Comprehensive Six-Degrees-of-Freedom Trajectory Design and Optimization of a Launch Vehicle with a Hybrid Last Stage Using the PSO Algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Increased performance with reduced overall cost, and precise design and optimization of launch systems are critical to affordability. In this respect, the use of hybrid motors has increased to ease handling based on motor selection. In the current study, the launch vehicle’s performance is enhanced by incorporating a hybrid rocket motor into the last stage and optimized using particle swarm optimization to develop a six-degrees-of-freedom tool. This modification aims to increase payload placement flexibility, facilitate handling, and reduce costs. Thanks to the interactive subsystems within this research, this innovative study more comprehensively considers the launch vehicle trajectory design problem, allowing the simultaneous consideration of the effect of launch vehicle geometry along with other parameters in the system. In this context, the proposed method is applied to the Minotaur-I launch vehicle, and contributions of the detailed design and optimization are presented. Optimization results show that the percentage differences between these models for the original vehicle were observed to be 11.55% in velocity and 8.02% in altitude. However, there were differences of 10.06% and 48.8%, 15.8% and 23.2%, and 19.5% and 78.9% in altitudes and velocities when the center of gravity and moment of inertia changes were neglected, and constant aerodynamic coefficients were assumed, respectively. In all these cases, it was observed that the flight path angle was not close to zero. Moreover, the same mission was achieved by the launch vehicle with the optimized hybrid last stage and the propulsion performance was increased by about 7.64% based on the specific impulse and total impulse-over-weight ratio.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rocket and propulsion systems research · Spacecraft Dynamics and Control · Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Astronautical Engineering of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Istanbul Technical University, 34485 Istanbul, Turkey
Microelectronic Guidance and Electro-Optical Group, Aselsan Inc., 06200 Ankara, Turkey
Department of Solar Physics, Astronomical Institute of Czech Academy of Sciences, Fričova 298, 251 65 Ondřejov, Czech Republic
Funding
ITU Coordinatorship of Scientific Research Projects
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Niederstrasser, C. (2018, January 4–9). SSC 18-IX-01 Small Launch Vehicles—A 2018 State of the Industry Survey. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Lagan, UT, USA. SSC18-IX-01.
2. VirginGalactic (2023, September 26). SpaceShipOne. Available online: https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/spaceshipone/nasm_A20050459000.
3. ARCASpace (2023, September 26). Arca Made Available the Ecorocket Technology for Civilian and Military Applications. Available online: https://www.arcaspace.com/.
4. Messier, D. (2023, September 26). EXPACE Raises US$182 Million for Small Satellite Launchers. Parabolic Arc. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20201204225826/http://www.parabolicarc.com/2017/12/20/expace-raises-182-million-small-satellite-launchers/.
5. Faenza, M.G., Boiron, A.J., Haemmerli, B., Lennart, S., Vesteras, T., and Verberne, O. (2017, January 3–6). Getting Ready for Space: Nammo’s Development of a 30 kN Hybrid Rocket Based Technology Demonstrator. Proceedings of the Nammo Raufoss AS, 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences, Milan, Italy.
6. Yonhap, S. (2023, March 20). Korean Startup Innospace Launches Test Launch Vehicle HANBIT-TLV. Available online: https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20230320000109.
7. Optimal Design of Hybrid Rocket Small Satellite Launchers Ground Versus Airborne Launch10.2514/1.A35428 ↗
8. Deterministic and Robust Optimization of Hybrid Rocket Engines for Small Satellite Launchers10.2514/1.A35007 ↗
9. Multi-Stage Hybrid Rocket Conceptual Design for Micro-Satellites Launch using Genetic Algorithm10.2322/tjsass.55.229 ↗
10. Design and optimization of variable thrust hybrid rocket motors for sounding rockets10.1007/s11431-011-4597-4 ↗
11. Glaser, C., Hijlkema, J., and Anthoine, J. (2023). Bridging the Technology Gap: Strategies for Hybrid Rocket Engines. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10100901 ↗
12. Lu, P., and Pan, B. (1992, January 9). Trajectory optimization and guidance for an advanced launch system. Proceedings of the 10th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.1992-732 ↗
13. Optimization of Launch Vehicle Ascent Trajectories with Path Constraints and Coast Arcs10.2514/2.4712 ↗
14. Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 1: Algorithm Structure10.1023/A:1022114117273 ↗
15. Design Optimization of Space Launch Vehicles Using a Genetic Algorithms10.2514/1.35318 ↗
16. Trade-Offs and Optimization of Air-Assisted Launch Vehicles for Small Satellites
17. Schoettle, U.M., and Hillesheimer, M. (1991, January 12–14). Performance optimization of an airbreathing launch vehicle by a sequential trajectory optimization and vehicle design scheme. Proceedings of the Navigation and Control Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.2514/6.1991-2655 ↗
18. Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 2: Application to a Multistage Launch Vehicle Design10.1023/A:1022154001343 ↗
19. Rafique, A.F., LinShu, H., Zeeshan, Q., Kamran, A., Nisar, K., and Xioawei, W. (2009, January 2–5). Hybrid Optimization Method for Multidisciplinary Design of Air Launched Satellite Launch Vehicle. Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, USA.10.2514/6.2009-5535 ↗
20. Wiegand, A., Cremaschi, F., Winter, S., Weikert, S., Link, T., Zell, D., and Albinger, J. (2015). Design Optimisation and Performance Analysis of Launch Vehicles with ASTOS, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft-und Raumfahrt-Lilienthal-Oberth eV.
