Unveiling Valuable Geomechanical Monitoring Insights: Exploring Ground Deformation in Geological Carbon Storage
Source abstract
Abstract
Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) involves storing CO2 emissions in geological formations, where safe containment is challenged by structural and stratigraphic trapping and caprock integrity. This study investigates flow and geomechanical responses to CO2 injection based on a Brazilian offshore reservoir model, highlighting the critical interplay between rock properties, injection rates, pressure changes, and ground displacements. The findings indicate centimeter-scale ground uplift and question the conventional selection of the wellhead as a monitoring site, as it might not be optimal due to the reservoir’s complexity and the nature of the injection process. This study addresses the importance of comprehensive sensitivity analyses on geomechanical properties and injection rates for advancing GCS by improving monitoring strategies and risk management. Furthermore, this study explores the geomechanical effects of modeling flow in the caprock, highlighting the role of pressure dissipation within the caprock. These insights are vital for advancing the design of monitoring strategies, enhancing the predictive accuracy of models, and effectively managing geomechanical risks, thus ensuring the success of GCS initiatives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena · Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro 20231-030, Brazil
Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Energy, Science and Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
References (87)
Show source-provided references
1. Birol, D.F. (2022). World Energy Outlook 2022, IEA Publications.
2. Nghiem, L., Shrivastava, V., Kohse, B., Hassam, M., and Yang, C. (2009, January 16–18). Simulation of Trapping Processes for CO2 Storage in Saline Aquifers. Proceedings of the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta.10.2118/2009-156 ↗
3. Evaluation of Trapping Mechanisms in Geologic CO2 Sequestration: Case Study of SACROC Northern Platform, a 35-Year CO2 Injection Site10.2475/04.2010.03 ↗
4. Modeling and Simulation of Carbon Sequestration at Cranfield Incorporating New Physical Models10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.03.019 ↗
5. Rackley, S.A. (2017). Carbon Capture and Storage, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-812041-5.00002-7 ↗
6. Hovorka, S. (2008). Optimization of Geological Environments for Carbon Dioxide Disposal in Saline Aquifers in the United States (Part One), University of Texas.10.2172/990445 ↗
7. Composite Confining Systems: Rethinking Geologic Seals for Permanent CO2 Sequestration10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103908 ↗
8. An Improved Model Calculating CO2 Solubility in Pure Water and Aqueous NaCl Solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000 Bar10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00263-2 ↗
9. Modelling CO2 Solubility in Pure Water and NaCl-Type Waters from 0 to 300 °C and from 1 to 300 Bar10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.12.007 ↗
10. Enhanced Mass Transfer of CO2 into Water: Experiment and Modeling10.1021/ie801521u ↗
11. Convective Dissolution of Carbon Dioxide in Saline Aquifers10.1029/2010GL044728 ↗
12. Effect of Convective Mixing Process on Storage of CO2 in Saline Aquifers with Layered Permeability10.21926/acr.2101012 ↗
13. A Visual Investigation of CO2 Convective Mixing in Water and Oil at the Pore Scale Using a Micromodel Apparatus at Reservoir Conditions10.3390/gases1010005 ↗
14. Interactions between Gravity Currents and Convective Dissolution10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.006 ↗
15. Spiteri, E.J., Juanes, R., Blunt, M.J., and Orr, F.M. (2005, January 9–12). Relative Permeability Hysteresis: Trapping Models and Application to Geological CO2 Sequestration. Proceedings of the All Days, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2523/96448-MS ↗
16. Risk Mitigation through the Optimization of Residual Gas and Solubility Trapping for CO2 Storage in Saline Aquifers10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.079 ↗
17. Design of Carbon Dioxide Storage in Aquifers10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.004 ↗
18. Advanced Modeling of Enhanced CO2 Dissolution Trapping in Saline Aquifers10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103907 ↗
19. Using Natural CO2 Reservoir to Constrain Geochemical Models for CO2 Geological Sequestration10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.01.009 ↗
20. The Role of Hydrogeological and Geochemical Trapping in Sedimentary Basins for Secure Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.233.01.09 ↗
21. Geomechanical Challenges during Geological CO2 Storage: A Review10.1016/j.cej.2022.140968 ↗
22. Wouters, M., Hanssen, R.F., and Govers, R. (2021, January 13–17). Using PS-InSAR Observations to Detect Aseismic Fault Slip in the Seismically Active Groningen Gas Field. Proceedings of the AGU Fall Meeting 2021, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1002/essoar.10509685.1 ↗
23. Compaction and Subsidence Issues within the Petroleum Industry: From Wilmington to Ekofisk and Beyond10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00015-1 ↗
24. In Salah CO2 Storage JIP: Hydromechanical Simulations of Surface Uplift Due to CO2 Injection at In Salah10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.246 ↗
25. Vilarrasa, V., Makhnenko, R.Y., and Rutqvist, J. (2019). Science of Carbon Storage in Deep Saline Formations, Elsevier.
