Corn Cropping Systems in Agricultural Soils from the Bajio Region of Guanajuato: Soil Quality Indexes (SQIs)
Source abstract
Abstract
Agriculture is a sector of great importance for Mexico’s economy, generating employment and contributing significantly to the country’s gross domestic product. The Bajio stands out as one of the most productive agricultural regions in Mexico. However, intensive agricultural practices in this area have caused a progressive deterioration and loss of soil fertility. This study focused on evaluating the quality of soils used for agriculture in the Bajio region of the State of Guanajuato, Mexico. This evaluation, utilised soil quality indexes (SQIs) based on a total of 27 physicochemical, biological and enzymatic indicators. These indicators were selected by means of a principal component analysis (PCA), which allowed for the identification of a minimum set of data. The SQIs developed in this study categorised soils into different quality levels, ranging from low to high, mainly based on the values observed in the biological indicators (SMR and qCO2), which comprised the established SQIs. The inclusion of these biological indicators provides the developed SQIs with greater sensitivity to detect minor disturbances in agricultural soils due to human activity, compared with SQIs consisting only of physicochemical indicators. The developed SQIs can be used to ensure high-quality food production in soils used for corn cultivation under similar conditions, both nationally and internationally.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Banana Cultivation and Research · Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics · Soil Management and Crop Yield
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Michoacán, Justo Sierra No. 28, Centro, Jiquilpan 59510, Michoacán, Mexico
Posgrado de Ingeniería Bioquímica, Tecnológico Nacional de México/IT de Celaya, Ave. Tecnológico y A. García Cubas No. 600, Celaya 38010, Guanajuato, Mexico
Departamento de Ingeniería Bioquímica y Ambiental y Posgrado de Ingeniería Bioquímica, Tecnológico Nacional de México/IT en Celaya, Ave. Tecnológico y A. García Cubas No. 600, Celaya 38010, Guanajuato, Mexico
Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS Los Reyes, Los Reyes 60330, Michoacán, Mexico
Campo Experimental Bajio, INIFAP, Carretera Celaya San Miguel de Allende km 6.5, Celaya 38010, Guanajuato, Mexico
Funding
Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado del IPN
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Soil Quality Indicators to Assess Functionality of Restored Soils in Degraded Semiarid Ecosystems
2. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales [SEMARNAT] (2024, March 19). Diario Oficial de la Federación, Available online: https://biblioteca.semarnat.gob.mx/janium/Documentos/Ciga/libros2009/DO2280n.pdf.
3. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales [SEMARNAT] (2011). Estrategia Nacional de Manejo Sustentable de Tierras.
4. Soil Degradation and the Need for Public Policies
5. García-Lara, S., and Serna-Saldivar, S.O. (2019). Corn, Elsevier.
6. Robust Soil Quality Index for Tropical Soils Influenced by Agricultural Activities
7. Hernández, A., Ascanio, M., Morales, M., Borjórquez, I., García, N., and García, D. (2008). El Suelo: Fundamentos Sobre su Formación, los Cambios Globales y su Manejo, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit.
8. Interpretation of Soil Quality Indicators for Land Suitability Assessment—A Multivariate Approach for Central European Arable Soils10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.063 ↗
9. Análisis de indicadores e índices de calidad de suelos en México
10. Abdel-Fattah, M.K., Mohamed, E.S., Wagdi, E.M., Shahin, S.A., Aldosari, A.A., Lasaponara, R., and Alnaimy, M.A. (2021). Quantitative Evaluation of Soil Quality Using Principal Component Analysis: The Case Study of El-Fayoum Depression Egypt. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13041824 ↗
11. Soil Quality Indices in a Conservation Agriculture Based Rice-Mustard Cropping System in North-Western Indo-Gangetic Plains10.1016/j.still.2020.104914 ↗
12. Instituto Nacional para el Federalismo y el Desarrollo Municipal [INAFED] (2024, March 19). Sistema Nacional de Información Municipal 2022, Available online: http://www.snim.rami.gob.mx/.
13. Deckers, J.A., Driessen, P.M., Nachtergaele, F.O., and Spaargaren, O.C. (2002). Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Marcel Dekker.
14. Soil Quality Index (SQI) as a Tool to Evaluate Crop Productivity in Semi-Arid Deccan Plateau, India10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.07.010 ↗
15. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales [SEMARNAT] (2024, March 19). Diario Oficial de la Federación, Available online: https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=691939&fecha=15/08/2003#gsc.tab=0.
16. Hydrometer Method Improved for Making Particle Size Analyses of Soils 110.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x ↗
17. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1951). Soil Survey Manual.
18. Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Loeppert, R.H., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, C.T., and Summer, M.E. (2018). Chemical Methods, Soil Science Society of America.
19. Dane, J.H., and Topp, G.C. (2002). Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4, Soil Science Society of America.10.2136/sssabookser5.4 ↗
20. Nannipieri, P. (2020). Soil Is Still an Unknown Biological System. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10113717 ↗
21. An Examination of Different Methods for Determining Soil Organic Matter and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 ↗
22. The Role of Organic/Bio–Fertilizer Amendment on Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon Content in Different Aggregate Scales10.1016/j.still.2017.01.003 ↗
23. Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Loeppert, R.H., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, C.T., and Summer, M.E. (2018). Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods, John Wiley & Sons.
