Automatic Object Detection in Radargrams of Multi-Antenna GPR Systems Based on Simulation Data for Railway Infrastructure Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a non-invasive technology that uses electromagnetic pulses for subsurface exploration. In the railroad sector, it is crucial to assessing soil layers and infrastructure, offering insights into soil stratification and geological features and aiding in identifying subsurface hazards. However, the automation of radargram analysis is impeded by the lack of ground truth—accurate real-world data used to validate machine learning models—thus affecting the deployment of advanced algorithms. This study focuses on generating high-quality simulated data to address the shortage of real-world data in the context of object detection along railroad tracks and presents a fully automated pipeline that includes data generation, algorithm training, and validation using real-world data. By doing so, it paves the way for significantly easing the future task of object detection algorithms in the railway sector. A simulation environment, including the digital twin of a GPR antenna, was developed for artificial data generation. The process involves pre- and post-processing techniques to transform the three-dimensional data from the multichannel GPR system into two-dimensional datasets. This ensures minimal information loss and suitability for established two-dimensional object detection algorithms like the well-known YOLO (You Only Look Once) framework. Validation involved real-world measurements on a track with predefined buried objects. The entire pipeline, encompassing data generation, processing, training, and application, was automated for efficient algorithm testing and implementation. Artificial data show promise for better performance with increased training. Future AI and sensor advancements will enhance subsurface exploration, contributing to safer and more reliable railroad operations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Plasser & Theurer, Export von Bahnbaumaschinen, Gesellschaft m.b.H., Pummererstraße 5, 4021 Linz, Austria
School of Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstraße 23, 4600 Wels, Austria
Funding
Plasser & Theurer, Export von Bahnbaumaschinen, Gesellschaft m.b.H
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Olhoeft, G., Smith, S., Hyslip, J., and Selig, E. (2004, January 21–24). GPR in railroad investigations. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference Ground Penetrating Radar, Delft, The Netherlands.
2. Railway ballast condition assessment using ground-penetrating radar—An experimental, numerical simulation and modelling development10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.110 ↗
3. Triplanar Imaging of 3-D GPR Data for Deep-Learning-Based Underground Object Detection10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2953505 ↗
4. GPR-RCNN: An Algorithm of Subsurface Defect Detection for Airport Runway Based on GPR10.1109/LRA.2021.3062599 ↗
5. Automatic recognition of tunnel lining elements from GPR images using deep convolutional networks with data augmentation10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103830 ↗
6. GPR-based detection of internal cracks in asphalt pavement: A combination method of DeepAugment data and object detection10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111281 ↗
7. Luo, J., Lei, W., Hou, F., Wang, C., Ren, Q., Zhang, S., Luo, S., Wang, Y., and Xu, L. (2021). GPR B-Scan Image Denoising via Multi-Scale Convolutional Autoencoder with Data Augmentation. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10111269 ↗
8. Yue, Y., Liu, H., Meng, X., Li, Y., and Du, Y. (2021). Generation of High-Precision Ground Penetrating Radar Images Using Improved Least Square Generative Adversarial Networks. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13224590 ↗
9. Rice, W. (2019). Applying Generative Adversarial Networks to Intelligent Subsurface Imaging and Identification. [Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga]. Available online: https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/595.
10. Jol, H.M. (2009). Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications, Elsevier.
11. Kark, K.W. (2014). Antennen und Strahlungsfelder: Elektromagnetische Wellen auf Leitungen, im Freiraum und ihre Abstrahlung, Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-03616-4 ↗
12. gprMax: Open Source Software to Simulate Electromagnetic Wave Propagation for Ground Penetrating Radar10.1016/j.cpc.2016.08.020 ↗
13. Creating finite-difference time-domain models of commercial ground-penetrating radar antennas using Taguchi’s optimization method10.1190/1.3548506 ↗
14. Li, D., Hyslip, J., Sussmann, T., and Chrismer, S. (2015). Railway Geotechnics, CRC Press.10.1201/b18982 ↗
15. Jol, H. (2009). Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications, Elsevier.
16. A practical approach to correct attenuation effects in GPR data10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.09.002 ↗
17. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016). You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
18. (2024, January 17). What Is Lidar? Learn How Lidar Works. Available online: https://velodynelidar.com/what-is-lidar/.
19. Ayyadevara, V.K., and Reddy, Y. (2020). Modern Computer Vision with PyTorch: Explore Deep Learning Concepts and Implement over 50 Real-World Image Applications, Packt Publishing Ltd.
20. Kreyszig, E. (2011). Advanced Engineering Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [10th ed.].
21. Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