26. Changes in Pore Structure and Connectivity Induced by CO2 Injection in Carbonates: A Combined Pore-Scale Approach10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.455 ↗
27. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Wormholing during CO2 Storage and Water Alternating Gas Injection10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102901 ↗
28. Experimental Investigation into Salt Precipitation during CO2 Injection in Saline Aquifers10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.399 ↗
29. Salt Precipitation and CO2/Brine Flow Distribution under Different Injection Well Completions10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.020 ↗
30. Ahusborde, E., Amaziane, B., De Hoop, S., El Ossmani, M., Flauraud, E., Hamon, F.P., Kern, M., Socié, A., Su, D., and Mayer, K.U. (2024). A Benchmark Study on Reactive Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media: Part II—Results and Discussion. Comput. Geosci., 1–18.10.1007/s10596-024-10269-y ↗
31. A Benchmark Study on Reactive Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media: Part I—Model Description10.1007/s10596-024-10268-z ↗
32. Kim, K., Vilarrasa, V., and Makhnenko, R. (2018). CO2 Injection Effect on Geomechanical and Flow Properties of Calcite-Rich Reservoirs. Fluids, 3.10.3390/fluids3030066 ↗
33. Harvey, S., O’Brien, S., Minisini, S., Oates, S., and Braim, M. (2021, January 15–18). Quest CCS Facility: Microseismic System Monitoring and Observations. Proceedings of the 15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference, Virtual.10.2139/ssrn.3817042 ↗
34. Stress Evolution During CO2 Storage—A Case for Long-Term Monitoring10.3997/1365-2397.fb2023019 ↗
35. Sensitivity Analysis of Geomechanical Constraints in CO2 Storage to Screen Potential Sites in Deep Saline Aquifers10.3389/fclim.2021.720959 ↗
36. Tang, M., Ju, X., and Durlofsky, L.J. (2021). Deep-Learning-Based Coupled Flow-Geomechanics Surrogate Model for CO2 Sequestration. arXiv.10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103692 ↗
37. Zheng, F., Jha, B., and Jafarpour, B. (2023, January 17). Controlled CO2 Injection into Storage Reservoirs to Minimize Geomechanical Risks under Geologic Uncertainty. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.2118/215155-MS ↗
38. Long-Term Effects of CO2 Sequestration on Rock Mechanical Properties10.1115/1.4032011 ↗
39. He, X., Zhu, W., AlSinan, M., Kwak, H., and Hoteit, H. (2022, January 22). CO2 Storage Capacity Prediction In Deep Saline Aquifers: Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.10.2523/IPTC-22463-MS ↗
40. Davis, E., Wright, C., Demetrius, S., Choi, J., and Craley, G. (2000, January 19). Precise Tiltmeter Subsidence Monitoring Enhances Reservoir Management. Proceedings of the All Days, SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.2523/62577-MS ↗
41. Bouquet, S., Frey, J., Malinouskaya, I., Estublier, A., and Fourno, A. (2022, January 23–24). Evaluation of Surface Movement Observability and Optimization of the Monitoring Plan through Conceptual and Coupled Flow-Geomechanics Models. Examples of Carbonate and Sandstone Reservoirs in CCS Context. Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (GHGT-16), Lyon, France.10.2139/ssrn.4301904 ↗
42. A Coupled Reservoir Simulation-Geomechanical Modelling Study of the CO2 Injection-Induced Ground Surface Uplift Observed at Krechba, in Salah10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.266 ↗
43. Zhang, T., Zhang, W., Yang, R., Gao, H., and Cao, D. (2022). Analysis of Available Conditions for InSAR Surface Deformation Monitoring in CCS Projects. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15020672 ↗
44. Ervine, C. (2015). Core Statutes on Company Law, Macmillan Education.10.1007/978-1-137-54507-7 ↗
45. Fetch-Trap Pairs: Exploring Definition of Carbon Storage Prospects to Increase Capacity and Flexibility in Areas with Competing Uses10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103817 ↗
