journal article·2024-06-29Open access

Study of Urban Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Separation in Free Flight Based on Track Prediction

Jian Zhang, Zongxiao Li, Xinyue Luo, Yifei Zhao, Fei Lu

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 13

Abstract

In recent years, the application prospect of urban logistics unmanned aerial vehicles has attracted extensive attention. The high-density operation of UAVs requires autonomous separation maintenance capability. To achieve autonomous separation maintenance, it is necessary to conduct autonomous track prediction and formulate the required separation accordingly. Based on the target level of safety requirements for UAV operation, aiming at the autonomous separation maintenance ability of UAVs and considering the accuracy of track prediction, a method to calculate the required separation between UAVs is proposed. This study consists of two parts. Firstly, based on historical data, the position prediction error of the flight track is investigated. Using a machine learning model, a two-stage track prediction method, which involves classification followed by prediction, is proposed for urban logistics UAV track data. Subsequently, based on the track prediction error distribution, by designing a gas model and a position error probability model, a separation-formulating model for urban logistics UAVs in free flight is proposed in which UAV maneuverability is considered. By applying this model, the required separation is formulated for UAVs. When the required separation is set to 48.5 m, the overall collision risk meets the TLS requirements. The research provides a feasible method for establishing autonomous separation for urban logistics UAVs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Traffic control and management · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Plan Project

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Future air traffic management: Quantitative en route safety assessment part 2–new approaches10.1017/S037346330200187X ↗
2. Machine learning and mass estimation methods for ground-based aircraft climb prediction10.1109/TITS.2015.2437452 ↗
3. A deep learning approach for aircraft track prediction in terminal airspace10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016289 ↗
4. A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for aircraft 4D track prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010963 ↗
5. Bayesian neural networks for flight track prediction and safety assessment10.1016/j.dss.2020.113246 ↗
6. Four-dimensional track prediction based on BADA and aircraft intention
7. A four-dimensional flight track prediction model based on improved Kalman filter
8. Application of improved extended Kalman filter in aircraft 4D track prediction algorithm
9. Short-term 4D track prediction algorithm based on online updated LSTM network
10. 4D flight track prediction using a hybrid Deep Learning prediction method based on ADS-B technology: A case study of Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL)10.1016/j.trc.2022.103878 ↗
11. Zeng, W., Chu, X., Xu, Z., Liu, Y., and Quan, Z. (2022). Aircraft 4D track Prediction in Civil Aviation: A Review. Aerospace, 9.10.3390/aerospace9020091 ↗
12. Aircraft 4D track Prediction during Climbing and Descending Stages
13. Terminal air traffic flow and collision exposure10.1109/PROC.1970.7638 ↗
14. Endoh, S. (1982). Aircraft Collision Models. [Master’s Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
15. Weibel, R.E., and Hansman, R.J. (2006). Safety Considerations for Operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the National Airspace System: ICAT-2005-1, MIT ICAT.
16. Probability of Low-Altitude Midair Collision Between General Aviation and Unmanned Aircraft10.1111/risa.13368 ↗
17. Christopher, W.L., and Blake, W. (2023, November 18). A Risk Based Paradigm and Model for Unmanned Aerial Systems in the National Airspace. Available online: https://www.aa.washington.edu/sites/aa/files/research/afsl/publications/lum_risk_for_uavs_2010_2.pdf.
18. (2019). Guidelines on Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) (Standard No. JAR-DEL-WG6-D.04).
19. Nikodem, F., Dittrich, J.S., and Bierig, A. (2023, November 18). The New Specific Operations Risk Assessment Approach for UAS Regulation Compared to Common Civil Aviation Risk Assessment. Available online: https://www.dglr.de/publikationen/2019/480130.pdf.
20. RPAS conflict-risk assessment in non-segregated airspace10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.018 ↗
21. Collision Risk Modeling and Analysis for Lateral Separation to Support Unmanned Traffic Management
22. Risk assessment of lateral collision between military UAV and civil aviation flight
23. (2021). Algorithms for Analysing the Collision Risk (Standard No. Bubbles D4.1).
24. On the safety assessment for the collision risk between the civilian and military airplanes
25. Research on assessment method of safety separation for logistics UAVs based on position error probability model
26. (1998). Manual on Airspace Planning Methodology for the Determination of Separation Minima (Standard No. DOC 9689).
27. (1995). ICAO RGCSP (Review of the General Concept of Separation Panel). RGCSP Working Group Meeting: Summary of Discussions and Conclusions (Standard No. WG-A/WP8).
28. Dynamic obstacle avoidance for quadrotors with event cameras10.1126/scirobotics.aaz9712 ↗