journal article·2024-03-29Open access

Speech Audiometry: The Development of Lithuanian Bisyllabic Phonemically Balanced Word Lists for Evaluation of Speech Recognition

Vija Vainutienė, Justinas Ivaška, Vytautas Kardelis, Tatjana Ivaškienė, Eugenijus Lesinskas

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 7

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Speech audiometry employs standardized materials, typically in the language spoken by the target population. Language-specific nuances, including phonological features, influence speech perception and recognition. The material of speech audiometry tests for the assessment of word recognition comprises lists of words that are phonemically or phonetically balanced. As auditory perception is influenced by a variety of linguistic features, it is necessary to develop test materials for the listener’s mother tongue. The objective of our study was to compose and evaluate new lists of Lithuanian words to assess speech recognition abilities. Materials and Methods: The main criteria for composing new lists of Lithuanian words included the syllable structure and frequency, the correlation between consonant and vowel phonemes, the frequency of specific vowel and consonant phonemes, word familiarity and rate. The words for the new lists were chosen from the Frequency Dictionary of Written Lithuanian according to the above criteria. Word recognition was assessed at different levels of presentations. The word list data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Results: Two hundred bisyllabic words were selected and organized into four lists. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the four sets of words. The interaction of the word list and presentation level was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Monaural performance functions indicated good inter-list reliability with no significant differences between the word recognition scores on the different bisyllabic word lists at each of the tested intensities. The word lists developed are equivalent, reliable and can be valuable for assessing speech recognition in a variety of conditions, including diagnosis, hearing rehabilitation and research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phonetics and Phonology Research · Speech and Audio Processing · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Santariškių Str. 5, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania

Clinic of Ear, Nose, Throat and Eye Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M.K. Čiurlionio Str. 21, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania

Department of Lithuanian Language, Faculty of Philology, Vilnius University, Universiteto Str. 5, LT-01122 Vilnius, Lithuania

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Lawson, G., and Peterson, M. (2011). Speech Audiometry, Plural Publishing.
2. Development of materials for speech audiometry10.1044/jshd.1703.321 ↗
3. Articulation testing methods10.1288/00005537-194809000-00002 ↗
4. Linguistic considerations and intelligibility10.1121/1.1907713 ↗
5. Speech Audiometry: The development of Modern Greek Word Lists for Suprathreshold Word Recognition Testing
6. Development of a Turkish Monosyllabic Word Recognition Test for Adults10.5152/iao.2014.118 ↗
7. Psychometrically equivalent Polish bisyllabic words spoken by male and female talkers
8. Psycho-metrically equivalent Polish monosyllabic word recognition materials spoken by male and female talkers
9. Development of Korean standard monosyllabic word lists for adults (KS-MWL-A)
10. Psychometrically equivalent mandarin bisyllabic speech discrimination materials spoken by male and female talkers10.1080/14992020500147615 ↗
11. Development of speech reception threshold materials for speakers of Taiwan Mandarin10.1080/14992020701361296 ↗
12. Development and validation of the Mandarin speech perception test10.1121/1.3590739 ↗
13. A review of Mandarin speech recognition test materials for use in Singapore10.1080/14992027.2020.1826587 ↗
14. Development of SC-10: A psychometrically equivalent Singapore Mandarin disyllabic word list for clinical speech audiometry use10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.02.011 ↗
15. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials10.3109/14992027.2010.542491 ↗
16. Development of phonemically balanced word list in Tamil for speech audiometry and evaluation of its effectiveness in adults10.1007/s12070-023-04209-y ↗
17. The development of the University of Jordan word recognition test10.1080/14992027.2017.1303200 ↗
18. Ambrazas, V. (2006). A Grammar of Modern Lithuanian, Institute of Research and Encyclopedia Publication.
19. Morphemic structure of Lithuanian words10.1515/opli-2016-0008 ↗
20. Compilation of articulation tables in Lithuanian
21. Girdenis, A., and Karosiene, V. (2010). Statistical Structure of Lithuanian Language—Phonology Subjects, Vilnius University.
22. Utka, A. (2009). Frequency Dictionary of Written Lithuanian—Based on 1 m Word Morphologically Annotated Corpus, Vytautas Magnus University.
23. (1996). Specification for Audiometers (Standard No. ANSI S3.6-1996).
24. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1990). Guidelines for screening for hearing impairments and middle-ear disorders. ASHA, 32, 17–24.
25. The question of phonetic balance in word recognition testing10.1055/s-0042-1748141 ↗
26. Frequency of structural types of phonological syllables in Lithuanian
27. The role of word familiarity in Spanish/English bilingual word recognition10.3109/14992027.2010.527862 ↗
28. Test-retest reliability of word recognition score using Korean standard monosyllabic word lists for adults as a function of the number of test words10.7874/jao.2015.19.2.68 ↗
29. Current audiologic practices in the United States
30. Most comfortable listening level presentation versus maximum discrimination for word discrimination material10.3109/00206097609071793 ↗
31. A comparison of Auditec St. Louis cassette recordings of NU-6 and CID W-22 on normal hearing population10.1044/jshd.4201.60 ↗
32. Relation between slopes of word recognition Psychometric functions and homogeneity of the stimulus materials10.1055/s-0041-1741115 ↗
33. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No.6. Materials spoken by the same speaker10.1097/00003446-199710000-00008 ↗
34. Performance norms for the VA compact disc versions of CID W-22 (Hirsh) and PB-50 (Rush Hughes) word lists
35. Variations in the slope of the psychometric function for speech intelligibility: A systematic survey10.1177/2331216514537722 ↗