Layer-Weighted Attention and Ascending Feature Selection: An Approach for Seriousness Level Prediction Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, we introduce a novel combination of layer-static-weighted attention and ascending feature selection techniques to predict the seriousness level of adverse drug events using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). We utilized natural language processing (NLP) to analyze the terms in the active substance field, in addition to considering demographic and event information such as patient sex, healthcare provider qualification, and drug characterization. Our ascending feature selection method, which progressively incorporates additional features based on their importance, demonstrated continuous enhancements in prediction performance. Simultaneously, we employed a layer-static-weighted attention technique, which dynamically adjusts the model’s focus between natural language processing (NLP) and demographic features. This technique achieved its best performance at a balanced weight of 50%, yielding an average test accuracy of 74.56% and CV ROC score of 0.83 when 4000 features were included, indicating a compelling advantage to include a larger volume of meaningful features. By integrating these methodologies, we constructed a robust model capable of effectively predicting seriousness levels, offering significant potential for improving pharmacovigilance and enhancing drug safety monitoring. The results underscore the value of NLP and demographic data in predicting drug event seriousness and demonstrate the effectiveness of our combined techniques. We encourage further research to refine these methods and evaluate their application to other clinical datasets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
Department of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Can preclinical drug development help to predict adverse events in clinical trials?10.1016/j.drudis.2021.08.010 ↗
2. Salehi, T., Seyedfatemi, N., Mirzaee, M., Maleki, M., and Mardani, A. (2021). Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice in Relation to Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: A Systematic Review. BioMed Res. Int., 2021.10.1155/2021/6630404 ↗
3. Systematic analysis of drug combinations that mitigate adverse drug reactions10.1147/JRD.2018.2875837 ↗
4. Eppler, M.B., Sayegh, A.S., Maas, M., Venkat, A., Hemal, S., Desai, M.M., Hung, A.J., Grantcharov, T., Cacciamani, G.E., and Goldenberg, M.G. (2023). Automated Capture of Intraoperative Adverse Events Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.3390/jcm12041687 ↗
5. Gurulingappa, H., Mateen-Rajput, A., and Toldo, L. (2012). Extraction of potential adverse drug events from medical case reports. J. Biomed. Semant., 3.10.1186/2041-1480-3-15 ↗
6. Wei, J., Cheng, L., Han, P., Zhu, Y., and Huang, W. (2021). Decision Tree-Based Data Stratification Method for the Minimization of the Masking Effect in Adverse Drug Reaction Signal Detection. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311380 ↗
7. Assaf, R., Jayousi, R., and Rattrout, A. (2021, January 17–18). Current state of machine learning based methods for adverse events prediction. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Promising Electronic Technologies (ICPET), Deir El-Balah, Palestine.10.1109/ICPET53277.2021.00013 ↗
8. Semi-supervised learning algorithm for identifying high-priority drug–drug interactions through adverse event reports10.1109/JBHI.2019.2932740 ↗
9. Improved Adverse Drug Event Prediction Through Information Component Guided Pharmacological Network Model (IC-PNM)10.1109/TCBB.2019.2928305 ↗
10. Improving the Prediction of Adverse Drug Events Using Feature Fusion-Based Predictive Network Models10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979452 ↗
11. Karlsson, I., and Zhao, J. (2014, January 27–29). Dimensionality reduction with random indexing: An application on adverse drug event detection using electronic health records. Proceedings of the IEEE 27th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1109/CBMS.2014.22 ↗
12. Zhao, J., Henriksson, A., Asker, L., and Boström, H. (2014, January 2–5). Detecting adverse drug events with multiple representations of clinical measurements. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Belfast, UK.10.1109/BIBM.2014.6999216 ↗
13. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors associated renal adverse event prediction10.1016/j.ejim.2023.05.021 ↗
14. Exploiting complex medical data with interpretable deep learning for adverse drug event prediction10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101942 ↗
15. Adverse drug event prevention and detection in older emergency department patients10.1016/j.cger.2023.04.008 ↗
16. Machine learning approaches for predicting the onset time of the adverse drug events in oncology
17. Extensive evaluation of transformer-based architectures for adverse drug events extraction10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110675 ↗
18. Development of an adverse drug event network to predict drug toxicity10.1016/j.crtox.2020.06.001 ↗
19. MTMA: Multi-task multi-attribute learning for the prediction of adverse drug–drug interaction10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105978 ↗
20. Nakao, Y., Asada, M., and Uesawa, Y. (2023). Comprehensive Study of Drug-Induced Pruritus Based on Adverse Drug Reaction Report Database. Pharmaceuticals, 16.10.20944/preprints202308.0935.v1 ↗
21. Liu, Z., Gao, X., and Li, C. (2022). Modeling COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Effects with a Visualized Knowledge Graph Database. Healthcare, 10.10.3390/healthcare10081419 ↗
22. Dang, L.H., Dung, N.T., Quang, L.X., Hung, L.Q., Le, N.H., Le, N.T.N., Diem, N.T., Nga, N.T.T., Hung, S.-H., and Le, N.Q.K. (2021). Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions for Histamine Antagonist Using Hybrid Chemical Features. Cells, 10.10.3390/cells10113092 ↗
23. (2023, September 15). FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers/fda-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers-public-dashboard.
24. Ji, X., Hua, L., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., and Li, J. (2019, January 4–7). A comparison of methods of data mining algorithms directed predictive pharmacosafety networks for adverse drug event detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Tianjin, China.10.1109/ICMA.2019.8816543 ↗
25. Karlsson, I., and Boström, H. (2016, January 4–7). Predicting adverse drug events using heterogeneous event sequences. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/ICHI.2016.64 ↗
26. McMaster, C., Chan, J., Liew, D., Su, E., Frauman, A., Chapman, W., and Pires, D. (2023). Developing a deep learning natural language processing algorithm for automated reporting of adverse drug reactions. J. Biomed. Inform., 137.10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104265 ↗
27. Machine learning prediction of side effects for drugs in clinical trials10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100358 ↗
28. Improved prediction of drug-drug interactions using ensemble deep neural networks10.1016/j.medidd.2022.100149 ↗