journal article·2024-06-04Open access

Machine Learning-Driven Calibration of Traffic Models Based on a Real-Time Video Analysis

Ekaterina Lopukhova, Ansaf Abdulnagimov, Grigory Voronkov, Elizaveta Grakhova

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 11

Abstract

Accurate traffic simulation models play a crucial role in developing intelligent transport systems that offer timely traffic information to users and efficient traffic management. However, calibrating these models to represent real-world traffic conditions accurately poses a significant challenge due to the dynamic nature of traffic flow and the limitations of traditional calibration methods. This article introduces a machine learning-based approach to calibrate macroscopic traffic simulation models using real-time traffic video stream data. The proposed method for creating and calibrating a traffic simulation model has significantly improved the statistical correspondence between the generated vehicle characteristics and real data about cars on the simulated road section. The correspondence has increased from 37% to 73%. Machine learning models trained on generated data and tested on real data show improved accuracy rates. Mean absolute error, mean square error, and mean absolute percentage error decreased by more than two orders of magnitude. The coefficient of determination has also increased, approaching 1. This method eliminates the need to deploy wireless sensor networks, which can reduce the cost of implementing intelligent transport systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Photonics Engineering and Research Advances (SPhERA), Ufa University of Science and Technology, 32 Z. Validi Street, Ufa 450076, Russia

Department of Automated Control Systems, Ufa University of Science and Technology, 32 Z. Validi Street, Ufa 450076, Russia

