Determining the Safety Level of State Roads: An Italian Case Study
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to establish an effective approach for evaluating the safety performance of road infrastructure. Road safety levels are typically quantified using safety performance indicators. However, due to the stochastic nature of accidents, many safety performance indicators cannot adequately and completely describe reality. Therefore, predictive methods based on regression models are widely used. This approach also allows for the identification of latent risk conditions in the infrastructure, even in the absence of accidents. Among available approaches, the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology is chosen for its synthesis of validated highway research and best practices for incorporating safety into both new design and rehabilitation. For this study, a preliminary new version of HSM is used. The application of this method, which combines a predictive model with observed accidents through an empirical Bayesian approach, requires a calibration process that is crucial to tailoring this method to the specific study context. In this research, the predictive model is calibrated for single carriageway roads with one lane per direction across the Italian national network. Following calibration, the safety indicators are evaluated. The results obtained according to different indicators are compared to show the importance of adopting this method to counteract the regression to the mean of observed crashes. In fact, the method, supported by empirical Bayesian analysis, enables the identification of high-risk sections of the road network, selecting more sections that would be neglected by traditional indicators based solely on observed crashes. Finally, a possible approach to prioritizing sites for inspection based both on the excess of crashes and the Safety Potential (SAPO) is proposed. In addition, SAPO is adjusted to local conditions to account for the specific context and the decreasing trend of accidents over the years.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Occupational Health and Safety Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. WHO—World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018, WHO.
2. European Commission—Mobility and Transport (2020). EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021–2030 Next Steps Towards ‘Vision Zero’, European Commission.
3. MIMS—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e della Mobilità Sostenibili (2021). Piano Nazionale Sicurezza Stradale 2030 Indirizzi Generali e Linee Guida di Attuazione, MIMS.
4. Istat—Istituto Nazione di Statistica, and ACI—Automobile Club d’Italia (2023). Incidenti Stradali—Anno 2022, Ufficio stampa ACI, Ufficio stampa ISTAT.
5. MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2012). Linee Guida Per La Gestione Della Sicurezza Delle Infrastrutture Stradali—D.Lgs n.35/11, MIT.
6. AASHTO—American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2012). Highway Safety Manual, AASHTO.
7. The economic burden of road traffic injuries until one-year after hospitalization: A survey study10.1016/j.aap.2021.106459 ↗
8. Taniform, P., Persia, L., Usami, D.S., Kunsoan, N.B., Karumba, M.M., and Wijnen, W. (2023). An Assessment of the Social Costs of Road Traffic Crashes in Cameroon. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15021316 ↗
9. Socio-economic costs of road crashes in middle-income countries: Applying a hybrid approach to Kazakhstan10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.12.006 ↗
10. World Road Association—PIARC (2019). Road Safety Manual a Guide for Practitioners: Road Safefy Management, PIARC. [4th ed.].
11. European Commission (2023). Network Wide Road Safety Assessment—Methodology and Implementation Handbook, Publications Office of the European Union. [1st ed.].
12. Proactive Methods for Road Safety Analysis
13. The common road safety approaches: A scoping review and thematic analysis10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.02.005 ↗
14. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (2006). FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines, Federal Highway Administration.
15. U.S. Department of Transportation—FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2013). Road Safety Audit Case Studies: Using Three-Dimensional Design Visualization in the Road Safety Audit Process, U.S. Department of Transportation.
16. (2019). Direttiva 2019/1936/EC, Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio. Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea.
17. (2022, January 01). Guide to Road Safety: Set, 2021. Austroads, Sidney, New South Wales, Australia. Available online: https://austroads.com.au/publications/road-safety/agrs-set.
18. Austroads (2012). An Introductory Guide for Evaluating Effectiveness of Road Safety Treatments, Austroads.
19. Austroads (2018). Measuring and Reporting the Value of Road Maintenance and Renewal Works, Austroads.
20. Austroads (2015). Guide to Road Safety Part 8—Treatment of Crash Locations, Austroads.
21. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure—British Columbia (2014). Benefit Cost Analysis Guidebook Guidelines for the Benefit Cost Analysis of Highway Improvement Projects in BC, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.
22. Sayed, T., and de Leur, P. (2008). Collision Prediction Models for British Columbia, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.
23. Highways England (2017). Technology Management and Maintenance Manual Name, Highways England.
24. Highways England (2021). A Step by Step Guide to using GG104 Requirements for Safety Risk Assessment, Highways England.
25. Ufficio federale delle strade USTRA (2019). Rapporto Sullo Stato Delle Strade Nazionali, Ufficio federale delle strade USTRA.
26. International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP) (2022, January 01). iRAP Star Rating and Investment Plan Manual. Available online: www.irap.org/specifications.
27. World Road Association (2003). Road Safety Manual, Route to Market.
28. The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine (2021). Improved Prediction Models for Crash Types and Crash Severities (2021), The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine.