24. A Microwave Oven Digestion Method for the Determination of Metals in Sewage Sludges by ICP-AES and GFAAS10.1080/03067319108028117 ↗
25. Soil and Plant Testing as a Basis of Fertilizer Recommendations
26. Alef, K., and Nannipieri, P. (1995). Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Elsevier.
27. Ninhydrin-Reactive Nitrogen Measurements of Microbial Biomass in 0.5 m K2SO4 Soil Extracts10.1016/0038-0717(90)90027-W ↗
28. Ratio of Microbial Biomass Carbon to Soil Organic Carbon as a Sensitive Indicator of Changes in Soil Organic Matter10.1071/SR9920195 ↗
29. Assay for Fluorescein Diacetate Hydrolytic Activity: Optimization for Soil Samples10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.06.020 ↗
30. Ratios of Microbial Biomass Carbon to Total Organic-C in Arable Soils10.1016/0038-0717(89)90117-X ↗
31. API ZYM Assay to Evaluate Enzyme Fingerprinting and Microbial Functional Diversity in Relation to Soil Processes10.1007/s00374-015-1055-7 ↗
32. Applicability of API ZYM to Capture Seasonal and Spatial Variabilities in Lake and River Sediments10.1080/09593330.2018.1468492 ↗
33. (2024, March 19). R Core Team R: Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2021. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/mirrors.html.
34. Johnson, R., and Wichern, D. (2014). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Pearson Education Limited. [6th ed.].
35. Soil Quality Assessment of Coastal Salt-Affected Acid Soils of India10.1007/s11356-020-09010-w ↗
36. Análisis Multivariado de Las Propiedades Químicas de los Suelos Pardos Erosionados
37. Effects of Agricultural Management Practices on Soil Quality: A Review of Long-Term Experiments for Europe and China10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028 ↗
38. Selecting the Minimum Data Set and Quantitative Soil Quality Indexing of Alkaline Soils Under Different Land Uses in Northeastern China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.301 ↗
39. A Functional Evaluation of Three Indicator Sets for Assessing Soil Quality10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.12.009 ↗
40. Indicadores e Indices de Calidad de Los Suelos (ICS) Cebaderos del Sur Del Estado de Hidalgo, México10.15517/am.v24i1.9643 ↗
41. Rahman, M.A., Lee, S.H., Ji, H.C., Kabir, A.H., Jones, C.S., and Lee, K.W. (2018). Importance of Mineral Nutrition for Mitigating Aluminum Toxicity in Plants on Acidic Soils: Current Status and Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19103073 ↗
42. Nitrogen Addition Aggravates Microbial Carbon Limitation: Evidence from Ecoenzymatic Stoichiometry10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.019 ↗
43. Fatima, N., Bahuguna, V., and Kumar, V. (2018). A Review on Microalgae Application in Bioenergy Generation & Integrated Wastewater Management. SSRN Electron. J., Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3298651.10.2139/ssrn.3298651 ↗
44. Costa, O.Y.A., Raaijmakers, J.M., and Kuramae, E.E. (2018). Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Ecological Function and Impact on Soil Aggregation. Front. Microbiol., 9.10.3389/fmicb.2018.01636 ↗
45. Use of Organic Amendments to Reclaim Saline and Sodic Soils: A Review10.1080/15324982.2018.1498038 ↗
46. Carbon Sequestration Under Different Organic Amendments in Saline-Alkaline Soils10.1016/j.catena.2020.104882 ↗
47. Mejoramiento de Las Propiedades Físicas y Químicas de Un Suelo Agrícola Mezclado Con Lombricompostas de Dos Efluentes de Biodigestor
48. Soil Carbon Dynamics in Saline and Sodic Soils: A Review10.1111/j.1475-2743.2009.00251.x ↗
49. Soil Nutrition, Microbial Composition and Associated Soil Enzyme Activities in KwaZulu-Natal Grasslands and Savannah Ecosystems Soils10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103663 ↗
50. Labile Carbon Matters More than Temperature for Enzyme Activity in Paddy Soil10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.016 ↗
51. Kacprzak, M., Kupich, I., Jasinska, A., and Fijalkowski, K. (2022). Bio-Based Waste’ Substrates for Degraded Soil Improvement—Advantages and Challenges in European Context. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15010385 ↗
52. The Influence of Organic Amendment Source on Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization in Different Soils10.1007/s42729-019-00116-w ↗
53. Organic Amendments Increase Crop Yields by Improving Microbe-Mediated Soil Functioning of Agroecosystems: A Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.002 ↗
54. Medina-Herrera, M.d.R., Negrete-Rodríguez, M.d.l.L.X., Álvarez-Trejo, J.L., Samaniego-Hernández, M., González-Cruz, L., Bernardino-Nicanor, A., and Conde-Barajas, E. (2020). Evaluation of Non-Conventional Biological and Molecular Parameters as Potential Indicators of Quality and Functionality of Urban Biosolids Used as Organic Amendments of Agricultural Soils. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10020517 ↗
55. Bedolla-Rivera, H.I., Xochilt Negrete-Rodríguez, M.d.l.L., Medina-Herrera, M.d.R., Gámez-Vázquez, F.P., Álvarez-Bernal, D., Samaniego-Hernández, M., Gámez-Vázquez, A.J., and Conde-Barajas, E. (2020). Development of a Soil Quality Index for Soils under Different Agricultural Management Conditions in the Central Lowlands of Mexico: Physicochemical, Biological and Ecophysiological Indicators. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12229754 ↗
56. Naeem, M., Ansari, A.A., and Gill, S.S. (2020). Contaminants in Agriculture: Sources, Impacts and Management, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-41552-5 ↗
57. Hu, Z., Liu, S., and Gong, Y. (2021). Evaluation of Soil Quality and Maize Growth in Different Profiles of Reclaimed Land with Coal Gangue Filling. Land, 10.10.3390/land10121307 ↗
58. Soil Quality Index of an Ultisol under Long-Term Plots in the Coastal Tablelands in Northeastern Brazil10.1590/1983-21252023v36n220rc ↗
59. Soil Quality Indices Based on Long-Term Conservation Cropping Systems Management10.1002/agg2.20036 ↗