Funding

Russian Science Foundation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Bronzino, J.D., and Peterson, D.R. (2018). Medical Devices and Human Engineering, CRC Press.10.1201/9781351228671 ↗
2. Statsenko, A.A., Rogov, A.A., Obukhov, I.V., and Smirnova, E.E. (2021, January 26–29). Developing Software and Hardware for Automation of Ground Urban Transport Traffic Management. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus), St. Petersburg/Moscow, Russia.10.1109/ElConRus51938.2021.9396597 ↗
3. Comparison of Hospital Logistics Systems
4. An Agent-Based Traffic Recommendation System: Revisiting and Revising Urban Traffic Management Strategies10.1109/TSMC.2022.3177027 ↗
5. Crolla, D., Foster, D.E., Kobayashi, T., and Vaughan, N. (2014). Intelligent Transport Systems: Overview and Structure (History, Applications, and Architectures), Wiley.
6. 3GPP C-V2X and IEEE 802.11p for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications in Highway Platooning Scenarios10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.03.004 ↗
7. Game Theory-Based Ramp Merging for Mixed Traffic With Unity-SUMO Co-Simulation10.1109/TSMC.2021.3131431 ↗
8. Multitask-Oriented Brain-Controlled Intelligent Vehicle Based on Human–Machine Intelligence Integration10.1109/TSMC.2022.3212744 ↗
9. Review and Perspectives on Driver Digital Twin and Its Enabling Technologies for Intelligent Vehicles10.1109/TIV.2022.3195635 ↗
10. Context-Aware Machine Learning for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Survey10.1109/TITS.2022.3216462 ↗
11. Parallel Vision for Intelligent Transportation Systems in Metaverse: Challenges, Solutions, and Potential Applications10.1109/TSMC.2022.3228314 ↗
12. Treiber, M., and Kesting, A. (2013). Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-32460-4 ↗
13. Analysis and Comparison of Traffic Flow Models: A New Hybrid Traffic Flow Model vs Benchmark Models10.1186/s12544-021-00515-0 ↗
14. A Macroscopic Traffic Model for Traffic Flow Harmonization10.1186/s12544-018-0291-y ↗
15. A Behavioural Car-Following Model for Computer Simulation10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0 ↗
16. Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs)—State-of-the-Art10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.091 ↗
17. Postigo, I. (2022). Developing Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models for the Transition towards Automated Driving, Springer.10.3384/9789179294397 ↗
18. Development of Dynamic Micro- and Macroscopic Hybrid Model for Efficient Highway Traffic Simulation: Model Extension to Merging Sections and Validation with Probe Data
19. A Macroscopic Traffic Model for Heterogeneous Flow10.1016/j.cjph.2019.12.005 ↗
20. Microscopic and Macroscopic Flow Models of Traffic Management10.59251/2181-1296.2023.v1.1.1879 ↗
21. Andersen, N.S., Chiarandini, M., and Debrabant, K. (2022). A Comparison of Different Approaches to Dynamic Origin-Destination Matrix Estimation in Urban Traffic. arXiv.
22. Simulation-Based Origin-Destination Matrix Reduction: A Case Study of Helsinki City Area10.52825/scp.v4i.197 ↗
23. Englezou, Y., Timotheou, S., and Panayiotou, C.G. (2019, January 27–30). Bayesian Estimation of the Origin-Destination Matrix Using Traffic Flow Dynamics. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Auckland, New Zealand.10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917143 ↗
24. Amini, S., Tilg, G., and Busch, F. (2024, April 08). Calibration of Mesoscopic Simulation Models for Urban Corridors Based on the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram. Available online: https://transp-or.epfl.ch/heart/2019/abstracts/hEART_2019_paper_181.pdf.
25. Lee, J.-B., and Ozbay, K. (2024, April 08). Calibration of a Macroscopic Traffic Simulation Model Using Enhanced Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation Methodology. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/View/848861.
26. Lopez, P.A., Behrisch, M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., Flötteröd, Y.-P., Hilbrich, R., Lücken, L., Rummel, J., Wagner, P., and Wiessner, E. (2018, January 4–7). Microscopic Traffic Simulation Using SUMO. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569938 ↗
27. Lopukhova, E., Abdulnagimov, A., Voronkov, G., Kutluyarov, R., and Grakhova, E. (2023). Universal Learning Approach of an Intelligent Algorithm for Non-GNSS Assisted Beamsteering in V2I Systems. Information, 14.10.3390/info14020086 ↗
28. Recent Development and Applications of SUMO—Simulation of Urban Mobility
29. Jármai, K., and Bolló, B. (2018). A SUMO-Based Hardware-in-the-Loop V2X Simulation Framework for Testing and Rapid Prototyping of Cooperative Vehicular Applications, Springer International Publishing.
30. Online Calibration of Traffic Prediction Models10.1177/0361198105193400125 ↗
31. Extending the Intelligent Driver Model in SUMO and Verifying the Drive Off Trajectories with Aerial Measurements10.52825/scp.v1i.95 ↗
32. Ross, M., Du, L., and Seibold, B. (2021, January 21–25). Spatial-Temporal EV Charging Demand Model Considering Generic Second-Order Traffic Flows. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC), Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/ITEC51675.2021.9490052 ↗
33. Integrated Method for Online Calibration of Real-Time Traffic Network Management Systems10.3141/2528-12 ↗
34. Calibration of a Microscopic Traffic Simulation in an Urban Scenario Using Loop Detector Data: A Case Study within the Digital Twin Munich10.52825/scp.v4i.223 ↗
35. Development, Calibration, and Validation of a Large-Scale Traffic Simulation Model: Belgium Road Network10.52825/scp.v4i.199 ↗
