journal article·2024-07-09Open access

The Effectiveness of Semi-Supervised Learning Techniques in Identifying Calcifications in X-ray Mammography and the Impact of Different Classification Probabilities

Miu Sakaida, Takaaki Yoshimura, Minghui Tang, Shota Ichikawa, Hiroyuki Sugimori, Kenji Hirata, Kohsuke Kudo

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 14

Abstract

Identifying calcifications in mammograms is crucial for early breast cancer detection, and semi-supervised learning, which utilizes a small dataset for supervised learning combined with deep learning, is anticipated to be an effective approach for automating this identification process. This study explored the impact of semi-supervised learning on identifying mammographic calcifications by including 712 mammographic images from 252 patients in public datasets. Initially, 212 mammogram images were segmented into patches and classified visually for calcification presence. A subset of these patches, derived from 169 mammogram images, was used to train a ResNet50-based classifier. The classifier was evaluated using patches generated from 43 mammograms as a test data set. Additionally, 500 more mammogram images were processed into patches and analyzed using the trained ResNet50 model, with semi-supervised learning applied to patches exceeding certain classification probabilities. This process aimed to enhance the classifier’s accuracy and achieve improvements over the initial model. The findings indicated that semi-supervised learning significantly benefits the accuracy of calcification detection in mammography, underscoring its utility in enhancing diagnostic methodologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan

Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan

Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan

Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan

Clinical AI Human Resources Development Program, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan

Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8518, Japan

Institute for Research Administration, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan

Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Cancer Statistics, 202310.3322/caac.21763 ↗
3. ud din, N.M., Dar, R.A., Rasool, M., and Assad, A. (2022). Breast Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges Ahead. Comput. Biol. Med., 149.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106073 ↗
4. A Context-Sensitive Deep Learning Approach for Microcalcification Detection in Mammograms10.1016/j.patcog.2018.01.009 ↗
5. Beneficial Effect of Repeated Participation in Breast Cancer Screening upon Survival10.1177/09691413231186686 ↗
6. Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.002 ↗
7. Microcalcification on Mammography: Approaches to Interpretation and Biopsy10.1259/bjr.20160594 ↗
8. Breast Calcifications: Which Are Malignant?
9. Leong, Y.S., Hasikin, K., Lai, K.W., Mohd Zain, N., and Azizan, M.M. (2022). Microcalcification Discrimination in Mammography Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network: Towards Rapid and Early Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Front. Public Health, 10.10.3389/fpubh.2022.875305 ↗
10. Demetri-Lewis, A., Slanetz, P.J., and Eisenberg, R.L. (2012). Breast Calcifications: The Focal Group. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 198.10.2214/AJR.10.5732 ↗
11. Szewczuk, M., and Konefał, A. (2023). Optimization of Image Quality in Digital Mammography with the Response of a Selenium Detector by Monte Carlo Simulation. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010171 ↗
12. Kawakami, M., Hirata, K., Furuya, S., Kobayashi, K., Sugimori, H., Magota, K., and Katoh, C. (2020). Development of Combination Methods for Detecting Malignant Uptakes Based on Physiological Uptake Detection Using Object Detection With PET-CT MIP Images. Front. Med., 7.10.3389/fmed.2020.616746 ↗
13. Asami, Y., Yoshimura, T., Manabe, K., Yamada, T., and Sugimori, H. (2021). Development of Detection and Volumetric Methods for the Triceps of the Lower Leg Using Magnetic Resonance Images with Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112412006 ↗
14. Manabe, K., Asami, Y., Yamada, T., and Sugimori, H. (2021). Improvement in the Convolutional Neural Network for Computed Tomography Images. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11041505 ↗
15. Sugimori, H. (2019). Evaluating the Overall Accuracy of Additional Learning and Automatic Classification System for CT Images. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9040682 ↗
16. CAD and AI for Breast Cancer-Recent Development and Challenges10.1259/bjr.20190580 ↗
17. Breast Microcalcification Diagnosis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network from Digital Mammograms10.1155/2019/2717454 ↗
18. Jung, H., Kim, B., Lee, I., Yoo, M., Lee, J., Ham, S., Woo, O., and Kang, J. (2018). Detection of Masses in Mammograms Using a One-Stage Object Detector Based on a Deep Convolutional Neural Network. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0203355 ↗
19. Deep Learning Modeling Using Normal Mammograms for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk10.1002/mp.13886 ↗
20. Baccouche, A., Garcia-Zapirain, B., Zheng, Y., and Elmaghraby, A.S. (2022). Early Detection and Classification of Abnormality in Prior Mammograms Using Image-to-Image Translation and YOLO Techniques. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 221.10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106884 ↗
21. Lopez-Almazan, H., Javier Pérez-Benito, F., Larroza, A., Perez-Cortes, J.C., Pollan, M., Perez-Gomez, B., Salas Trejo, D., Casals, M., and Llobet, R. (2022). A Deep Learning Framework to Classify Breast Density with Noisy Labels Regularization. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 221.10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106885 ↗
22. Sakaida, M., Yoshimura, T., Tang, M., and Ichikawa, S. (2023). Development of a Mammography Calcification Detection Algorithm Using Deep Learning with Resolution-Preserved Image Patch Division. Algorithms, 16.10.3390/a16100483 ↗
23. Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Learning: The next Frontier in Machine Learning for Plant Systems Biology10.1111/tpj.15905 ↗
24. Shadow-Consistent Semi-Supervised Learning for Prostate Ultrasound Segmentation10.1109/TMI.2021.3139999 ↗
25. Han, C.H., Kim, M., and Kwak, J.T. (2021). Semi-Supervised Learning for an Improved Diagnosis of COVID-19 in CT Images. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0249450 ↗
26. Recent Advances and Clinical Applications of Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis10.1016/j.media.2022.102444 ↗
27. Burton, W., Myers, C., and Rullkoetter, P. (2020). Semi-Supervised Learning for Automatic Segmentation of the Knee from MRI with Convolutional Neural Networks. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 189.10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105328 ↗
28. A Real Use Case of Semi-Supervised Learning for Mammogram Classification in a Local Clinic of Costa Rica10.1007/s11517-021-02497-6 ↗
29. A Semi-Supervised Method for Tumor Segmentation in Mammogram Images10.4103/jmss.JMSS_62_18 ↗
30. Mammographic Masses Characterization Based on Localized Texture and Dataset Fractal Analysis Using Linear, Neural and Support Vector Machine Classifiers10.1016/j.artmed.2006.03.002 ↗
31. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.-C. (2019). MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks Mark. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
32. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
33. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
34. A Fully Integrated Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Digital X-ray Mammograms via Deep Learning Detection, Segmentation, and Classification10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.06.003 ↗
35. A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 ↗
36. MIDCAN: A Multiple Input Deep Convolutional Attention Network for Covid-19 Diagnosis Based on Chest CT and Chest X-Ray10.1016/j.patrec.2021.06.021 ↗
37. Oliver, A., Odena, A., Raffel, C., Cubuk, E.D., and Goodfellow, I.J. (2018, January 2–8). Realistic Evaluation of Deep Semi-Supervised Learning Algorithms. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Syste, Montreal, QC, Canada.
38. Not-so-Supervised: A Survey of Semi-Supervised, Multi-Instance, and Transfer Learning in Medical Image Analysis10.1016/j.media.2019.03.009 ↗
39. Watanabe, A.T., Retson, T., Wang, J., Mantey, R., Chim, C., and Karimabadi, H. (2023). Mammographic Breast Density Model Using Semi-Supervised Learning Reduces Inter-/Intra-Reader Variability. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13162694 ↗
40. Categorized Contrast Enhanced Mammography Dataset for Diagnostic and Artificial Intelligence Research10.1038/s41597-022-01238-0 ↗
41. Altameem, A., Mahanty, C., Poonia, R.C., Saudagar, A.K.J., and Kumar, R. (2022). Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Fuzzy Ensemble Modeling Techniques. Diagnostics, 12.10.3390/diagnostics12081812 ↗
42. The Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: An Independent Review10.1038/bjc.2013.177 ↗
43. Volumetric Breast Density Affects Performance of Digital Screening Mammography10.1007/s10549-016-4090-7 ↗
44. Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts Recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)10.1007/s00330-022-08617-6 ↗
45. Mammographic Breast Density and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.007 ↗
46. Breast Density and Risk of Breast Cancer in Asian Women: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies10.3961/jpmph.16.054 ↗
47. Stanescu, A., and Caragea, D. (2015). An Empirical Study of Ensemble-Based Semi-Supervised Learning Approaches for Imbalanced Splice Site Datasets. BMC Syst. Biol., 9.10.1186/1752-0509-9-S5-S1 ↗
48. Mammographic Density in a Multiethnic Cohort10.1097/gme.0b013e318032569c ↗
49. Srivastava, S., and Sharma, G. (2024, January 3–8). OmniVec: Learning Robust Representations with Cross Modal Sharing. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACV57701.2024.00127 ↗
50. Sannasi Chakravarthy, S.R., Bharanidharan, N., Vinoth Kumar, V., Mahesh, T.R., Alqahtani, M.S., and Guluwadi, S. (2024). Deep Transfer Learning with Fuzzy Ensemble Approach for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer. BMC Med. Imaging, 24.10.1186/s12880-024-01267-8 ↗