21. 3-DOF Reentry Trajectory Optimization for a Reusable Launch Vehicle Using an Advanced Indirect Method10.2514/1.A34893 ↗
22. Villanueva, F.M. (2022, January 5–12). Small Modular Launch Vehicle Multidisciplinary Design Optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843685 ↗
23. Comparison Be-tween Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization10.1007/BFb0040812 ↗
24. Particle Swarm Optimization10.2514/2.2111 ↗
25. Particle swarm optimization of as-cent trajectories of multistage launch vehicles10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.09.013 ↗
26. Particle Swarm Optimization Applied to Ascent Phase Launch Vehicle Trajectory Optimization Problem10.1016/j.procs.2015.06.059 ↗
27. Ascent phase trajectory optimization for vehicle with mul-ti-combined cycle engine based on improved particle swarm optimization10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.08.024 ↗
28. Dukeman, G.A. (2002). AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
29. Six-DOF Trajectory Optimization for Reusable Launch Vehicles via Gauss Pseudospectral Method10.1109/JSEE.2016.00044 ↗
30. Six-Degree-of-Freedom Trajectory Targeting and Optimization for Titan Launch Vehicles10.2514/2.3214 ↗
31. Online Trajectory Optimization for Power System Fault of Launch Vehicles via Convex Programming
32. Generation of Launch Vehicle Abort Trajectories Using a Hybrid Optimization Method10.2514/1.7989 ↗
33. Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques Applied to a Reusable Launch Vehicle10.2514/1.16577 ↗
34. Hyper Heuristic Approach for Design and Optimization of Satellite Launch Vehicle10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60019-8 ↗
35. Rea, J. (2003). AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
36. Orbital Sciences (2006). Minotaur I Space Launch Vehicle-Fact Sheet, NASA. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
37. Williams, J.E., and Vukelich, S.R. (1979). The USAF Stability and Control Digital DATCOM. Volume I. User’s Manual, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (AFFDL). Tech. Rep. AFFDL-TR-79-3032 Volume I.
38. DassaultSyst’emes (2023, September 26). CATIA. Available online: https://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/.
39. Carpenter Technology (2000). Titanium Alloy 6Al-4V Technical Data Sheet, Carpenter Technology.
40. Impact of additive manufacturing on titanium supply chain: Case of titanium alloys in automotive and aerospace industries
41. Pavlis, N.K., Holmes, S.A., Kenyon, S.C., and Factor, J.K. (2012). The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 117.10.1029/2011JB008916 ↗
42. Markley, F.L., and Crassidis, J.L. (2014). Fundamentals of Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-0802-8 ↗
43. (1976). NOAA, NASA, and USAF, U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976 (Standard No. NOAA-SIT 76-1562).
44. Design Optimization and Parameter Analysis of a Hybrid Rocket Motor-Powered Small LEO Launch Vehicle10.1155/2021/5574436 ↗
45. Optimization design in single wagon-wheel fuel grain of hybrid rocket motor10.1016/j.fpc.2021.11.010 ↗
46. Sutton, G.P., and Biblarz, O. (2023, September 26). Rocket Propulsion Elements, New York. Available online: https://ftp.idu.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/ebook/tdg/DESIGN%20SISTEM%20DAYA%20GERAK/Rocket%20Propulsion%20Elements.pdf.
47. MathWorks (2023, September 26). Matlab. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/?stid=gnlogo.
48. Stevens, B.L., Lewis, F.L., and Johnson, E.N. (2016). Aircraft Control and Simulation Dynamics, Controls Design and Autonomous Systems, Wiley. [3rd ed.].10.1002/9781119174882 ↗
49. An Algorithm Using Runge-Kutta Methods of Orders 4 and 5 for Systems of ODEs
50. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia.
51. A Survey on Parallel Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms10.1007/s13369-018-03713-6 ↗
52. Depince, P., Guedas, B., and Picard, J. (2007, January 21–25). Multidisciplinary and multiobjective optimization: Comparison of several methods. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
53. Chen, H. (2020). Encyclopedia of Ocean Engineering, Springer.
54. Peri, D., Dessi, D., and Campana, E. (2008, January 10–12). Global Optimization Algorithms in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization. Proceedings of the 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, MAO, Victoria, BC, Canada.10.2514/6.2008-5888 ↗
55. Buckley, S.J., Weis, S.C., and Schoneman, S. (2000, January 19–21). The Orbital/Suborbital Program (OSP) Minotaur Space Launch Vehicle: Using Surplus ICBM Motors to Achieve Low Cost Space Lift For Small Satellites. Proceedings of the 12th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Long Beach, CA, USA.
56. OrbitalATK (2015). Minotaur I User’s Guide, OrbitalATK. Tech. Rep.
57. ESTECO (2023, September 26). ModeFrontier. Available online: https://engineering.esteco.com/modefrontier/.
58. Zhang, F., Litson, K., and Feldon, D.F. (2022). Social predictors of doctoral student mental health and well-being. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0274273 ↗
59. Indirect effect of open innovation on clinical and economic value creation in digital healthcare: A comparative study of European countries10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113701 ↗
60. Brochu, R., and Lestage, R. (2003). Three-Degree-of-Freedom (DOF) Missile Trajectory Simulation Model and Comparative Study with a High Fidelity 6DOF Model, DRDC Valcartier TIM.