36. Alicante-Murcia Freeway Scenario: A High-Accuracy and Large-Scale Traffic Simulation Scenario Generated Using a Novel Traffic Demand Calibration Method in SUMO10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3126269 ↗
37. Calibration of Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models: Methods and Application10.3141/1999-21 ↗
38. On Kinematic Waves II. A Theory of Traffic Flow on Long Crowded Roads
39. Phase Transition of Traffic Congestion in Lattice Hydrodynamic Model: Modeling, Calibration and Validation10.1142/S021798492450012X ↗
40. Calibration of Traffic Incident Simulation Models Using Field Data
41. Dadashzadeh, N., Ergun, M., Kesten, A.S., and Zura, M. (2019, January 5–7). Improving the Calibration Time of Traffic Simulation Models Using Parallel Computing Technique. Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), Cracow, Poland.10.1109/MTITS.2019.8883322 ↗
42. Luaces, O., Gámez, J.A., Barrenechea, E., Troncoso, A., Galar, M., Quintián, H., and Corchado, E. (2016). Multi-Objective Memetic Algorithm Based on NSGA-II and Simulated Annealing for Calibrating CORSIM Micro-Simulation Models of Vehicular Traffic Flow, Springer International Publishing.
43. Calibration of Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models Using Metaheuristic Algorithms10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.05.001 ↗
44. Hybrid Mesoscopic–Microscopic Traffic Simulation10.1177/0361198105193400123 ↗
45. Mixing Microscopic and Macroscopic Representations of Traffic Flow: Hybrid Model Based on Lighthill–Whitham–Richards Theory10.3141/1852-24 ↗
46. Bourrel, E., and Lesort, J. (2024, April 08). Mixing Micro and Macro Representations of Traffic Flow: A Hybrid Model Based on the LWR Theory. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Mixing-Micro-and-Macro-Representations-of-Traffic-a-Bourrel-Lesort/9f5d08d4f35180a9b3d2dd2385a036910fba626d.
47. Magne, L., Rabut, S., Gabard, J., and Toulouse, O. (2024, April 08). Towards an Hybrid Macro-Micro Traffic Flow Simulation Model. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Towards-an-hybrid-macro-micro-traffic-flow-model-Magne-Rabut/7b073b5a3cede03297e383cea558559a920623d0.
48. Khan, I., and Ahmed, Z. (2023, January 22–23). ML and DL Classifications of Route Conditions Using Accelerometers and Gyroscope Sensors. Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI), Islamabad, Pakistan.10.1109/ICAI58407.2023.10136666 ↗
49. Traffic Congestion Detection and Alternative Route Provision Using Machine Learning and IoT-Based Surveillance
50. Liu, Y., and Wu, H. (2017, January 9–10). Prediction of Road Traffic Congestion Based on Random Forest. Proceedings of the 2017 10th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID), Hangzhou, China.10.1109/ISCID.2017.216 ↗
51. Road Traffic Conditions Classification Based on Multilevel Filtering of Image Content Using Convolutional Neural Networks10.1109/MITS.2018.2842040 ↗
52. Intelligent Road Traffic Control System for Traffic Congestion A Perspective
53. Tan, K., Bremner, D., Kernec, J.L., and Imran, M. (2020, January 20–21). Federated Machine Learning in Vehicular Networks: A Summary of Recent Applications. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on UK-China Emerging Technologies (UCET), Glasgow, UK.10.1109/UCET51115.2020.9205482 ↗
54. Selection of Relays Based on the Classification of Mobility-type and Localized Network Metrics in the Internet of Vehicles10.1002/ett.4246 ↗
55. FASPM: Fuzzy Logic-based Adaptive Security Protocol for Multihop Data Dissemination in Intelligent Transport Systems10.1002/ett.3190 ↗
56. Yun, K., Yun, H., Lee, S., Oh, J., Kim, M., Lim, M., Lee, J., Kim, C., Seo, J., and Choi, J. (2024). A Study on Machine Learning-Enhanced Roadside Unit-Based Detection of Abnormal Driving in Autonomous Vehicles. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13020288 ↗
57. An IoT Architecture for Assessing Road Safety in Smart Cities10.1155/2018/8214989 ↗
58. Amorim, B.d.S.P., Firmino, A.A., Baptista, C.d.S., Júnior, G.B., Paiva, A.C.d., and Júnior, F.E.d.A. (2023). A Machine Learning Approach for Classifying Road Accident Hotspots. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 12.10.3390/ijgi12060227 ↗
59. Jyothi, N., and Patil, R. (2023, January 5–6). Enhanced Machine Learning Based Techniques for Security in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT), Gharuan, India.
60. Marouane, H., Dandoush, A., Amour, L., and Erbad, A. (2023). A Review and a Tutorial of ML-Based MDS Technology within a VANET Context: From Data Collection to Trained Model Deployment. Authorea Preprints.10.36227/techrxiv.22559473 ↗
61. Anomaly Detection in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: A Survey, Analysis, and Research Challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3361829 ↗
62. ADS-Lead: Lifelong Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving Systems10.1109/TITS.2021.3122906 ↗
63. Zekry, A., Sayed, A., Moussa, M., and Elhabiby, M. (2021, January 25–28). Anomaly Detection Using IoT Sensor-Assisted ConvLSTM Models for Connected Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring), Helsinki, Finland.10.1109/VTC2021-Spring51267.2021.9449086 ↗
64. Bokaba, T., Doorsamy, W., and Paul, B. (2022). Comparative Study of Machine Learning Classifiers for Modelling Road Traffic Accidents. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020828 ↗
65. Würth, A., Binois, M., and Goatin, P. (2024, April 08). Traffic Prediction by Combining Macroscopic Models and Gaussian Processes. Available online: https://hal.science/hal-04345140.
66. Road Traffic Can Be Predicted by Machine Learning Equally Effectively as by Complex Microscopic Model10.1038/s41598-023-41902-y ↗
