronic Health Applications?10.1093/pm/pnz164 ↗
72. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults
73. Measurement of Adherence to mHealth Physical Activity Interventions and Exploration of the Factors That Affect the Adherence: Scoping Review and Proposed Framework10.2196/30817 ↗
74. Interpretation of correlations in clinical research10.1080/00325481.2017.1383820 ↗
75. Cohort studies of aetiology and prognosis: They’re different10.1016/j.jphys.2014.07.005 ↗
76. Bias Analysis for Uncontrolled Confounding in the Health Sciences10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021644 ↗
77. An Investigation Into the Use of mHealth in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy: Scoping Review10.2196/33609 ↗
78. Beukenhorst, A.L., Druce, K.L., and De Cock, D. (2022). Smartphones for musculoskeletal research—Hype or hope? Lessons from a decennium of mHealth studies. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23.10.1186/s12891-022-05420-8 ↗
79. The law of attrition10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 ↗
80. Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review10.2196/35120 ↗
81. The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.014 ↗