Show source-provided references
1. A Comprehensive Analysis of Lung Cancer Highlighting Epidemiological Factors and Psychiatric Comorbidities from the All of Us Research Program
10.1038/s41598-023-37585-0 ↗3. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries
10.3322/caac.21660 ↗4. Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Small Lung Lesions Clinically Diagnosed as Primary Lung Cancer on Radiologic Examination
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.026 ↗5. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Operable Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Can SBRT Be Comparable to Surgery?
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1751 ↗6. Predictive Risk Factors for Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients
10.1097/JTO.0b013e31825871de ↗7. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma or Adenocarcnioma in Situ (Formerly Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma): A Patterns of Failure Analysis
10.1186/1748-717X-8-4 ↗8. A Prospective Radiological Study of Thin-Section Computed Tomography to Predict Pathological Noninvasiveness in Peripheral Clinical IA Lung Cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201)
10.1097/JTO.0b013e31821038ab ↗9. Relationship between Consolidation Tumor Ratio and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Small-Sized Lung Adenocarcinoma
10.1111/1759-7714.14524 ↗10. A Multi-Institutional Analysis of the Combined Effect of Micropapillary Component and Consolidation-to-Tumor Ratio >0.5 on the Prognosis of Pathological, Stage IA3, Lung Adenocarcinoma
10.1245/s10434-023-13658-2 ↗11. Relationship between the consolidation to maximum tumor diameter ratio and outcomes following stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer
10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.12.003 ↗12. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with lung tumors composed of mainly ground-glass opacity
10.1093/jrr/rraa015 ↗13. Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities
10.3389/fonc.2021.616149 ↗14. A Semiautomatic CT-Based Ensemble Segmentation of Lung Tumors: Comparison with Oncologists’ Delineations and with the Surgical Specimen
10.1016/j.radonc.2012.09.023 ↗15. Deep learning-based solid component measuring enabled interpretable prediction of tumor invasiveness for lung adenocarcinoma
10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107392 ↗16. Lack of incremental value of three-dimensional measurement in assessing invasiveness for lung cancer
10.1093/ejcts/ezad373 ↗18. Automated Approach for Segmenting Gross Tumor Volumes for Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using CT-Based Dense V-Networks
10.1093/jrr/rraa132 ↗19. Deep Learning Model Fusion Improves Lung Tumor Segmentation Accuracy across Variable Training-to-Test Dataset Ratios
10.1007/s13246-023-01295-8 ↗20. Aerts, H.J.W.L., Wee, L., Rios Velazquez, E., Leijenaar RT, H., Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Carvalho, S., Bussink, J., Monshouwer, R., and Haibe-Kains, B. (2014). Data from NSCLC-Radiomics (Version 4) [Data Set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive, National Cancer Institute.
21. Albertina, B., Watson, M., Holback, C., Jarosz, R., Kirk, S., Lee, Y., Rieger-Christ, K., and Lemmerman, J. (2016). The Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma Collection (TCGA-LUAD) (Version 4) [Data Set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive, National Cancer Institute.
22. Kirk, S., Lee, Y., Kumar, P., Filippini, J., Albertina, B., Watson, M., Rieger-Christ, K., and Lemmerman, J. (2016). The Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Collection (TCGA-LUSC) (Version 4) [Data Set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive, National Cancer Institute.
23. Computer-Assisted Framework for Machine-Learning-Based Delineation of GTV Regions on Datasets of Planning CT and PET/CT Images
10.1093/jrr/rrw082 ↗24. Johns, H., and Cunningham, J. (1983). The Physics of Radiology, Charles C Thomas Publisher. [4th ed.].
29. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗30. Pedamonti, D. (2018). Comparison of non-linear activation functions for deep neural networks on MNIST classification task. arXiv.
31. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to Build a Bridge from a Population-Based to a More “Personalized” Approach to Cancer Staging
10.3322/caac.21388 ↗32. Nuclear Morphology in Breast Lesions: Refining Its Assessment to Improve Diagnostic Concordance
10.1111/his.14577 ↗33. Burgeth, B., Kleefeld, A., and Naegel, B. (2019, January 8–10). Topological Mapper for 3D Volumetric Images. Proceedings of the Mathematical Morphology and Its Applications to Signal and Image Processing, Saarbrücken, Germany.
10.1007/978-3-030-20867-7 ↗39. Inter-Observer Reproducibility of Semi-Automatic Tumor Diameter Measurement and Volumetric Analysis in Patients with Lung Cancer
10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.006 ↗42. Automated Lung Segmentation and Image Quality Assessment for Clinical 3D/4D Computed Tomography
43. Thanoon, M.A., Zulkifley, M.A., Zainuri, M.A.A.M., and Abdani, S.R. (2023). A Review of Deep Learning Techniques for Lung Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Based on CT Images. Diagnostics, 13.
10.3390/diagnostics13162617 ↗44. Model-based adaptive filter for a dedicated cardiovascular CT scanner: Assessment of image noise, sharpness and quality
10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110032 ↗46. Lei, Y., Ding, Y., Qiu, R., Wang, T., Roper, J., Fu, Y., Shu, H.-K., Mao, H., and Yang, X. (2023). Hippocampus substructure segmentation using morphological vision transformer learning. Phys. Med. Biol., 68.
10.1088/1361-6560/ad0d45 ↗