67. Differentiable Hybrid Traffic Simulation10.1145/3550454.3555492 ↗
68. Interpretable Machine Learning Approach in Estimating Traffic Volume on Low-Volume Roadways10.1016/j.ijtst.2019.09.004 ↗
69. Xu, W., and Wei, H. (2023, January 21–23). Learning to Calibrate Hybrid Hyperparameters: A Study on Traffic Simulation. Proceedings of the ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1145/3573900.3591113 ↗
70. Niel, O. (2023). A Novel Algorithm Can Generate Data to Train Machine Learning Models in Conditions of Extreme Scarcity of Real World Data. arXiv.
71. and Singh, A.K. (2024, April 08). Wireless Sensor Network: A Survey. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320385994_Wireless_Sensor_Networks_A_Survey.
72. Thalmann, D., Subhashini, N., Mohanaprasad, K., and Murugan, M.S.B. (2018). Emergency and Traffic Congestion Avoidance Using Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication, Springer.
73. Yu, H., and Guo, M. (2010, January 17–19). An Efficient Freeway Traffic Information Monitoring Systems Based on Wireless Sensor Networks and Floating Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2010 First International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Signal Processing and Applications, Harbin, China.10.1109/PCSPA.2010.262 ↗
74. Compressed Sensing for Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Network
75. A Traffic Data Collection and Analysis Method Based on Wireless Sensor Network10.1186/s13638-019-1628-5 ↗
76. Zavoral, F., Yaghob, J., Pichappan, P., and El-Qawasmeh, E. (2010). RoadMic: Road Surface Monitoring Using Vehicular Sensor Networks with Microphones, Springer.
77. Data Collection and Modeling of Heterogeneous Traffic—A Review10.22214/ijraset.2018.3271 ↗
78. Deployment of Wireless Mobile Detection and Surveillance for Data-Intensive Applications10.3141/1900-16 ↗
79. A Review of Advanced Pavement Distress Evaluation Techniques Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles10.1080/10298436.2023.2268796 ↗
80. Park, S.-S., Tran, V.-T., and Lee, D.-E. (2021). Application of Various YOLO Models for Computer Vision-Based Real-Time Pothole Detection. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311229 ↗
81. Hidas, P., and Wagner, P. (2004, January 4–8). Review of Data Collection Methods for Microscopic Traffic Simulation. Proceedings of the WCTR, Istanbul, Turkey.
82. Automatic vehicle trajectory extraction for traffic analysis from aerial Video data10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W2-9-2015 ↗
83. Multimedia Imaging System of Data Collection and Antenna Alignment for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based Internet of Things10.54216/FPA.120202 ↗
84. Kornyei, L., Horvath, Z., Ruopp, A., Kovacs, A., and Liszkai, B. (2021, January 20–22). Multi-Scale Modelling of Urban Air Pollution with Coupled Weather Forecast and Traffic Simulation on HPC Architecture. Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia-Pacific Region Companion, Virtual Event.10.1145/3440722.3440917 ↗
85. Basnayake, C., MacIver, A., and Lachapelle, G. (2024, April 08). A Gps-Based Calibration Tool for Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=9bd08e6f4e8579b7693e5b66e828b5bd90ae9a8f.
86. Building opendrive model from mobile mapping data10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2021-9-2021 ↗
87. Itmlogic: The Irregular Terrain Model by Longley and Rice10.21105/joss.02266 ↗
88. Study on Geometric Factors Influencing Saturation Flow Rate at Signalized Intersections under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions
89. Characterizing Heterogeneous Traffic Flow at a Slope Bottleneck via Cellular Automaton Model10.1109/TITS.2022.3182352 ↗
90. Bifurcation Analysis of Improved Traffic Flow Model on Curved Road10.1115/1.4062267 ↗
91. Guido, G., Shaffiee Haghshenas, S., Shaffiee Haghshenas, S., Vitale, A., Astarita, V., Park, Y., and Geem, Z.W. (2022). Evaluation of Contributing Factors Affecting Number of Vehicles Involved in Crashes Using Machine Learning Techniques in Rural Roads of Cosenza, Italy. Safety, 8.10.3390/safety8020028 ↗
92. Factors Affecting Traffic Accidents Density on Selected Multilane Rural Highways10.28991/cej-2021-03091719 ↗
93. Zakharov, D., Magaril, E., and Rada, E. (2018). Sustainability of the Urban Transport System under Changes in Weather and Road Conditions Affecting Vehicle Operation. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10062052 ↗
94. Autonomous Vehicle Positioning with GPS in Urban Canyon Environments10.1109/TRA.2002.807557 ↗
95. GPS Multipath Mitigation for Urban Area Using Omnidirectional Infrared Camera10.1109/TITS.2008.2011688 ↗
96. Ji, Z., and Xie, Q. (2021, January 11–13). Bidirectional Mapping Trajectory Similarity Measurement Algorithm Based on Geohash Grid. Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Symposium on Computer and Information Processing Technology (ISCIPT), Changsha, China.10.1109/ISCIPT53667.2021.00063 ↗
97. Learning under Concept Drift: A Review
98. Ostrowski, K., and Budzynski, M. (2021). Measures of Functional Reliability of Two-Lane Highways. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14154577 ↗
99. Cleveland, R. (2024, April 08). STL: A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/openview/cc5001e8a0978a6c029ae9a41af00f21/1?pq-origsite=gscholar%26cbl=105444.
100. Arjasakusuma, S., Swahyu Kusuma, S., and Phinn, S. (2020). Evaluating Variable Selection and Machine Learning Algorithms for Estimating Forest Heights by Combining Lidar and Hyperspectral Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9090507 ↗