46. Active CO2 Reservoir Management for Carbon Storage: Analysis of Operational Strategies to Relieve Pressure Buildup and Improve Injectivity10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007 ↗
47. Multi-Lateral Horizontal Well with Dual-Tubing System to Improve CO2 Storage Security and Reduce CCS Cost10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120368 ↗
48. Analysis of Evolving Capillary Transition, Gravitational Fingering, and Dissolution Trapping of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers during Continuous Injection of Supercritical CO210.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.014 ↗
49. Pore-Scale Simulation of Miscible Viscous Fingering with Dissolution Reaction in Porous Media10.1063/5.0045051 ↗
50. Injectivity Assessment for CCS Field-Scale Projects with Considerations of Salt Deposition, Mineral Dissolution, Fines Migration, Hydrate Formation, and Non-Darcy Flow10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129148 ↗
51. Leakage Risk Assessment of a CO2 Storage Site: A Review10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103849 ↗
52. Farshidi, S.F., Fan, Y., Durlofsky, L.J., and Tchelepi, H.A. (2013, January 18). Chemical Reaction Modeling in a Compositional Reservoir-Simulation Framework. Proceedings of the All Days, SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/163677-MS ↗
53. Machado, M.V.B., Khanal, A., and Delshad, M. (2024). Unveiling the Essential Parameters Driving Mineral Reactions during CO2 Storage in Carbonate Aquifers through Proxy Models. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14041465 ↗
54. UNISIM-I: Synthetic Model for Reservoir Development and Management Applications
55. Poisson’s Ratio Values for Rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.011 ↗
56. Geologic Carbon Storage for Shale Gas Recovery10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1713 ↗
57. (2024, March 01). Energies | Free Full-Text | Periodic CO2 Injection for Improved Storage Capacity and Pressure Management under Intermittent CO2 Supply. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/566.10.3390/en15020566 ↗
58. Kuk, M., Kuk, E., Janiga, D., Wojnarowski, P., and Stopa, J. (2020). Optimization Wells Placement Policy for Enhanced CO2 Storage Capacity in Mature Oil Reservoirs. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13164054 ↗
59. Machado, M.V.B., Delshad, M., and Sepehrnoori, K. (2023). Potential Benefits of Horizontal Wells for CO2 Injection to Enhance Storage Security and Reduce Leakage Risks. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132312830 ↗
60. Drainage and Imbibition Relative Permeability Relationships for Supercritical CO2/Brine and H2S/Brine Systems in Intergranular Sandstone, Carbonate, Shale, and Anhydrite Rocks10.2118/99326-PA ↗
61. Capillary Pressure Characteristics of CO2-Brine-Sandstone Systems10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102876 ↗
62. Bennion, D.B., and Bachu, S. (2007, January 11). Permeability and Relative Permeability Measurements at Reservoir Conditions for CO2-Water Systems in Ultralow-Permeability Confining Caprocks. Proceedings of the All Days, EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, London, UK.10.2118/106995-MS ↗
63. CMG (2023). GEM, Windows, CMG. Compositional & Unconventional Simulator, (version 2023.30).10.5040/9781501365287.498 ↗
64. A Practical and Innovative Workflow to Support the Numerical Simulation of CO2 Storage in Large Field-Scale Models10.2118/215838-PA ↗
65. Balhoff, M. (2022). An Introduction to Multiphase, Multicomponent Reservoir Simulation, Elsevier. Developments in Petroleum Science.10.1016/B978-0-323-99235-0.00015-4 ↗
66. Machado, M.V.B. (2023). Numerical Petroleum Reservoir Modeling: Integrated Simulation Practice, PETROBRAS. [1st ed.]. (In Portuguese).
