Review on Mercury Control during Co-Firing Coal and Biomass under O2/CO2 Atmosphere
Source abstract
Abstract
Combining biomass co-firing with oxy-fuel combustion is a promising Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) technology. It has the potential to achieve a large-scale reduction in carbon emissions from traditional power plants, making it a powerful tool for addressing global climate change. However, mercury in the fuel can be released into the flue gas during combustion, posing a significant threat to the environment and human health. More importantly, mercury can also cause the fracture of metal equipment via amalgamation, which is a major risk for the system. Therefore, compared to conventional coal-fired power plants, the requirements for the mercury concentration in BECCS systems are much stricter. This article reviews the latest progress in mercury control under oxy-fuel biomass co-firing conditions, clarifies the impact of biomass co-firing on mercury species transformation, reveals the influence mechanisms of various flue gas components on elemental mercury oxidation under oxy-fuel combustion conditions, evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of various mercury removal methods, and finally provides an outlook for mercury control in BECCS systems. Research shows that after biomass co-firing, the concentrations of chlorine and alkali metals in the flue gas increase, which is beneficial for homogeneous and heterogeneous mercury oxidation. The changes in the particulate matter content could affect the transformation of gaseous mercury to particulate mercury. The high concentrations of CO2 and H2O in oxy-fuel flue gas inhibit mercury oxidation, while the effects of NOx and SO2 are dual-sided. Higher concentrations of fly ash in oxy-fuel flue gas are conducive to the removal of Hg0. Additionally, under oxy-fuel conditions, CO2 and metal ions such as Fe2+ can inhibit the re-emission of mercury in WFGD systems. The development of efficient adsorbents and catalysts is the key to achieving deep mercury removal. Fully utilizing the advantages of chlorine, alkali metals, and CO2 in oxy-fuel biomass co-firing flue gas will be the future focus of deep mercury removal from BECCS systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mercury impact and mitigation studies · Coal and Its By-products · Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Electronic Equipment Structure Design, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. International Energy Agency (2024, April 15). CO2 Emissions in 2022. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022.
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2024, April 15). Global Warming of 1.5 °C. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/download/#full.
3. Life cycle energy-economic-CO2 emissions evaluation of biomass/coal, with and without CO2 capture and storage, in a pulverized fuel combustion power plant in the United Kingdom10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.013 ↗
4. Review and perspectives on mercury release and migration during chemical looping combustion of solid fuels10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04235 ↗
5. The adsorption mechanisms of Hg0 on marcasite-type metal selenides: The influences of metal-terminated site10.1016/j.cej.2020.126723 ↗
6. Enhanced photocatalytic Hg0 oxidation activity of iodine doped bismuth molybdate (Bi2MoO6) under visible light10.1016/j.jcis.2021.10.012 ↗
7. Lyu, Q., Wang, C., Liu, X., and Che, D. (2022). Numerical study on the homogeneous reactions of mercury in a 600 MW coal-fired utility boiler. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15020446 ↗
8. (2011). Emission Standard of Air Pollutants for Thermal Power Plants (Standard No. GB 13223-2011).
9. After the clean air mercury rule: Prospects for reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants10.1021/es802649u ↗
10. Praveen, A. (2003). Mercury Emissions from Coal Fired Power Plants—The Case for Regulatory Action, NESCAUM.
11. Carnell, P.J.H. (2007, January 24–27). A re-think of the mercury removal problem for LNG plants. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference & Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG 15), Barcelona, Spain.
12. Lv, Q., Wang, C., He, Y., Cai, M., and Che, D. (2020). Elemental mercury removal over CeO2/TiO2 catalyst prepared by sol-gel method. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10082706 ↗
13. Investigation on elemental mercury removal and antideactivation performance of modified SCR catalysts10.1002/apj.2208 ↗
14. Ilmenite as alternative bed material for the combustion of coal and biomass blends in a fluidised bed combustor to improve combustion performance and reduce agglomeration tendency10.1016/j.energy.2021.121913 ↗
15. Alkali sulfation during combustion of coal in a pilot scale facility using additives to alter the global sulfur to potassium and chlorine to potassium ratios10.1016/j.proci.2020.07.118 ↗
16. Characteristics of speciated mercury emissions from coal combustion in air and oxygen-enriched environment10.1007/s00128-019-02626-w ↗
17. Wang, J., Yao, Q., Jin, X., and Deng, L. (2023). The influence of co-firing coal with biomass syngas on the thermodynamic parameters of a boiler. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011477 ↗
18. Combustion and heat transfer characteristics of co-firing biomass and coal under oxy-fuel condition10.1002/er.4163 ↗
19. Research progress of carbon capture technology based on alcohol amine solution10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125715 ↗
20. Numerical investigation on NOxformation of staged oxy-fuel combustion in a 35 MW large pilot boiler10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130177 ↗