29. Crash modification functions for pavement surface condition and geometric design indicators10.1016/j.aap.2020.105887 ↗
30. Assessing the transferability of the highway safety manual predictive method for urban roads in Fortaleza City, Brazil10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000734 ↗
31. Mendes, O.B.B., Larocca, A.P.C., Silva, K.R., and Pirdavani, A. (2023). Assessing the Performance of Highway Safety Manual (HSM) Predictive Models for Brazilian Multilane Highways. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151310474 ↗
32. Safety performance models for urban intersections in Brazil10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.008 ↗
33. Calibrating the Highway Safety Manual Predictive Models for Multilane Rural Highway Segments in Saudi Arabia10.1007/s13369-021-05944-6 ↗
34. Development of comprehensive accident models for two-lane rural highways using exposure, geometry, consistency and context variables10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.015 ↗
35. Development of an accident prediction model for Italian freeways10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.023 ↗
36. Investigating transferability and goodness of fit of two different approaches of segmentation and model form for estimating safety performance of motorways10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.478 ↗
37. Elagamy, S.R., El-Badawy, S.M., Shwaly, S.A., Zidan, Z.M., and Shahdah, U.E. (2020). Segmentation effect on the transferability of international safety performance functions for rural roads in Egypt. Safety, 6.10.3390/safety6030043 ↗
38. Development of regionalized SPFs for two-lane rural roads in Pennsylvania10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.035 ↗
39. Comparative analysis of multiple techniques for developing and transferring safety performance functions10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.024 ↗
40. Highway Safety Manual Calibration: Estimating the Minimum Required Sample Size10.1177/03611981211062219 ↗
41. Sensitivity analysis of the calibration factor resulting from the application of the HSM predictive method to Italian rural two-lane, two-way roads. The Emilia-Romagna case study10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102258 ↗
42. US Department of Transportation—FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2018). The Calibrator: An SPF Calibration and Assessment Tool Updated User Guide, Federal Highway Administration.
43. Investigation of models for relating roundabout safety to predicted speed10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.011 ↗
44. Bassani, M., and Sacchi, E. (2011, January 18–20). Experimental Investigation into Speed Performance and Consistency of Urban Roundabouts: An Italian Case Study. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Roundabouts, Carmel, IN, USA.
45. Crash prediction models for rural motorways10.3141/2083-21 ↗
46. Safety performance functions incorporating design consistency variables10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.019 ↗
47. Assessing international transferability of highway safety manual crash prediction algorithm and its components10.3141/2279-11 ↗
48. Identification of Road Black Spots Based on the Sliding Window Optimization and Safety Performance Function Development10.7250/bjrbe.2024-19.629 ↗
49. Darma, Y., Isya, M., Azan, S.A., and Rahmad, A. (2021, January 28–29). Identification of Black Spot Locations concerning the equivalent accident number and upper control limit methods: A case study of national highways in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd Aceh International Symposium on Civil Engineering: Towards the Sustainable and Green Construction Promoting Advanced Materials and Technology for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure and Environments, AISCE 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia.
50. Karamanlis, I., Kokkalis, A., Profillidis, V., Botzoris, G., Kiourt, C., Sevetlidis, V., and Pavlidis, G. (2023). Deep Learning-Based Black Spot Identification on Greek Road Networks. Data, 8.10.3390/data8060110 ↗
51. Bonera, M., Barabino, B., and Maternini, G. (2022). A Straightforward Framework for Road Network Screening to Lombardy Region (Italy). Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141912424 ↗
52. Crispino, M., Camozzi, K., Ketabdari, M., Antoniazzi, A., and Toraldo, E. (2024). Safety Impact Prediction of Redesigning National Roads Crossing Residential Areas: An Italian Case Study. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14124984 ↗
53. Safety effects of maintenance treatments to improve pavement condition on two-lane rural roads—Insights for pavement management10.1139/cjce-2019-0514 ↗
54. Estimation of the safety effect of pavement condition on rural, two-lane highways10.3141/2435-06 ↗
55. Safety effect of preventive maintenance: A case study of microsurfacing10.3141/2044-09 ↗
56. Abuzwidah, M., Balwan, M., Abdel-Aty, M., and Al-Kateeb, G. (2019, January 4–16). Traffic Safety Benefits of Using Highway Lighting Technology: (Case Study: 4-Lanes Expressways in the Rural Areas). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Engineering and Technology (ICAET 2019), Incheon, Republic of Korea.10.1088/1757-899X/811/1/012023 ↗
57. Benefit-to-Cost Analysis Framework for Intersection Illumination: A Case Study of Rural Conventional Intersections in Georgia10.1177/0361198119843262 ↗
58. Effectiveness of Experimental Left-Turn Sign Usage in Terms of Crashes and Analyzing Severity of Left Turn Crashes in Alaska10.2174/1874447801812010021 ↗
59. Safety effects of shoulder paving for rural and urban interstate, multilane, and two-lane highways10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000580 ↗
60. Safety effects of median treatments using longitudinal channelizers: Empirical bayesian before-and-after study10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000585 ↗
61. Assessing the Effectiveness of Centerline Rumble Strips Accounting for Winter Maintenance Operational Levels on Wyoming Highways Using Before–After Empirical Bayes10.1061/JTEPBS.0000714 ↗
62. MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2010). Studio di Valutazione dei Costi Sociali Dell’Incidentalità, MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti.