IFF-Net: Irregular Feature Fusion Network for Multimodal Remote Sensing Image Classification
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, classification and identification of Earth’s surface materials has been a challenging research topic in the field of earth science and remote sensing (RS). Although deep learning techniques have achieved some results in remote sensing image classification, there are still some challenges for multimodal remote sensing data classification, such as information redundancy between multimodal remote sensing images. In this paper, we propose a multimodal remote sensing data classification method IFF-Net based on irregular feature fusion, called IFF-Net. The IFF-Net architecture utilizes weight-shared residual blocks for feature extraction while maintaining the independent batch normalization (BN) layer. During the training phase, the redundancy of the current channel is determined by evaluating the judgement factor of the BN layer. If this judgment factor falls below a predefined threshold, it indicates that the current channel information is redundant and should be substituted with another channel. Sparse constraints are imposed on some of the judgment factors in order to remove extra channels and enhance generalization. Furthermore, a module for feature normalization and calibration has been devised to leverage the spatial interdependence of multimodal features in order to achieve improved discrimination. Two standard datasets are used in the experiments to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The experimental results show that the IFF-NET method proposed in this paper exhibits significantly superior performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Center for Information and Educational Technology, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
Funding
Collaborative Education Research Project of the Ministry of Education
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Hyperspectral and LiDAR data classification based on structural optimization transmission10.1109/TCYB.2022.3169773 ↗
2. Spectral–spatial latent reconstruction for open-set hyperspectral image classification10.1109/TIP.2022.3193747 ↗
3. SPANet: Successive pooling attention network for semantic segmentation of remote sensing images10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3175191 ↗
4. A review of machine learning in processing remote sensing data for mineral exploration10.1016/j.rse.2021.112750 ↗
5. Bin, J., Zhang, R., Wang, R., Cao, Y., Zheng, Y., Blasch, E., and Liu, Z. (2022). An Efficient and Uncertainty-Aware Decision Support System for Disaster Response Using Aerial Imagery. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22197167 ↗
6. Virtriana, R., Riqqi, A., Anggraini, T.S., Fauzan, K.N., Ihsan, K.T.N., Mustika, F.C., Suwardhi, D., Harto, A.B., Sakti, A.D., and Deliar, A. (2022). Development of spatial model for food security prediction using remote sensing data in west Java, Indonesia. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 11.10.3390/ijgi11050284 ↗
7. Adaptive Drop Block-enhanced generative adversarial networks for hyperspectral image classification10.1109/TGRS.2020.3015843 ↗
8. A tutorial on synthetic aperture radar10.1109/MGRS.2013.2248301 ↗
9. Convolutional Neural Networks for Multimodal Remote Sensing Data Classification
10. Unsupervised hyperspectral and multispectral images fusion based on nonlinear variational probabilistic generative model10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3028772 ↗
11. Dabbiru, L., Samiappan, S., Nobrega, R.A.A., Aanstoos, J.A., Younan, N.H., and Moorhead, R.J. (2015, January 26–31). Fusion of synthetic aperture radar and hyperspectral imagery to detect impacts of oil spill in Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Milan, Italy.10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326165 ↗
12. Deep learning for classification of hyperspectral data: A comparative review10.1109/MGRS.2019.2912563 ↗
13. Challenges and opportunities in LiDAR remote sensing10.3389/frsen.2021.641723 ↗
14. Generalized graph-based fusion of hyperspectral and LiDAR data using morphological features10.1109/LGRS.2014.2350263 ↗
15. Land-cover classification using both hyperspectral and LiDAR data10.1080/19479832.2015.1055833 ↗
16. Fusion of hyperspectral and LiDAR data with a novel ensemble classifier10.1109/LGRS.2018.2816958 ↗
17. Kernel-based framework for multitemporal and multisource remote sensing data classification and change detection10.1109/TGRS.2008.916201 ↗
18. Joint Euclidean and angular distance-based embeddings for multisource image analysis10.1109/LGRS.2018.2827845 ↗
19. CoSpace: Common subspace learning from hyperspectral-multispectral correspondences10.1109/TGRS.2018.2890705 ↗
20. Learning shared cross-modality representation using multispectral-LiDAR and hyperspectral data10.1109/LGRS.2019.2944599 ↗
21. Learnable manifold alignment (LeMA): A semi-supervised cross-modality learning framework for land cover and land use classification10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.10.006 ↗
22. MIMA: MAPPER-induced manifold alignment for semi-supervised fusion of optical image and polarimetric SAR data10.1109/TGRS.2019.2924113 ↗
23. Challenges and opportunities of multimodality and data fusion in remote sensing10.1109/JPROC.2015.2462751 ↗
24. More diverse means better: Multimodal deep learning meets remote-sensing imagery classification10.1109/TGRS.2020.3016820 ↗
25. Graph-induced aligned learning on subspaces for hyperspectral and multispectral data10.1109/TGRS.2020.3021140 ↗
26. Classification of hyperspectral and LiDAR data using coupled CNNs10.1109/TGRS.2020.2969024 ↗
27. Deep encoder-decoder networks for classification of hyperspectral and LiDAR data
28. Gadiraju, K.K., Ramachandra, B., Chen, Z., and Vestavia, R.R. (2020, January 6–10). Multimodal deep learning-based crop classification using multispectral and multitemporal satellite imagery. Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Virtual.10.1145/3394486.3403375 ↗
29. Multimodal deep learning from satellite and street-level imagery for measuring income, overcrowding, and environmental deprivation in urban areas10.1016/j.rse.2021.112339 ↗
30. Information fusion for classification of hyperspectral and LiDAR data using IP-CNN
31. Cascaded recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification10.1109/TGRS.2019.2899129 ↗
32. Wu, H., and Prasad, S. (2017). Convolutional recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral data classification. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9030298 ↗
33. Spectral Former: Rethinking hyperspectral image classification with transformers10.1109/TGRS.2021.3130716 ↗
34. Roy, S.K., Deria, A., Hong, D., Rasti, B., Plaza, A., and Chanussot, J. (2022). Multimodal fusion transformer for remote sensing image classification. arXiv.10.1109/TGRS.2023.3286826 ↗
35. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015, January 6–11). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lile, France.
36. OpenStreetMap: User-generated street maps10.1109/MPRV.2008.80 ↗
37. MDAS: A new multimodal benchmark dataset for remote sensing10.5194/essd-15-113-2023 ↗
38. Multimodal remote sensing benchmark datasets for land cover classification with a shared and specific feature learning model10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.05.011 ↗
39. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines10.1109/TGRS.2004.831865 ↗
40. Robust capsule network based on maximum correntropy criterion for hyperspectral image classification10.1109/JSTARS.2020.2968930 ↗
41. Generative Adversarial Networks and Markov Random Fields for oversampling very small training sets10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113819 ↗