21. United Nations Environment Programme (2019). Global Mercury Assessment 2018, UNEP.
22. Efficient removal of Hg0 from simulated flue gas by novel magnetic Ag2WO4/BiOI/CoFe2O4 photocatalysts10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.060 ↗
23. Mercury(II) and methyl mercury speciation on Streptococcus pyrogenes loaded Dowex Optipore SD-210.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.100 ↗
24. Monperrus, M., Pécheyran, C., and Bolliet, V. (2020). Imaging differential mercury species bioaccumulation in glass eels using isotopic tracers and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072463 ↗
25. Mulenga, M., Ouma, K., Monde, C., and Syampungani, S. (2024). Aquatic mercury pollution from artisanal and small-scale gold mining in sub-Saharan Africa: Status, Impacts, and Interventions. Water, 16.10.3390/w16050756 ↗
26. Spatial-temporal changes of land-use mercury emissions in China10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109430 ↗
27. Plant demethylation in global mercury cycling10.1038/s43016-023-00909-4 ↗
28. Mercury in natural gas streams: A review of materials and processes for abatement and remediation10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121036 ↗
29. Failures of structures and components by metal-induced embrittlement10.1007/s11668-008-9124-y ↗
30. Numerical study of co-firing biomass with lean coal under air-fuel and oxy-fuel conditions in a wall-fired utility boiler10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00207 ↗
31. Dziok, T., Kołodziejska, E.K., and Kołodziejska, E.L. (2020). Mercury content in woody biomass and its removal in the torrefaction process. Biomass Bioenergy, 143.10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105832 ↗
32. Mercury: What can we learn from the Amazon?10.1016/j.envint.2020.106223 ↗
33. Emissions of SO2, NOx, CO2, and HCl from co-firing of coals with raw and torrefied biomass fuels10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.049 ↗
34. Towards the development of a chemical kinetic model for the homogeneous oxidation of mercury by chlorine species10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00108-3 ↗
35. Enhanced elemental mercury removal via chlorine-based hierarchically porous biochar with CaCO3 as template10.1016/j.cej.2020.126828 ↗
36. Process for converting hydrogen-chloride to chlorine10.1021/ie00036a014 ↗
37. Pilling, M., and Seakins, P.W. (1995). Reaction Kinetics, Oxford Science Publications.
38. A predictive mechanism for mercury oxidation on selective catalytic reduction catalysts under coal-derived flue gas10.1080/10473289.2005.10464779 ↗
39. Assess of biomass co-firing under oxy-fuel conditions on Hg speciation and ash deposit formation10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.081 ↗
40. Emission factors of mercury and particulate matters, and in situ control of mercury during the co-combustion of anthracite and dried sawdust sludge10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.026 ↗
41. Wang, Q. (2009). Study on Emission Behavior of Particulate Matter during Co-Combustion of Biomass and Coal. [Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology].
42. Ash transformation during co-firing coal and straw10.1016/j.fuel.2006.10.008 ↗
43. The ash chemistry in fluidised bed gasification of biomass fuels. Part I: Predicting the chemistry of melting ashes and ash-bed material interaction10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00026-6 ↗
44. Obernberger, I., Dahl, J., and Brunner, T. (September, January 29). Formation, composition and particle size distribution of fly ashes from biomass combustion plants. Proceedings of the 4th Biomass Conference of the Americas, Oakland, CA, USA.
45. Bruner, T., and Joeller, M. (2002, January 17–21). Aerosol and fly ash formation in fixed bed biomass combustion systems using woody biofuels. Proceedings of the 12th European Biomass Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
46. Investigation on gaseous pollutants emissions during co-combustion of coal and wheat straw in a fluidized bed combustor10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124853 ↗
47. Thermodynamics study of effects of alkali metals on mercury transformation during co-combustion of biomass with coal
48. Mercury transformation across particulate control devices in six power plants in China: The co-effect of chlorine and ash composition10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.030 ↗
49. Effects of metal ions on Hg0 re-emission under air and oxy-fuel combustion atmospheres in a WFGD system10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120881 ↗
50. Release characteristics of mercury in coal under O2/CO2 atmosphere
51. Experimental study of homogeneous mercury oxidation under O2/CO2 atmosphere10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.125 ↗
52. Effect of oxy-combustion flue gas on mercury oxidation10.1021/es500967d ↗
53. Activated carbon for capturing Hg in flue gas under O2/CO2 combustion conditions. Part 1: Experimental and kinetic study10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03380 ↗
54. Mercury adsorption and oxidation over cobalt oxide loaded magnetospheres catalyst from fly ash in oxyfuel combustion flue gas10.1021/acs.est.5b01029 ↗
55. Gharebaghi, M., Goh, B., Porter, R.T.J., Pourkashanian, M., and Williams, A. (2009, January 8–11). Modelling methods for co-fired pulverized fuel furnaces. Proceedings of the 1st Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus, Germany.
56. The fate of mercury in fluidized beds under oxy-fuel combustion conditions10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.045 ↗
57. Flue gas effects on a carbon-based mercury sorbent10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00103-4 ↗
58. Effect of atmosphere of SO2 coexisted with oxidizing gas on mercury removal under oxy-fuel condition10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127525 ↗
59. The activity and characterization of CeO2-TiO2 catalysts prepared by the sol-gel method for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH310.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.112 ↗
60. Oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury by hydrochloric acid over CuCl2/TiO2-based catalysts in SCR process10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.032 ↗
61. Impact of SO2 on elemental mercury oxidation over CeO2-TiO2 catalyst10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.100 ↗
62. Review of mercury formation and capture from CO2-enriched oxyfuel combustion flue gas10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02420 ↗
63. Stam, A., Ploumen, P., and Brem, G. (June, January 31). Coal: World energy security. Proceedings of the 34th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, Clearwater, FL, USA.
64. A mechanism study on effects of bromide ion on mercury re-emission in WFGD slurry10.1016/j.cej.2020.127010 ↗
65. Gaseous mercury re-emission from wet flue gas desulfurization wastewater aeration basins: A review10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126546 ↗
66. A comprehensive evaluation of the influence of air combustion and oxy-fuel combustion flue gas constituents on Hg0 re-emission in WFGD systems10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.041 ↗
67. Characteristics of mercury re-emission and migration in a lab-scale wet flue gas desulfurization scrubber under simulated air and oxy-fuel combustion atmospheres10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03019 ↗
68. Removal of elemental mercury by clays impregnated with KI and KBr10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.072 ↗
69. Effect of characteristics of KI-impregnated activated carbon and flue gas components on Hg0 removal10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.083 ↗
70. Adsorption performance and mechanism of bentonite modified by ammonium bromide for gas-phase elemental mercury removal10.1016/S1872-5813(14)60049-9 ↗
71. Stability of mercury on three activated carbon sorbents10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.10.005 ↗
72. Sorption of elemental mercury by activated carbons10.1021/es00057a020 ↗
73. Adsorption of vapor-phase elemental mercury (Hg0) and mercury chloride (HgCl2) with innovative composite activated carbons impregnated with Na2S and S0 in different sequences10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.059 ↗
74. Impact of flue gas conditions on mercury uptake by sulfur-impregnated activated carbon10.1021/es990315i ↗
75. Effect of sulfur impregnation method on activated carbon uptake of gas-phase mercury10.1021/es9609260 ↗
76. Optimization of sulfur impregnation protocol for fixed bed application of activated carbon-based sorbents for gas-phase mercury removal10.1021/es970630+ ↗
77. Optimization of high temperature sulfur impregnation on activated carbon for permanent sequestration of elemental mercury vapors10.1021/es9813008 ↗
78. Application of sulfonated carbons for mercury removal in gas processing10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02630 ↗
79. Influences of acidic/oxidizing gases on elemental mercury adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of sulfur-impregnated activated carbon10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.011 ↗
80. Removal of elemental mercury from Bayer stack gases using sulfur-impregnated activated carbons10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.098 ↗
81. Characteristics of the mercury vapor removal from coal combustion flue gas by activated carbon using H2S10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.007 ↗
82. Deep study on effects of activated carbon’s oxygen functional groups for elemental mercury adsorption using temperature programmed desorption method10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.031 ↗
83. Activated carbons from biocollagenic wastes of the leather industry for mercury capture in oxy-combustion10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.018 ↗
84. Pd/activated carbon sorbents for mid-temperature capture of mercury from coal-derived fuel gas10.1016/j.jes.2014.05.016 ↗
85. CeO2-TiO2 catalysts for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in low-rank coal combustion flue gas10.1021/es2007808 ↗
86. Adsorptive removal of gas-phase mercury by oxygen non-thermal plasma modified activated carbon10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.002 ↗
87. Increasing oxygen functional groups of activated carbon with non-thermal plasma to enhance mercury removal efficiency for flue gases10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.090 ↗
88. Liu, Y. (2009). Zeolite-Supported Silver Nanoparticles for Coal-Fired Power Plant Mercury Emission Control. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alberta].
89. Control of mercury emissions from coal-combustion flue gases using CuCl2-modified zeolite and evaluating the cobenefit effects on SO2 and NO removal10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.04.031 ↗
90. Zeolite sorbent that effectively removes mercury from flue gases10.1016/S0015-1882(02)80207-5 ↗
91. Evaluation of two sulfur impregnation methods on activated carbon and bentonite for the production of elemental mercury sorbents10.1089/ees.2000.17.303 ↗
92. Surface sulfidation modification of magnetospheres from fly ash for elemental mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas10.1016/j.cej.2022.135212 ↗
93. Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas by recyclable CuCl2 modified magnetospheres from fly ash: Part 5. Industrial scale studies at a 50 MWth coal-fired power plant10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117052 ↗
94. Mercury capture by native fly ash carbons in coal-fired power plants10.1016/j.pecs.2009.12.003 ↗
95. Mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas by modified fly ash10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60065-5 ↗
96. Experimental study on Hg0 removal by filter material loaded with fly ash-CaO adsorbent
97. Pd/Al2O3 sorbents for elemental mercury capture at high temperatures in syngas10.1021/ie501292a ↗
98. Preparation of gold- and chlorine-impregnated bead-type activated carbon for a mercury sorbent trap10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.021 ↗
99. Validation of a new and cost-effective method for mercury vapor removal based on silver nanoparticles coating on micro glassy balls10.1016/j.apr.2016.10.004 ↗
100. Fixed-bed studies of the interactions between mercury and coal combustion fly ash10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00070-5 ↗