67. Phase Equilibria of Oil, Gas and Water/Brine Mixtures from a Cubic Equation of State and Henry’s Law10.1002/cjce.5450640319 ↗
68. Package FLUIDS 1. Computer Programs for Analysis of Fluid Inclusion Data and for Modelling Bulk Fluid Properties10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00268-1 ↗
69. CO2 Diffusion and Dispersion in Porous Media: Review of Advances in Experimental Measurements and Mathematical Models10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03552 ↗
70. Carbon Dioxide Storage Potential of Shales10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.03.003 ↗
71. Montegrossi, G., Cantucci, B., Piochi, M., Fusi, L., Misnan, M.S., Rashidi, M.R.A., Abu Bakar, Z.A., Tuan Harith, Z.Z., Bahri, N.H.S., and Hashim, N. (2022). CO2 Reaction-Diffusion Experiments in Shales and Carbonates. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13010056 ↗
72. Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow from Rock Properties10.2118/1942-PA ↗
73. Carlson, F.M. (1981, January 4). Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis to the Nonwetting Phase. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.2523/10157-MS ↗
74. Review and Implications of Relative Permeability of CO2/Brine Systems and Residual Trapping of CO210.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.013 ↗
75. Stress Orientations in Brazilian Sedimentary Basins from Breakout Analysis: Implications for Force Models in the South American Plate10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb00991.x ↗
76. Seismicity and Stresses in the Brazilian Passive Margin10.1785/BSSA0880010160 ↗
77. Bizzo, Y.F. (2017). Evaluation of the Effects of Fluid and Rock Properties on Geomechanical Simulations of Reservoirs from the Namorado Field. [Master’s Thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro].
78. Evaluating Geomechanical Effects Related to the Production of a Brazilian Reservoir10.1007/s13202-021-01190-6 ↗
79. Bjørnarå, T.I., Aker, E., Cuisiat, F., and Skurtveit, E. (2010, January 17–19). Modeling CO2 Storage Using Coupled Reservoir-Geomechanical Analysis. Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference, Paris, France.
80. Stability, Accuracy, and Efficiency of Sequential Methods for Coupled Flow and Geomechanics10.2118/119084-PA ↗
81. Garipov, T.T., and Hui, M. (2018, January 17). Simulation of Coupled Geomechanics and Multiphase Flow in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Proceedings of the 52nd U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Seattle, DC, USA.
82. New Iterative Coupling Between a Reservoir Simulator and a Geomechanics Module10.2118/88989-PA ↗
83. Investigation of Caprock Integrity Due to Pressure Build-up During High-Volume Injection into the Utsira Formation10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1444 ↗
84. CO2 Plume and Pressure Monitoring through Pressure Sensors above the Caprock10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103660 ↗
85. Currenti, G., Cantucci, B., Montegrossi, G., Napoli, R., Misnan, M.S., Rashidi, M.R.A., Abu Bakar, Z.A., Harith, Z.Z.T., Bahri, N.H.S., and Hashim, N. (2023). CO2 Leakage Scenarios in Shale Overburden. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13081016 ↗
86. Injection of CO2 into Saline Formations: Benchmarking Worldwide Projects10.1016/j.cherd.2011.04.003 ↗
87. Metz, B. (2005). IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Cambridge University Press, for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.